Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Lifetime driving bans?

58 replies

LovelyBitOfHam · 12/07/2024 16:45

How would people feel about harsher driving bans alongside sentencing for drivers who aren’t safe?

After the dreadful news this week of the sentencing of the drunk driver who killed two at 141mph, I read he had been banned for around 20 years, which came as a surprise as it seemed like a long time.

Equally, Im also surprised when people who’ve caused accidents, injuries and death due to driving without care and attention or under the influence are given menial bans, like 12 months.

I know many are reliant on cars (and I’m from an area with poor public transport provision) but I have always considered driving to be a privilege and never a right.

Personally, I think automatic lengthy bans (as in 5 years or more) should be in place for any and all drink or drug drivers and the most egregious cases should lose the right to drive forever.

Too many lives are lost and changed by motorists and nothing seems to be done about it.

For what it’s worth I can (but don’t) drive.

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
PassingStranger · 08/08/2024 21:26

Agree, courts seem afraid to ban people forever.

Just do it.
Why do they deserve to drive again after taking lives.

JohnofWessex · 14/07/2024 10:29

The issue we have is that the roads are an 'open' system.

If we could try to control whose on it that would have significant benefits beyond banned drivers and make it much harder for offenders to move around.

The figure was that about 10% of vehicles have 'document issues' ie no tax/mot/drivers licences and about 25% of the occupants of those vehicles are wanted by the police so its a 'target rich' environment for the police

Workaholic99 · 14/07/2024 07:21

I don't disagree with your post but I would worry that lengthy bans would lead to more uninsured drivers and risk takers on the roads.

Copperoliverbear · 14/07/2024 07:12

Lifetime ban and prison for a speed like that, but I think this country needs to be tougher with laws altogether, I like the death penalty brought back for certain things.

AbraAbraCadabra · 14/07/2024 03:09

I think the current laws are sufficient.

Afternoonteavirgin · 14/07/2024 03:07

Some people forget that making something illegal doesn't stop people from doing it.

I mean, burglary is illegal, so what's the point in alarms or locking our doors?
Oh yeh. Because people still do it.

Catsmere · 14/07/2024 02:49

JohnofWessex · 12/07/2024 19:05

Just dont take the driver out before you do it...........

You win the thread! 😂

outdamnedspots · 13/07/2024 23:46

He's was banned for 20 years as he was sentenced to 18 years in prison.

Carebearsonmybed · 13/07/2024 23:29

I agree. Those poor pilots who were killed by the lorry driver- he shouldn't be allowed to drive again!

XenoBitch · 13/07/2024 23:13

Biggleslefae · 13/07/2024 23:10

Nah, you've not thought that through at all.

A lot of cars are now keyless ignition. They rely on a chip being present in the car to start... you don't have to be in the driver seat.

So a passenger with an implanted chip that blocks this signal (somehow), could no longer get taxis, get a lift from anyone etc. Maybe even get on a bus, or be picked up in a ambulance or police car.

That is batshit.

Biggleslefae · 13/07/2024 23:11

XenoBitch · 13/07/2024 22:55

Not from me.
If you have no driving license, you can still get around via public transport/favours.
Say you have family abroad... confiscating passports would have a huge detrimental affect. You would not be able to fly out in case there is an emergency.
And I know people will come back and say you should have thought of that before you did xyz... but we are all one simple reckless mistake away from being a criminal.

So?
Skype them.

Biggleslefae · 13/07/2024 23:10

XenoBitch · 13/07/2024 22:28

You have not really thought that through... it would mean they could never be a passenger in any car too. And implanting a chip is a medical procedure. And no criminal is subject to being forced to have one regardless of what they have done.

Nah, you've not thought that through at all.

DreamTheMoors · 13/07/2024 23:08

Aa long as there’s alcohol and drugs in the world, and as long as there’s foolish people indulging themselves, there will tragic consequences.
And therein lies the rub.

XenoBitch · 13/07/2024 22:55

Biggleslefae · 13/07/2024 12:54

Another vote for penalizing people by confiscating passports.

Not from me.
If you have no driving license, you can still get around via public transport/favours.
Say you have family abroad... confiscating passports would have a huge detrimental affect. You would not be able to fly out in case there is an emergency.
And I know people will come back and say you should have thought of that before you did xyz... but we are all one simple reckless mistake away from being a criminal.

XenoBitch · 13/07/2024 22:28

Biggleslefae · 12/07/2024 18:18

I think they should have a chip implanted that means any car they get in wont start.
Obvs the car industry would lobby against it as they'd lose out on car sales.

You have not really thought that through... it would mean they could never be a passenger in any car too. And implanting a chip is a medical procedure. And no criminal is subject to being forced to have one regardless of what they have done.

JohnofWessex · 13/07/2024 22:24

EBearhug · 13/07/2024 19:37

Car drivers are not always car owners. I'd be pretty peeved if my car was nicked and then got crushed because the thief was done for speeding.

Passports wouldn't work. My parents drove for decades, but didn't have passports. It might be more unusual these days not to have a passport, but it's certainly not unknown.

Edited

AFAIK in Victoria (Australia) if your car is used by someone else who plays the fool with it while you woint get it crushed first time you will have to have a discussion with The Police about how you are going to stop other drivers playing the fool with it in future

CharismaticMegafauna · 13/07/2024 20:48

I wish there were more lifetime bans.

A friend of my daughter's was left severely brain damaged and paralysed by a lorry driver who drove into her family's car at about 60mph when they had just pulled in on the hard shoulder. He will be able to drive again in a few years' time.

EBearhug · 13/07/2024 19:37

DezTheMoaner · 12/07/2024 19:01

Crush the car every time: they'll soon run out of cars to drive

Car drivers are not always car owners. I'd be pretty peeved if my car was nicked and then got crushed because the thief was done for speeding.

Passports wouldn't work. My parents drove for decades, but didn't have passports. It might be more unusual these days not to have a passport, but it's certainly not unknown.

Blackcats7 · 13/07/2024 19:24

This thread has made me ponder whether I was lied to.
I went out with a bloke via online dating after my divorce. After I had been seeing him for a while he told me he had a five year driving ban plus 120 hours of community service because he had fallen asleep at the wheel and wrote his car off on a motorway. He said he had been working very long hours with no rest and the police used his work records to prove he would have been unfit to drive. No drink or drugs involved and nobody hurt or any other vehicle involved.
Reading this thread has made me think that considering the pathetically short bans and limited punishments given for actually hurting other people by dangeous/ reckless driving this bloke seems to have got a fairly hefty sentence so makes me wonder if he was telling me the full truth.

LlynTegid · 13/07/2024 19:15

JohnofWessex · 13/07/2024 15:32

I suggest that because the UK was the first country to have a blood alcohol limit we have one that is higher than most.

Given the changes in both what we now know about the affects of alcohol and the advances in testing technology iy is time to revisit it.

I would support a lower limit. I would also test many parents on the school run as I think some would fail a lower limit.

LlynTegid · 13/07/2024 19:13

foothandmouth · 13/07/2024 18:29

I don't think the passport thing would work. So many people carry or are Eligible to carry two passports.

Easy enough for there to be a banning list and now you have to give advance passenger information much easier to enforce.

foothandmouth · 13/07/2024 18:29

I don't think the passport thing would work. So many people carry or are Eligible to carry two passports.

Scunnered123 · 13/07/2024 16:58

LlynTegid · 12/07/2024 20:29

Another non custodial option for driving after a lifetime ban, alongside car crushing, would be to take away a passport for a very long time. Deny such people their fortnight in the sun for say at least ten years would hurt many people.

I'd vote for this!

Snarpy · 13/07/2024 16:55

The fact that people can evade driving bans by claiming hardship makes me furious. Driving should be treated as a privilege, not a right, and if you need your licence to deliver groceries to your parents (as that arsehole Ian Brown claimed) or whatever, its up to you to keep it, not the general public to have to put up with your shit and dangerous behaviour.

JohnofWessex · 13/07/2024 15:32

LovelyBitOfHam · 13/07/2024 12:50

This is interesting because when growing up, my parents wouldn’t have so much as half a shandy and drive afterwards. It was as simple as that.

So as an adult I’ve always been a bit taken aback by how common it is for someone to have a pint (or two) after work and drive home.

I believe Scotland has a much lower limit in force which acts as a deterrent for this sort of driving, which I would embrace.

I suggest that because the UK was the first country to have a blood alcohol limit we have one that is higher than most.

Given the changes in both what we now know about the affects of alcohol and the advances in testing technology iy is time to revisit it.

Swipe left for the next trending thread