To want to write to the governors about my DD's suspension?

Parents should still make representations even for suspensions less than 5 days because it builds evidence of a picture of need.

It's the LA case officers here who are often not that much use!

Sorry OP but this school can't meet her needs. They are clearly showing they cannot meet her needs, by sending her home. I wouldn't be surprised if very soon they tell you and the council that they cannot meet her needs and that's because they cannot. I also think it's strange you've been asked to write a statement to the governors was this by the school or someone else?

You've had issues after issue the senco basicly made out to you that there was only so much they can do for her as a mainstream school. The writing is on the wall.

I feel for you, your doing absolutely everything possible to get her into school and are met with this excluding her because they can't persuade her into school Or manage her condition appropriately. She needs a needs assesment and far more funding than she's currently getting at the very least.

If you haven't contacted IAS then you really need to they are there to help with the legalities like her attendance and mediation with the school etc.

Your the OP that's been having problems in other ways no? The school trip etc? I'm flabbergasted they've now decided to start doing this instead.

I know you like the school but quite honestly I've never known anything like it. I feel like things are taking an awful turn for you and your DD. I wouldn't be suprised if they soon want her to be placed elsewhere. They can't suspend a child for being upset, honestly I'd be raging and at the council first thing tomorrow.

Who has "asked" you to write to the governors? You said earlier that "they" said you can "make a statement" to governors and I'm confused about who has said what to you.

The governing body, as others have said, cannot overturn this suspension, so any letter you write to the chair of governors (which is the person you'd actually write to) needs to have some other purpose.

Do you want to make a complaint about how this was handled? If so, you need to go via the school's complaints policy and your complaint would go to the headteacher in the first instance.

It sounds like you are very focused on the negative connotations of an unauthorized absence or suspension on her record (understandable). But by having these wouldn’t that show that she has serious problems and needs help to stay in school? Might that not lead to more support? Ultimately she needs to be in school, and pass her GCSEs, and she can’t go through 5 years of refusing to go in. Kids with issues on their records are more likely to get referrals which may lead to more help.

I'm really glad you posted this as I have an autistic girl about the start high school. I think initially I would have been shocked by the suspension but there are some helpful replies here.
In my letter to the governors I'd ask if there are any alternative options. And then you can consider the pros and cons of each.

As a pp has said, I am not sure why they are telling you to write to the governors? The legislation says "106. In the case of a suspension which does not bring the pupil's total number of days of suspension to more than five in a term, the governing board must consider any representations made by parents, but it cannot direct reinstatement and is not required to arrange a meeting with parents"

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/64ef773513ae1500116e30db/Suspension_and_permanent_exclusion_guidance_september_23.pdf

So you can write to the governors but they can't change the decision. What you could do is highlight to them that she didn't actually do anything wrong but was distressed during to mental health and that the correct course of action would have been to note an authorised absence for medical reasons..... And perhaps stop giving you a hard time for attendance when she is unable to attend due to medical reasons. This may highlight the lack of support within the school. You can link to

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5ce6a72e40f0b620a103bd53/supporting-pupils-at-school-with-medical-conditions.pdf

And

assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65f1b048133c22b8eecd38f7/Working_together_to_improve_school_attendance__applies_from_19_August_2024_.pdf

I would write to the governors stating the issue and asking for a solution!

My DS has a friend with ASD and struggles with school. The school has reduced his timetable to P1 to P3, then he goes home. That way his attendance is only based across 3 lessons a day and not 5, and the shorter day means he is less tired. It was originally just P1 and P2.

At the school I teach at, a few years ago we had a parent who spent all morning sitting in reception so their child would stay in school! Oddly it worked!

You need to show the governors what the issue is and suggest some strategies that might help the situation.

School governor here. It sounds like the school were between a rock and a hard place - they were happy for you to take her home but said it would be unauthorised, you then challenged them on that so they had no choice but to suspend.

You have the right to make representations to the governors but they do not have the power to reinstate when the suspension is under 5 days, so have a think about what you actually want to achieve by this.

They could have marked her down as a school refusal.

^^
There is no code for school refusal....personally I think there should be, but as it stands school refusal comes under 'O' unauthorised absence (for England, I don't know if the same is true in other countries in the UK). It's important the school is informed its refusal, so if the education welfare officer becomes involved, it can be dealt with appropriately.

Don't think governors can overturn a suspension.

You could go down the complaint route but need to follow the complaints policy.

As others have said, schools can't just send pupils home. Would have to go through the fixed term suspension route. What was stated in the school communication to you?

Can your letter be in 2 parts:

1. detailing why suspension was the wrong response

2. setting out what you want from school to support her better

For 1) do school have a behaviour mgt policy that sets out what qualifies a suspension? I'd hope that what you've described doesn't hit that threshold! Then set out the alternative options as outlined from PP and which one you feel would have been most appropriate.

For 2) I'd ask for one of the goals to be that you and school agree an 'action plan' by the end of the term (?!) on what they will do, what you will do and what DD will do in order to start fresh in September.

Good luck this sounds really hard

Op, this is exactly why an EHCP is necessary, so I'm pleased you're applying for a needs assessment. This provides the consistency SEN children need throughout their education, including the formality of regular reviews to see how her needs have changed.

In my opinion, you should argue for authorised absence due to the impact on her mental health. The fact that her attendance is so low, and that they are 'on your back' about it speaks volumes. They suspended her because schools are under the kosh with regards to unauthorised absence. She's not coping, and her needs are not being met because they have no idea what her needs actually are. The Ed Pysch is a really positive step forward for you.

I would write to the governors and state that anxiety is a by product of a neurodevelopmental disorder for which your dd has a diagnosis. She's sick, not naughty, and anxiety is a mental health concern therefore authorised absence (sick) is fair. And I think you need this agreement to extend until such time as you have an EHCP in place.

Poor girl.

Op, this is exactly why an EHCP is necessary, so I'm pleased you're applying for a needs assessment. This provides the consistency SEN children need throughout their education, including the formality of regular reviews to see how her needs have changed.

In my opinion, you should argue for authorised absence due to the impact on her mental health. The fact that her attendance is so low, and that they are 'on your back' about it speaks volumes. They suspended her because schools are under the kosh with regards to unauthorised absence. She's not coping, and her needs are not being met because they have no idea what her needs actually are. The Ed Pysch is a really positive step forward for you.

I would write to the governors and state that anxiety is a by product of a neurodevelopmental disorder for which your dd has a diagnosis. She's sick, not naughty, and anxiety is a mental health concern therefore authorised absence (sick) is fair. And I think you need this agreement to extend until such time as you have an EHCP in place.

Poor girl.