Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it's time to repeal the sugar tax?

119 replies

Citrusandginger · 03/06/2024 10:26

It's been a soapbox subject of mine for a while that it's difficult to buy drinks without artificial sweeteners since lots of products have been reformulated to reduce the sugar content.

Now UPF and artificial sweeteners are being looked at, as very sadly the incidence of bowel cancer has increased in younger people.

I was brought up in the 70's and while we mostly had home cooked foods, we also had angel delight, Vesta meals, and plenty of other chemical foods. The one thing we didn't have was Diet Coke. We had full fat coke on high days and holidays but the only drinks with artificial sweeteners were marketed for people with diabetes.

I personally gave up sweeteners about 18 months ago and have found it has reduced my sugar cravings overall, so I can see the benefits to me as an individual. My adult children drink diet drinks regularly though - and think they are invincible. I'm worried that the messaging that sugar is bad/so drink diet drinks is so ingrained in their generation, that this will be hard to turn around.

Surely, we need to at least be honest about the health issues associated with sweeteners and give people a choice?

Cancer cases rising twice as fast among under-50s

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c9a913dc-63f4-4fa4-8c25-0faa3301cdee?shareToken=654498f832dfc690127f6e147c127e93

OP posts:
DaisyHaites · 03/06/2024 12:57

minipie · 03/06/2024 10:36

I agree about the risks of sweeteners (see also Alzheimers) but isn’t that more a case for banning or restricting artificial sweeteners, rather than making sugar cheaper again? Sugar isn’t great either.

Also I don’t think manufacturers switched to sweeteners because of the sugar tax, they’ve done it because customers wanted “sugar free” or lower calorie products. To change this demand (and hence what manufacturers offer) we need education about sweetener risks.

Ultimately the best thing would be to wean ourselves off having regular sweet foods (as you say, the cravings do go away) rather than debating whether sugar vs sweeteners is better or worse.

It was the sugar tax. Almost overnight it went from being a choice of sugar and sugar free, to now largely having a choice of one or two sugar options and the rest are now ‘Zero’.

I’m more of the view you know where you stand with sugar than sweeteners, and I do hugely resent that choice being limited as I don’t really like the idea of sweeteners (mostly irrationally, I accept!).

CloseEncountersOfTheTurdKind · 03/06/2024 12:57

For anyone that wants to find sweetener free drinks and we warned of recipe changes, like the one Pepsi sneaked in, I recommend joining a group on Facebook called 'Save our sugar'

2dogsandabudgie · 03/06/2024 12:54

Citrusandginger · 03/06/2024 10:46

Totally agree that processed foods generally are not a good thing. I suppose I'm musing on the fact that the 1970's were not a nirvana of organic food either and yet there has been a rise in health issues in more recent decades. And sweetners are far more widely available and consumed.

I'm also not arguing that sugar is a good thing. Especially when it's in ready meals that really shouldn't be sweetened at all. But at least we know that sugar is unhealthy. I'm concerned by the sugar bad / sweetener ok messaging.

I was born in the 1960s so my childhood was in the 60s/70s. My mum cooked everything from scratch. She would make her own custard and rice puddings, egg custards, cakes and jam tarts and sponge puddings. Everything was made with ingredients from the pantry so there was very little processed food.

I didn't have my first McDonald's until I was about 19, as a child I never had pizza, I must have been about 19/20 when I first went to Pizza Hut. There wasn't the fast food places about like there is now, plus we were always out playing, riding bikes and getting lots of exercise.

Citrusandginger · 03/06/2024 12:51

haveatye · 03/06/2024 12:30

I don't think we need to repeal the sugar tax. We need to do far, far more than the sugar tax.

The sugar tax got through because corporations had a work around (sweeteners).

We need to do root and branch stuff to address the obesogenic environment. Active transport, poverty reduction, free school meals, cooking classes, the lot. And penalise the fuck out of big food businesses.

I actually don't disagree. My OP was slightly goady and I appreciate that tackling obesity, diabetes, inflammatory conditions and bowel cancer is far more complicated than just banning artificial sweeteners.

But I genuinely don't think the sugar tax has helped the nations health in any way and I am concerned that sugar has been replaced with sweeteners without any serious attempts to promote properly healthier alternatives.

OP posts:
MakeTheFriendshipBracelets · 03/06/2024 12:49

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

MrsSlocombesCat · 03/06/2024 12:49

Citrusandginger · 03/06/2024 10:26

It's been a soapbox subject of mine for a while that it's difficult to buy drinks without artificial sweeteners since lots of products have been reformulated to reduce the sugar content.

Now UPF and artificial sweeteners are being looked at, as very sadly the incidence of bowel cancer has increased in younger people.

I was brought up in the 70's and while we mostly had home cooked foods, we also had angel delight, Vesta meals, and plenty of other chemical foods. The one thing we didn't have was Diet Coke. We had full fat coke on high days and holidays but the only drinks with artificial sweeteners were marketed for people with diabetes.

I personally gave up sweeteners about 18 months ago and have found it has reduced my sugar cravings overall, so I can see the benefits to me as an individual. My adult children drink diet drinks regularly though - and think they are invincible. I'm worried that the messaging that sugar is bad/so drink diet drinks is so ingrained in their generation, that this will be hard to turn around.

Surely, we need to at least be honest about the health issues associated with sweeteners and give people a choice?

Cancer cases rising twice as fast among under-50s

www.thetimes.co.uk/article/c9a913dc-63f4-4fa4-8c25-0faa3301cdee?shareToken=654498f832dfc690127f6e147c127e93

I think the increase in bowel cancer has more to do with the consumption of red meat. Young people seem to eat a lot of burgers, and as soon as the sun comes out so do the barbecues! Years ago a steak was a rare treat and now people are eating them as regular treats. Just my two’pennorth.

Munchyseeds2 · 03/06/2024 12:48

I hate sweetners and the fact they are now in most drinks (of course it's because of the sugar tax!)
On the rare occasion I fancy a fizzy drink I want it to taste as it should, same with squash so full fat coke, fever tree or rocks is about it

I'm another one who disbelieves the (industry funded) research about this issue

MrsSlocombesCat · 03/06/2024 12:44

HeBeaverandSheBeaver · 03/06/2024 10:51

I think it should go or we need to at least have choice. I only really buy full fat coke now as it's not full of sweetners.

They other are all ruined for me anyway Despite the potential health issues

Also. After all the scandals of blood post office vaping smoking etc etc. Do you think manufacturers give a shit about safety profiles. I'm willing to get something comes out about them. It's already proven they raise blood insulin levels.

That’s not actually true. I saw a doctor on a tv show experimenting with a girl who drank too much sugary fizz. She argued that diet drinks make your blood sugar rise anyway. So he tested her after drinking the sugar drink and her levels rose. Then he got her to drink the sugar free stuff for 24 hours and there was no rise at all. Zilch. Nada. So it’s misinformation and rumour based on no facts at all.

MarthaDunstable · 03/06/2024 12:41

HideTheCroissants · 03/06/2024 11:02

I can’t tolerate artificial sweeteners - they make me very ill. I wouldn’t actually mind paying the tax but what has actually happened us that the producers have put the artificial stuff in nearly all the drinks. I hardly ever drank Coke before the sugar tax, now it’s one of the few “safe” soft drinks for me. If I go to a pub I can rarely be the designated driver unless I drink water! The sugar tax has meant I now HAVE to ( 😉) drink alcohol instead of orange juice and lemonade or lemonade and lime.

OJ and soda water/Perrier. It's the only way. TBH it was the only way even back when pub lemonade did have sugar in it.

Belvoir lime cordial and soda is also a fool-proof option.

MyFirstLittlePony · 03/06/2024 12:36

@Allergictoironing yes sweetener is a migraine trigger product for me too

MyFirstLittlePony · 03/06/2024 12:35

I agree OP but for different reasons

I hate the after taste of sweetener and it has ruined so many drinks for me, even getting a normal G&T now has a sweetener-sweet tonic 😭 in most places

I still buy regular coke every now and then as that is the ONLY soft drink left without sweetener (I think?!)

Even San Pellegrino is betraying me

Hope there is a come back of normal sodas soon

Teamarugula · 03/06/2024 12:33

@Citrusandginger Plenty of people drink lots of full-sugar drinks! I see teens drinking can after can of energy drinks and they are packed with sugar. I don’t think the choice of sugar vs sweetener is the limiting factor in how much people drink but whether their palate is accustomed to sweetness. Most sweeteners are actually sweeter than sugar.

Lollygaggle · 03/06/2024 12:31

However the evidence also shows we cannot moderate our sugar intake.
In the US it's even worse because high corn fructose , of which they've had a glut for many years, is shovelled into everything which is why American chocolate and dessert tastes disgusting to us.
The UK is addicted to sugar and anything to discourage that intake and health consequences should be tried. Artificial sweeteners merely encourage that "sweet tooth" but at least xylitol has ant decay properties.

haveatye · 03/06/2024 12:30

I don't think we need to repeal the sugar tax. We need to do far, far more than the sugar tax.

The sugar tax got through because corporations had a work around (sweeteners).

We need to do root and branch stuff to address the obesogenic environment. Active transport, poverty reduction, free school meals, cooking classes, the lot. And penalise the fuck out of big food businesses.

Allergictoironing · 03/06/2024 12:30

Artificial sweeteners, apart from tasting vile IMO, cause me dreadful stomach problems, migraines and even sometimes joint ache. A short while back Pepsi started putting aspartame in their non-diet cola - no notification, nothing to say they had changed the recipe etc. I drank maybe half a glass and was on the loo with a bucket in my hands all night. Pepsi used to be my cola of choice, but not any more! Like many of the drinks I used to enjoy, there's now a stealth addition of these compounds that make me ill.

All the sugar tax has done is make things that people will buy anyway more expensive. Kids don't eat fewer sweets because they cost more, people don't eat less chocolate because of the cost. But people with an intolerance to artificial sweeteners need to check the ingredients list of things that aren't listed as Diet on a regular basis in case they have been changed without notice.

Citrusandginger · 03/06/2024 12:26

Fullrecoveryispossible · 03/06/2024 12:20

I actually worked on the campaign against the sugar tax.
there is NO evidence that suggests that a sugar tax reduces obesity levels. All evidence cited is very weak (I looked into it extensively).
Sponsor of these studies are often dubious to say the least as well.
The companies did not change the formula of their drinks to reduce sugar because of customer demand. It was simply the sugar tax that forced them into it.
like others have said, moderation is key. I for one think it was an appalling tax that forces us to consume unnatural chemicals.

That's so interesting. I think in years to come we will be shocked that we were led into this nonsense.

OP posts:
Citrusandginger · 03/06/2024 12:24

Teamarugula I agree sugar isn't healthy, but at least it's honestly unhealthy and people tend to be more mindful of their intake. Very few people could guzzle 2litres of full fat coke as it's far too sweet for most of us.

But some people do drink 2 litres of Diet Coke. You only have to see the teens stopping at the co-op before boarding the school bus to know that for some of them it is normal.

OP posts:
Lollygaggle · 03/06/2024 12:20

Tooth decay is the number one reason a child in the UK needs a hospital admission.

Children and adults in the UK eat 2 to 3 times the recommended amount of sugar per day.

The average UK child eats 7 times a day.

We are a nation of dysfunctional eaters and cheap,highly processed high sugar , high fat foods is not helping , neither is the culture of continuous grazing.

If ,as a country, we have to foot the bill for bad dietary habits then we should try to discourage consumption and recoup costs.

The years of healthy eating advice is doing nothing, most people only eat 5 portions of veg a day on Christmas Day.

Fullrecoveryispossible · 03/06/2024 12:20

I actually worked on the campaign against the sugar tax.
there is NO evidence that suggests that a sugar tax reduces obesity levels. All evidence cited is very weak (I looked into it extensively).
Sponsor of these studies are often dubious to say the least as well.
The companies did not change the formula of their drinks to reduce sugar because of customer demand. It was simply the sugar tax that forced them into it.
like others have said, moderation is key. I for one think it was an appalling tax that forces us to consume unnatural chemicals.

Allfur · 03/06/2024 12:16

Why not just give up sweet fizzy drinks altogether?

Teamarugula · 03/06/2024 12:13

People thinking that sugar is fine because no one was overweight in the 70s… the generation that were kids in the 70s are now majority overweight adults and health conditions like diabetes are rife. It might not have had a visible impact at the time but it will have had a long term impact, T2DM doesn’t happen overnight. I don’t think sweeteners are good either but the answer needs to be discouraging both sugar and sweeteners, not encouraging one over the other.

Needanewname42 · 03/06/2024 12:08

Slimming World are totally anti diet juice because it encourages a sweet tooth and leaves people craving actual sugar too.

Or at least that's what I was told years ago when I tried SW. They might actually be on go some thing.

Citrusandginger · 03/06/2024 12:03

J2os - I know what you mean about being a bit tin hat, but I am inclined to agree that I have my doubts about some of the studies. Especially ones sponsored in some way by industry.

And yes I know that correlation isn't causation. But sweeteners are addictive. We all know people who struggle with their weight and as a PP pointed out, we also know obese people who drink a lot of diet fizzy pop. It certainly isn't helping them.

OP posts:
KnittedCardi · 03/06/2024 12:01

There may be no evidence yet, but, as others have said, it is odd that the 70's generation, of which I am one, we were drinking squash, ribena, nesquick. Putting spoons of sugar on to our sugary chocolatey cereals, spoons of sugar into our tea. Lots of bread. We had proper puddings with meals. Literally no kid was overweight, not one.

It's way more complex than just eating sugary things. It's a holistic lifestyle thing, and focusing just on sugar is simplistic.

Needanewname42 · 03/06/2024 11:56

Op I'm with you. The aim should be for foods to be as natural as possible.