Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Schools insistence on uniform rules are behind the times

443 replies

spanieleyes22 · 17/05/2024 21:26

I know I will be slated for saying this but just reading a thread from a poster who is disappointed that there is not a more formal dress code at work and so many people saying everyone is more casual in offices all over the place and suits are more worn by older people in the city. Yet schools seem to put so much faith in whether a boy keeps his shirt tucked in or how short a girls skirt is. God forbid they dye their hair or have more than 1 stud earring. Isn't it time for schools to loosen up wrt dress code? In the Scandinavian countries there is no uniform. Does this mean their teenagers are wild and don't learn anything. Why are we so hung up on not allowing teenagers to express themselves.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Nannyogg134 · 18/05/2024 08:56

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

I am a teacher of 15 years and I get what you're saying. I don't know about you but I spend a lot of time in escalated situations with students because they're carrying a coat, have mascara on, their hair was dyed blonde, their socks have frills or their shoes have a diamante on the buckle. I don't think there is anything wrong with scaling back the minute rules of uniform to prevent these interactions. I'm not saying lets make it a free for all, but I don't believe that one pair of stud earring would become hundreds, and the girls who spend all day on make-up are already doing that....they're just also shouting abuse at myself and SLT for the battle to get them to take it off, which then leads to a day in isolation and yet more of my subject missed. I say lets pull back on uniform and deal more with students who are abusive or abscond from lessons.

lemonmeringueno3 · 18/05/2024 08:54

IMBCRound2 · 18/05/2024 08:38

Also my child is currently below the first percentile and I’ve been told we’ll need to get her uniforms custom made . That is absolutely not happening on my paycheck 😂

and I’ve spent so long reinforcing the message that she needs to find clothing that makes her body happy - it makes me feel a bit sick that she’ll then have 13 years of being forced into something that may not make her feel happy and confident. I have a huge bum and tiny waist - I’m very limited in clothes that I can wear - I can imagine school uniforms would have made what was a bit of body conciousness as a teen absolutely unbearable.

and finally - schools may have mottos and values that don’t align with our family values . The vast majority of the schools around here are CoE and I’m strongly atheist- she’s a child so she’s obviously agnostic. I don’t want her walking around with God on her chest when it’s actively against my belief system - and she’s too little to understand the nuances of organised religion.

in short - my child is not wearing a uniform if I can help it!

Just don't apply to the church schools or the ones who have a uniform you disapprove of.

But probably you'll apply to a church school with a strict uniform policy and spend the next ten years moaning about it and how it's discriminatory to your child, and finding little ways to circumvent it.

Airdustmoon · 18/05/2024 08:50

I like uniforms in general. Agreed polyester blazers for secondary aren’t very nice - on the other hand when I was at school the boys had to wear proper wool suits that were dry clean only - at least polyester blazers can be washed!

My DS is still at primary and the uniform isn’t too bad - it is smart (shirts and ties from year 3) but only the tie, the school jumper and the PE polo shirt are branded, everything else can be bought from supermarkets.

When I was at secondary school (late 90s/early 2000s) I remember being totally shocked by the ridiculous number of uniform items I needed for PE - shorts/joggers and branded polo shirt, long hockey socks, shin pads, hockey stick and special hockey boots, gym skirt and gym knickers (bizarrely, not worn for indoor gymnastics but for tennis, rounders etc in the summer). The PE gear alone must’ve cost hundreds? Boys had to have all the rugby and cricket paraphernalia in place of hockey and gym skirts. Absolute madness for two hours of PE a week!!

Zodfa · 18/05/2024 08:45

Disagree that polo shirts are "smart". They look rubbish on almost everybody, including most adults. You can get away with them if you're Daniel Craig or someone.

Makinglists · 18/05/2024 08:40

I like uniform however I think uniforms need to change they are just not practical for school or a changing climate. Polyester blazers - horrible sweaty things - not warm enough in winter, too hot in summer. Ties - heath and safety hazards, get lost, grabbed I could go on. Formal skirts/trousers - again often not practical. Let's have uniforms that are smart and practical, particularly at secondary age. Polo shirts/swearshirts/cargo trousers/rain jackets/ shorts option in summer. Most professions that have uniform have changed to a practical version - let's do the same for schools.

IMBCRound2 · 18/05/2024 08:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Except I went to a non-uniform school and this emphatically wasn’t the case .

(former teacher - currently work in schools as a therapist so hopefully I meet your criteria for commenting )

IMBCRound2 · 18/05/2024 08:38

Also my child is currently below the first percentile and I’ve been told we’ll need to get her uniforms custom made . That is absolutely not happening on my paycheck 😂

and I’ve spent so long reinforcing the message that she needs to find clothing that makes her body happy - it makes me feel a bit sick that she’ll then have 13 years of being forced into something that may not make her feel happy and confident. I have a huge bum and tiny waist - I’m very limited in clothes that I can wear - I can imagine school uniforms would have made what was a bit of body conciousness as a teen absolutely unbearable.

and finally - schools may have mottos and values that don’t align with our family values . The vast majority of the schools around here are CoE and I’m strongly atheist- she’s a child so she’s obviously agnostic. I don’t want her walking around with God on her chest when it’s actively against my belief system - and she’s too little to understand the nuances of organised religion.

in short - my child is not wearing a uniform if I can help it!

Cityandmakeup · 18/05/2024 08:38

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

shellshocks · 18/05/2024 08:38

My local secondary has always been blazers and tie for boys, blazers and blouse (open neck shirt) for girls. This year decided to move with the times... girls now have to wear shirt and tie too! If you're going to modernise get rid of blazer and ties! Presumably it was introduced way back, to reflect formal work wear. We're not there anymore. In most offices you'd look like you were leaving at lunch to attend a funeral or stand in the dock!

LostInTheBog · 18/05/2024 08:35

No. Behind the times means having to wear a straw boater or a cap to School.

sashh · 18/05/2024 08:33

My school actually had a different summer and winter uniform. I think that's a bit much but I have said before, the PE kit should be suitable to be worn when we do have temperatures hitting the 30s.

I also think there should be more choice, flight attendants all used to wear something similar to a school uniform but more recently they have introduced more options (OK not all airlines) I think BA has options of a jumpsuit, trousers, dress or skirt and a tunic / trousers combo.

I've taught girls who will not remove a jumper because their shirts are thin and show their underwear.

My cousins in Australia had a sort of uniform at primary, it was basically red, white and blue so you could wear trousers, skirts, shorts, pinafores.

On PE day they had to have something suitable for PE but it could be something you took in or you could spend the day in a tracksuit.

It seemed to work well and allowed for different sizes and shapes.

PoppyCherryDog · 18/05/2024 08:31

Macbeff · 17/05/2024 21:31

Sorry, I prefer school uniforms. One less thing to think about and they have a lifetime to express themselves. Also helps kids who can’t afford the latest trendy “gear”.

This. My understanding is that uniforms make everyone equal and the lesser we’ll off kids therefore don’t feel so different to their peers.

Maybe schools could relax a bit on some aspects like hair colour and earrings. Suitable length skirts though I think should be adhered to. Just my experience but the children in my town literally have skirts that are maybe 3 inches long at most.

IMBCRound2 · 18/05/2024 08:31

I can’t stand them - I hate that - by and large - the messaging is directed at girls that they have to dress a certain way not to be a distraction or at risk. it also reinforces that message to boys that it’s the girls fault because of what they are wearing. (I’m a CSA therapist and it absolutely breaks my heart hearing the girls question themselves)

the flip side is the only way they can experiment with their style is the length of their skirt.

if they are going to experiment with clothing - I’d much rather them do it while I’m about to help discuss any pros/cons (eg what’s interview appropriate) than when they are off at uni without any guidance.

I grew up without uniforms (different country) and noticed a few things :

  1. there was less interest in brands because there was so many different ways to explore your identity .
  2. if you were interested in brands - it was cheaper because you weren’t restricted to coats and shoes which tend to be more expensive- you could get a T-shirt or something small
  3. while I fully support people wearing whatever they like - sadly we don’t live in a world wear girls and women can wear certain outfits without drawing attention to themselves . By and large , girls wear a lot less here and I think they don’t get the chance to explore things beyond the length of their skirt . Part of me happily waves my feminist flag and says you go girl - part of me is horrified at the thought of my little girl going out how i used to dress when I moved back to the uk ! 😂
Sashikocheck · 18/05/2024 08:29

tiggergoesbounce · 18/05/2024 08:08

I prefer a uniform - it is easier to not have to think about what clothes our DS needs to wear.

I think keeping shirts tucked in etc is also good for kids to learn about looking smart and having pride in your appearance. Polished clean shoes etc...

The kids don't have pride in their appearance when wearing uniform - just have a look at the mess they look on their way home from school - especially on a summer day when they are over-heating. I mean all that cheap ill fitting polyester what more could we expect?
Still we think our kids need 13 years of practice to wearing a uniform so they can learn how to tuck their shirt in - what poor expectations we have on their ability to pick things up quickly!🙄

Crikeyalmighty · 18/05/2024 08:28

To the person saying about Scandinavia etc- I saw very little poverty when we were there but also very little that we might call high 'fashion' - all teens seemed to dress the same

Here- not so much- given the amount of income disparity I think it best to stick to uniforms.

Sashikocheck · 18/05/2024 08:23

Nannyogg134 · 18/05/2024 08:15

I'm a secondary teacher and I feel it's time for a big overhaul on uniform rulings. I'm not against having a uniform but the amount of school-labelled items is ridiculous, and the petty uniform rules I have to enforce drive me to insanity. I honestly don't care if the girls socks have frills, or if the boys are wearing black socks instead of grey. There are so many arguments with students that could be avoided and then the invariable detentions that follow. Also, I'd scrap isolations/reflections (whatever you want to call it), for haircut and uniform infringements. I teach Year 10 and I'd rather the students were with me, prepping for GCSEs.
Having said all this....I just don't think it's going anywhere unfortunately.

Voice of reason!👏

LuckysDadsHat · 18/05/2024 08:22

If uniforms are required it should be a plain black tracksuit and a polo shirt for all years. It is ridiculous in this day and age that we send our kids out in mini suits for no reason but academies trying to assert some power.

It isn't a leveller, it doesn't mean kids don't know who the poor kids are. They all know. Teaching kindness to others less fortunate should be a given by parents anyway! Tackle bullying properly not dress it up in a uniform policy.

Most other countries don't have uniform and get better exam results and have better behaved students. What is going on in the UK? Is it cos of all the pointless rules on this, and speaking in class, and walking in silence etc.... that the kids feel the need to act out.

I have worked in numerous schools over my years in pastoral care and I can honestly say uniform rules are all bullshit. Yes there is excitement on a non uniform day as its a novelty. Do it every day and it would calm down very quickly.

Parker231 · 18/05/2024 08:22

Heatherbell1978 · 18/05/2024 06:52

@GordonBlue I'm currently in the process of equipping my DS for private school. £422 is probably what we'll pay in total for all his uniform including sports wear. Some M&S for the basics, some thrift shop, some new. Includes a school blazer which is £120 new which I bought second hand for £40. But that's private and my choice.

On the other hand, for him when he was at state (and DD who is still there), it's cost peanuts. Yes I buy the school sweatshirts and t-shirts. £10 each but they get handed down and I could buy for £2 from thrift. Everything else supermarket, grey and navy theme. I just bought a bundle of gingham dresses from Vinted for DD for £4.

I have no idea where this notion that school inform is more expensive than 'normal' clothes comes from. Even the private uniform I'm buying, comparing new with new, is cheaper.

It’s cheaper because they don’t need any additional clothes - DT’s wear the same clothes during the school day as they do after school, weekends and holidays.

Nannyogg134 · 18/05/2024 08:15

I'm a secondary teacher and I feel it's time for a big overhaul on uniform rulings. I'm not against having a uniform but the amount of school-labelled items is ridiculous, and the petty uniform rules I have to enforce drive me to insanity. I honestly don't care if the girls socks have frills, or if the boys are wearing black socks instead of grey. There are so many arguments with students that could be avoided and then the invariable detentions that follow. Also, I'd scrap isolations/reflections (whatever you want to call it), for haircut and uniform infringements. I teach Year 10 and I'd rather the students were with me, prepping for GCSEs.
Having said all this....I just don't think it's going anywhere unfortunately.

tiggergoesbounce · 18/05/2024 08:08

I prefer a uniform - it is easier to not have to think about what clothes our DS needs to wear.

I think keeping shirts tucked in etc is also good for kids to learn about looking smart and having pride in your appearance. Polished clean shoes etc...

isthesolution · 18/05/2024 08:07

Uniform rules often aren't about the uniform. They are able making sure children follow rules. And, let's be realistic, they are pretty easy rules to follow.

I have a uniform for work. I love it. I don't have to buy clothes for work or think about what I'm going to wear everyday. And I feel the same about school uniforms.

Plus the kids all look the same and are easy to identify on trips etc. There's no one trying to outdo anyone else by showing off designer clothes etc. It isn't easy to identify families who can't afford lots of outfits. I'm fully behind uniforms.

SpongeBob2022 · 18/05/2024 08:06

Yalta · 18/05/2024 08:00

You are in for a treat when your child gets to secondary school where every logo, shoe style and blazer which costs 3 figures for something made with the cheapest material gets inspected.

I know! It annoys me that all that stuff about uniform needing to be accessible came out and yet from what I can tell, absolutely nothing changed in reality.

LongStoryLong · 18/05/2024 08:01

I don’t know why people go on about the price of uniform- what good value it is “per wear” etc. These are clothes you have to buy only for your children to attend school. You have to buy other clothes too, right?! They also need stuff to wear at the weekends and during the holidays- different shoes, other coats, more formal things for family parties etc etc etc. I think what people are missing when they talk about what good value uniform is, is that the clothes you buy your children anyway, THOSE are the clothes they’d wear to school if there was no uniform.

When my children were at a school with no uniform, it was WAY cheaper. They literally had one coat (seasonally appropriate) and one pair of shoes (again seasonally adjusted, sandals and flip flops excepted). They wore those clothes to school, and they wore them at the weekends and during the holidays. When their feet grew, I bought one pair of new shoes, not one for home and a separate pair for school.

Uniform makes life more expensive for parents, not less.

Ange1233556 · 18/05/2024 08:01

HelpMeHelpMyBro · 17/05/2024 21:37

This is just such a myth, like the kids don't know who's poor Hmm

Bags, shoes, hair, teeth, snacks... There's a million signs.

Surely better to crack down hard on bullying and teach from a young age that such things don't matter!

It’s not a myth at all. I was poor and went to grammar school. Uniform super strict including bags and shoes and even hair bobbles. I didn’t know how rich some of my friends were until I went to their houses.

Yalta · 18/05/2024 08:00

SpongeBob2022 · 18/05/2024 07:38

DS's (primary) uniform is polos, sweatshirt (with or without logo) and trousers. I think it's great...washes up really well, no thinking in the morning, practical and only costs the same as your average, normal stuff.

I can see both sides of the argument for secondary. I'm fine with the above applying to secondary too although I think there should be freedom of trouser styles to suit different shapes etc. so kids feel comfortable.

There are lots of generic statements about non-uniforms in other countries not being an issue for bullying on this thread. But then plenty of people who have lived experience of this absolutely not being the case...so on balance I would go with supporting the latter. I wonder if it's a case of the first year of scrapping uniform causing an issue with brands etc..but then it would calm down long term.

I actually am anti most jewellery for health and safety and theft reasons..teachers have enough to do without having to check jewellery is off for PE/hear about so and so's lost or stolen bracelet etc. People will say health and safety has gone mad, but necklace injuries are a real thing...happens in healthcare settings.

What I do feel really strongly about is an ultra smart dress code and specifically a blazer...I am very anti these, hideously expensive, unnecessary and uncomfortable.

You are in for a treat when your child gets to secondary school where every logo, shoe style and blazer which costs 3 figures for something made with the cheapest material gets inspected.