Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Bulgarian UC benefit scammers took at least £50m, possibly £250m per annum, via complex fraud.

108 replies

Papyrophile · 29/05/2024 20:46

There's a trial happening in north London right now, with five Bulgarians in the dock for organising the largest benefit fraud operation ever in the UK. It was detected by the Bulgarian police. Where were the UK authorities during this? Asleep?

A link to the Telegraph, but paywalled, so good luck accessing it. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/28/bulgarian-town-boomed-from-uks-biggest-benefits-fraud/

The Bulgarian town that boomed from UK’s biggest benefits fraud

Gang who may have taken hundreds of millions in British welfare caught when inspector noticed sudden rise in wealth

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2024/05/28/bulgarian-town-boomed-from-uks-biggest-benefits-fraud

OP posts:
Papyrophile · 30/05/2024 20:53

Sorry I tried to remove the strike through and failed. It's still legible though.

OP posts:
Papyrophile · 30/05/2024 20:51

I am completely in favour of mandatory ID cards, with biometric identification. Iris scans, fingerprints, you choose, and with an NHS number so that it can be requested at every official interface and scanned quickly. I know others object vehemently to the idea. But every other European country requires them, they substitute for passports, and they should be the main default recourse to proving who you are and your status/entitlement to benefits or NHS care. Like it or not, the absence of such a card in the UK leaves us open, and makes the UK a destination, along with the fact that almost everyone who goes to school anywhere in the world has a smattering of English.

OP posts:
suburburban · 30/05/2024 20:49

Is there any way of extracting the stolen money out of Bulgaria

Are they able to freeze bank accounts there or ask for co operation from their government

HeadDeskHeadDesk · 30/05/2024 20:44

PassingStranger · 30/05/2024 20:40

It wasn't worth it, they got caught and will now have to go to prison.
They will try and claim some money back from them too.

It's rarely worth it you always get caught in the end.
Just to go on holiday buy some watches and trainers not worth it.
If you want the highlife, then earn it yourself and sleep easy at night or be lucky enough to win it.
Stupid greedy people.

Not worth it? 50 million for 3 to 8 years in prison, which they'll probably only serve half of, less time already spent on parole? I'd say it's worth it. That money is all over Bulgaria now. The UK will never recover much of it. They'll see out their days in luxury once out of prison.

PassingStranger · 30/05/2024 20:40

It wasn't worth it, they got caught and will now have to go to prison.
They will try and claim some money back from them too.

It's rarely worth it you always get caught in the end.
Just to go on holiday buy some watches and trainers not worth it.
If you want the highlife, then earn it yourself and sleep easy at night or be lucky enough to win it.
Stupid greedy people.

HeadDeskHeadDesk · 30/05/2024 20:35

Zimunya · 30/05/2024 14:51

The asylum seeker thing is easily resolved - bring in mandatory ID cards. It's common in many countries, and I've never totally understood the UK's extreme objection to it.

totally agree.

suburburban · 30/05/2024 20:34

GoneFishingToday · 30/05/2024 20:29

When I think of how I had to fight to get the benefits I need to live on, even though I was still making NI contributions, and am severely disabled, this makes me want to print off the article and go and personally shove it up Rishi Sunak's nose! How dare they consider sanctioning us, because we can't actually get into a government building for an assessment, because it's so badly designed, whilst paying literally £millions to people who don't even live here, and have never contributed to our country in their lives? Makes my blood boil!😡😡😡

And mine, so much corruption

itsgettingweird · 30/05/2024 20:34

Well our own chancellor "carelessly" underpaid £3m in tax. Plenty is possible.

HeadDeskHeadDesk · 30/05/2024 20:34

Papyrophile · 29/05/2024 21:08

This particular scheme may have been closed but how many replicas are there? Any variations on the same scale?

Given how tough it appears to be to claim benefits legitimately here, how can this be happening?

Many, I imagine. Very many. We truly are a joke. How on earth can you agree to give people in excess of 2k a month in benefits based on an online assessments and not even a face to face meeting?

I read that although it is known to have been 50 million it could potentially have been up to 200 million.

And they've been sentenced to between 3 and 8 years each. For 50 million.

I'll say it again. We are truly an absolute fucking joke.

RickyGervaislovesdogs · 30/05/2024 20:32

Drop in the ocean. Benefit tourism is rife. Pretending to rent homes that are rarely lived in, children not in school for months at a time, carers not even in the same country as the people they are meant to be caring for. UC is a joke.

GoneFishingToday · 30/05/2024 20:29

When I think of how I had to fight to get the benefits I need to live on, even though I was still making NI contributions, and am severely disabled, this makes me want to print off the article and go and personally shove it up Rishi Sunak's nose! How dare they consider sanctioning us, because we can't actually get into a government building for an assessment, because it's so badly designed, whilst paying literally £millions to people who don't even live here, and have never contributed to our country in their lives? Makes my blood boil!😡😡😡

WellThisIsFuckingShit · 30/05/2024 20:23

Namechange43654 · 30/05/2024 20:22

Or... Not resident at all in the case of many of these 'claimants'.

See my second post though - proving it is hard !!

Namechange43654 · 30/05/2024 20:22

WellThisIsFuckingShit · 30/05/2024 15:22

That really isn't true. You need to be habitually resident in the UK to claim universal credit.

Or... Not resident at all in the case of many of these 'claimants'.

Namechange43654 · 30/05/2024 20:20

TheChosenTwo · 30/05/2024 14:13

I read about this and just couldn’t quite believe it! Genuinely shocking.
What happens to all that money now?

A large amount seems to be tied up in new casinos and other businesses in Sliven - no way the UK is ever getting that back 🤯

Scintella · 30/05/2024 20:08

Gawd - I might even vote for the Reform party - I am so pissed with this sort of thing - Reform they say they will pick up the boat people and take them back to France. Apparently the Belgians do that, take them back on shore hence they have no boat people leaving their shores.
Goodness knows how many scams are going on - hundreds? thousands? There used to be no checks on people setting up fake companies in Companies House - I hope that's changed now.

Beezknees · 30/05/2024 20:07

Zxz71 · 30/05/2024 17:17

Yes and one of the ways they can prove they are habitually resident is to set up shell companies which don't actually exist such as shops which will then report their earnings to HMRC so it looks like they actually live here. Very few checks have been made by HMRC on the legitimacy of these companies until recently. As it looks as though they are earning a decent amount, they aren't called in for appointments so they can continue to claim U C without question.

Lots of these people aren't even in this country. They make all sorts of excuses not to attend appointments to continue their claims when they are caught. They will then produce false documents showing school attendance, doctors registration etc to prove they are here (the documents are often laughably poor).

The old system of JSA was that if you didn't turn up to sign on, your money was not released from the system. Now it can continue to be paid to people and their full families who aren't even in this country.

Multiple claims of housing costs are made for the same properties. False childcare costs are claimed.

Any possible loophole is exposed and abused.

Huh? I had to claim JSA last year and I had to attend the jobcentre every week. If you don't go you get sanctioned.

GentlemanJohnny · 30/05/2024 20:03

The DWP has always been the most incompetent Dept in Whitehall (I spent all my working life dealing with them so I speak from experience).

The surrpise, such as it is, is that this is the only major fraud discovered so far.

Notaflippinclue · 30/05/2024 19:47

And only came to light when a village cop in Bulgaria wondered why half the village were suddenly driving round in brand new 4x4s

Notaflippinclue · 30/05/2024 19:42

Can anyone explain why this country is such a push over and is this going on all over the country - God help us

WellThisIsFuckingShit · 30/05/2024 18:49

Zxz71 · 30/05/2024 17:17

Yes and one of the ways they can prove they are habitually resident is to set up shell companies which don't actually exist such as shops which will then report their earnings to HMRC so it looks like they actually live here. Very few checks have been made by HMRC on the legitimacy of these companies until recently. As it looks as though they are earning a decent amount, they aren't called in for appointments so they can continue to claim U C without question.

Lots of these people aren't even in this country. They make all sorts of excuses not to attend appointments to continue their claims when they are caught. They will then produce false documents showing school attendance, doctors registration etc to prove they are here (the documents are often laughably poor).

The old system of JSA was that if you didn't turn up to sign on, your money was not released from the system. Now it can continue to be paid to people and their full families who aren't even in this country.

Multiple claims of housing costs are made for the same properties. False childcare costs are claimed.

Any possible loophole is exposed and abused.

See, one of my friends was caught out by the habitual residence thing when she moved to UC from TC. She was born abroad but her parents came to live here when she was a toddler, she was educated here, studied and worked here, has children who are British citizens. But UC took months to agree that she was habitually resident (and left her without any payments in the meantime) - she had to provide proof of addresses and jobs and bank statements going back 20 years! So how on earth can anyone who hasn't ever even been in the UK get away with claiming? I'm staggered tbh.

Bululu · 30/05/2024 17:44

How can someone claim and not live in the U.K? 😡

Zxz71 · 30/05/2024 17:17

WellThisIsFuckingShit · 30/05/2024 15:22

That really isn't true. You need to be habitually resident in the UK to claim universal credit.

Yes and one of the ways they can prove they are habitually resident is to set up shell companies which don't actually exist such as shops which will then report their earnings to HMRC so it looks like they actually live here. Very few checks have been made by HMRC on the legitimacy of these companies until recently. As it looks as though they are earning a decent amount, they aren't called in for appointments so they can continue to claim U C without question.

Lots of these people aren't even in this country. They make all sorts of excuses not to attend appointments to continue their claims when they are caught. They will then produce false documents showing school attendance, doctors registration etc to prove they are here (the documents are often laughably poor).

The old system of JSA was that if you didn't turn up to sign on, your money was not released from the system. Now it can continue to be paid to people and their full families who aren't even in this country.

Multiple claims of housing costs are made for the same properties. False childcare costs are claimed.

Any possible loophole is exposed and abused.

Papyrophile · 30/05/2024 17:17

Because the recipients of the fraudulently obtained money didn't actually live in the UK, they would not have been subject to income tax. Apparently if HMRC had been involved, the sentences would have been significantly longer but the DWP doesn't have the same prosecuting powers as the tax office. That's my understanding, based on one of the BBC articles linked above.

OP posts:
NamechangeForthisquestion1 · 30/05/2024 17:12

And yet it's the disabled and carers that the DWP go after. It's fucked. 😡

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 30/05/2024 17:04

PippyLongTits · 30/05/2024 15:24

This was covered on BBC news at lunchtime. I expect it will be covered on the 6 o clock news too for anyone interested. The segment I saw said that they would have got longer if they defrauded the tax office, but the court was limited in sentencing because they defrauded the benefits office (not the tax office).

It was crazy to see the scale of their operation. Shelves and shelves of mobile phones and sim cards used to make claims in different names, folders and spreadsheets of it all and wads and wads of cash.

But surely they defrauded the tax office as well, unless they have declared all the money they received because of the fraud?