Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this is an immature approach to voting?

139 replies

foreverstardust · 04/07/2024 12:24

I asked my colleague if she’s voting after work and she replied no “because I’m not informed enough to make a decision”, I politely told her to educate herself as this is a lazy view to have. Not as bluntly as that obviously.

OP posts:
godmum56 · 04/07/2024 14:02

I have said this before. My late beloved Dad used to say "If you don't vote, don't moan"

Obki · 04/07/2024 13:58

I’m an educated professional and I don’t feel sure either so I don’t blame her.

I don’t want to vote Tory due to the sleaze and racism.
I don’t want to vote Labour due to their stance on women’s rights and lack of support for Palestine (and also worried about tax hikes as a higher rate tax payer)
Libdems weren’t any better when they were in shared power with Tories (Vince Cable refusing to meet the sub-postmasters in the Post Offuce scandal was disgusting).
A vote for the greens feels like a wasted vote.

So I’ll either spoil my ballot or not vote.

AmelieTaylor · 04/07/2024 13:58

Fink · 04/07/2024 12:37

I'd rather people abstained from voting if they don't have a clue what's going on, rather than voting without research. Obviously getting clued up and voting accordingly is the ideal. But in a less than ideal world, I think it might be better if the uninformed stayed home.

@Fink
me too. If people don't engage with it all, I'd rather they didn't sway the vote ( one can
only hope they all balance out)

Jutemat · 04/07/2024 13:55

Theres no obligation to be clued up at all. Just place a tick in whose box you like the best. Reform always looks good.

TinyYellow · 04/07/2024 13:54

@Applescruffel yes, or that!

Applescruffel · 04/07/2024 13:53

TinyYellow · 04/07/2024 13:51

YABU. I wish more people had recognised that they weren’t informed enough to vote in the brexit referendum.

I just wish we'd never been given that stupid referendum in the first place

earlymorningcurlewcall · 04/07/2024 13:53

She should spoil her ballot if she doesn't want to vote for a candidate. Let them know that nothing was suitable, rather than just fading into the background.

TinyYellow · 04/07/2024 13:51

YABU. I wish more people had recognised that they weren’t informed enough to vote in the brexit referendum.

VolvoFan · 04/07/2024 13:47

Some people are too tired, pissed off or apathetic about politics. If they don't want to vote, don't chastise them.

Jutemat · 04/07/2024 13:46

Just vote for anybody. Its not as if everyone else is clued up.

Voterswung · 04/07/2024 13:46

I'm blunt and I probably wouldn't tell you either.

Fink · 04/07/2024 13:45

tamade · 04/07/2024 13:19

I know but I’d feel like it is not my place

Fair enough. I think it depends a lot on individual circumstances. I lived abroad for a while but always knew I would come back, and wasn't eligible to vote in the country I lived in, so I continued to vote in the UK.

Triffid1 · 04/07/2024 13:45

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 04/07/2024 13:39

Exactly. We are very used to not giving our views on sensitive or controversial issues. It's just part of the job.

My school did, what I now suspect was a conscious experiment based on the fact that this was mid 90s in South Africa so a difficult time where the reality that the history and "facts" we'd all been taught was often a load of bollocks.

We were studying the French Revolution. As it turned out, one class was learning about the French Revolution in a manner biased towards the Revolution, and the other class was learning about it in a manner biased towards the nobility. It was very interesting and as students we were completely shocked to discover the differences when we were brought together for study groups.

Having said that, I think it's ridiculous not to want to teach politics in case of bias. Over the course of their school career children will engage with dozens teachers of different types of background and political leanings. Plus, as others have said, teachers are trained to provide learning that is as unbiased as possible and that encourages children to come to their own conclusions or to access sources of different types.

Libre2 · 04/07/2024 13:44

GasPanic · 04/07/2024 13:10

Sounds more like a good case for why the voting age should be lowered to me.

He takes an interest. What more is there to it ?

Because he is very, very dogmatic in his views and thinks Farage would be a viable PM. In fairness he articulates himself well (both DS and Farage!) but we talked about and he doesn’t think the voting age should be lowered either.

RainbowZebraWarrior · 04/07/2024 13:44

IdLikeToBeAFraser · 04/07/2024 13:31

So the answer is just not to teach it? That's completely batshit. For a start, some bias in teaching is expected and is found in every subject pretty much, particlarly any broadly in the arts/humanities section. But good schools, and good teachers can compensate for this to a large extent AND it can be mitigated by engaging with different teachers and subject matter over a longer period.

@RainbowZebraWarrior This is what I was trying to explain in my earlier post. Some people are just so bloody scared of receiving "biased" information, they'll just avoid any information at all.

You've hit the nail on the head in your last post about mistrust. That's definitely what I feel I'm seeing.

Education, also is very clearly a factor.

As a kid in the 1970s / 80s I was encouraged to debate politics and listened intently to what my family discussed. That is not to say that I went on to share or parrot their views. I made up my own mind. I feel that this open debate encouraged my own curiosity and desire to learn and understand more.

Likewise, at school I was treated like an adult from around 14 onwards. Teachers would delight in getting us kids to debate an engage our brains. I remember this nit just in subjects like English, but in History and Religious Studies, too. (Our RS ones were particularly heated, and are very much still relatable)

There were relatives I respected. There were teachers I respected. What I took from all of it, though was not their views, but the fact that they were happy to discuss, share and listen to opinions. It really is something I feel is imperative at such an age.

Forming opinions and having the courage of our own convictions is something we apply to all aspects of our lives as adults. It's such an important factor in education.

notnorman · 04/07/2024 13:43

I have had to cover politics in PSHE lessons in the past.
I'm not sure that anyone listened or was vaguely interested though.
But it was on the curriculum to be taught.

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 04/07/2024 13:39

SharonEllis · 04/07/2024 13:37

Not a properly trained teacher.

Exactly. We are very used to not giving our views on sensitive or controversial issues. It's just part of the job.

SharonEllis · 04/07/2024 13:37

CantDealwithChristmas · 04/07/2024 13:31

The problem with that is that some people are so steeped in political bias that they don't even realise they're still spekaing, thinking or debating from a place of bias.

Not a properly trained teacher.

AllProperTeaIsTheft · 04/07/2024 13:35

@MrsTartanTeacosy problem with that is it could easily be biased to whatever the teacher’s or school’s political leanings are. i just don’t trust it can be taught well and taught neutrally

Well people have to trust that teachers aren't brainwashing their students the rest of the time (e.g. in RS or PSHE lessons, or history, which involves politics), so I don't see why it would be any different for teaching politics. Not that we have time in the curriculum, or the trained teachers to deliver it...

Megifer · 04/07/2024 13:34

Did you actually speak to your colleague like that? I'd have told you to piss off.

Applescruffel · 04/07/2024 13:33

Yes, it's immature and she needs to grow up.

But she won't, and no doubt she will continue to moan about things as we all do, only she will have passed up her chance to do something about it.

CantDealwithChristmas · 04/07/2024 13:31

SharonEllis · 04/07/2024 13:25

I don't see why not. A decent teacher who believes in democracy should be able to be neutral. I'm a lefty through & through but I challenge my children in discussion & often put right wing positions to them so they develop their political & debatings skills & knowledge. In this context things like our voting system, history of democracy etc can absolutely be taught neutrally and I think they should be. The idea that democracy only works if we participate should be part of our national identity imo.

The problem with that is that some people are so steeped in political bias that they don't even realise they're still spekaing, thinking or debating from a place of bias.

IdLikeToBeAFraser · 04/07/2024 13:31

motherofbabydragon · 04/07/2024 12:33

@MrsTartanTeacosy problem with that is it could easily be biased to whatever the teacher’s or school’s political leanings are. i just don’t trust it can be taught well and taught neutrally

So the answer is just not to teach it? That's completely batshit. For a start, some bias in teaching is expected and is found in every subject pretty much, particlarly any broadly in the arts/humanities section. But good schools, and good teachers can compensate for this to a large extent AND it can be mitigated by engaging with different teachers and subject matter over a longer period.

@RainbowZebraWarrior This is what I was trying to explain in my earlier post. Some people are just so bloody scared of receiving "biased" information, they'll just avoid any information at all.

CantDealwithChristmas · 04/07/2024 13:30

GasPanic · 04/07/2024 13:23

I think the description I have heard that I agree with most is :

"Democracy is an extremely imperfect system. Unfortunately we have yet to come up with anything better".

I don't think there are that many new ideas in politics. Just the old ones recycled again and again, or re labelled with new trendy terms.

Yup. Often attributed to Churchill. And AN Wilson. Whoever said it, I agree with them!

IdLikeToBeAFraser · 04/07/2024 13:28

RainbowZebraWarrior · 04/07/2024 13:22

That said, there is a myriad of information about the parties, the candidates, at everyone’s fingertips. In that context, her response is massively depressing; she might as well say, I can’t be arsed to find anything out.

This is interesting, because from 1923 onwards, voting turnout was roughly between 70 to 80% (fluctuating between 71.1 and 83.9%)

Voter turnout was at its highest in the 1950s.

From the year 2000, it dropped to 59% With the exception of the Referendum, it's been languishing at sixty odd percent. So in the past 20 years - the years of technology - it has dropped. The years whereby all the information is, indeed, at our fingertips.

Are people less engaged? Is there too much information out there? Has 24/7 news and Internet dulled our senses? Do younger people just feel disconnected, or are there too many other distractions? Do people just think "what's the point?" (there's been a rise in mental health issues during the same time period)

It could be a combination of all these things and more. It's sad to see, though.

Life has definitely become way more complicated.

I think often people are paralysed by indecision because there is so much info so they don't even know how to go to find what they need. And there's so muchmistrust of the media that even just watching a few news broadcasts or reading a few MSM newspapers feels fraught.

To be fair, spend 10 seconds on MN even and there's half a dozen threads talking about how "terrifying" a labour government is as an idea and another half dozen with people completely shocked and horrified anyone would ever vote conservative again. etc etc.

Swipe left for the next trending thread