Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask if its fair that inclusivity has excluded my DC from their hobby?

341 replies

DImplesandCheese · 26/06/2024 13:43

TLDR: ND child is causing my DC to quit much loved hobby as ND child's behaviour is ruining it for them.

Full Story: DC (13) attended a hobby/club and has done for years. 2 years ago a new child joined. The child is ND and their particular behaviours include shouting out, not listening, inappropriate use of kit and refusal to fully participate in activities. DC has complained on and off since this child joined that it is spoiling it. I have encouraged DC to be understanding and supportive, I have spoken with the staff at the club to ask if more support for this child can be put in place. Nothing has changed.

Part of the club involves some unsupervised time and this is DC's favourite part of the club. The last two unsupervised sessions have been completely ruined by this child's behaviour, the group have had to call staff for help to sort it out and therefore their final result for the session has been effected. 2 months ago after the last ones of these sessions I spoke with staff and asked why this child doesn't have a 1 to 1 support/parent staying with them as this is hugely effecting everyone else's enjoyment and I was told that my DC is exaggerating and 'fixating' on this child.

DC came home last night as said he's quitting. This child has wrecked the night's activity again. I spoke to the staff and was told that they 'are an inclusive club and they pride themselves in being open to all' and hinted that DC leaving may well be for the best if he's not happy.

I have 2 ND DC, I get the difficulties, I get that they should have access to clubs and activities, I get that allowances need to be made for their behaviour. I am in no way suggesting the child should be kicked out but surely if you have children leaving because of another child then the support in place for that child isn't right?

AIBU to think that more should be done to support this child correctly so DC can continue to enjoy their hobby and that my DC having to leave is not an acceptable situation?

OP posts:
PardonMee · 27/06/2024 05:11

The club is at fault here for dismissing your son’s experience and failing to meet the ND child’s needs. It’s much easier to point the finger at your son and ignore any havoc during sessions, much harder to acknowledge your sons experience and monitor the free play time.

TealPoet · 27/06/2024 04:50

Haven’t RTFT so I apologise if I’m just repeating. This is ridiculous for the club to use ‘inclusivity’ as an excuse in this way.

If the activities aren’t something the child can/wants to engage with, no amount of ‘inclusion’ will help. If they do want to be there, inclusivity surely means providing the resources required to actually *be included, which by the sound of it means 1to1 support.

Learning to be patient and kind with people who are ND is obviously important, but it’s not your child’s job to act as staff.

BruFord · 27/06/2024 01:58

@Twototwo15 Yes, I think the children need more guidance.

Twototwo15 · 27/06/2024 01:18

DImplesandCheese · 26/06/2024 21:14

My DC know all about reasonable adjustments - they no longer sing or whistle while DC1 is at home. They don’t get to go first at anything (meals, getting in car, walking along a path). They have to do chores while DC1 does not. They have to stop what they are saying if DC1 needs to talk - and that list is just what’s happened in the last hour. My NT DC are amazing at accommodating. but there is a difference between accommodating and allowing complete disruption.

Why can’t your NT son occasionally get to go first at anything? It sounds as if you accommodate all of your ND child’s wants and needs above your NT son but expect another person’s ND child to fit in perfectly.
Also, do the group activities have to be done with each person doing an individual bit or could all bits be done by any of the group, which would mean if the ND child didn’t want to, or couldn’t do his bit, someone else could?

fliptopbin · 27/06/2024 00:58

Well if the esteemed Rishi or Nigel get their way, we'll be out of the ECHR and that means we we can scrap the Equalities Act, and people can then ban those pesky noisy disabled people from public life.
Thankfully, this looks very unlikely.

BruFord · 27/06/2024 00:23

Sniffle555 · 26/06/2024 22:18

Says who? One child.He’s doing it at his level.

@Sniffle555 It sounds as if the other children are under the impression that these activities have to be completed as a group, and that the rest of them can’t complete them if one child refuses to participate.

It may be as simple as explaining to the children that if X decides not to join in the scavenger hunt, don’t worry about it, you’re still allowed to do it.

MisterMagnolia · 26/06/2024 22:51

I think that it depends upon whether you have to pay a reasonable amount for your DS hobby or whether it is a charity, run by volunteers. If this is Scouts, then i actually think that you are being very unreasonable. I volunteer at brownies and the commitment is enormous. There is so much planning, so much red tape, forms after forms and risk assessments. It is like a full time job being a guiding or scouting volunteer. So, if my hunch is right, you are highly unreasonable to expect there to be additional volunteers there to assist this child, unless of course you are happy to volunteer to provide that assistance yourself and assuming that the ND child would benefit from the additional help, rather than being able to benefit from a degree of independence.

If you are paying a lot of money (not just subs), then i would take your money elsewhere.

BobLemon · 26/06/2024 22:44

People got crazy butt hurt about an imaginary Knit and Natter group 😟

I hope your DS finds an alternative hobby, OP.

Sniffle555 · 26/06/2024 22:18

AndSoFinally · 26/06/2024 21:50

Being included isn't being "prioritised". Adjustments aren't favourtism

But there aren't any adjustments, that's the whole point. The ND child is being expected to manage at the same level as the NT children, and he can't do it. That's the problem

Says who? One child.He’s doing it at his level.

DImplesandCheese · 26/06/2024 21:53

AndSoFinally · 26/06/2024 21:50

Being included isn't being "prioritised". Adjustments aren't favourtism

But there aren't any adjustments, that's the whole point. The ND child is being expected to manage at the same level as the NT children, and he can't do it. That's the problem

Thank you, that is the point.

OP posts:
BruFord · 26/06/2024 21:50

Sniffle555 · 26/06/2024 21:44

I’ve done hoards of scavenger hunts. Plenty of kids with or without SEN or NT go off the route. They’re kids not robots.

@Sniffle555 With support, the child does participate in group activities, though. Without support, the activity falls apart. What are the other 13-year-olds supposed to do? Genuine question, I’m not sure.

AndSoFinally · 26/06/2024 21:50

Being included isn't being "prioritised". Adjustments aren't favourtism

But there aren't any adjustments, that's the whole point. The ND child is being expected to manage at the same level as the NT children, and he can't do it. That's the problem

WaitingForMojo · 26/06/2024 21:45

Other posters have made very valid points about conflicting needs. One person’s need for quiet conflicting with another’s need to stim, for example. It absolutely can be challenging to accommodate both.

Sniffle555 · 26/06/2024 21:44

BruFord · 26/06/2024 21:42

@Sniffle555 Yes, the child is capable of participating in activities with appropriate support. The OP gave the example of the scavenger hunt:
They will refuse to continue the route until staff are called.

The child needs support and they’re not getting it. If the other 13-year-olds are expected to provide the appropriate support, they need to be shown how to do this, they’re children, they don’t know what to do when X refuses to participate. If they try and it doesn’t work, the adults need to step in.

Edited

I’ve done hoards of scavenger hunts. Plenty of kids with or without SEN or NT go off the route. They’re kids not robots.

WaitingForMojo · 26/06/2024 21:44

Errors · 26/06/2024 16:25

Haven’t RTFT but surely, the point of equity and inclusivity is to give ND children additional support so they can perform/engage at as close a rate as possible to their NT peers?
It seems the attitude is that it should be the other way around. That NT children have to change the way they engage instead. This doesn’t feel like a good solution at a societal level!

No, that isn’t the point of inclusivity at all. It isn’t to make disabled people behave as though they weren’t disabled as far as possible!

The point in inclusivity is to enable everyone to participate in the way that suits them.

I’m sure you don’t mean it to be, but this really is quite an ableist perspective.

BruFord · 26/06/2024 21:42

Sniffle555 · 26/06/2024 20:25

Who says this child isn’t capable? 1 child. The organisers disagree.

@Sniffle555 Yes, the child is capable of participating in activities with appropriate support. The OP gave the example of the scavenger hunt:
They will refuse to continue the route until staff are called.

The child needs support and they’re not getting it. If the other 13-year-olds are expected to provide the appropriate support, they need to be shown how to do this, they’re children, they don’t know what to do when X refuses to participate. If they try and it doesn’t work, the adults need to step in.

DImplesandCheese · 26/06/2024 21:42

It’s nothing to do with ‘not liking losing’. DC is frustrated that they cannot complete activities because of this child’s behaviour and the staff are not doing anything to change that. Not occasionally, this is every time they do bigger activities.

OP posts:
Sniffle555 · 26/06/2024 21:31

DImplesandCheese · 26/06/2024 21:14

My DC know all about reasonable adjustments - they no longer sing or whistle while DC1 is at home. They don’t get to go first at anything (meals, getting in car, walking along a path). They have to do chores while DC1 does not. They have to stop what they are saying if DC1 needs to talk - and that list is just what’s happened in the last hour. My NT DC are amazing at accommodating. but there is a difference between accommodating and allowing complete disruption.

“Complete disruption”- we only have a 13 year old who doesn’t like losing saying that. You’re not even there.

WaitingForMojo · 26/06/2024 21:29

blacksax · 26/06/2024 14:16

Seems from what the OP has said, that this child is being extremely disruptive and does not have a 1-1 support or other staff member with them to supervise, or prevent them from spoiling things for the other kids.

That is not fair on the other children. They should not have to tolerate someone else ruining their club evenings. The ND child should not be left to run amok, which is what is happening at the moment.

I didn’t get that from the OP at all. It didn’t sound to me as though the other child was being ‘extremely disruptive’

DImplesandCheese · 26/06/2024 21:14

My DC know all about reasonable adjustments - they no longer sing or whistle while DC1 is at home. They don’t get to go first at anything (meals, getting in car, walking along a path). They have to do chores while DC1 does not. They have to stop what they are saying if DC1 needs to talk - and that list is just what’s happened in the last hour. My NT DC are amazing at accommodating. but there is a difference between accommodating and allowing complete disruption.

OP posts:
autienotnaughty · 26/06/2024 21:05

The problem is clubs will declare they are inclusive . And assume that means disabled people can attend without ensuring they make reasonable adjustments to support.

So the nd child would potentially benefit from additional support. If they are struggling taking a sensory break or having help completing tasks. Opportunity to not complete tasks without it impacting on others. If the club can not support this child they should not be declaring themselves inclusive.

Saying that this is a great opportunity to teach h your child compassion and about making reasonable adjustments

Lavenderflower · 26/06/2024 20:38

It sounds as thought the situation is not being managed well. I think where possible accommodation and reasonable adjustment should be considered. Equally, I think it important to recognise disabilities do exclude people from fully participating. As someone who has disability and requires reasonable adjustments, I am fully aware there are somethings I just cannot do. Pretending otherwise, it not helpful, if any it minimises my difficulties or makes me feel invisible.

ThisOldThang · 26/06/2024 20:27

Maybe the organisers don't give a shit?

They chuck the kids out of the door to have 'unsupervised time' and then get to sit around huffing glue for an hour.

Sniffle555 · 26/06/2024 20:25

Garlicker · 26/06/2024 20:23

You have a very one-sided view of the law, and of how rights work in a functional society.

"Autism is legally protected", you said. All disabilities are legally protected from discrimination.* *It's not discrimination to say I can't join a walking group because I can't walk. It's not discrimination to tell a pilot with dementia that he can't fly planes any more. It's not discrimination to stop a child joining a team because he can't be a team player.

There are things we can do in spite of our disabilities, and we should be facilitated to do them as far as possible. That is not the same as inserting us into situations we're not capable of, then telling everyone else to suck it up.

Who says this child isn’t capable? 1 child. The organisers disagree.

timetobegin · 26/06/2024 20:24

neilyoungismyhero · 26/06/2024 20:20

I should think the OP's son already knows quite a lot about resilience and empathy bless him as he's already living with ND siblings. Now he can't even do his hobby in peace and no one is supporting him and he is missing out. Much as I sympathise with SN children other children also deserve to be considered.

Possibly his siblings know quite a lot about it too given they can’t take a break from their own difficulties and a likely to spend more time with other disabled people. I agree he needs support. It’s fairly straightforward, he can’t cope with the disabled child and needs support if he’s to manage the club.

Swipe left for the next trending thread