Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

tto think it should be illegal to travel abroad for anonymous egg/sperm donation?

332 replies

ZoeCM · 24/07/2024 19:09

If the government can ban people from travelling outside the UK for FGM, why can't they ban this? It's absolutely appalling that clinics will destroy all records of a child's biological parent in this day and age. Yes, the child can potentially trace their parents through companies such as AncestryDNA, but there's no guarantee they'll be successful. It's a massive abuse of power.

Anonymous donation is all about what's best for the recipients and the donor, never the child. AIBU to think it should be illegal to travel abroad for this purpose?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
HectorPlasm · 25/07/2024 20:04

adviceneeded1990 · 25/07/2024 18:43

My friend used a brilliant book series to help with this from Cryos International. I’m sure your boy will know how wanted he was. My first round of IVF failed in June, I’m gearing up for round 2. Nine is unimaginable and I’m sorry you had to go through that 🩷.

Thank you - I think it was Einstein who said that doing the same thing over and over again and expecting a different result doesn't work so we mixed it up a bit at the end.

I wish you all the luck in the world in your next round - I don't think people appreciate how tough it is with the injections and the waiting and the living in hope

HectorPlasm · 25/07/2024 20:01

drspouse · 25/07/2024 18:34

What will you do if he feels a deep need to know his genetic parent (s)?

Not sure - be honest, tell him how much he was wanted - got a few years to think about it yet!

hippopotty · 25/07/2024 20:00

It's worse than FGM. It lasts a lifetime. FGM can be surgically improved.

adviceneeded1990 · 25/07/2024 19:47

adviceneeded1990 · 25/07/2024 19:46

The cost of this is unaffordable and always will be for many people in the UK. I agree it’s the better option, for what it’s worth. But when you are both working well paid jobs and still can’t get near it in the time frame you would need in order to be young enough to transfer, it isn’t an option.

As I’ve said already on this thread though, if you are offering us either an egg or the money to use a known donor please feel free to have an opinion on what myself and others choose to do.

adviceneeded1990 · 25/07/2024 19:46

YOYOK · 25/07/2024 19:08

It’s not either or. You could use a donor that’s NOT anonymous.

The cost of this is unaffordable and always will be for many people in the UK. I agree it’s the better option, for what it’s worth. But when you are both working well paid jobs and still can’t get near it in the time frame you would need in order to be young enough to transfer, it isn’t an option.

YOYOK · 25/07/2024 19:08

adviceneeded1990 · 25/07/2024 18:03

This 100000%. I know what I’d prefer!

It’s not either or. You could use a donor that’s NOT anonymous.

adviceneeded1990 · 25/07/2024 18:43

HectorPlasm · 25/07/2024 17:26

And yes, we will discuss it with him when the time is right

My friend used a brilliant book series to help with this from Cryos International. I’m sure your boy will know how wanted he was. My first round of IVF failed in June, I’m gearing up for round 2. Nine is unimaginable and I’m sorry you had to go through that 🩷.

drspouse · 25/07/2024 18:34

HectorPlasm · 25/07/2024 17:26

And yes, we will discuss it with him when the time is right

What will you do if he feels a deep need to know his genetic parent (s)?

ibelieveshereallyistgedevil · 25/07/2024 18:14

Iwasafool · 25/07/2024 16:59

We are all different and personally I resent that I was a mistake and knew that from an early age. To me knowing my parents worked so hard to get me and wanted me so much would outweigh genetic history.

This is the crux of the matter- different things are important to different people.

Some donor conceived people won’t care and they shouldn’t have genetic parents forced on them, and some will care and should have the option to contact their donor.

So donor conceived children should be anonymous and donors should be traceable.

adviceneeded1990 · 25/07/2024 18:03

Iwasafool · 25/07/2024 16:18

Or you were unwanted and unplanned after a seedy ONS where your mother didn't even bother to get your father's name versus your mother and father wanted you so much they invested time and money to get you, your mother went through painful and invasive procedures to have you and a kind woman/man donated an egg/sperm to make it all positive. You have always known you much you were wanted and are loved.

This 100000%. I know what I’d prefer!

HectorPlasm · 25/07/2024 17:26

And yes, we will discuss it with him when the time is right

HectorPlasm · 25/07/2024 17:24

Haven't read the thread. All I know is we went abroad for our final throw at IVF after 9 failed attempts. We now have a beautiful little boy and I can't thank the sperm and egg donors enough. I'm sorry we will never know them but I totally respect their anonymity. So no, I can't agree.

PurpleDreamCatcher · 25/07/2024 17:23

Mickey79 · 25/07/2024 17:18

This is assuming a picture perfect ideal though isn’t it?
A lot can happen in 18 years. The donor will likely have a wife and family that they possibly didn’t have at the time of donation, maybe even school age children, other things going on. There is much more to consider than the original donor child, it’s complex and can impact a lot of peoples lives. An automatic right to the donors name, dob, last known address isn’t necessarily going to result in any kind of relationship with them, much less being part of another, extended family.

The is true. And I think it’s time society had a proper, sensible discussion about all the ethical issues surrounding donor conception and surrogacy.

Currently we are allowing the scientific advances dictate how people are made, rather than following considered ethical principles.

Mickey79 · 25/07/2024 17:18

PurpleDreamCatcher · 25/07/2024 16:22

There’s something else important that I think is being missed here. It’s not just ‘genetic history’ which is being withheld.

I have noticed as I have got older that my own cousins have become more important to me. Having adult discussions about certain traits we have in common and so on, helping me to make more sense of myself and even to make more sense of my own children.

So the child is also being denied access to that entire family tree and all the living relatives in it, when they are denied that link. It’s not just genetic code or names on some certificates. It’s people - relatives.

This is assuming a picture perfect ideal though isn’t it?
A lot can happen in 18 years. The donor will likely have a wife and family that they possibly didn’t have at the time of donation, maybe even school age children, other things going on. There is much more to consider than the original donor child, it’s complex and can impact a lot of peoples lives. An automatic right to the donors name, dob, last known address isn’t necessarily going to result in any kind of relationship with them, much less being part of another, extended family.

PurpleDreamCatcher · 25/07/2024 17:16

Iwasafool · 25/07/2024 17:04

I know what it feels like to be a mistake, for one of my earliest memories to be that my mother contemplated suicide when she found out she was having me. I hope you don;t know what it feels like to be in that situation.

💐 If it’s any consolation, I was an accident, my mum was going to have me aborted, my dad tried to dissuade her and her friend basically reassured her that she’d be alright, so here I am. She did have two abortions after me though, which a weird thought.

SugarandSpiceandAllThingsNaice · 25/07/2024 17:11

Persipan · 25/07/2024 17:08

Returning to the question of how this could ever be enforceable, assuming you were able to somehow identify that a family had gone overseas for donor treatment that you'd now made illegal, what would the remedy be? Mandatory abortion of any pregnancy conceived in this way? I can't see how that could possibly be considered ethical, and the potential for disastrous mistakes seems quite high even if you thought it was reasonable. Imprisonment of the parents? That would clearly be immensely traumatic and likely harmful to the donor conceived children involved. If your basic premise is that anonymous donor conception is harmful to the children involved, then you need to identify a remedy that doesn't harm them further if you want to make their conception illegal - because people absolutely do go ahead and do things even though the law says they can't.

Excellent points! I can imagine any court case forcing an abortion would last well after the baby is born, so mandatory abortion would be right out. Confiscating the ‘illegally conceived’ baby and having them raised in state care would not be in the baby’s best interests.

I can’t see how this is ever going to be enforceable?

Shroedy · 25/07/2024 17:09

KimberleyClark · 25/07/2024 16:37

Article about egg donation here. Personally I do not feel at all comfortable with young uni students being targeted as potential egg donors.

https://inews.co.uk/inews-lifestyle/fertility-clinics-using-social-media-persuade-young-women-sell-eggs-2217424

Which is an article focused on egg donation in the U.K., which is (of course) not anonymous...

Persipan · 25/07/2024 17:08

Returning to the question of how this could ever be enforceable, assuming you were able to somehow identify that a family had gone overseas for donor treatment that you'd now made illegal, what would the remedy be? Mandatory abortion of any pregnancy conceived in this way? I can't see how that could possibly be considered ethical, and the potential for disastrous mistakes seems quite high even if you thought it was reasonable. Imprisonment of the parents? That would clearly be immensely traumatic and likely harmful to the donor conceived children involved. If your basic premise is that anonymous donor conception is harmful to the children involved, then you need to identify a remedy that doesn't harm them further if you want to make their conception illegal - because people absolutely do go ahead and do things even though the law says they can't.

Iwasafool · 25/07/2024 17:04

I know what it feels like to be a mistake, for one of my earliest memories to be that my mother contemplated suicide when she found out she was having me. I hope you don;t know what it feels like to be in that situation.

drspouse · 25/07/2024 17:02

But you are not in a situation where your parents worked hard to get you but you don't know your genetic history. So just like men can't know what it's like to be women, you don't know how you'd feel if you were in that situation.

Iwasafool · 25/07/2024 17:01

PurpleDreamCatcher · 25/07/2024 16:22

There’s something else important that I think is being missed here. It’s not just ‘genetic history’ which is being withheld.

I have noticed as I have got older that my own cousins have become more important to me. Having adult discussions about certain traits we have in common and so on, helping me to make more sense of myself and even to make more sense of my own children.

So the child is also being denied access to that entire family tree and all the living relatives in it, when they are denied that link. It’s not just genetic code or names on some certificates. It’s people - relatives.

Again we are all different, I haven't seen any of my cousins in years, I think I saw a couple of them about 12 years ago at a funeral. I have no contact with them, nothing in common with them, no desire to see them. I have lots of cousins, well I did but I suppose some of them could be dead.

Iwasafool · 25/07/2024 16:59

PurpleDreamCatcher · 25/07/2024 16:28

I think it would depend upon how much I resented having no access to my genetic history/family. In one case it was carelessness, the other was deliberateness. I think I would resent deliberateness much more than carelessness in that situation.

We are all different and personally I resent that I was a mistake and knew that from an early age. To me knowing my parents worked so hard to get me and wanted me so much would outweigh genetic history.

PurpleDreamCatcher · 25/07/2024 16:28

Iwasafool · 25/07/2024 16:18

Or you were unwanted and unplanned after a seedy ONS where your mother didn't even bother to get your father's name versus your mother and father wanted you so much they invested time and money to get you, your mother went through painful and invasive procedures to have you and a kind woman/man donated an egg/sperm to make it all positive. You have always known you much you were wanted and are loved.

I think it would depend upon how much I resented having no access to my genetic history/family. In one case it was carelessness, the other was deliberateness. I think I would resent deliberateness much more than carelessness in that situation.

PurpleDreamCatcher · 25/07/2024 16:22

There’s something else important that I think is being missed here. It’s not just ‘genetic history’ which is being withheld.

I have noticed as I have got older that my own cousins have become more important to me. Having adult discussions about certain traits we have in common and so on, helping me to make more sense of myself and even to make more sense of my own children.

So the child is also being denied access to that entire family tree and all the living relatives in it, when they are denied that link. It’s not just genetic code or names on some certificates. It’s people - relatives.

Swipe left for the next trending thread