Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Remove Travellers or relinquish land title?

227 replies

Toetouchingtitties · 21/07/2024 13:39

I’ve recently become an Administrator for a relatives estate. As part of their estate, they owned a very small plot of land in a London borough, surrounded by houses. The land is fenced in and did have a padlocked entranced.

I visited recently to check everything was ok, to find Travellers, plus their horses have taken it over. This must’ve happened in the last few months. It was relatively contained and tidy before - but is now an absolute mess, covered with rubbish etc.

I’ve enquired with bailiffs about costs to remove them and it’s roughly the same as the land would be worth if I sold it. I do not want the hassle of managing the eviction, re-securing the site, cleaning it up and then selling it; especially as the estate will lose money overall.

So, I’m thinking of just relinquishing the land back to the land registry and walking away. But, at the back of my mind I’d feel somewhat guilty as the area is otherwise well kept by the local residents.

AIBU to save the estate money, but by doing so potentially impact the local residents enjoyment of the area? For clarity, I don’t know anyone who lives in the area, I don’t live locally and we don’t have any local family ties.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Moirarosesgarden · 21/07/2024 13:44

I understand the hassle but feel sorry for the locals. Why should the travellers in effect be gifted the land? You could mail drop the local area to see if any neighbours (or a collection of) want to buy it or if you’re really not bothered about the money, gift it to them and they can pay for their removal possibly? (Ps I have absolutely no idea of the legalities in any of that!)

OneTC · 21/07/2024 13:42

Someone will buy it even with the squatters