To actually not mind paying tax?

My income tax and NI seem reasonable (increasingly crap NHS aside). I don't object to paying my fair share for public services, I just think we're perhaps entitled to have some of them (well, health) be better than than they are.

I do object to only getting 25% off my council tax for living alone. Two people take up half the resources of one - it should be 50%! (And I don't have a large / valuable property). And, again, there's a bit of a feeling that I should be getting a bit more for it. Too many damn potholes round here.

Absolutely. Also those who have a choice to work full time, part time or not at all are normally higher contributors so it would make a lot of sense to keep them motivated to work for longer.

Re double taxation - VAT leaves a choice of what to buy and when, other taxes don't, only to work or not, invest or not etc

There comes a point when taxation is too high and it disincentivises people from working. Laffer curve.

Think of it this way - if taxation was 100% for 100% of people no one would be bothered to work and the government would get 0 taxation.
If taxation is 0% the government gets 0 taxation.

You need a point between those two but the higher it gets, the more people stop working.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laffer_curve

I know how IHT works. I just mean there’s a large nil rate band which means very large sums of money can be passed on tax free.

You could scrap IHT and have a gifts tax of receipt of inheritance and other gifts example. So the liability falls on the recipient.

IHT does involve double taxation but then so does pretty much all tax - you pay VAT out of taxed income for example.

I think there are significant issues with raising IHT in terms of incentives to work longer etc. But I also think there are issues with a tax system which relies so heavily on employment taxes which do, regardless of whether some people are willing to pay more, disincentivise work.

I wouldn't mind paying a few percentage points more income tax. Also; inheritance tax. My parents are not in the UK, and I know whatever I inherit from them will be subject to 20% tax. I'd have no issue if the UK also implemented a similar or more stringent inherit tax (which would affect DH and therefore me too).

Not exactly - we pay whatever marginal rate on earnings and than 40% of IHT on over 500k. Means if you're on higher (not even highest) tax band, out of every £ earned you pass 20p to your kids. More harsh IHT and people will start assessing how much they need to leave for remaining years and then resign early. What's the point in continuing working if this all goes to taxman?

I’m not sure which bit you are not understanding. Of course the amount is linked to earnings. However PP was asking why people don’t pay additional tax voluntarily (i.e. more than the amount that is linked to earnings). The analogy was therefore to voluntarily running an extra mile in a marathon.

Are you not in the uk? In the uk everyone does, and the actual amount is directly linked to your earnings,

You know, you can be proud of running a marathon, but still not want to run an additional mile by yourself at the end.

The idea is that everyone contributes.

What proportion of your income would you like to pay in tax?

Good for you. You do realise that you can pay additional voluntary tax to HMRC if you want? Off you go then. Or do you 'pay enough', like the rest of us???

I had a Tory at my door canvassing a few weeks back and he kept coming out with £2k figure and you will pay more tax under Labour.

When I said you say that like it’s a bad thing he didn’t know how to reply. It was quite an amusing conversation seeing him get all flustered as he couldn’t compute that there are people that are happy to pay tax as long as it’s used appropriately and not to pay off their mates

I always feel that it's a blessing to have a high income and to be able to pay tax.

Suppose it depends what your financial situation is, many people are paying a lot of tax but find themselves struggling and are frustrated when they slog it out to try and earn a bit more to make their life more comfortable to find after tax, childcare, communities and SLC they’re still struggling almost as much. Everyone’s situation is different and can imagine if you're not struggling, feel secure about your future, pension etc and doing work you enjoy doing regardless of the net income then you’ll not be so bothered

I am happy to pay tax, but in return I’d like a vote, access to public funds if needed, and access to NHS services without paying - none of which I have as a foreigner on a work visa.

Increasing VAT is generally avoided because it’s regressive in that low income people also pay it. Increasing VAT also lowers consumption.

Also Labour’s election pledge includes not increasing VAT other than on private schools.

If you look at the election pledges they have committed to not raising taxes on working people. That leaves it open to increase capital gains tax e.g to match income tax. However that won’t raise much as people have control over when they realise gains.

Labour did produce a policy paper about funding HMRC better. This seems really sensible as HMRC could collect a lot more tax if they were better resourced and have faced cuts recently. There is a lot of really good anti-avoidance law that they just can’t enforce. Or just taxpayers who have no idea that they even owe tax.

Personally I think a model where we mostly tax labour is not working well in the modern economy because hours worked is not really where wealth is generated any more. I think the main reason we emphasise taxing employment income so heavily is that it’s relatively easy to tax. You can receive a £500k windfall tax free from inheritance yet if you make that in salary you lose half. Inheritance taxes are controversial even on the left and also really hard to design so that they can’t be avoided. But in principle taxing inheritance more heavily could raise a huge amount of revenue and prevent wealth being entrenched over generations without hitting productivity in the way income taxes do.

You and others who are keen to have these inevitable tax rises which tax do you pay that you want to increase?

This is true.

I feel penalising people for working hard and saving is perverse. There will be a point when there just aren’t enough net contributors to sustain the massive state machine and it will fall regardless. Because most of the people who bore the financial burden of the ever expanding state will have either left the country or can’t be bothered anymore.

Of course there should be a safety bed for everyone but this isn’t how the system works now.

Penalising those who can see it coming for trying to secure their own future is immoral.

P.S. It’s likely that you were gatekept.

inevitable tax rises

Wasn't it there won’t be tax rises under Labour just a couple of days ago

Has that changed?

Yep, completely agree. We don’t fear the inevitable tax rises and are optimistic for public services for the first time in many years.

Well I am talking about 10 yrs ago when it happened but no I'm not going to ever allow myself.to think there is a safety.nrt for me from.the government despite paying my taxes. I've finally saved enough to cover me for 6 months if I ever lose my job again. Except.labour see anyone woth savings as rich even if those savings are a safety net

I'd pay more if I knew I was actually getting something for it.

It seems a cheek now that people may be paying less, but are then left to die because there are no ambulances.

You should be entitled to the ‘new style’ JSA if you’ve worked long enough. It’s contribution based. Perhaps you’ve been gatekept?

www.gov.uk/guidance/new-style-jobseekers-allowance