Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

UPF, poverty, obesity.... children’s healthy eating - an impossible challenge?

494 replies

PaminaMozart · 19/06/2024 07:08

This is truly frightening: Food Foundation says height of five-year-olds falling, child obesity up by a third and type 2 diabetes by a fifth

The average height of five-year-olds is falling, obesity levels have increased by almost a third and the number of young people being diagnosed with type 2 diabetes has risen by more than a fifth, the report by the Food Foundation said.

Aggressive marketing of cheap ultra-processed food, diets lacking essential nutrition and high levels of poverty and deprivation are driving the “significant decline” in children’s health, researchers found.

Obesity levels among 10 and 11-year-olds in England have increased by 30% since 2006, with one in five children already officially obese by the time they leave primary school, researchers found.
Cases of type 2 diabetes, which is linked to obesity, have risen by 22% among those aged under 25 in England and Wales in the last five years, the study added.

Babies born in the UK today will also enjoy a year less good health than babies born a decade ago, according to the report.
Baroness Anne Jenkin, a Conservative peer, said children’s health had “never been worse” but warned that almost no one was talking about it. “This is a timebomb waiting to explode if action isn’t taken.”
Gordon Brown, the former Labour prime minister, said: “When the height of five-year-olds has been falling since 2013, and we’re learning babies born today will enjoy a year less good health than babies born a decade ago, every mother and father in the land will be concerned and shocked at what is happening to children through lack of nutrition, living through the hungry 2020s in food bank Britain.”

https://www.theguardian.com/society/article/2024/jun/19/uk-children-shorter-fatter-and-sicker-amid-poor-diet-and-poverty-report-finds

UK children shorter, fatter and sicker amid poor diet and poverty, report finds

Food Foundation says height of five-year-olds falling, child obesity up by a third and type 2 diabetes by a fifth

https://www.theguardian.com/society/article/2024/jun/19/uk-children-shorter-fatter-and-sicker-amid-poor-diet-and-poverty-report-finds

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Riversideandrelax · 19/06/2024 09:47

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 19/06/2024 08:43

I went to DD’s sports day yesterday and was truly shocked at the number of obese children. I’m not joking when I say probably a third of them were noticeably overweight and a sixth actually obese. There were 10 year old girls bigger than me, a size 12 mum of two.

The school doesn’t help. School dinners always have the option of cake, birthday sweets dished out every other week, a weekly ice cream van parks on the school drive so you have to walk past it to leave and it has a massive queue 🤯

I’m going to say something a bit left field and I hope people understand this is not me justifying smacking (as I was accused of yesterday) but since parents stopped using ‘harsh’ discipline methods, they seem to be at a loss as to how to control their children and I think eating has become part of that picture. Food as bribes, food to keep them quiet, food to stave off a tantrum, food as a reward, food because everyone else now seems to be eating and it feels mean to say no. Endless snacks, they never seem to wait between meals. Mums take endless packets of biscuits and bread sticks with them everywhere.

I don't recognise that at all. Me and my friends have never abused our DC but can 'control' them just fine.

savoycabbage · 19/06/2024 09:45

I do supply teaching and I can go in to a year one class one day and the children are tall and strong with shining skin and hair and I can go to a different year one class the next day and the children look fragile and dull. The white kids are grey with sunken eyes.

In some schools not one child will eat any of the provided fruit or vegetables. Sometimes I give nursery children a sticker if they drink some milk. They walk around sucking down cordial all day instead.

In school nurseries, the lunches are not free so most have packed lunches. Some children will have just two packets of crisps for their lunch or just a six pack of Oreo's. I'm at the stage now where I'm pleased is they have a greggs sausage roll.

crackofdoom · 19/06/2024 09:45

One advert that has really pissed me off recently is the one for buying train tickets through Uber. "With all that money saved, the snacks are on you!"

Why do you need snacks on a train journey?! Yes, if it's a long one you might need to take or buy lunch, but it's the normalisation of snacking EVERYWHERE that boils my piss.

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 19/06/2024 09:41

‘Elevenses was more structured though.

There's a mindset difference in pausing mid-way between meals, having a sit, eating some food off a plate, compared grazing on the go and eating from packets.’

Yes, there was a thread recently about someone being annoyed by a colleague eating noisily at her desk.
It became clear that many people now see it as a norm or indeed a human right to be able to eat constantly at your desk if you want to. It didn’t used to be. There used to be more of an assumption that you would take a break and it was more likely the employer would provide a staff room for you to do it in.

ParentsTrapped · 19/06/2024 09:38

I read Ultra Processed People recently and the stuff about the “food swamp” was compelling - when the prevailing food environment is UPF it is really difficult to avoid. UPF is readily available, heavily marketed, cheap, easy to prepare, has a long shelf life and tastes nice - you can absolutely see why time poor cash strapped families turn to it.

And I absolutely agree that the government needs to step in to publicise the dangers of this stuff and then regulate it. The extent to which “big food” controls not only politics but most of the scientific research in this area is terrifying.

BogRollBOGOF · 19/06/2024 09:34

Riversideandrelax · 19/06/2024 09:02

I always find it interesting when people talk about there not being snacks in the past.

At my grandparents born in the 1920s we always had 'elevenses' and 'tea' in-between meals. But I agree we probably didn't have as many snacks as nowadays.

I'm battling with UPF myself at the moment. Various reasons (illness, mental health, low income) has meant we have far too much.

Elevenses was more structured though.

There's a mindset difference in pausing mid-way between meals, having a sit, eating some food off a plate, compared grazing on the go and eating from packets.

By pausing and structuring, it's easier to regulate what you're having.

Plates were smaller which led to smaller meals. My 1980s "student plate" has a large rim, so the flat surface is the same as the medium plates we have, but the outer circumfrence is the same as the full size dinner plate. Some meals I use the smaller plates, but often if I use the bigger plates for the family, I dig the old one out to naturally hold my portion back (older children needing a higher intake than me, they used to use the small plates). It still gives me a full looking plate without looking like a restriction.
Those small IKEA plastic bowls- they can fit a whole can of food. The capacity is surprising and its easier to eat more than you think you are.

That leads me to another musing- the size of things like lunch boxes. People naturally fill the vessel they have. I've seen huge lunch bags filled with every type of food- sandwich, fruit, crisps, chocolate bar, cake, yoghurt pouch, peperami and babybels for a few miles walk/ picnic. I ended up taking the children's bags for them and putting them in my rucksack because they were so heavily weighed down and struggling to walk with them under the weight of the food.

Many parents seem terrified to let their children starve on walks of only a couple of miles.
For context on a 10 mile run this week, I used one of my two nakd bars in two hours of constant running. A 2 mile walk at child pace is not going to have children depleting their glycogen stores!
I'm also seeing more parents being doubtful about going ahead with outdoor activties in standard weather conditions. Yes it is safe to go for an hour's walk in 10⁰C rain- send them in their coat (cohort can afford coats, just not used to being out of nice cars)

crackofdoom · 19/06/2024 09:33

There are a lot of factors, but the easy availability of ultra processed, ultra palatable food plays a big part. British supermarkets have markedly bigger aisles of processed shite than do continental ones- perhaps European countries have legislation to control aggressive marketing that we don't?

A while back someone published excerpts on Facebook of his diary as a young man walking the Ridgeway Path in the 1970s with his two mates- it was really entertaining, but what stood out for me was the low availability of food. They were on a low budget, and seemed to exist on mostly rice. On the rare occasions when they encountered a shop that was open they couldn't afford much- maybe some oranges, or on one occasion they found a chip shop and enjoyed the luxury of chip butties! In the photos they look incredibly skinny.

Nowadays, every village Spar would sell you 100g Dairy Milk for a quid, or a 2 for 1 offer on Pringles, or a packet of value biscuits for 50p. The shape of young men- supposedly the fittest and skinnier of us- has completely changed- they're a lot more chunky. A lot of it is gym honed chunk, but still...

DS is 14, now has his own pocket and occasional job money, and the school bus drops him off outside the Spar. Every fucking day he comes back munching a Snickers bar or a packet of value biscuits, and often has a fizzy drink on the go, too. It drives me bloody mad. He's not overweight (yet), but it's doing his health no good at all.0

TheCountessofFitzdotterel · 19/06/2024 09:33

Riversideandrelax · 19/06/2024 09:02

I always find it interesting when people talk about there not being snacks in the past.

At my grandparents born in the 1920s we always had 'elevenses' and 'tea' in-between meals. But I agree we probably didn't have as many snacks as nowadays.

I'm battling with UPF myself at the moment. Various reasons (illness, mental health, low income) has meant we have far too much.

But the snack size and frequency have both grown enormously. People used to have ‘a biscuit’ which to be fair usually meant two. What it didn’t mean was the whole packet. Crisps were a small bag not a multipack or grab bag.
When I was at secondary school in the 80s my year group was kept back after assembly and harangued by a teacher for the heinous crime of ‘eating in public in school uniform.’ It must have been a transitional moment because we had no idea we weren’t supposed to do this. It was a grammar school and many of us had long commutes so what this meant was that we were officially not supposed to eat anything between school dinner at 12 and getting home at 5. Can you imagine that now, when parents wait outside the school gate with snacks for their kids at 3.15 (and many of them will have had snacks in an afternoon break in any case)?

PaminaMozart · 19/06/2024 09:33

Riversideandrelax · 19/06/2024 09:18

Out of interest what would you make in 10 minutes? I succumb to takeaways when fatigued/ill etc.

Usually stirfrys - protein (chicken fish or prawns) plus a variety of vegetables. Served with rice or egg noodles. Okay, the rice will take 15 minutes or so, but I don't have do do anything once it's started.

Or a frittata. My go to super quick meal.

Or chicken plus vegetables with whole wheat pasta or brown/wild rice.

I badge cook chicken pieces and caramelized onions (+/- garlic) so I have key ingredients to hand.

OP posts:
LadyKenya · 19/06/2024 09:33

lifechangingsausageroll · 19/06/2024 09:23

I agree. I can't understand why there isn't more outrage.

A Co-op opened near me recently. Huge excitement to have a 'local' shop. I looked around and all I could see was 'fake' food. 90% of it was fizzy drinks and crap. We are doomed.

Not quite. As more people become aware, and engaged with knowing what is in the food that they are consuming, that knowledge will hopefully trigger a change in how people shop, and the food that they give to their families. The first step has to be an awareness of the damage being done to people, through low quality, processed food.

Riversideandrelax · 19/06/2024 09:32

Sunnysummer24 · 19/06/2024 08:20

I disagree. 4.3 million children (30% of all UK children) were in poverty” in 2022/23, “up from 3.6 million in 2010/11”.

The definition of poverty used here is absolutely poverty, meaning they don’t have enough money to feed, cloth, house and keep children warm.

That’s 30% of children in the UK living in households who don’t have enough money to feed those children a health diet. It doesn’t matter how much education around food and healthy meals, if they haven’t got the money to buy nutrious food they can’t make it.

It's a scandal. I don't think people realise basically 1 child out of 3 is in poverty.

swedex · 19/06/2024 09:31

I also started listening to rangan chatterjees podcast this morning about the loneliness epidemic and the huge impact on mental and physical health so that's fun 😬

Riversideandrelax · 19/06/2024 09:27

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Previously banned poster.

But ok for the DC to suffer??

Ginmonkeyagain · 19/06/2024 09:24

@User8746422 you are just trolling now. All UK apples, organic or not, will have been be kept in cold storage as we cannot grow apples over the winter and spring. Organic plants are not magic.

lifechangingsausageroll · 19/06/2024 09:23

SulkySeagull · 19/06/2024 08:30

The food companies, and the government who allow them to produce utter shite and market it to kids and parents are to blame. Why there isn’t more outrage towards them is beyond me. They’re poisoning people with chemicals and unnecessary ingredients on a massive scale.

I agree. I can't understand why there isn't more outrage.

A Co-op opened near me recently. Huge excitement to have a 'local' shop. I looked around and all I could see was 'fake' food. 90% of it was fizzy drinks and crap. We are doomed.

Grandmasswagbag · 19/06/2024 09:19

Wow this is really scary. Young people too sick to work already. How on earth are we going to finance the failing health of the next ? This is a perfect example of the short termism of austerity. Unfortunately the effects aren't truly felt until way down the line when everything and everyone is screwed!

Riversideandrelax · 19/06/2024 09:18

PaminaMozart · 19/06/2024 07:38

Personally I'm puzzled by the take-out/deliveroo culture as I can rustle up a delicious healthy meal in 10 minutes or so.

The article strikes a cord with me as I have a young grandchild who doesn't eat anything other than pizza, pasta and fruit. And ice cream. Maybe a couple of cherry tomatoes and cucumber slices at a push. But that's it - its all she will eat. (Her mother is the same.)

At 9 years old she is already overweight.

Out of interest what would you make in 10 minutes? I succumb to takeaways when fatigued/ill etc.

CharlotteRumpling · 19/06/2024 09:16

User8746422 · 19/06/2024 09:13

Yes but with what types of ingredients? The prerequisite is that meat & eggs needs to meet the highest level of animal welfare and organic farming. Fruit and veg need to be organic and pesticide free, local if possible. This is not judging anyone who shops and cooks with different ingredients but it's an objective fact based on what level of food is deemed "healthiest", and arguable tastiest. Children can't be forced to eat healthy if it doesn't taste good.

Cheaper meat and produce often don't taste like anything and that's why children refuse to eat them. The cheapest, non-organic apples that have been kept in cold storage months literally taste like biting into cold styrofoam. How can a child be expected to eat that when they also have the option of a chocolate bar or a bag of crisps? Cheap chicken is dry and rubbery with zero flavour. How are kids supposed to eat that compared to deep fried chicken nuggets slathered with sauce.

This is nonsense. Millions of cuisines- Asian, Arab, Mexican- know how to add flavour to non organic food with spices and herbs.

Riversideandrelax · 19/06/2024 09:14

PracticallyYesterday · 19/06/2024 07:28

Aggressive marketing of cheap ultra-processed food

Is this not within the government's power to control? Advertising of harmful products can be controlled or banned - see tobacco for an example.

I include in this advertising of services that provide this kind of food - TV is swamped by adverts for JustEat, for example. They'd probably argue that you can use JustEat to order a salad or whatever, but the reality is that it's mostly used for standard takeaways.

I'm not saying that no one should ever have a takeaway - I enjoy a takeaway myself - but these delivery services are normalising them as an everyday meal choice ("did somebody say 'Just Eat') rather than an occasional thing you have as a change.

I have to be honest that the rise of Just Eat and such like and the enormous variety of food you can order has increased how much we get a takeaway. When I was growing up in the 90s we got a Chinese once in a blue moon. We get a takeaway probably twice a month and more if ill/fatigued etc.

crackofdoom · 19/06/2024 09:14

User8746422 · 19/06/2024 08:27

It's prohibitively expensive to cook from scratch with fully healthy ingredients. We try to do that for the obvious reasons mentioned in the title and the price of raw ingredients, especially organic meat and produce, add up to eating out in a restaurant. We're only 3 people and an average meal at home costs £30-£50 in raw ingredients. Before the meal planning brigade jumps in, this is literally the stuff that gets used up in one meal. Organic steak £15-20, two organic chicken breasts £15, a single cantaloupe melon £5, 1 box of strawberries from a local farm £6 etc. Add in a few packs of herbs, dairy products and juice and that's the budget for a single day.

UPFs are not only cheaper, they are shelf stable. You can buy an entire week's worth of meals in cans, jars and vacuum sealed packets for a fraction of what it costs fresh. It makes perfect sense why so many families rely on that out of convenience and cost.

Holy shit 😆 Makes me glad I'm a vegetarian and can rustle up a meal from scratch for under a fiver then!

User8746422 · 19/06/2024 09:13

TheKeatingFive · 19/06/2024 08:53

It's prohibitively expensive to cook from scratch with fully healthy ingredients. We try to do that for the obvious reasons mentioned in the title and the price of raw ingredients, especially organic meat and produce, add up to eating out in a restaurant. We're only 3 people and an average meal at home costs £30-£50 in raw ingredients.

This is total nonsense though. Cooking from scratch can cost a fraction of this.

This is not a money issue. It can be an education issue, mental energy issue, skills issue - but cooking cheaply and well for yourself is more than possible.

Yes but with what types of ingredients? The prerequisite is that meat & eggs needs to meet the highest level of animal welfare and organic farming. Fruit and veg need to be organic and pesticide free, local if possible. This is not judging anyone who shops and cooks with different ingredients but it's an objective fact based on what level of food is deemed "healthiest", and arguable tastiest. Children can't be forced to eat healthy if it doesn't taste good.

Cheaper meat and produce often don't taste like anything and that's why children refuse to eat them. The cheapest, non-organic apples that have been kept in cold storage months literally taste like biting into cold styrofoam. How can a child be expected to eat that when they also have the option of a chocolate bar or a bag of crisps? Cheap chicken is dry and rubbery with zero flavour. How are kids supposed to eat that compared to deep fried chicken nuggets slathered with sauce.

CharlotteRumpling · 19/06/2024 09:13

Cooking at home is way cheaper for me. Eating out in London is phenomenally expensive.

Ginmonkeyagain · 19/06/2024 09:10

@User8746422 absolute nonsense. I cook from scratch for two of us and our total grocery bill for the week (including cleaning stuff and gasp some stuff like crisps, chocolate and biscuits) maximum £85 - and we could definitely go lower.

I made a chilli at the weekend that did four generous meals with rice with a bit left over to have for lunch one day with a piece of bread.

It was made with 750 grams of decent quality minced beef, an onion, a carrot, a couple of sticks of celery, two peppers, a can of chopped tomatoes and a can of kidney beans (plus garlic, chilli, smoked palrika, bay leaves, a cinammon stick, cumin etc..).

I suspect it came out at around £3 a portion.

I like good quality fish and meat (preferabl free range and/or organic) so operate a policy of bulking it it with vegetables and pulses and buying cheaper cuts or species - we eat a lot of mackerel. I also make liberal use of the yellow sticker section. I got two very nice salmon fillets half price on Saturday. They went straight in to the freezer and I will use them tomorrow to make terayaki salamon with egg fried rice and pak choi.

LadyKenya · 19/06/2024 09:10

User8746422 · 19/06/2024 08:27

It's prohibitively expensive to cook from scratch with fully healthy ingredients. We try to do that for the obvious reasons mentioned in the title and the price of raw ingredients, especially organic meat and produce, add up to eating out in a restaurant. We're only 3 people and an average meal at home costs £30-£50 in raw ingredients. Before the meal planning brigade jumps in, this is literally the stuff that gets used up in one meal. Organic steak £15-20, two organic chicken breasts £15, a single cantaloupe melon £5, 1 box of strawberries from a local farm £6 etc. Add in a few packs of herbs, dairy products and juice and that's the budget for a single day.

UPFs are not only cheaper, they are shelf stable. You can buy an entire week's worth of meals in cans, jars and vacuum sealed packets for a fraction of what it costs fresh. It makes perfect sense why so many families rely on that out of convenience and cost.

Where are you shopping for an organic steak to cost so much? Organic steak can be obtained from Sainsburys for much cheaper than that. Cooking healthy meals from scratch, does not have to cost so much, you are choosing to use very expensive ingredients.

Spendonsend · 19/06/2024 09:08

Kendodd · 19/06/2024 08:54

I'm sure poverty is the biggest factor, but could immigration also be a factor? People from 'shorter' nations moving here?

Or taller people leaving after brexit?

I dont know as the report doesn't mention that.

I dont know if immigration was materially different for babies born in 2012, 11, 10 etc to those from 2013 or whether shorter people started immigrating here in big numbers in time to have babies from 2013 onwards.