Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Is it a foregone conclusion now that labour will win?

183 replies

hangerba · 29/05/2024 20:30

That’s it really…

OP posts:
HelenaWaiting · 29/05/2024 23:10

amijustbeingsuspicious · 29/05/2024 21:35

the election results disagree with you

Election results do not necessarily reflect the quality of the campaigning. If Labour and Tory both run good campaigns, as happened when Teresa May came close to losing a big lead, or both run poor ones, people will vote with the party they instinctively lean towards.

pinotnow · 29/05/2024 23:09

Well, if they get Dacre on side they won't that really will be the exception that proves the rule. And it wasn't simply the amazing quality of the Blair campaign that won the sun over as I understand it.

My last sentence is holding up for now at least, looks like they're aiming for the worst campaign ever.

amijustbeingsuspicious · 29/05/2024 23:04

pinotnow · 29/05/2024 22:51

But you don't 'get the press aligned with you' - the British press is always right wing because of who owns it, not because of the quality of the campaigns that are run. (I do know Blair got the Sun on side and that was a massive achievement of that campaign, however it came about).

I agree that the Johnson campaign was impressive but I honestly can't remember much about the Cameron one and do feel in some ways it was a bit like the Tory situation now in that people felt it was time for a change and were blaming Brown for the financial crash. I suppose that did come up in the campaign and the Tories were absolutely on message for the decade after that in saying how Labour had wrecked the economy - they kept that up right up to Brexit/Covid as I recall.

But this Tory talent for campaigning has really not been much in evidence this time around has it?

I’m not sure if the campaigning this time around is shit because 1) they are working with a damp squib or because 2) it’s just a different team without the force.

the second DC campaign was a huge achievement - I posted an article about it earlier in the thread.

agree the Blair campaign was also epic.

FrivolousKitchenRollUse · 29/05/2024 23:01

pinotnow · 29/05/2024 22:51

But you don't 'get the press aligned with you' - the British press is always right wing because of who owns it, not because of the quality of the campaigns that are run. (I do know Blair got the Sun on side and that was a massive achievement of that campaign, however it came about).

I agree that the Johnson campaign was impressive but I honestly can't remember much about the Cameron one and do feel in some ways it was a bit like the Tory situation now in that people felt it was time for a change and were blaming Brown for the financial crash. I suppose that did come up in the campaign and the Tories were absolutely on message for the decade after that in saying how Labour had wrecked the economy - they kept that up right up to Brexit/Covid as I recall.

But this Tory talent for campaigning has really not been much in evidence this time around has it?

Yes, you do get the press aligned with you, the Blair point is the exception that proves the rule.

Hoping your last sentence is true.

sf99 · 29/05/2024 22:58

Vote*, not bite!

sf99 · 29/05/2024 22:57

pinotnow · 29/05/2024 22:38

I must say it's funny how PPs are crediting Cameron and Johnson with being such excellent campaigners and failing to mention the enormous boost they get from the right-wing press in this country. Remember a certain bacon sandwich and the absolutely heinous way in which it was eaten which would undoubtedly have resulted in the annihilation of Great Britain had Putin witnessed it?

Obviously Johnson did have a certain appeal amongst many and the simplicity bullshit of 'Get Brexit Done' was effective (so effective it's now never mentioned even though it's one promise that was kept - wonder why that is...) but Cameron was not a great campaigner. He also headed the Remain campaign and look how well that went. However, to be fair to dear old Hammy there was also the law-breaking on the Leave side - it was hardly a fair fight.

I think the press play a big part in it all, even today, and then unexpected things like the bloody 'bigoted woman' thing can crop up, but even that wasn't that unexpected as it was all tied in with fucking Brexit, not that it was even called that then I don't think. I think, when you step back and peel back the layers, there's often a common thread that takes hold. From 2015 onwards that was Brexit, and now I really do think it's the idea that everything has gone to shit in this country and that is the fault of the Tories who are corrupt/shit/both, or they've just been in too long. I think many people hold a version of that view and I hope (and barely dare to think) that that will be the thread that strengthens and will result in a clear Labour win.

Yep. And that press painted Corbin as a villain - a genuinely good man lost to a joker, known only for his lies.
And that's why the young generations bite differently - they don't consume that media.

pinotnow · 29/05/2024 22:51

But you don't 'get the press aligned with you' - the British press is always right wing because of who owns it, not because of the quality of the campaigns that are run. (I do know Blair got the Sun on side and that was a massive achievement of that campaign, however it came about).

I agree that the Johnson campaign was impressive but I honestly can't remember much about the Cameron one and do feel in some ways it was a bit like the Tory situation now in that people felt it was time for a change and were blaming Brown for the financial crash. I suppose that did come up in the campaign and the Tories were absolutely on message for the decade after that in saying how Labour had wrecked the economy - they kept that up right up to Brexit/Covid as I recall.

But this Tory talent for campaigning has really not been much in evidence this time around has it?

Carebearsonmybed · 29/05/2024 22:51

I'm assuming so

amijustbeingsuspicious · 29/05/2024 22:43

pinotnow · 29/05/2024 22:38

I must say it's funny how PPs are crediting Cameron and Johnson with being such excellent campaigners and failing to mention the enormous boost they get from the right-wing press in this country. Remember a certain bacon sandwich and the absolutely heinous way in which it was eaten which would undoubtedly have resulted in the annihilation of Great Britain had Putin witnessed it?

Obviously Johnson did have a certain appeal amongst many and the simplicity bullshit of 'Get Brexit Done' was effective (so effective it's now never mentioned even though it's one promise that was kept - wonder why that is...) but Cameron was not a great campaigner. He also headed the Remain campaign and look how well that went. However, to be fair to dear old Hammy there was also the law-breaking on the Leave side - it was hardly a fair fight.

I think the press play a big part in it all, even today, and then unexpected things like the bloody 'bigoted woman' thing can crop up, but even that wasn't that unexpected as it was all tied in with fucking Brexit, not that it was even called that then I don't think. I think, when you step back and peel back the layers, there's often a common thread that takes hold. From 2015 onwards that was Brexit, and now I really do think it's the idea that everything has gone to shit in this country and that is the fault of the Tories who are corrupt/shit/both, or they've just been in too long. I think many people hold a version of that view and I hope (and barely dare to think) that that will be the thread that strengthens and will result in a clear Labour win.

Sorry - I think you have misinterpreted my comment.

I am not saying that DC and BJ are good campaigners themselves. I am complimenting the campaigning machine of the conservatives. The two are extremely different.

FrivolousKitchenRollUse · 29/05/2024 22:42

pinotnow · 29/05/2024 22:38

I must say it's funny how PPs are crediting Cameron and Johnson with being such excellent campaigners and failing to mention the enormous boost they get from the right-wing press in this country. Remember a certain bacon sandwich and the absolutely heinous way in which it was eaten which would undoubtedly have resulted in the annihilation of Great Britain had Putin witnessed it?

Obviously Johnson did have a certain appeal amongst many and the simplicity bullshit of 'Get Brexit Done' was effective (so effective it's now never mentioned even though it's one promise that was kept - wonder why that is...) but Cameron was not a great campaigner. He also headed the Remain campaign and look how well that went. However, to be fair to dear old Hammy there was also the law-breaking on the Leave side - it was hardly a fair fight.

I think the press play a big part in it all, even today, and then unexpected things like the bloody 'bigoted woman' thing can crop up, but even that wasn't that unexpected as it was all tied in with fucking Brexit, not that it was even called that then I don't think. I think, when you step back and peel back the layers, there's often a common thread that takes hold. From 2015 onwards that was Brexit, and now I really do think it's the idea that everything has gone to shit in this country and that is the fault of the Tories who are corrupt/shit/both, or they've just been in too long. I think many people hold a version of that view and I hope (and barely dare to think) that that will be the thread that strengthens and will result in a clear Labour win.

But in some ways getting the press (of either wing) aligned with you is another part of campaigning?

I totally share your views btw, just making a point on getting the media onside.

pinotnow · 29/05/2024 22:38

I must say it's funny how PPs are crediting Cameron and Johnson with being such excellent campaigners and failing to mention the enormous boost they get from the right-wing press in this country. Remember a certain bacon sandwich and the absolutely heinous way in which it was eaten which would undoubtedly have resulted in the annihilation of Great Britain had Putin witnessed it?

Obviously Johnson did have a certain appeal amongst many and the simplicity bullshit of 'Get Brexit Done' was effective (so effective it's now never mentioned even though it's one promise that was kept - wonder why that is...) but Cameron was not a great campaigner. He also headed the Remain campaign and look how well that went. However, to be fair to dear old Hammy there was also the law-breaking on the Leave side - it was hardly a fair fight.

I think the press play a big part in it all, even today, and then unexpected things like the bloody 'bigoted woman' thing can crop up, but even that wasn't that unexpected as it was all tied in with fucking Brexit, not that it was even called that then I don't think. I think, when you step back and peel back the layers, there's often a common thread that takes hold. From 2015 onwards that was Brexit, and now I really do think it's the idea that everything has gone to shit in this country and that is the fault of the Tories who are corrupt/shit/both, or they've just been in too long. I think many people hold a version of that view and I hope (and barely dare to think) that that will be the thread that strengthens and will result in a clear Labour win.

frankentall · 29/05/2024 22:19

hangerba · 29/05/2024 21:08

@SherbetDips but what will that mean? Will it mean labour will get their policies through still?

It's pretty simple really - it's a numbers game. If nonparty has enough seats (MPs elected) to outvote all the other parties and independents, they will have to seek allies among the other parties. The last time this happened, the Tories had to agree to implement some Lib Dem policies in return for the Lib Dems voting through some of the Conservatives policies.

YaMuvva · 29/05/2024 22:16

amijustbeingsuspicious · 29/05/2024 22:15

The thing with it is just that it’s divisive to voters. Some voters will support her and be angry, other voters will find her comments anti semitic and be annoyed that the findings weren’t presented months ago

Dare I say it - I think Diane thinks she holds more importance in the Labour Party than she does.

amijustbeingsuspicious · 29/05/2024 22:15

YaMuvva · 29/05/2024 22:13

The Diane Abbot thing from today is so odd.
Then again I don’t support antisemites being politicians and I find her tantrum over something that hasn’t happened to be rather crass.

I think many people expect a PM to have charisma, and that will be an obstacle for Starmer. But IMO he ticks the boxes that matter.

The thing with it is just that it’s divisive to voters. Some voters will support her and be angry, other voters will find her comments anti semitic and be annoyed that the findings weren’t presented months ago

YaMuvva · 29/05/2024 22:13

The Diane Abbot thing from today is so odd.
Then again I don’t support antisemites being politicians and I find her tantrum over something that hasn’t happened to be rather crass.

I think many people expect a PM to have charisma, and that will be an obstacle for Starmer. But IMO he ticks the boxes that matter.

FrivolousKitchenRollUse · 29/05/2024 22:11

GentlemanJohnny · 29/05/2024 22:05

No. There are still sufficient fair weather Labour voters who will only vote if the Party is currently 100% in accord with their own personal views to hand the election to the Tories.

Such voters call their action "sticking to their principles". I call it smug self-satisfaction.

Think this puts it more succinctly than my previous waffle a couple of minutes ago 😂

MarkWithaC · 29/05/2024 22:11

I’m not convinced of a Labour win, even more so since today with the Diane Abbott thing. I think diehard Diane fans/Corbynistas people in her constituency will vote Green or Lib Dem in protest and split the vote, and diehard lefties in other constituencies may do the same either in ‘solidarity’ with her or just because there’s a worrying number of people still longing for JC and his ilk to come back because they think Starmer is too right-wing/they’re still not over Blair and Iraq. I know quite a lot of those types.

the80sweregreat · 29/05/2024 22:11

Not at all.
There are tv debates and five more weeks to go yet. I still think it could be a hung Parliament, but that's only my opinion and most people I know think labour will win. They lead the polls.
Whoever gets in has a hell of a job with the NHS , money and everything else. I don't envy any of them, there are two many problems to try and solve.

FrivolousKitchenRollUse · 29/05/2024 22:10

amijustbeingsuspicious · 29/05/2024 22:02

Very interesting. Did they feel let down by how centrist he is?

Yes. Blair copped for a bit as well. The history was fascinating and Scargill gave a long speech as well about the timeline of the strikes. Overall, some of the beliefs are outdated - they feel old labour is the only labour and a small minority even that coal will make a comeback in this country. I've no idea where some of their protest votes would go though, or if they wouldn't vote at all. We do have a trade union/socialist candidate as usual so be interesting to see how they do. They got <300 I think in 2010 and given the passing of time I would be surprised if they do any better this time round.

HappiestSleeping · 29/05/2024 22:08

amijustbeingsuspicious · 29/05/2024 21:59

I’ll look that up too - haven’t read much about the labour campaigning but im
sure there’s a wealthy of (dare I say comical) info around the Miliband years 😀 thanks!

They so picked the wrong Milliband brother.

GentlemanJohnny · 29/05/2024 22:05

No. There are still sufficient fair weather Labour voters who will only vote if the Party is currently 100% in accord with their own personal views to hand the election to the Tories.

Such voters call their action "sticking to their principles". I call it smug self-satisfaction.

amijustbeingsuspicious · 29/05/2024 22:02

FrivolousKitchenRollUse · 29/05/2024 22:00

I think your first paragraph just nails it and shows how much of a balancing act the opposition have to do. I attended an anniversary march for the miners strike a few months ago in my S Yorks town. Behind Thatcher, Starmer was the most called out politician in the speeches which is what makes me think its not a foregone conclusion at all.

Very interesting. Did they feel let down by how centrist he is?

VanCleefArpels · 29/05/2024 22:00

No for the following reasons:

  1. boundary changes mean unpredictable results in new constituencies
  2. Labour need a shedload of Scottish seats to get an overall majority - the SNP are on dodgy ground but who knows…
  3. Secret Tories- there’s a real phenomenon of people voting Tory but not admitting to it to pollsters (for shame reasons!)
  4. turn out- has trust / interest in the political process got so low that people (usually younger) won’t bother to vote
  5. Reform party / Libdem will be recipients of protest votes which may deprive Labour of crucial swing seats they need to get an overall majority.
I’d say a small Labour majority or even hung Parliament are a good bet
FrivolousKitchenRollUse · 29/05/2024 22:00

HappiestSleeping · 29/05/2024 21:47

The trouble is, the further right the right go, the further right the left have to go to capture the disenfranchised middle voters that the right piss off by going further right. And they have to do it without pissing off the left voters in the process.

JC was always unelectable. He's the best thing that ever happened to the Conservative party. The amount of young people who started talking politics was incredible though, and I have to concede that this is a good thing.

I think your first paragraph just nails it and shows how much of a balancing act the opposition have to do. I attended an anniversary march for the miners strike a few months ago in my S Yorks town. Behind Thatcher, Starmer was the most called out politician in the speeches which is what makes me think its not a foregone conclusion at all.

amijustbeingsuspicious · 29/05/2024 21:59

HappiestSleeping · 29/05/2024 21:54

I shall have a look, it is interesting. I recall reading am article by the guy who did labour campaigns when Milliband was in the chair and he asked whether any of the shadow cabinet had ongoing relationships with anyone from the demographic they were supposed to represent. Not a one of them did.

I don't doubt that there is more science / effort than I give credit to, however I lost interest in the campaigns when they started with the chicken / headless chicken suits. 1997 I think. It has all been downhill from there really.

I’ll look that up too - haven’t read much about the labour campaigning but im
sure there’s a wealthy of (dare I say comical) info around the Miliband years 😀 thanks!

Swipe left for the next trending thread