Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

"Prime Minister Keir Starmer recommits to £3 billion a year of military support for Ukraine until 2030/31 and for as long as needed"

285 replies

changefromhr · 11/07/2024 07:31

That's a huge amount of money for a war that's not going to end anytime soon.
3 BILLION a year!
3 x 1 thousand millions!
Where is this money going to come from? This is in addition to almost £12.5bn in military, humanitarian and economic support already given for Ukraine since Russia’s illegal and miscalculated full scale invasion in February 2022.
https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-to-stand-with-ukraine-for-as-long-as-it-takes-pm-to-tell-nato

UK to stand with Ukraine for as long as it takes, PM to tell NATO

The international community cannot waver in the face of relentless Russian aggression, the Prime Minister will tell NATO today.

https://www.gov.uk/government/news/uk-to-stand-with-ukraine-for-as-long-as-it-takes-pm-to-tell-nato

OP posts:
Thread gallery
8
DucklingSwimmingInstructress · 11/07/2024 23:27

You mean like Putin pushing over 500,000 of his people into the slaughter, young and old?

IClaudine · 11/07/2024 23:26

PopSockette · 11/07/2024 23:09

I never mentioned the UK NATO seems to be pushing Ukraine to total mobilization of their people including their youths. As the ex US Ambassador to NATO says it's currently being fought by soldiers with an average age of 40 years.Old people pushing teenagers into the slaughter, not a good look.

Edited

Well I agree with you there 100% about not sending teenagers to war, but what you posted appears to be about what an Ex US Ambassador to NATO has said? So this is not coming from NATO itself? - but it is hard to properly comment without having access to a reliable link.

PopSockette · 11/07/2024 23:09

PopSockette · 11/07/2024 23:02

Ex US Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder exhorts Ukraine to think about how important this war is for them, and to start mobilizing 18 year olds. He states that NATO troops will never be deployed in the future if Ukraine does not first mobilize it's youth for war.

https://twitter.com/euronews/status/1811113172868243554

Edited

I never mentioned the UK NATO seems to be pushing Ukraine to total mobilization of their people including their youths. As the ex US Ambassador to NATO says it's currently being fought by soldiers with an average age of 40 years.Old people pushing teenagers into the slaughter, not a good look.

justasking111 · 11/07/2024 23:04

We also need the food the Ukraine provide to Europe.

PopSockette · 11/07/2024 23:02

IClaudine · 11/07/2024 22:59

Something more reliable than a Reddit link that tells me there is mature content that I can't access without using the app (which I don't have) would be helpful! Ta.

Eta: I managed to read a bit of it. Nothing about UK conscripting 18 year olds. So not sure of relevance to a thread about UK's funding of Ukraine?

Edited

Ex US Ambassador to NATO Ivo Daalder exhorts Ukraine to think about how important this war is for them, and to start mobilizing 18 year olds. He states that NATO troops will never be deployed in the future if Ukraine does not first mobilize it's youth for war.

https://twitter.com/euronews/status/1811113172868243554

IClaudine · 11/07/2024 22:59

PopSockette · 11/07/2024 22:57

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/comments/1dzpuqp/uapovexusambassadortonatoivodaalder/ - it's in Ukraine he says there should be total mobilization from Ukrainians before any other country should need to have boots on the ground.

Edited

Something more reliable than a Reddit link that tells me there is mature content that I can't access without using the app (which I don't have) would be helpful! Ta.

Eta: I managed to read a bit of it. Nothing about UK conscripting 18 year olds. So not sure of relevance to a thread about UK's funding of Ukraine?

PopSockette · 11/07/2024 22:57

IClaudine · 11/07/2024 22:54

Who is talking about conscripting18 year olds in the UK? Do you have a link please?

https://www.reddit.com/r/UkraineRussiaReport/comments/1dzpuqp/uapovexusambassadortonatoivodaalder/ - it's in Ukraine he says there should be total mobilization from Ukrainians before any other country should need to have boots on the ground.

IClaudine · 11/07/2024 22:54

PopSockette · 11/07/2024 22:52

Crazy amounts of money to continue a war that is being lost and they are talking about conscripting 18 years olds.

Who is talking about conscripting18 year olds in the UK? Do you have a link please?

PopSockette · 11/07/2024 22:52

Crazy amounts of money to continue a war that is being lost and they are talking about conscripting 18 years olds.

duckfordinner · 11/07/2024 22:47

We should have referendum on this..

Arconialiving · 11/07/2024 22:35

WinterMorn · 11/07/2024 07:37

Ukraine needs our support. The cost of a Putin victory will be far more than financial. Should he decide to turn his attention to a NATO member then all bets are off. Funding Ukraine now is an investment in all our futures.

Agreed!

Kovus · 11/07/2024 21:19

I would rather pay any amount than for my son to have to fight the Russians on UK soil.

The Kremlin has already deployed weapons to the UK. Let's not forget that.

Isitsixoclockalready · 11/07/2024 21:02

Putin won't stop with Ukraine.

blueshoes · 11/07/2024 20:57

I'd be happy for £3 billion of military aid to go to Ukraine every year, many times more in fact. And pony up more taxes to fund it, if necessary.

I would rather pay any amount than for my son to have to fight the Russians on UK soil.

DesdamonasHandkerchief · 11/07/2024 20:16

Newbutoldfather · 11/07/2024 12:40

It is a disproportionate and unnecessary amount.

I don’t buy the domino theory so often used to support Ukraine. Yes, if we had allowed Putin to invade Ukraine at little cost, he might have thought of venturing further. But, right now, he would happily settle for 20% of Ukraine, at least some of which is more Russian than Ukrainian in terms of language and culture.

The great powers (the U.S and China) may need a more global view, but we don’t, especially if Europe won’t come along for the ride. The nations who should be investing a lot more are Germany (especially) and Poland, not the UK.

I find the grandstanding of the establishment over Ukraine quite nauseating when so many are dying here through lack of basic medical care and schools are falling apart. We might still be a rich (ish) country on paper, but that is because of the super wealthy. On a median income basis, we are really quite average.

We should pay our fair share on Ukraine, but no more.

Can I remind you of a pp PizzaHearts point:

Ukraine hosted nuclear weapons at the moment of Soviet Unions collapse and then agreed to transfer them to Russia in exchange for assurances from Russia, UK and USA to respect Ukrainian independence and sovereignty in existing borders. UK is part of this treaty. UK promised to guarantee Ukrainian independence and sovereignty.

Had we and the USA not convinced Ukraine to hand their nuclear weapons over to russia Ukraine would not have been invaded.
We guaranteed their sovereignty, under those circumstances how can anyone believe we are doing too much. We really aren't doing enough.

WellwellwellInever · 11/07/2024 17:28

FinalCeleryScheme · 11/07/2024 16:47

I don’t need to. Look it up.

The Daily Mail has reported on the analysis of this. Here you go…

www.dailymail.co.uk/money/investing/article-13604661/What-Labour-mean-investment-returns-Prime-Ministers-fared-1970.html

WellwellwellInever · 11/07/2024 17:27

FinalCeleryScheme · 11/07/2024 14:04

This is nonsense. It’s a falsehood that continues to circulate however many times it’s shot down.

Labour since WWII has inherited better economies than it has left. That’s the false basis of the claim.

I hate the DM. But it’s a right leaning ‘paper’ and this is what it says;

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/investing/article-13604661/What-Labour-mean-investment-returns-Prime-Ministers-fared-1970.html

How will investors fare under the new Labour Government

A delve back into historical data shows that Labour has largely had positive returns when it's in office.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/investing/article-13604661/What-Labour-mean-investment-returns-Prime-Ministers-fared-1970.html

WinterMorn · 11/07/2024 17:18

Backwoods57 · 11/07/2024 16:29

Yet more money and people being thrown into the meat grinder for no good reason. Why is NATO getting involved

I don’t even know where to start with this.

DucklingSwimmingInstructress · 11/07/2024 17:13

For anyone who thinks that Russia isn't trying to attack:

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/11/politics/us-germany-foiled-russian-assassination-plot/index.html

US intelligence discovered earlier this year that the Russian government planned to assassinate the chief executive of a powerful German arms manufacturer that has been producing artillery shells and military vehicles for Ukraine, according to five US and western officials familiar with the episode.
The plot was one of a series of Russian plans to assassinate defense industry executives across Europe who were supporting Ukraine’s war effort, these sources said. The plan to kill Armin Papperger, a white-haired goliath who has led the German manufacturing charge in support of Kyiv, was the most mature.
When the Americans learned of the effort, they informed Germany, whose security services were then able to protect Papperger and foil the plot. A high-level German government official confirmed that Berlin was warned about the plot by the US.

Exclusive: US and Germany foiled Russian plot to assassinate CEO of arms manufacturer sending weapons to Ukraine | CNN Politics

Earlier this year, US intelligence discovered that the Russian government planned to assassinate the chief executive of a powerful German arms manufacturer which has been producing artillery shells and military vehicles for Ukraine, according to five U...

https://edition.cnn.com/2024/07/11/politics/us-germany-foiled-russian-assassination-plot/index.html

PregnantWithHorrors · 11/07/2024 16:59

Backwoods57 · 11/07/2024 16:29

Yet more money and people being thrown into the meat grinder for no good reason. Why is NATO getting involved

That you Nige?

HappiestSleeping · 11/07/2024 16:51

FinalCeleryScheme · 11/07/2024 16:47

I don’t need to. Look it up.

I did.

FinalCeleryScheme · 11/07/2024 16:47

HappiestSleeping · 11/07/2024 16:27

I have been a conservative voter my whole life, up until Brexshit. I was surprised to learn that Labour have not necessarily inherited stronger economies and in fact, it is the other way around in many instances. I suggest you conduct further analysis of your figures.

I don’t need to. Look it up.

Scammersarescum · 11/07/2024 16:32

Not a Starmer fan, in fact I intensely dislike him but he is right to commit to Ukraine.

For all our sakes.

ACynicalDad · 11/07/2024 16:32

This isn't about Ukraine, it's about keeping Putin in check and frankly I'm far from convinced the Western powers shouldn't put boots on the ground.

Backwoods57 · 11/07/2024 16:29

Yet more money and people being thrown into the meat grinder for no good reason. Why is NATO getting involved

Swipe left for the next trending thread