Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

"Prime Minister Keir Starmer recommits to £3 billion a year of military support for Ukraine until 2030/31 and for as long as needed"

285 replies

changefromhr · 11/07/2024 07:31

That's a huge amount of money for a war that's not going to end anytime soon.
3 BILLION a year!
3 x 1 thousand millions!
Where is this money going to come from? This is in addition to almost £12.5bn in military, humanitarian and economic support already given for Ukraine since Russia’s illegal and miscalculated full scale invasion in February 2022.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-to-stand-with-ukraine-for-as-long-as-it-takes-pm-to-tell-nato

UK to stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes, PM to tell NATO

The international community cannot waver in the face of relentless Russian aggression, the Prime Minister will tell NATO today.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-to-stand-with-ukraine-for-as-long-as-it-takes-pm-to-tell-nato

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
Notonthestairs · 11/07/2024 12:36

Jumpingthruhoops · 11/07/2024 12:32

And so it begins. This is what people voted for...

Where have you been for the last few years?
Johnson committed the UK to supporting Ukraine and each PM since has reaffirmed that commitment.
What do you think that meant?

Puffinfoot · 11/07/2024 12:36

randomchap · 11/07/2024 12:35

And your issue with trying to protect innocent civilians is what precisely?

Russia are carrying out an abhorrent act and we should be offering support. If anything we've not done enough

That's true, but it's not why we need to spend this money. It's entirely for our own safety and protection.

PregnantWithHorrors · 11/07/2024 12:36

Jumpingthruhoops · 11/07/2024 12:32

And so it begins. This is what people voted for...

Yes, yes it is. Woooo!

ButtSurgery · 11/07/2024 12:35

Jumpingthruhoops · 11/07/2024 12:32

And so it begins. This is what people voted for...

What begins? Carrying on what the previous government promised with the intent of keeping Russia from an all out war with NATO?

randomchap · 11/07/2024 12:35

Jumpingthruhoops · 11/07/2024 12:32

And so it begins. This is what people voted for...

And your issue with trying to protect innocent civilians is what precisely?

Russia are carrying out an abhorrent act and we should be offering support. If anything we've not done enough

Puffinfoot · 11/07/2024 12:35

Jumpingthruhoops · 11/07/2024 12:32

And so it begins. This is what people voted for...

What would you do to stop the Russians?

What about when they've overrun Ukraine?

Jumpingthruhoops · 11/07/2024 12:32

And so it begins. This is what people voted for...

PregnantWithHorrors · 11/07/2024 12:27

changefromhr · 11/07/2024 11:43

Some of us do have jobs you know!
Posted this before work. Reading replies in my break.
Defence against Russia is important BUT that is an insane amount of money when we have problems of our own. Will it be spent wisely? Are we dick waving with the US to compete?
And the war won't end with Zelensky calling the shots.

It was a perfectly reasonable question. Posters starting a thread then not returning happens all the time on here, especially on controversial topics.

Now that that have, there is no planet on which Zelensky is calling the shots. That is a truly ridiculous claim. Any conclusions based on so faulty a premise will inevitably be wrong.

WinterMorn · 11/07/2024 12:27

Yes, it is a lot of money. However, it’s still a reasonable price to pay given the wider context and the very unpleasant alternative.

Arewethebadguys · 11/07/2024 12:17

broccolienthusiast · 11/07/2024 07:47

You do realise that if Ukraine falls we are all fucked right?

This all day long

randomchap · 11/07/2024 12:09

changefromhr · 11/07/2024 11:43

Some of us do have jobs you know!
Posted this before work. Reading replies in my break.
Defence against Russia is important BUT that is an insane amount of money when we have problems of our own. Will it be spent wisely? Are we dick waving with the US to compete?
And the war won't end with Zelensky calling the shots.

Zelensky calling the shots? Wow

I'm pretty certain the invasion was by Russia. Zelensky is just doing his best to protect his country from destruction.

What would you be doing in his place?

DucklingSwimmingInstructress · 11/07/2024 11:51

Good thing to put it off as long as possible though.

Impossiblethree · 11/07/2024 11:49

WellwellwellInever · 11/07/2024 08:05

We are a few years off WWIII. If we support Ukraine to win we might avert it. If we were invaded we would want and need the same support.

Temporarily. Then there will be another issue in another place, or the same place. It’s just delaying it nothing is ultimately going to avert humans destroying the planet and/or ourselves one way or another.

OP posts:
changefromhr · 11/07/2024 11:43

PregnantWithHorrors · 11/07/2024 10:00

Wonder if OP is going to come back?

Some of us do have jobs you know!
Posted this before work. Reading replies in my break.
Defence against Russia is important BUT that is an insane amount of money when we have problems of our own. Will it be spent wisely? Are we dick waving with the US to compete?
And the war won't end with Zelensky calling the shots.

OP posts:
wtfissummer · 11/07/2024 11:40

marmaladeandpeanutbutter · 11/07/2024 10:12

I don’t. You could tell me?

Who?

Puffinfoot · 11/07/2024 11:34

We could just leave the Russians to march through Europe, I suppose.

wtfissummer · 11/07/2024 11:34

TreadLight · 11/07/2024 09:15

The war needs to be stopped. Either overwhelming support for Ukraine with British brigades on the ground pushing Russia back to its original boards, or stop supporting Ukraine and allow Russia to take over. This half way house or limited aid with unreasonable conditions is costing lives and resources and causing a WW1 style stalemate, sending Russians and Ukrainians men to pointless meat grinder.

What ever happens, the region won't find peace. If Ukraine win, the eastern pro-Russian regions will continue a guerrilla action against the Ukrainians, and if Russia win they won't be able to govern the country without oppression.

What eastern pro Russian regions?

wtfissummer · 11/07/2024 11:33

WinterMorn · 11/07/2024 09:12

@Arewealljustloosingtheplot its not just me, but don’t let that get in the way of your bizarre narrative. Have a lovely morning 🙂

I didn't understand it either

It sounded like a trite "you do you" response that means there is no answer

wtfissummer · 11/07/2024 11:25

Glitterybee · 11/07/2024 08:07

Where’s the support for Gaza?

Why only Ukraine?

Well that didn't take long

There's a whole section on gaza

DucklingSwimmingInstructress · 11/07/2024 10:42

Russia's already attacking the UK, mostly from within and to a certain degree physically.

We might not want to be at war, but it doesn't depend on us - it depends on the country that is hostile to us, and we can't control that.

We need to face it and to pay for ways to stop it.

Proof?

Russia's carrying out some sabotage missions within the UK and Europe already and actively recruiting to get more people to carry them out
https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/30/europe-on-high-alert-after-suspected-moscow-linked-arson-and-sabotage

There was also a potentially suspicious incident at a S Wales arms factory, although the investigation is still ongoing so Russian involvement isn't confirmed. But there have been other incidents in Europe where it has been confirmed including Germany recently (https://www.wsj.com/world/europe/russian-saboteurs-behind-arson-attackat-german-factory-c13b4ece ) and Czechia, that one was quite a few years ago now.
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/explosion-major-bae-systems-arms-29012349

Russia's shadow war
https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/10/europe/russia-shadow-war-nato-intl-latam/index.html

Russia's already attacking the UK from within, it's called Hybrid warfare
https://www.reuters.com/world/europe/nato-says-russian-hybrid-attack-intensify-members-territories-2024-05-02/

Bojo wouldn't allow the investigation into Russian funding of Brexit to be released which says a lot in itself, but Farage is clearly a stooge for the Kremlin. Certainly Russia's been interfering in British politics for a long time
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence_and_Security_Committee_Russia_report

and Russia's interfered in Scottish politics https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/508266-uk-intelligence-report-says-russia-meddled-in-scottish-independence/ ... plenty more evidence but this is more than enough!

Europe on high alert after suspected Moscow-linked arson and sabotage

Security services say spate of fires and infrastructure attacks could be part of attempt by Russia to destabilise continent

https://www.theguardian.com/world/article/2024/may/30/europe-on-high-alert-after-suspected-moscow-linked-arson-and-sabotage

pizzaHeart · 11/07/2024 10:36

Sosorryliver · 11/07/2024 09:59

Ukraine shouldn’t be allowed to fall. Russia won’t stop there . It’ll be a NATO country next. That said I think it’s a lot of money. I do think it’s easier to spend money you haven’t earned. I might have wants but when I consider how many minutes it took me to earn £3 for a decent coffee, Then I decide to wait till I’m home and have nice coffee for 50p. When work is buying I’m much more generous.

I hope when they commit to enormous sums they consider where the money comes from and how hard people have had to work.

Can you clarify what exactly do you mean by “wants”?
It is a bit unclear from your post.

ilikecatsandponies · 11/07/2024 10:27

hamstersarse · 11/07/2024 09:00

There is absolutely no evidence that Putin will “move further West”

His stated aim is to reclaim a part of Ukraine that was previously part of Russia / USSR

I don’t believe that hype anymore.

I’m also unsure what this pledge means anymore, I am of the understanding that the money just goes to British companies who make the weapons that are then given to Ukraine. So if that’s the case, it’s odd. We aren’t “giving money” to Ukraine, we are funding our own arms trade. I don’t know what to make of it all. Theres definitely some jiggerypokery going on

Other countries like Estonia and Latvia were also in the USSR, all the way up to East Germany. Many of these countries are NATO members.

L1ttledrummergirl · 11/07/2024 10:20

hamstersarse · 11/07/2024 09:00

There is absolutely no evidence that Putin will “move further West”

His stated aim is to reclaim a part of Ukraine that was previously part of Russia / USSR

I don’t believe that hype anymore.

I’m also unsure what this pledge means anymore, I am of the understanding that the money just goes to British companies who make the weapons that are then given to Ukraine. So if that’s the case, it’s odd. We aren’t “giving money” to Ukraine, we are funding our own arms trade. I don’t know what to make of it all. Theres definitely some jiggerypokery going on

Putin is intent on wiping out Ukraine as a nation. Ukrainian children have been taken from their communities and forcibly adopted in Russis to be made into good Russian citizens. That is not just reclaiming non existent borders.

Any negotiating should be on Ukraine's terms, and should start with Russia getting back to the pre 2014 borders, and then giving ground to a buffer zone. It should certainly mean all those children being reunited with their families, and Russia paying to rebuild what it has destroyed.

We should be fully supporting Ukraine in this.

prettybird · 11/07/2024 10:19

I'm glad that Labour has continued the commitment to supper Ukraine.

As others have said, Ukraine wouldn't be the end of Russian ambitions Sad There really are, unfortunately, parallels with the appeasement strategy of the 1930s.

The Baltic states have been explicit about the risk: that Russia's strategy is to take a little, re-group and then take more Angry

The West didn't react properly when Russia invaded Crimea. The consequence was that Russia was emboldened to continue into the rest of Ukraine. Putin has stated explicitly that he doesn't consider Ukraine to be a sovereign state. Angry

Ukraine is the only country in the world to have voluntarily given up its nuclear weapons, which was codified in the Budapest Memorandum of 1994. This guaranteed that its sovereignty would be protected. Russia, USA and the UK committed then to support Ukraine in the event of any aggression against Ukraine. Confused

Unfortunately, Russia proved that its commitments to international treaties are worthless. So why should anyone believe that it would respect a "peace treaty" that involves Ukraine giving up its sovereign territories? Hmm

So no, I do think it's right that we are continuing to commit resources to Ukraine, for all our safety. If anything, we should be committing more and releasing Ukraine from constraints as to how or where they can use the assets that we send them.