Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

to make complaint about ticket inspector who detained child and took their phone?

342 replies

SmellsLikeTeenSpirits · 04/07/2024 23:45

15 yo DD bought wrong train ticket today. She got off at stop after the one she'd bought ticket for because of a last minute change of plan with her friends. So a £2.70 journey rather than a £3 one.

At the final destination her and her friend were stopped by ticket inspector. They tried to explain what had happened and pay the excess. He wasn't having any of it. I can kind of sympathise with that.

What I would like your view on / experience of is this:

He detained them for 20 minutes. DD called me and was a bit shaken. I heard him say - you can't talk to your mum now - and then her phone went off. I tried calling and she messaged saying she'd call back in 5. He took her phone off her and went through her apps to try and prove she was over 15 (she looks 16 maybe - no older). In the end he accepted that she was in fact 15 and has written on the fine notice that he verified her age through her Vinted app. DD said she felt really uncomfortable as he went through her vinted page (where she is modelling some crop tops etc) and scrolled through the pictures. I got through to her again on the phone and asked her to put him on the phone but he refused.

Eventually he gave her a fine of £52 and let her go on her way.

Is this acceptable? Am I being unreasonable if I complain. I don't feel that an adult man should be detaining 15 year olds and confiscating their phones? She had the wrong ticket - just issue the fine if you need to?? Or am i being unreasonable - not having correct ticket is a crime - suck it up - the guy was just doing his job?

OP posts:
Nolongera · 05/07/2024 08:44

kittensinthekitchen · 05/07/2024 00:19

So did the train and all the passengers just sit for 20 minutes whilst he scrolled through her phone?

Are you sure you are hearing the whole truth about what happened?

This.

Bromptotoo · 05/07/2024 08:41

There us/was a man at Milton Keynes who routinely threatened people with arrest for getting cross about the machine that read the magnetic stripe on their season ticket swallowing it.

If this guy took DD's phone without her explicit consent he needs reporting.

faceid81 · 05/07/2024 08:40

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

faceid81 · 05/07/2024 08:40

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

RayonSunrise · 05/07/2024 08:37

Bedroomdilemmas113 · 05/07/2024 08:24

I’m going to say you don’t have the entirely full story.

I just don’t believe a ticket inspector said let me scroll your Vinted account. What I do believe is that he started from the POV of you are travelling on a child ticket and not a child AND you’ve gone a stop too far. And she’s panicked and heard not a child - and immediately wanted to prove that she is right. So suggested ways she could prove it, and this was Vinted etc. He should not have gone through it though, he should have said no, that’s not proof of age.

From my experience with my child, this is where panic takes over. Rationally, I asked him why on earth he didn’t just ask me to send a pic of his passport - but in the moment he wasn’t thinking clearly and panicked.

I say this from experience as very similar happened to my child (who was also 15 and not believed). They were very over zealous with him. They’re not allowed to speak to a parent on the phone for GDPR (again I know this as I happened to be really close as was picking him up at the station, so dashed to where they had detained him and asked these questions in person). At the time when I was on the end of the phone I was really panicked and couldn’t understand why they wouldn’t come to the phone - I thought they were being difficult but when I got there they were lovely and explained they could lose their job for it.

However, what I would challenge is - the fine will be an on the spot penalty. It’ll be the same whether you have no ticket/the wrong ticket.

So they already had the wrong ticket (went a station too far). He decided to be a jobsworth and issue a fine (you don’t have a leg to stand on with this as they did have the wrong ticket - where people tell you that inspector X let them away with it etc, that’s because inspector X was not a jobsworth, was a decent human but actually, from a job POV they actually didn’t do their job properly, and this inspector did). Therefore whether she was 15 or not (and the subsequent phone scrolling) is irrelevant.

If the fine was based on age alone, you could/he could argue that this was an attempt to verify age and therefore not fine her - fair enough (ish)? But he was fining her anyway so this is where I think you have grounds to say abuse of power/overstepping.

His counter argument would be the above, so you would in your complaint immediately debunk that theory by pointing out that the fine was being issued regardless.

He should have very calmly said - in future, please carry proof of your age. You could be fined for travelling on a child ticket if you cannot prove you are a child. However, because you are travelling on the wrong ticket, I am issuing you with a fine for that anyway - here you go. That would have saved the drama and panic and confusion.

You've made a lot of good points here, but unfortunately there are no incentives for ticket inspectors to NOT intimidate and belittle lone minors.

I've noticed that inspectors actually reign it in a bit if they're checking tickets on a crowded train because they have a lot of witnesses, and ironically they can be very polite-but-firm with a crowd of young men who've ALL tried dodging the correct fare because they know they need British Transport Police backup if anything escalates!

But on the platform with fewer witnesses, and with people they see are more vulnerable (like lone minors), too many ticket inspectors are all too willing to give into their worst impulses. They have zero incentive to improve on that and it seems little behavioural oversight.

Cops

faceid81 · 05/07/2024 08:36

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

faceid81 · 05/07/2024 08:36

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

SmellsLikeTeenSpirits · 05/07/2024 08:36

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Yes of course. If there was anything relevant to add based on that I would have included in original post?

OP posts:
faceid81 · 05/07/2024 08:35

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

Tracker1234 · 05/07/2024 08:32

Are you 100% certain this is the whole story? A ticket inspector grabbing her phone and scrolling through and finding pics of your daughter in skimpy clothes? All for 30p?

SmellsLikeTeenSpirits · 05/07/2024 08:32

Dontmesswithmyhead · 05/07/2024 08:27

And you verifying her age. Honestly OP that just makes you sound daft. Parents lie too!

I would have asked what they needed and offered to send photo of her passport - not (sadly) expected to be believed.

OP posts:
faceid81 · 05/07/2024 08:27

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

parkrun500club · 05/07/2024 08:27

AngeloMysterioso · 05/07/2024 00:52

IANAL but I’m pretty certain ticket inspectors do not have the legal authority to prevent anyone from making phone calls, and certainly not to confiscate a person’s phone and snoop through it. Even more so for a child.

No they don't. Many of them don't even work for the rail companies and are contracted to it from agencies. They have no authority at all, the most they can do is call the British Transport Police.

As for someone saying if they show humanity they aren't doing their jobs properly - there are inconsistencies anyway. Apparently I have to buy a ticket before I board a train, but if I buy it on the train the guard (not the same as a ticket inspector) gets commission. It all depends on whether my non-ticket is checked by a guard or a ticket inspector. The rules are ridiculous.

Dontmesswithmyhead · 05/07/2024 08:27

SmellsLikeTeenSpirits · 05/07/2024 08:13

DD was at the station not on the train. And I do believe her as (a) I heard him tell her she couldn’t talk to me (b) I heard him refuse to talk with me so I could verify age (c) I have the carbon copy of the fine where he has written ‘vinted’ as age verification. He’s also ticked ‘no ticket’ on the form rather than the ‘travel beyond validity’ box. Also DD is not a liar generally - she’s a crier if you know what I mean.

And you verifying her age. Honestly OP that just makes you sound daft. Parents lie too!

Dontmesswithmyhead · 05/07/2024 08:26

SmellsLikeTeenSpirits · 05/07/2024 08:13

DD was at the station not on the train. And I do believe her as (a) I heard him tell her she couldn’t talk to me (b) I heard him refuse to talk with me so I could verify age (c) I have the carbon copy of the fine where he has written ‘vinted’ as age verification. He’s also ticked ‘no ticket’ on the form rather than the ‘travel beyond validity’ box. Also DD is not a liar generally - she’s a crier if you know what I mean.

Oh give over, everyone will fib to save their skin.

Lesson learned, don’t steel by not paying for what you take. That’s what she did, whether it was a ‘mistake’ or not.

Bedroomdilemmas113 · 05/07/2024 08:24

I’m going to say you don’t have the entirely full story.

I just don’t believe a ticket inspector said let me scroll your Vinted account. What I do believe is that he started from the POV of you are travelling on a child ticket and not a child AND you’ve gone a stop too far. And she’s panicked and heard not a child - and immediately wanted to prove that she is right. So suggested ways she could prove it, and this was Vinted etc. He should not have gone through it though, he should have said no, that’s not proof of age.

From my experience with my child, this is where panic takes over. Rationally, I asked him why on earth he didn’t just ask me to send a pic of his passport - but in the moment he wasn’t thinking clearly and panicked.

I say this from experience as very similar happened to my child (who was also 15 and not believed). They were very over zealous with him. They’re not allowed to speak to a parent on the phone for GDPR (again I know this as I happened to be really close as was picking him up at the station, so dashed to where they had detained him and asked these questions in person). At the time when I was on the end of the phone I was really panicked and couldn’t understand why they wouldn’t come to the phone - I thought they were being difficult but when I got there they were lovely and explained they could lose their job for it.

However, what I would challenge is - the fine will be an on the spot penalty. It’ll be the same whether you have no ticket/the wrong ticket.

So they already had the wrong ticket (went a station too far). He decided to be a jobsworth and issue a fine (you don’t have a leg to stand on with this as they did have the wrong ticket - where people tell you that inspector X let them away with it etc, that’s because inspector X was not a jobsworth, was a decent human but actually, from a job POV they actually didn’t do their job properly, and this inspector did). Therefore whether she was 15 or not (and the subsequent phone scrolling) is irrelevant.

If the fine was based on age alone, you could/he could argue that this was an attempt to verify age and therefore not fine her - fair enough (ish)? But he was fining her anyway so this is where I think you have grounds to say abuse of power/overstepping.

His counter argument would be the above, so you would in your complaint immediately debunk that theory by pointing out that the fine was being issued regardless.

He should have very calmly said - in future, please carry proof of your age. You could be fined for travelling on a child ticket if you cannot prove you are a child. However, because you are travelling on the wrong ticket, I am issuing you with a fine for that anyway - here you go. That would have saved the drama and panic and confusion.

faceid81 · 05/07/2024 08:23

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

SmellsLikeTeenSpirits · 05/07/2024 08:13

kittensinthekitchen · 05/07/2024 00:19

So did the train and all the passengers just sit for 20 minutes whilst he scrolled through her phone?

Are you sure you are hearing the whole truth about what happened?

DD was at the station not on the train. And I do believe her as (a) I heard him tell her she couldn’t talk to me (b) I heard him refuse to talk with me so I could verify age (c) I have the carbon copy of the fine where he has written ‘vinted’ as age verification. He’s also ticked ‘no ticket’ on the form rather than the ‘travel beyond validity’ box. Also DD is not a liar generally - she’s a crier if you know what I mean.

OP posts:
Dontmesswithmyhead · 05/07/2024 08:10

lemonmeringueno3 · 05/07/2024 08:07

Surely he just stopped her and, when she insisted she was under 16 (they all say that!), he asked for proof and she opened Vinted and handed him her phone?

The alternative is that she couldn't prove it and she'd have been dealt with as 16+

Did he really scroll through her photos, or was she just aware that the photos were on there when she showed him her account info?

I can't help feeling sceptical. I teach kids that age and am often shocked at their skewed perception.

If he really did 'detain her' and forced her into unlocking her phone for him, and scrolled through her photos, then yes of course complain.

This.

Your DD is unfortunately getting the brunt of the manner in which fare dodgers behave.

I’ve heard them and they are full of crap as they slowly get caught out in all their lies.

RayonSunrise · 05/07/2024 08:09

lemonmeringueno3 · 05/07/2024 05:28

I know someone who does that job. She sees hundreds of people each week who 'got off at the wrong stop for a very legitimate reason' and most of them say they're under 16 for a more lenient response.

The losses are huge and there's an obligation to other passengers to try to tackle it imo.

I'm assuming she did actually want to prove that she was under 16, and preferred the outcome that arose as a result of doing so?

So if he snatched her phone against her will and forced the passcode out of her then that's not ok, but if he asked for proof of age and she said she had an app that could prove it, opened the app and handed it to him, then that's ok I think.

What's the alternative? Just believing her, or treating her as an adult I guess.

The train companies can run their own prosecutions, like the Post Office. They abuse the power, like the Post Office, as demonstrated by ticket inspectors acting as though they actually are police.

Your friend might want to start a little careful arse-covering now, just in case a bit of Post Office backlash comes to the train companies. It would be better to treat people fairly than end up the person in front of an inquiry tearfully saying you thought it was your job to bully and detain minors.

lemonmeringueno3 · 05/07/2024 08:07

Surely he just stopped her and, when she insisted she was under 16 (they all say that!), he asked for proof and she opened Vinted and handed him her phone?

The alternative is that she couldn't prove it and she'd have been dealt with as 16+

Did he really scroll through her photos, or was she just aware that the photos were on there when she showed him her account info?

I can't help feeling sceptical. I teach kids that age and am often shocked at their skewed perception.

If he really did 'detain her' and forced her into unlocking her phone for him, and scrolled through her photos, then yes of course complain.

faceid81 · 05/07/2024 08:07

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

SmellsLikeTeenSpirits · 05/07/2024 08:06

MistressoftheDarkSide · 05/07/2024 00:01

Also even when dealing with the police minors can't be grilled without a responsible adult present, so stopping your DD from speaking with you is absolutely over-reach in his position. The more I think about this the crosser I'm getting.

I’m with you. Took DDs call at work and my anger slowly escalated during day. To Yh point where I had to come on hear for a sense check! And everyone’s been really helpful.

OP posts:
Squareplate · 05/07/2024 08:06

You should complain, but make sure you have the facts straight. DD has just been issued a big fine due to her own mistake, it's possible she may be exaggerating? Maybe not, but make sure you're not going to look stupid. The inspector was probably wearing a bodycam..

Also make sure you're complaining about the right things. He was correct to challenge someone without the correct ticket. He absolutely shouldn't have taken her phone, but did she have an eticket, so he did need to look at it? If he did look through her phone, that's enough, it doesn't matter what he looked at and the crop tops are a red herring.

Talk to the friend, but if it's as it seems, yes definitely complain. I'd consider police too.

Cycleaway · 05/07/2024 08:06

Initially I thought maybe he was having a bad day and your daughter got the brunt of it, but the point at which he knowingly prevented a minor from speaking to their parent, and thus didn’t shake him out of his power trip..it’s extremely worrying. His behaviour was completely disproportionate to the 30p mistake your daughter and her friend made, and extremely inappropriate. I agree with people who have suggested contacting the police, as it’s such an overstretch of what would have been the expected response. I fear if you just contact the train company you might just get fobbed off, and actually this behaviour is a complete abuse of his (very insignificant) power.