Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this is scandalous yet in plain sight because the patriarchy has no shame

564 replies

Webjisroommate · 15/07/2024 19:46

A year ago I separated from my DD’s father and she was in the middle of her first year of nursery. He paid the cms amount every month, without fail. This was 360 a month, even though I was left to pay over 1,300 on nursery fees alone. Obviously the situation has now changed slightly with the hours but his 360 contribution is quite literally nowhere near half her costs. I have spoken about this with other mum friends and have learned that 360 is actually pretty fortunate! Some women are being paid less than 200 and others have to chase cms when their ex is self employed. I was not aware of any of this before having Dd.

My career is now hugely clipped as I am doing 95% of childcare while ex sees her a day a week… the day I use mostly to clean and get the house in order to start the week again. And yes, I suggested 50/50, he didn’t want that.

I honestly feel like this is a huge joke player on women in plain sight while nothing is actually done about it?! I also can’t fathom how HMRC can chase tax from the self employed but Cms can’t chase these men to pay for their children. It’s a disgrace. Why is this allowed to happen?!

OP posts:
XChrome · 16/07/2024 20:09

Kinshipug · 16/07/2024 19:55

Of course super dad has a toddler who never tantrums.

😄 The story just keeps getting crazier with each post.

XChrome · 16/07/2024 20:06

Simonjt · 16/07/2024 19:53

Sorry in advance as I’m not the person you were replying to.

Ours have always stayed in the kitchen while we cooked, no tantrums, our washing machine is currently in our basement, if I’m home alone I carry our daughter and the washing basket, if I’m not in a rush she does the stairs on her own while I’m in front of her, if she asks nicely she gets a lift down in the washing basket. If I’m home alone and want a shower she just comes with me. When I was a lone parent to my son there wasn’t any household work I couldn’t do with him there. Where you live is it normal to just leave toddlers alone in playpens?

You carry a two year old in a full washing basket down the basement stairs? You must be the Incredible Hulk. There's no way that's safe either. One false step is all it would take.
You take a two year old in the shower with you? Also dangerous. They can easily slip and hit their heads.
Your kid never had tantrums if she was made to stay in a room she didn't want to be in? Congrats. You have the most well behaved kid in the history of the world.

Nothing personal, but in order to believe this is feasible I would have to assume the child was a wind-up doll who weighed all of ten pounds and with a skull made of titanium. What you describe is even more risky than leaving a child unsupervised.

Newhere5 · 16/07/2024 20:01

OceanStorm · 16/07/2024 08:58

@SummerTimeIsTheBest but a woman can abort a baby after she lay down with him?

You clearly are a man. Very nasty man.

ThisOldThang · 16/07/2024 19:59

"Where you live is it normal to just leave toddlers alone in playpens?"

We had one for our eldest and it was very handy when he was 12-24 months and needed a safe place to put him - e.g. taking a dump. I don't really have a problem with playpens, but i guess it depends on how long you leave kids alone in them.

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:58

XChrome · 16/07/2024 19:54

I am not responsible for what other people say. It should be tailored to the needs of the child. A disabled child, for example, would cost more.

Understandable but my comments was in response to comments to that effect. Which is why it was relevent

Kinshipug · 16/07/2024 19:55

Of course super dad has a toddler who never tantrums.

XChrome · 16/07/2024 19:54

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:52

If different kids have different needs why is this thread saying all NRP should pay a set amount regardless of what they earn?

I am not responsible for what other people say. It should be tailored to the needs of the child. A disabled child, for example, would cost more.

Simonjt · 16/07/2024 19:53

XChrome · 16/07/2024 19:48

That's not unsupervised then, if you can see and/or hear the child. My example was taking a shower or cooking dinner. The child is not going to want to stay in the kitchen while you cook, so there will be tantrums. Another example would be when your washing machine is in the basement, as it is in most North American homes. So would you carry the child down with you, as well as carrying the washing basket? Think about it.
If you have a small apartment it could be possible to do most household chores while still supervising a toddler. In a larger, two story home? No way.

Sorry in advance as I’m not the person you were replying to.

Ours have always stayed in the kitchen while we cooked, no tantrums, our washing machine is currently in our basement, if I’m home alone I carry our daughter and the washing basket, if I’m not in a rush she does the stairs on her own while I’m in front of her, if she asks nicely she gets a lift down in the washing basket. If I’m home alone and want a shower she just comes with me. When I was a lone parent to my son there wasn’t any household work I couldn’t do with him there. Where you live is it normal to just leave toddlers alone in playpens?

winstinsandgins · 16/07/2024 19:52

My parents separated whilst my mum was being treated for breast cancer. He felt that her having a mastectomy made her less of a woman so got a girlfriend.
Dad was self employed. Mum had been previously doing the booking keeping and some admin for the business so lost her job.
He gave us next to nothing but did give us something.
I had to get a part time job to help support mum, younger sister and I.
It was awful but we managed.
Dad then got cancer and died.
Absolutely nothing was set aside to help bring up my sister who was still in primary school.
Mum obviously couldn't apply for widow pension but in terms of extra benefits we were really struggling then. I was a student and it was unbelievably hard.
My mum was a hero for managing throughout everything.

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:52

XChrome · 16/07/2024 19:51

So? Different kids have different needs. Some people economize better than others. Your personal experience can't be extrapolated into a general claim.

If different kids have different needs why is this thread saying all NRP should pay a set amount regardless of what they earn?

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:51

Kinshipug · 16/07/2024 19:45

Except going to court for more contact. And of course, more kids didn't help his finances or time constraints did they? Shouldn't be having second families if they can't manage the first.

Yes court worked wonders. Couldn't forse mum not to move and count remove children from mum. So what the hell can you do. Keep going back to court and spending money ?

So mums get to have, affairs and second families but Dad has to just pau maintenance have no say and stay alone forever.

We managed and paid and never complained but making out that he is scum because he didn't hand over 100% of his wage isn't acceptable. He paid fair maintenance, he paid extra and provided for the children in full under our roof.

XChrome · 16/07/2024 19:51

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:36

It's relevent because when his eldest was age 9 the cost to DH was X when out child was 9 the cost was far less than x
Same for every age. Because their cost at ours is fairly comparable to each other but we have additional costs with his children on top.

So? Different kids have different needs. Some people economize better than others. Your personal experience can't be extrapolated into a general claim.

XChrome · 16/07/2024 19:48

ThisOldThang · 16/07/2024 19:37

"It is not safe to let a two year old wander around completely unsupervised and I'm appalled that you think it is. The hazards are too numerous to mention."

It's the living room, not the kitchen. I'm less than five metres away in another room with the doors open. It's perfectly safe for him to potter around playing with his Hot Wheels toys or watching a bit of cbeebies.

That's not unsupervised then, if you can see and/or hear the child. My example was taking a shower or cooking dinner. The child is not going to want to stay in the kitchen while you cook, so there will be tantrums. Another example would be when your washing machine is in the basement, as it is in most North American homes. So would you carry the child down with you, as well as carrying the washing basket? Think about it.
If you have a small apartment it could be possible to do most household chores while still supervising a toddler. In a larger, two story home? No way.

Kinshipug · 16/07/2024 19:45

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:40

He was doing as much as he possibly could seeing as mum moved away. Prior to moving away he was doing 50/50 was impossible.after the move but he did as much as he could do. Didn't change the cost of our home which was required to house them when they were 50/50 here we couldn't downsize and stick them under the stairs just because it was less than 50/50

So costs didn't go down, they still cost the same here in housing clothing and furniture. Food slightly less but not in reality as whereas our kids would eat non branded items, his children were only allowed to eat branded items according to mum.

Except going to court for more contact. And of course, more kids didn't help his finances or time constraints did they? Shouldn't be having second families if they can't manage the first.

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:40

Kinshipug · 16/07/2024 19:36

Well yes that's because he wasn't doing half the parenting. Hopefully his total contribution was close to half of what was needed to raise his children.

He was doing as much as he possibly could seeing as mum moved away. Prior to moving away he was doing 50/50 was impossible.after the move but he did as much as he could do. Didn't change the cost of our home which was required to house them when they were 50/50 here we couldn't downsize and stick them under the stairs just because it was less than 50/50

So costs didn't go down, they still cost the same here in housing clothing and furniture. Food slightly less but not in reality as whereas our kids would eat non branded items, his children were only allowed to eat branded items according to mum.

ThisOldThang · 16/07/2024 19:37

"It is not safe to let a two year old wander around completely unsupervised and I'm appalled that you think it is. The hazards are too numerous to mention."

It's the living room, not the kitchen. I'm less than five metres away in another room with the doors open. It's perfectly safe for him to potter around playing with his Hot Wheels toys or watching a bit of cbeebies.

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:36

XChrome · 16/07/2024 19:31

I can't make out what you're saying here. The cost difference of older children versus younger children are relevant because...?

It's relevent because when his eldest was age 9 the cost to DH was X when out child was 9 the cost was far less than x
Same for every age. Because their cost at ours is fairly comparable to each other but we have additional costs with his children on top.

Kinshipug · 16/07/2024 19:36

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:33

Age isn't relevant because year on year it's the same situation the cost of child A at 9 was more than child C at 9

Well yes that's because he wasn't doing half the parenting. Hopefully his total contribution was close to half of what was needed to raise his children.

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:33

Anonym00se · 16/07/2024 19:31

Childcare aside, older kids are MUCH more expensive than young ones.

Age isn't relevant because year on year it's the same situation the cost of child A at 9 was more than child C at 9

Anonym00se · 16/07/2024 19:31

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:27

That's not accurate.
My DH has spent far far more on caring for older children with costs here and maintenance and the other costs (trips and other) than the younger children have ever had spent on them.

Childcare aside, older kids are MUCH more expensive than young ones.

Simonjt · 16/07/2024 19:31

Good parents appropriately childproof their homes, a two year old shouldn’t be in a room that isn’t appropriately childproofed, supervised or not. If a room is so dangerous a two year old can’t be left there while you fetch something from another room it isn’t a safe room for them to be in at all.

XChrome · 16/07/2024 19:31

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:27

That's not accurate.
My DH has spent far far more on caring for older children with costs here and maintenance and the other costs (trips and other) than the younger children have ever had spent on them.

I can't make out what you're saying here. The cost difference of older children versus younger children are relevant because...?

XChrome · 16/07/2024 19:28

ThisOldThang · 16/07/2024 19:21

Bullshit.

My two year old can potter around the lounge without constant supervision. I can leave him alone and load the washing machine, hang laundry, wash the dishes, cook lunch, etc. My five year old can certainly be left alone while I get on with things.

I wouldn't have been able to do that when they were first walking and climbing up on things.

These ridiculous gotcha posts that apparently 'prove' that I'm incapable of looking after my kids are ridiculous.

Mens are incapable of buying and fitting a car seat? Buying nappies and bubble bath? Bathing children?

Do some women really find this stuff so difficult that you can't conceive of somebody else finding it simple and mundane?

Edited

Okay, so you low-key neglect your two year old's safety? It is not safe to let a two year old wander around completely unsupervised and I'm appalled that you think it is. The hazards are too numerous to mention.

Nobody is saying men can't do it. We're saying they usually don't. Of course they can do it. It's not rocket science.

Againlosinghope · 16/07/2024 19:27

XChrome · 16/07/2024 19:24

He's not paying more. He's only paying the equivalent (at best!) of what he'd be spending to keep them 50% of the time. The only difference is he is sending it to his ex instead of paying out of pocket on the daily himself.

That's not accurate.
My DH has spent far far more on caring for older children with costs here and maintenance and the other costs (trips and other) than the younger children have ever had spent on them.

XChrome · 16/07/2024 19:24

GentlemanJay · 16/07/2024 16:09

What about the father, who would like his children to stay with him 50% of the time, but because they don't want to has to pay far more.

He's not paying more. He's only paying the equivalent (at best!) of what he'd be spending to keep them 50% of the time. The only difference is he is sending it to his ex instead of paying out of pocket on the daily himself.