*Been reading for interest, and whilst I acknowledge success can be a combination of hard work and luck, I do not follow this luck argument completely after reading this thread. In fact, its turned me against it.
How can you even tell what 'luck' or 'privilege' every individual you meet has? Do you know their entire life story, their genetic makeup and have an understanding of every engagement they have had? Do you assign a point system to each thing? How do you know someone from a private school hasn't had a terrible upbringing? Are you assuming, rather terribly, that people from poorer backgrounds have had a terrible upbringing? Or are you making snap judgements based on stereotypes to form your opinion?
What is the argument for even trying to achieve something if it's all down to luck and privilege? Does that mean fate exists?*
In real life I don't know any of that. Because frankly, I don't care. First of all because I don't assign value to people based on what they earn/what they have/what job they do ,secondly, because if they're my friends/family , I care about them and I'm happy for all their successes and achievements, whatever form they take and thirdly, because overall I'm quite content and satisfied with my lot in life. So it doesn't matter to me if John gets millions in bonuses because he developed an innovative software at 16 or because he's Eton educated and from a wealthy family. I'll even listen to him complain about struggling with money because of x or y.Or whether Jenny got her 6 bedroom 3 bathrooms six house by scraping and saving and working hard at her job or because her parents gifted her the deposit. Mostly because they're not being twats about what they have and how they got there.
On here, it's different mostly because of disparaging comment from the "hard workers". Apparently lucky is insulting but lazy, unwilling, pity party, victim mentality etc isn't. The irony...