Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Gawping at the royals has to stop

140 replies

MeritocracyNotMonarchy · 16/06/2024 21:48

They are just people - no better, worse or more interesting than any other UK residents.

They're trussed up and put on show like animals in a zoo. No child should be wheeled out like this and gawped at. They're ordinary people in a fairly mediocre, mildly dysfunctional family, just like those found on any street in the UK.

We really need to mature as a country and put the whole pantomime of monarchy behind us. It reflects and entrenches the inequality that is so damaging to the UK. And the characters in the panto look bloody miserable.

AIBU?

Gawping at the royals has to stop
OP posts:
Blendeddogs · 17/06/2024 17:26

hastalav · 16/06/2024 21:58

Ten minutes on stage, full make up and costumes. Play the part, exit stage left.

It's a very expensive play isn't it?

This

cakeorwine · 17/06/2024 17:25

I wish someone would ask them "What the point of them is?"

Or ask them why they feel the need to release family photos on their birthdays?

And of course, they are perfect. They can't just be a normal family. They have to be seen as perfect by the media.

I can't imagine what it must be like to be them.

And you know the best thing about my life. I may not have much money but I have control over my destiny. My choices. I don't feel this sense of duty to have my life mapped out.

George will probably be King. Maybe he would like a regular life. But Kings can't do that.

His life has been mapped out since birth. So people can obsess over them.
And imagine Charlotte - and how her life is mapped out

GreenClock · 17/06/2024 16:49

I’m anti-monarchy for many reasons, one of which is because like the OP, I feel sorry for kids born into the line of succession. But I don’t think that disparaging the regulars on the RF board is ok tbh. Any chance that could be avoided?

But yes, republic all the way for me !

hairbearbunches · 17/06/2024 16:03

@Triestre The abolition of the monarchy would help other more scary things the left has in their agenda.

What? Like proper democracy. [clutches pearls] the very thought! This bunch of parasites sit at the apex of the class system in this country. Get rid of them and then start dismantling the hangers on as well.

ajandjjmum · 17/06/2024 15:16

Maybe we could follow the subscription idea on all of the things we like/dislike, so that we only pay for what we want? I don't use any local sports facilities, maybe I could have my tax back for that element (probably only a couple of quid a year, but every penny counts!)

Gilles27 · 17/06/2024 14:26

I saw a suggestion recently that they should be available via a subscription. If you paid a monthly fee you'll have access to news and videos etc of the royal family. Those that don't pay don't get access. Sounds perfect to me!

cakeorwine · 17/06/2024 14:12

This is what they brought their kids into.

Imagine everything you get to do because no one is obsessed by you.

It's a goldfish bowl.

GogAndMagog · 17/06/2024 13:59

I don't relate to Kate at all, bringing kids into dysfunction.

She knew what she was getting into.
Al the luxury servants in the world could not be worth your kids having no freedom and living in the full gaze of the world.

It is utterly ridiculous. Same with celebrities. My DP is always banging on about who he had met, its do boring. They aren't any better than the rest of us. You Tubers and Influencers etc. I don't understand the interest.

It doesn't seem to make many of them happy?

SlowerMovingVehicle · 17/06/2024 13:40

SpudleyLass · 16/06/2024 22:29

See, I could be swayed to a republic but I also feel every argument against the Monarchy can be applied to celebrity culture too.

If celebrity-dom vanished tomorrow or the exact moment we abolished the monarchy, then count me in.

No, only the privacy argument. Although celebs can be annoying I agree.

A lot of celebs pay taxes and some also have talent in their field.

ajandjjmum · 17/06/2024 13:38

Cooper77 · 17/06/2024 10:57

I can't bear them. God they make me so ashamed. I wish we'd never brought them back in the 1680s. No wonder other countries laugh at us. My patriotism is based on things worth being patriotic about – like Shakespeare, Dickens, Jane Austen and Charles Darwin. I 'celebrate' having two of the oldest and most famous universities in the world on this island, not that bunch of ugly, vulgar, grinning gargoyles. The sight of Anne in that ridiculous hat makes me want to curl up in a ball and pretend to be Spanish or Dutch.

Gosh - you sound very unpleasant. Maybe you should move to Spain or Holland and save yourself (and us) the trouble of worrying about you.

Perhaps post a picture, and we can judge how you compare to 'that bunch of ugly, vulgar, grinning gargoyles' - bet you're a proper ray of sunshine.

Troopingthewhat · 17/06/2024 13:22

I wonder if the younger royals - William and Kate’s age ish also think what the bloody hell are we doing, maybe they think it’s outdated and weird these days about their wealth and privileges and they are also curious as to why people want to see them and queue for hours to do it, must be a very weird, albeit a privileged life.

Maybe they’ll be big changes once Charles has gone.

I have been a fan of some of the royals over the decades, Diana, Harry, Kate, Sophie and Andrew’s two girls but I now think it’s all a bit old hat 😱

Might be my age !

PleaseletitbeSpring · 17/06/2024 13:04

Cooper77 · 17/06/2024 10:57

I can't bear them. God they make me so ashamed. I wish we'd never brought them back in the 1680s. No wonder other countries laugh at us. My patriotism is based on things worth being patriotic about – like Shakespeare, Dickens, Jane Austen and Charles Darwin. I 'celebrate' having two of the oldest and most famous universities in the world on this island, not that bunch of ugly, vulgar, grinning gargoyles. The sight of Anne in that ridiculous hat makes me want to curl up in a ball and pretend to be Spanish or Dutch.

Love this post. I couldn't have put it better!

KateDelRick · 17/06/2024 11:08

Ok. I don't know why it would be abolished because of a round number applicable to England?
2066... anything could be happening..

KimberleyClark · 17/06/2024 10:58

KateDelRick · 17/06/2024 10:55

Only 1,000 since the Normandy invasion and seizure of power.
The monarchy is older than that.

I know that, but 1,000 is a nice round number. And actually, in terms of Scotland and Wales the English monarchy is not actually as old as that.

Stompythedinosaur · 17/06/2024 10:58

I'm not a huge fan of the monarchy and would be happy to do away with the institution.

But presumably the current royals can opt out if they don't want to do it and go and live their own lives?

Cooper77 · 17/06/2024 10:57

I can't bear them. God they make me so ashamed. I wish we'd never brought them back in the 1680s. No wonder other countries laugh at us. My patriotism is based on things worth being patriotic about – like Shakespeare, Dickens, Jane Austen and Charles Darwin. I 'celebrate' having two of the oldest and most famous universities in the world on this island, not that bunch of ugly, vulgar, grinning gargoyles. The sight of Anne in that ridiculous hat makes me want to curl up in a ball and pretend to be Spanish or Dutch.

KateDelRick · 17/06/2024 10:55

KimberleyClark · 17/06/2024 10:31

I think it would be a nicely symbolic gesture if in 2066 whoever is monarch at the time were to announce that it’s been 1000 years, I think it’s time the country moved on,the nation can have Buckingham Palace, Balmoral and Sandringham, we don’t think you need a Royal Family any more and we can certainly do without all the gawping. We’re all off to live private lives and do actual jobs, you know?

Only 1,000 since the Normandy invasion and seizure of power.
The monarchy is older than that.

Triestre · 17/06/2024 10:54

ajandjjmum · 17/06/2024 09:54

I think they do a great job - with the odd notable exception.

Can't understand why people get so exercised about something that costs them £1.70 a year, even if they don't approve of the RF, just turn off the TV. There is far more of my tax money spent on things that I don't like, but I just have to suck it up and get on with my life.

After the various governments that we - the people - have elected over recent decades, I think an hereditary monarchy is a good thing!

Exactly! How ridiculous.

The abolition of the monarchy would help other more scary things the left has in their agenda.

KimberleyClark · 17/06/2024 10:31

I think it would be a nicely symbolic gesture if in 2066 whoever is monarch at the time were to announce that it’s been 1000 years, I think it’s time the country moved on,the nation can have Buckingham Palace, Balmoral and Sandringham, we don’t think you need a Royal Family any more and we can certainly do without all the gawping. We’re all off to live private lives and do actual jobs, you know?

medianewbie · 17/06/2024 10:22

Beenthereagainandagain · 16/06/2024 22:40

Are you suggesting that the only alternative to Charles III is Cromwell II?
I like to believe there are other options…

I do hope that nice Mr Farage isn't reading this. Can you imagine him self styled as 'Lord Protector' with a New Model Army to impose his new order?
I'm sure there must be other options...
Personally I think, once Charles dies, we should call an end to the Monarchy. I'm not suggesting a Revolution but a Referendum might be worth holding.

KarmenPQZ · 17/06/2024 10:03

You’re being very unreasonable to say ‘Gawping at the royals has to stop’ and then in the very same post include a picture of them. but I think that kinda proves the point.

McDonnellsfriend789 · 17/06/2024 10:02

ajandjjmum · 17/06/2024 09:54

I think they do a great job - with the odd notable exception.

Can't understand why people get so exercised about something that costs them £1.70 a year, even if they don't approve of the RF, just turn off the TV. There is far more of my tax money spent on things that I don't like, but I just have to suck it up and get on with my life.

After the various governments that we - the people - have elected over recent decades, I think an hereditary monarchy is a good thing!

People always quote the “only £1.70” figure but 1.70 x 60-odd million adds up to quite a lot of money.

McDonnellsfriend789 · 17/06/2024 09:58

FearDear · 17/06/2024 08:23

I’d prefer not to have a RF, but we do. Therefore they’ll have to deal with the attention they get from some people, whether positive or negative. They can walk away if they don’t want it, but they stay. I don’t know many people who are interested in them in a positive way, lots are appalled by Andrew and gossip about Kate’s cancer, but no one I know really gives a shit about them.

The RF board on here is awful and if I wasn’t put off already, I would be after reading what their supporters over there have to say. Part of me thinks it’s the same few posters socking themselves though, it’s all so weird and cliquey. Very strange board.

I totally agree. And if you weren’t a republican before; spend ten minutes on the royal family board on here and you will soon be persuaded!

ajandjjmum · 17/06/2024 09:54

I think they do a great job - with the odd notable exception.

Can't understand why people get so exercised about something that costs them £1.70 a year, even if they don't approve of the RF, just turn off the TV. There is far more of my tax money spent on things that I don't like, but I just have to suck it up and get on with my life.

After the various governments that we - the people - have elected over recent decades, I think an hereditary monarchy is a good thing!

McDonnellsfriend789 · 17/06/2024 09:53

Honestyy · 17/06/2024 08:34

Kate chose to marry Prince William and chose to have children. The children don't have a choice, but Kate did. Also, the Royals have quite a lot of privacy and it's mainly just special occasions that the children are seen.

I think that’s quite a naieve view. There are entire Instagram and You Tube accounts based on Charlotte’s fashion where her every gesture is analysed to the nth degree.

No children should be put under public scrutiny imho, whether they are royal, live on a Yorkshire farm or are a talented singer. By definition, as children, they cannot consent or have any proper idea of what public scrutiny entails. It rarely ends well.

Swipe left for the next trending thread