Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

The reaction to National Service on here

793 replies

MaryMaryVeryContrary · 27/05/2024 19:01

Many European countries (including Scandinavian countries) have NS. Are they ‘ridiculous’? Or are their much-coveted-by-Mumsnet-users communities better because of their sense of individual responsibility and contribution?

If 24 days (that’s how long it would be in total) of delivering prescriptions or volunteering as a hospital guide has you talking about human rights violations and Nazi Germany, then it’s very clear that you’re so pampered a bit of NS would do you good.

Everyone on here expects the world in terms of a ’village’, generous benefits, a caring society, but wants to do fuck all to contribute to it and think the notion of them having to do ANYTHING for anyone else is insane.

It’s nuts!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
21
SmileyHappyPeopleInTheSun · 28/05/2024 13:33

WoshPank · 28/05/2024 13:24

How would spunking a load of cash on 30,000 unwilling NEETs who the military don't want assist with this?

They don't want the neets - the military slots are supposed to be for the more motivated and bright students and only section where payments been suggested.

So how that would affect uni intakes, people who'd normally join services anyway at 18 after A-levels - or people doing apprenticeships or even starting own business - I don't think even been considered - perhaps that why they want a committee to flesh out ideas later - meaning it's impossible to know what form this scheme would take before voting for it.

WoshPank · 28/05/2024 13:31

Persimonne72 · 28/05/2024 13:27

Personally, I would not disturb the life of 18 years old but include it as a subject in secondary schools - 1h per week.

And that is how it functioned/ functiones in many countries.

Everybody needs training in first aid, and many useful skills

Edited

Which is an entirely different proposal to the one made by the government.

And that's important, because the proposals aren't just useless, but actively harmful. They'd waste resources, both financial and human, that then aren't available elsewhere. That's bad at the best of times, but it's worse when we're in a position where Russia have already attacked us.

SmileyHappyPeopleInTheSun · 28/05/2024 13:29

I’m so sick of the notion that all young people are ‘selfish’ and ‘entitled’ and ‘snowflakes’. It smacks of adultism (not to mention hypocrisy!)

This.

I've read the proposals it takes no account that young people can be in vastly different places - young carers/parents/full time working and most I know full time studying and p/t working if not volunteering already but not in fields mentioned so far.

Like Brexit there's also a lot of fill in the blanks. Posters insisting travel costs will be paid for volunteering with no idea who - it will just magically happen as will places - nothing been said so far - that military places are for neets when they said they want those places to go to best - there's headline saying parents will be fine/caution if their adult child doesn't comply then headlines saying no they won't - my 18 year old is in different part of UK at uni - military don't seem keen not sure rest of services mention are either.

It smack of punishing 18 year olds for going round being young at people.

Persimonne72 · 28/05/2024 13:27

WoshPank · 28/05/2024 13:24

How would spunking a load of cash on 30,000 unwilling NEETs who the military don't want assist with this?

Personally, I would not disturb the life of 18 years old but include it as a subject in secondary schools - 1h per week.

And that is how it functioned/ functiones in many countries.

Everybody needs training in first aid, and many useful skills

Persimonne72 · 28/05/2024 13:25

pointythings · 28/05/2024 13:22

Rents are now a far higher % of household income than in the 60s and 70s. It's not about inflation.

Read what Yalta above written. You are wrong

WoshPank · 28/05/2024 13:24

Persimonne72 · 28/05/2024 13:21

as with any new initiatives. The fact is that NATO secretary and admiral said that the war with Russian is not a question if it happen but when it happen. And we need people to support communities in case of bombarding.

How would spunking a load of cash on 30,000 unwilling NEETs who the military don't want assist with this?

Magnastorm · 28/05/2024 13:23

RubySloth · 28/05/2024 13:20

100% agree, if it hadn't of come out a tories mouth everyone would be praising the idea.

It's a stupid idea whoever's mouth it comes out of.

Just with the tories, you have to assume they are doing it to benefit their rich mates as well.

Comefromaway · 28/05/2024 13:22

RubySloth · 28/05/2024 13:20

100% agree, if it hadn't of come out a tories mouth everyone would be praising the idea.

Labour have come up with many hare brained ideas in the past and I have been equally as vocal. Nothing quite like this though.

pointythings · 28/05/2024 13:22

Persimonne72 · 28/05/2024 13:17

Rent is dictated by the price of housing. People do not rent if the rent doesn't pay for their mortgage. It sounds lower because of inflation. The salaries were also lower. But yes, the golden era for council housing being built was in 50-ties

Rents are now a far higher % of household income than in the 60s and 70s. It's not about inflation.

Shinyandnew1 · 28/05/2024 13:22

RubySloth · 28/05/2024 13:20

100% agree, if it hadn't of come out a tories mouth everyone would be praising the idea.

I doubt that very much. Mandatory enforced unpaid work is not a vote winner, no matter which colour flag you fly.

Persimonne72 · 28/05/2024 13:21

bluetopazlove · 28/05/2024 13:19

That is biggest problem I have with this you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours , you most untrusty band of scams we've ever had .

as with any new initiatives. The fact is that NATO secretary and admiral said that the war with Russian is not a question if it happen but when it happen. And we need people to support communities in case of bombarding.

RubySloth · 28/05/2024 13:20

100% agree, if it hadn't of come out a tories mouth everyone would be praising the idea.

bluetopazlove · 28/05/2024 13:19

wombat15 · 28/05/2024 13:11

Yes, they will give contracts to their mates who will make a lot of money out of organising 18 year olds to work for nothing. There is huge potential for profiteering and exploitation.

That is biggest problem I have with this you scratch my back and I'll scratch yours , you most untrusty band of scams we've ever had .

Yalta · 28/05/2024 13:19

wombat15 · 28/05/2024 13:09

Rents were low in the 60 and 70s and there were plenty of council houses.

😂😂😂

They really weren’t

I paid 75% of my salary on rent

The places were shit holes because landlords knew that if you they rented to you they couldn’t get you out. So why spend money on the place as they could easily rent the place out as it was take it or leave it. The next in the queue would have ot
Council houses were freely available if you didn’t mind going to a really rough or unsafe area.

Friend chose 3 places near her which weren’t exactly top notch areas and the least wait time was approximately 8 years
One area was 23 years

scarecrowded · 28/05/2024 13:18

cannonballz · 27/05/2024 19:08

The reality of the Scandinavian national service, knowing friends who have had to send their children, is that it is partly to discourage Putin - in other words, lining up their young people to defend their country, with their lives if necessary.

They think we are stark staring bonkers to be considering this when for them it is a brutal necessity, and for us would be a political choice

What? No it’s not. I’m in Scandinavia. And it’s not a brutal necessity, not sure what you are on about tbh. It’s about everybody needing to help out. Most people can contribute with something. I know where I will be stationed if there is a war, at my nursery. You can’t just take if you want a working society.

Persimonne72 · 28/05/2024 13:17

wombat15 · 28/05/2024 13:09

Rents were low in the 60 and 70s and there were plenty of council houses.

Rent is dictated by the price of housing. People do not rent if the rent doesn't pay for their mortgage. It sounds lower because of inflation. The salaries were also lower. But yes, the golden era for council housing being built was in 50-ties

Thelnebriati · 28/05/2024 13:15

This is the govt that stopped housing benefit for under 22 year olds and had to reinstate it for care leavers because of the catastrophic impact it had on them.

If they really wanted to do this they'd introduce a well designed scheme as a trial and then gradually increase the number of places available.

wombat15 · 28/05/2024 13:11

Thelnebriati · 28/05/2024 12:59

A lot of countries have well run NS schemes but we have a Govt that has a long history of giving contracts to their mates. So I'm sceptical. I also think its insane they want to fine parents of 18 year olds who don't comply.

Yes, they will give contracts to their mates who will make a lot of money out of organising 18 year olds to work for nothing. There is huge potential for profiteering and exploitation.

ThatPeachSnake · 28/05/2024 13:10

I think it’s tough. I was really busy at 18 - started an intense uni course, worked all hours I could just to survive. NS would have taken away time I really needed to earn money. I was really driven and wanted to get going with my life. I had limited financial help and had to completely rely on myself and my time.

My sibling, on the other hand, I think would have really benefited from NS. They were and still are (to a degree) lost in life. Made bad choices and partied all hours of every weekend, which is normal but ended up getting involved with drugs. Have had long periods of time without a job. I just think implementing a routine at that point would have been helpful for their mental health and sense of being.

but I know it can’t be done case by case…

wombat15 · 28/05/2024 13:09

Persimonne72 · 28/05/2024 13:06

Honestly, everything depends on perspective. After second world war people had food rationed, beans on toast was a luxury food and apart from few in their 20ties and 30ties even dreamt about owning a house. The mortgage rates in 60-70-ties and 80-ties were huge, much larger than now.

Rents were low in the 60 and 70s and there were plenty of council houses.

ByPeachSeal · 28/05/2024 13:09

National service for young men? Great idea; the young boys of today have no idea how to be a proper man.

For women? Nope. Not appropriate.

Persimonne72 · 28/05/2024 13:06

ColdToezzz · 28/05/2024 12:28

Exactly this!!!!

Honestly, everything depends on perspective. After second world war people had food rationed, beans on toast was a luxury food and apart from few in their 20ties and 30ties even dreamt about owning a house. The mortgage rates in 60-70-ties and 80-ties were huge, much larger than now.

The reaction to National Service on here
wombat15 · 28/05/2024 13:06

Thelnebriati · 28/05/2024 12:59

A lot of countries have well run NS schemes but we have a Govt that has a long history of giving contracts to their mates. So I'm sceptical. I also think its insane they want to fine parents of 18 year olds who don't comply.

Yes, that part really does suggest they are living in lala land and hadn't consulated anyone before coming up with the ridiculous idea. Since when are parents held responsible for the conduct of adult children in the UK?

Shinyandnew1 · 28/05/2024 13:06

The UK needs fruit pickers and because Brexit fucked up their system of paying people from other countries low wages for doing boring physical work, they need another plan. It also nicely fudges unemployment figures for 18 year olds.

Thelnebriati · 28/05/2024 12:59

A lot of countries have well run NS schemes but we have a Govt that has a long history of giving contracts to their mates. So I'm sceptical. I also think its insane they want to fine parents of 18 year olds who don't comply.