Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Wfh during summer hols with young children

132 replies

Jeannie88 · 03/07/2024 23:13

At what age do you think being able to properly wfh can be done while looking after your children? Just curious as a few friends in whattsapp group. Some say it's fine as 5, 6, 7 year olds can amuse themselves, others say their 5/6/7 year olds need constant attention. The debate is should they put them into nursery, holiday clubs etc. They do have the luxury of parents being able to help and take them out, so not all day every day having to parent.

Personally, I have responded with alternating days, so a child free day get lots done, next day less. I did also point out that those who don't wfh have no choice and need to rely on childcare or family help if lucky to have it.

For those who have partners who wfh as well it can be managed but when DP out at work it's difficult and stressful.

What do you think would be the best option? I would find it taxing to wfh and look after DC and would certainly consider some days of childcare and willing to pay for it, even 2 or 3 days a week, or full steam working and take DC out on the evening and weekends for fresh air and exercise.

It's not easy these days with both parents working during holidays 😕

OP posts:
New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Yerroblemom1923 · 12/07/2024 18:16

Whst @allthemiddlechildrenoftheworld said about wfh.

metellaestinatrio · 06/07/2024 11:39

11 probably. My older two are 8 and 5 and I can do bits and pieces with them around, but (1) screens, which I hate, are the only way to reliably keep them quiet, and (2) my work involves quite a bit of concentration, so being interrupted for snacks / drinks / to referee fights is annoying. It’s fine when they’ve been to a club that finishes at 3, as I use the club time to get the most important work done and finish up admin stuff when they’re home - a couple of hours’ TV for them after five hours of sport is fine.

I can see having the occasional “chill” screen time day for them while you wfh but that can’t be a solution for primary aged kids for most of the holidays.

HauntedPencil · 05/07/2024 10:02

Obviously during Covid we all had to do what we could without any childcare so that was different I don't think we can compare that now as all the options are back

HauntedPencil · 05/07/2024 10:00

I do think it depends on the child.

I used a mix of camps and clubs and leave to 11 with the odd day with them at home. I can wfh with them but only if they sit and watch tv or go on tablets all day basically which I don't feel is fair to them for the whole holidays so I try to only have a few "chill" days like these over the break

Sometimes there are free or very cheap clubs & things they can go to for just a come of hours to get them out of the house/

Also depends on your job, mine needs a lot of concentration and focus or if you can get away with dipping in and out.

MaryShelley1818 · 05/07/2024 07:21

I think it's totally child dependent.
We have DS6 and DD3. Couldn't wfh with DD unless absolutely an emergency.
DS however is extremely independent and able to amuse himself. I think during the entire 6.5wks we have 4 days where me/DH will wfh while he's home, he'll watch movies, play on his Switch, build Lego, play with his toys, read books, colour. I can sit on the sofa with my laptop and easily work while he does this. I also know though he's quite unusual to be able to do this.
I think 4 days lazing about with the other 35 out and about doing lots of fun activities is reasonable.

1AngelicFruitCake · 05/07/2024 07:12

In Covid I worked out of the house one day a week and my husband was suddenly WFH with a 4 and 6 year old on the day I wasn’t there. He’d have 2 hour meetings and they’d just get on and play, I used to leave snacks out and activities. I know how hard they found it on the days I wasn’t there and dad was busy most of the day. I think wfh with children can only work for short bursts of an hour or so.

NewName24 · 05/07/2024 00:33

Singleandproud · 03/07/2024 23:21

My work state that you can only have children 10 and above in the house if you are the person 'supervising'. Children younger than this need to go to childcare just like they would if you are in the office.

When getting perspective on topics like this I think it's useful to think about how you would feel and why if someone other than you put your child in that scenario IE if a teacher or childminder left a child mostly unsupervised for several hours in a row over a matter of weeks. Most would be very unhappy if there child was left to their own devices just for the day.

Excellent post.

Obviously it depends on a combination of the individual child, and what your job entails. There will be a few children at 10 who would be fine, there will be others at 11 or 12 who still need more supervision.

If it is a 'one off' one day, that is very different from 5 days a week x 6 weeks.

jannier · 04/07/2024 18:20

Rhubarblin · 03/07/2024 23:36

I'm very impressed by those with 4/5 year old who could manage this.
DD2 is 6 and I can barely write one email. (She does have SEN though)
I think DD1 (no SEN) could've managed me WFH from about 8.
I mostly work term time so all hypothetical.

Not sure impressed is the right word poor kids.

SouthLondonMum22 · 04/07/2024 18:03

Cosycover · 04/07/2024 17:56

Not necessarily true. Depends on the child. When my youngest was 4 he wanted to be at home. He hated nursery.

I imagine he wanted to be at home with a parent who can give him attention though, not at home with a parent who has to ignore him for most of the day because they are working.

Ponderingwindow · 04/07/2024 18:01

The first summer we had dd home she was 10yo and it was because of Covid. It was not good. We muddled through because like everyone else, we had no other options.

we started using holiday camps again at age 12, though at that point it wasn’t so much child care as just to have her not be bored. We mostly did every other week. we did that for ages 12 and 13

young children need to be in child care. Your work deserves your full focus and your children deserve attention as well.

the sexism that women can manage to work and care for children simultaneously is appalling. It is sexism because it is almost always women put in this position.

Cosycover · 04/07/2024 17:56

MightWusk · 04/07/2024 07:11

That's really unfair to a 4 year old.

Not necessarily true. Depends on the child. When my youngest was 4 he wanted to be at home. He hated nursery.

SouthLondonMum22 · 04/07/2024 17:52

At my company, anyone found to not have childcare for children primary aged and younger would face consequences. It's company policy.

maw1681 · 04/07/2024 17:48

My youngest is 9 and this is the first summer I've felt like I could fully WFH with her there. I won't though because it's not fair on her - will share care with DH, grandparents and me.
In the past I have done a lighter day 2 days a week then made up the time the other 3 days while she's with grandparents

Epicaricacy · 04/07/2024 16:17

Ozanj · 04/07/2024 15:21

I earn £130k for a full time, fully remote job, that gives me 3 days a week off and is fairly family friendly. So we have a lot of quality time. I’m not about to switch to part time or become a housewife to meet other (mainly white women’) views of what mothers should be like.

you are free to meet non-white women you know?

As a £130k fully remote job is more than enough to afford childcare, that's a non-issue for you, so what are you whinging about?

CoffeeCakeAndALattePlease · 04/07/2024 15:47

Depending on the child I’d say somewhere around 9 or 10. DD8 still interrupts and moans about being bored which is very distracting. DS5 there is no chance - holiday club finishes at 4 so the last hour I spend on admin only with no meetings but even that is hard!

WindsurfingDreams · 04/07/2024 15:44

Ozanj · 04/07/2024 15:21

I earn £130k for a full time, fully remote job, that gives me 3 days a week off and is fairly family friendly. So we have a lot of quality time. I’m not about to switch to part time or become a housewife to meet other (mainly white women’) views of what mothers should be like.

No one is suggesting you become a housewife or indeed that you reduce your hours at all

NineToFiveish · 04/07/2024 15:32

Ozanj · 04/07/2024 15:21

I earn £130k for a full time, fully remote job, that gives me 3 days a week off and is fairly family friendly. So we have a lot of quality time. I’m not about to switch to part time or become a housewife to meet other (mainly white women’) views of what mothers should be like.

What's with the casual racism there?

Beezknees · 04/07/2024 15:26

Ozanj · 04/07/2024 15:21

I earn £130k for a full time, fully remote job, that gives me 3 days a week off and is fairly family friendly. So we have a lot of quality time. I’m not about to switch to part time or become a housewife to meet other (mainly white women’) views of what mothers should be like.

I don't think people are suggesting becoming a housewife but putting him in childcare while you work?

Ozanj · 04/07/2024 15:21

LadyFeatheringt0n · 03/07/2024 23:25

DS is 4 and he often just plays while I wfh. During the holidays I wfh downstairs so I can keep an eye on him.

This is a bit sad. Either he isn't get the attention he deserves or your job isnt.

I earn £130k for a full time, fully remote job, that gives me 3 days a week off and is fairly family friendly. So we have a lot of quality time. I’m not about to switch to part time or become a housewife to meet other (mainly white women’) views of what mothers should be like.

Hmmmm2018 · 04/07/2024 15:19

Really depends on the job you are doing and the child. If it is a job that can be done at any point in the day with no need for specific meetings and time specific things you could probably do this with an 9 year old. If you are having to work strictly to a traditional 9 to 5 time frame then I think 11 or 12. Even then is a bit rubbish for the child if it is everyday.

SatinHeart · 04/07/2024 14:36

Most people also have to use their annual leave to cover school holidays. If there are two parents this is usually at least 50 days between them

DH and I get 60 days between us. 13 weeks of school holidays a year + 5 teacher training days = 70 days. So that's a minimum of 10 more days to find, if we didn't spend any of our annual leave together for the whole year. Then there's teacher strikes, child illness, snow closures, early finish at the end of term and whatever else on top.

As pp have said, holiday clubs are great but the hours are often short, spaces are limited and they will take your money but then won't take your DC if they are unwell/have SEN/hate it there.

Yes it's really not good to wfh with children around but it's not hard to see why poeple end up doing it.

MightyGoldBear · 04/07/2024 13:49

NicoleSkidman · 04/07/2024 12:00

Are there really no holiday clubs that do full days? That seems very unusual.

Most people also have to use their annual leave to cover school holidays. If there are two parents this is usually at least 50 days between them.

The football one does 9 to 3 but most are a range of unhelpful times and not everyday mon-friday. Depends on your annual leave but even 50 days isn't covering all the school holidays plus anything extra life throws up appointments/broken bones/lllness. Its all such a stressful struggle I'm baffled why its still like this it seems so outdated.

watchuswreckthemic · 04/07/2024 13:13

I don't think you can work from home effectively in the 13 weeks of school holidays with children under secondary age.
I know childcare is expensive but it's needed.
I had to wfh with my 2 during covid and quite frankly it was a bloody nightmare for me that I've still never caught up with.

Goldbar · 04/07/2024 12:51

I think siblings increase rather than decrease the need for supervision as they're a major source of injury and arguments.

LindorDoubleChoc · 04/07/2024 12:46

It's not fair to keep young children cooped up all day. I definitely wouldn't do a full time job wfh and look after children, at all.