Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think that 4/5 year olds should not be learning about d-day deaths?

183 replies

UponReflectionLake · 06/06/2024 16:54

4 year old DS came home from school telling us about how they learned about D-Day, including how many people died, and the fighting. Whilst I agree kids should learn about this I definitely don’t think it should be foundation age children! DS suffers with nightmares and night terrors and already know this is going to cause many of them in the next few weeks. Husband says I’m overreacting, curious to see other mums opinions?

OP posts:
Jeannie88 · 06/06/2024 17:51

It's fact and the young children at the time lived through it. No I don't think they're too young to learn about history, which usually encourages empathy and respect. Xx

Backwood · 06/06/2024 17:51

I’d ask the teachers about the content, I really doubt they will have been taught about the beaches turning red, but other kids might have talked about various things related to that.

Ereyraa · 06/06/2024 17:49

I think teachers should be considering the needs of everyone in their class of course and tailoring the curriculum appropriately!

This would be considering the needs of a specific one or two. Not ‘everyone’. You can’t change a whole class curriculum because some kids are anxious.

Runningupthecurtains · 06/06/2024 17:48

Was this a reception class lesson or an assembly? D-day is the type of event that would have been used as an assembly topic rather than main curriculum when mine were in primary.

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 06/06/2024 17:47

UponReflectionLake · 06/06/2024 17:47

It isn’t. Nor did I say that. However to give context he has since said they were taught about France turning red referencing the beach and sea. I don’t think that is appropriate

He’ll get over it. Move on

UponReflectionLake · 06/06/2024 17:47

It isn’t. Nor did I say that. However to give context he has since said they were taught about France turning red referencing the beach and sea. I don’t think that is appropriate

OP posts:
MaryMaryVeryContrary · 06/06/2024 17:46

UponReflectionLake · 06/06/2024 17:43

Apologies I typed quickly and should have mentioned his anxieties night terrors etc Originally. It’s not about not knowing these things, more about the appropriateness at this age talking about bloodshed which is what he has discussed since me posting this. It doesn’t sound like it has been done age appropriate. Learning about soldiers and how they serve a country, about veterans, different parts of military etc this in my eyes would be appropriate. I don’t think a 4 year old should learn about “France turning red” as he describes. It should absolutely be built upon with context which I could’ve helped with had I known this would be taught to him this year.

This is the sort of nightmare 2024 parenting that makes teacher’s lives hell, leads to anxiety in children, and deprives kids of the small moments which develop them as people, leading them into adulthood as nervous wrecks used to life in a sanitised jar.

DappledThings · 06/06/2024 17:46

I don’t think a 4 year old should learn about “France turning red” as he describes. It should absolutely be built upon with context which I could’ve helped with had I known this would be taught to him this year.
And how can you be sure this is what he's been taught? If he's able to turn the Queen dying into the Queen is coming yo get him he obviously does have a very vivid imagination. And could easily have turned a simple explanation that a lot of soldiers died into this idea of France running red with blood. Still very specific to him and far from evidence it wasn't age appropriate in general or shouldn't be taught at all.

LimeandCourgette · 06/06/2024 17:46

How is your child coping at play time? Whenever I've been in the playground there's a load of children running around 'shooting baddies' in the playground, or 'investigating a murder'.
I'm sure what they hear in the playground is worse than what is being taught in the classroom.

Longma · 06/06/2024 17:45

It will almost certainly have been done in an age appropriate manner, using age appropriate materials. Schools have been covering such topics for decades, working with all manner of children. He won't have seen anything specifically scary or anything gory or even details.

The France being red - I assume he saw a picture of poppy fields perhaps.

He won't have been told of soldiers coming and grabbing children, etc especially as that's not an aspect of the D Day landings remembrance.

Unfortunately some children are more sensitive than others with quite active imaginations where they can turn what they've been told into whole new scenarios in their head.

You can turn some of his stories into new versions - the red France is easy to,address. Show him a red poppy and show a field of poppies growing close together. The poppies aren't scary. They are just flowers. And so on...

UponReflectionLake · 06/06/2024 17:43

DappledThings · 06/06/2024 17:37

But you must know his reactions aren't within the realms of normal - he needs outside help and support, not for you to go and criticise the school for teaching the standard curriculum
This. Your thread title is really general and about all 4/5 year olds. There's no reason for the vast majority of children not to learn about war in an age-appropriate way as it will have been. YABU on that. Are you BU about your specific child and whether he should have been taken out of the lesson given that the school are aware he was significant issues? Maybe not. But what would you want? There's no mention of war at all? They are told soldiers went to France and everyone came home and lived happily ever after? Neither are really plausible.

Apologies I typed quickly and should have mentioned his anxieties night terrors etc Originally. It’s not about not knowing these things, more about the appropriateness at this age talking about bloodshed which is what he has discussed since me posting this. It doesn’t sound like it has been done age appropriate. Learning about soldiers and how they serve a country, about veterans, different parts of military etc this in my eyes would be appropriate. I don’t think a 4 year old should learn about “France turning red” as he describes. It should absolutely be built upon with context which I could’ve helped with had I known this would be taught to him this year.

OP posts:
MargaretThursday · 06/06/2024 17:43

Ds was fascinated with WWII by that age, so if your dc had been in his form then statistics and information could well have come from him. When they did WWII in year 6 his teacher told me (luckily amused) that the other children kept turning to Philip and asking if things were correct. Apparently he was always right and the teacher wasn't, when checked.

I remember at that age he was playing a game with dd1 (aged about 10yo) and he wanted to play war and she said "but I don't like playing war. Could we play something where I'm neutral?"
Quick as a flash he said: "Yes, we'll play Pearl Harbour-you can be America."

In a lot of ways the interest he had was very much about the machines and the facts, but he did have a good knowledge and it wasn't ghoulish at all.

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 06/06/2024 17:43

My DD is nearly 5 and we have discussed Jesus dying on the cross (Catholic school), the deaths of people we know, that the police will take mummy and daddy away if we don’t put her seat belt on, and showed her photos of her cousin who bashed her teeth out because she climbed on the side of the bath when her mum wasn’t looking (to discourage DD from doing the same). She doesn’t have nightmares; she’s a happy confident little girl.

ilovesooty · 06/06/2024 17:43

Your son has specific circumstances that drive his anxiety. Why is that evidence that the material wasn't taught in an age appropriate way?

DaisyChain505 · 06/06/2024 17:43

You can’t shelter your child from everything In the world I’m afraid. Him being told the queen died is just a natural part of every day life, it’s a normal part of growing up and is good for learning about his feelings.

Im sure they were taught about D day in an age appropriate way.

You can’t shield your child from every negative topic in life otherwise they’ll never form proper social skills or be able to handle their emotions.

fieldsofbutterflies · 06/06/2024 17:40

UponReflectionLake · 06/06/2024 17:37

The reason I state that is because he is getting help with it professionally. That’s the point I’m making. They’re aware of his anxieties and still went ahead with teaching him this, with no heads up to us or his liason, whilst knowing what his reaction would be. I think I’ve made it clear his anxieties aren’t “normal” however given our situation it’s pretty common for children to become anxious and we support him aswell as having external support. Regardless of this all though I’m not sure how appropriate teaching about the bloodshed is for a 4 year old.

Well, children will have been learning about D-Day and war in an age-appropriate way for decades. I remember doing it in school at a similar age and that was thirty years ago now.

I'd also say that lots of children love all this stuff - there's a reason why shows like Horrible Histories are so popular, after all.

If you feel the school should have given you a heads up then it's fine to address that, but not to go in and criticise the subject in general imo.

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 06/06/2024 17:39

Here we go again

Kids are so screened yet so ‘anxious’

Because parents make such a big deal out of everything

Lemonademoney · 06/06/2024 17:37

it will have been done in a very age appropriate manner. It will form part of a much larger curriculum. It is an important part of this countries cultural history and should absolutely be taught.

DappledThings · 06/06/2024 17:37

But you must know his reactions aren't within the realms of normal - he needs outside help and support, not for you to go and criticise the school for teaching the standard curriculum
This. Your thread title is really general and about all 4/5 year olds. There's no reason for the vast majority of children not to learn about war in an age-appropriate way as it will have been. YABU on that. Are you BU about your specific child and whether he should have been taken out of the lesson given that the school are aware he was significant issues? Maybe not. But what would you want? There's no mention of war at all? They are told soldiers went to France and everyone came home and lived happily ever after? Neither are really plausible.

UponReflectionLake · 06/06/2024 17:37

fieldsofbutterflies · 06/06/2024 17:31

Yes, you've said the school are aware several times Confused

But you must know his reactions aren't within the realms of normal - he needs outside help and support, not for you to go and criticise the school for teaching the standard curriculum.

Edited

The reason I state that is because he is getting help with it professionally. That’s the point I’m making. They’re aware of his anxieties and still went ahead with teaching him this, with no heads up to us or his liason, whilst knowing what his reaction would be. I think I’ve made it clear his anxieties aren’t “normal” however given our situation it’s pretty common for children to become anxious and we support him aswell as having external support. Regardless of this all though I’m not sure how appropriate teaching about the bloodshed is for a 4 year old.

OP posts:
MinervaMcGonagallsCat · 06/06/2024 17:37

I'm with your DH.

The D doesn't stand for Disney and it will have been taught in an age appropriate way.

Sue152 · 06/06/2024 17:33

I'm with you OP, I don't think it's age appropriate to teach 4 year olds about war, in the same way that school wouldn't teach them about PIV sex at that age (even if these things would get talked about at home). I also don't think it's age appropriate to teach them about Jesus being nailed to a cross either but you can expect that at Easter if it's a C of E school.

This certainly isn't the first thread I've read where a child has been negatively affected by being taught about war at school in reception. I think teachers should be considering the needs of everyone in their class of course and tailoring the curriculum appropriately! It's called differentiation and happens all the time.

UponReflectionLake · 06/06/2024 17:32

not accessing things he shouldn’t I have health issues that require hospital visits weekly/fortnightly. Unsure where the getting children but has come from, but he has had night terrors for a long time so I imagine it’s from those. He is getting help professionally externally for his anxiety and school are aware.

OP posts:
fieldsofbutterflies · 06/06/2024 17:31

UponReflectionLake · 06/06/2024 17:29

Ah yes i hadn’t ever thought to work on his anxiety thanks 🤦🏼‍♀️ the school are fully aware of his anxiety & night terrors as well as the family situation.

Yes, you've said the school are aware several times Confused

But you must know his reactions aren't within the realms of normal - he needs outside help and support, not for you to go and criticise the school for teaching the standard curriculum.

bluetopazlove · 06/06/2024 17:30

Don't ever go out with dog for a walk ,go out to the petting zoo to feed the baby lambs Don't ever go to visit The Crown Jewells or Tower Castle the will rock you socks .