The whole sense behind EHCP is obtaining additional funding
No, the whole point of (the educational sections) an EHCP is that the child’s needs, the SEP they reasonably require and outcomes are set out. Additional funding in order to meet those needs, provide the SEP and thus meet the outcomes is a byproduct of that, but it is not the whole sense of an EHCP. Which is why parents should focus on the SEP in F rather than the funding.
That may be through the use of specialist equipment ( does she need it? I doubt it) or 1:1 learning mentor for lister by me reasons.
There are many other things that are SEP. Not all will have 1:1 and not all will have equipment in F. Although how on earth you can judge OP’s DD doesn’t need equipment, I don’t know. Many with ASD do need sensory equipment &/or tech/assistive tech/specialist software.
If it is a need for counselling the schools refer to CAMHS
If counselling is required for a pupil with an EHCP, a normal referral to CAMHS isn’t required. It should be detailed, specified and quantified in F. It may or may not be provided by the NHS. If it is provided via the NHS, it may not be in a specialist hospital. It is rare for schools to provide long term MH therapies to the level required by many DC with the needs OP describes. Parents often have to appeal, but that doesn’t change any of the above.
If an ongoing monitoring is needed they council will look for specialist school if it is possible in the areas. They do anything to avoid another EHCP.
An EHCP is required for specialist schools. Not all DC who require ongoing monitoring are in or need SS. Just because LAs try to avoid issuing EHCPs doesn’t mean it is lawful or the parents should accept it without challenge.