Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

Single sex schools - PT2

94 replies

WalrusOfLove · 15/05/2024 09:06

I found it an interesting discussion so thought it would be worth having a new thread as the old is now full.

Just before the thread reached its post limit I posted a large government funded study which found that girls in single-sex schools are 'significantly more likely' to suffer threats of violence and actual violence than girls at mixed schools.

Unfortunately, it was too late in the thread to receive any replies but I thought it was an interesting statistic as many posters were suggesting that the benefit of single sex schools was a safer environment away from the boisterous/aggressive nature of boys.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
GabriellaMontez · 15/05/2024 14:28

WalrusOfLove · 15/05/2024 14:24

It was linked at the very start of the thread.

I can see a link to a Daily mail article which quotes several isolated pieces of information from a study.

I don't see a link to the study. It doesn't even say what year the study was done in.

Greengablesfables · 15/05/2024 14:25

60% schools in Ireland are single sex.

The Daily Mail news article was linked but not the actual research on which they said it was based. I couldn’t find the research on the web.

WalrusOfLove · 15/05/2024 14:24

GabriellaMontez · 15/05/2024 14:09

Yes, I'm definitely sceptical because it doesn't match my experience.

Which was why I wanted to see the study.

As the whole thread seems to be hanging on it, it would be a good place to start.

It was linked at the very start of the thread.

OP posts:
GabriellaMontez · 15/05/2024 14:23

This is a discussion about the same study the OP refers to.

But we still don't have a link to it. Or even the year the study was carried out.

Greengablesfables · 15/05/2024 14:23

On no planet would I send my daughters to a mixed secondary school. Mixed primary is great. They don’t need to put up with this shit at their teen plus age. Plenty of time in life to interact with males more. In future they’ll be older, their brains developed and they will be better equipped to deal with any issues. They don’t need to do that now. They’re having a great time. Unlike cousins who are putting up with sexualisation and harassment every week.

I was at a mixed comprehensive. The education was crap, the school was crap, the boys, for the most part were ok. But there was a significant minority who were not. I don’t need my daughters to put up with that shit when they don’t have to.

https://www.thenewfeminist.co.uk/2021/07/we-need-to-talk-about-schools-dismissal-of-sexual-harassment-against-young-women/?amp=1

In June 2021, ITV’s coverage showed that sexual harassment had become normalised to the point where students did not see the point in reporting it. Even more worryingly, 150 victims of upskirting were children.

Victims are so used to enduring it, meanwhile teachers often underestimate the situation and therefore fail to report it. Not to our surprise, the default solution amongst schools seems to be to place the blame on the girls’ choice of clothing.

These responses have not been well received; Norwich Academy, as just one example, was recently criticised for its misogynistic advice to female students not to wear short skirts or coloured bras to avoid unwanted attention. It is a tale as old as time.

We need to talk about schools’ dismissal of sexual harassment against young women - The New Feminist

The New Feminist look into school's dismissal of upskirting young women. To read the full article, click here.

https://www.thenewfeminist.co.uk/2021/07/we-need-to-talk-about-schools-dismissal-of-sexual-harassment-against-young-women/?amp=1

Another76543 · 15/05/2024 14:19

It’s quite difficult to find many recent studies, but here’s a recent one from Ireland which states “there is no difference in reading, mathematics or science performance between those attending single-sex or mixed-sex schools”.

https://bera-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/berj.3841

I think the point is that there is no widespread agreement on whether single sex schools are better for girls, and which is why many families actively avoid them.

GabriellaMontez · 15/05/2024 14:09

WalrusOfLove · 15/05/2024 14:06

I'm genuinely perplexed. I've just reread it and it sounds nothing like clickbait to me. Could it just be that you don't like what it's saying?

Yes, I'm definitely sceptical because it doesn't match my experience.

Which was why I wanted to see the study.

As the whole thread seems to be hanging on it, it would be a good place to start.

GabriellaMontez · 15/05/2024 14:06

Did I miss the link to the study? Sorry, if so, I thought I'd checked.

Have you read it?

Or are you just quoting out of context fragments from the daily mail.

WalrusOfLove · 15/05/2024 14:06

I'm genuinely perplexed. I've just reread it and it sounds nothing like clickbait to me. Could it just be that you don't like what it's saying?

OP posts:
WalrusOfLove · 15/05/2024 13:59

GabriellaMontez · 15/05/2024 13:47

the data still shows that girls are significantly more likely to experience violence in single sex schools

Is the data you're referring to the one in your OP?

Because I won't be relying on a few out of context quotes (in the DM) from a study I've not seen.

Even the quotes in the article don't fully make sense. It reads like click bait.

Well, of course you've 'not seen' it if you don't read it. It was nothing to do with the Daily Mail. It was a large government funded study.

OP posts:
GabriellaMontez · 15/05/2024 13:47

the data still shows that girls are significantly more likely to experience violence in single sex schools

Is the data you're referring to the one in your OP?

Because I won't be relying on a few out of context quotes (in the DM) from a study I've not seen.

Even the quotes in the article don't fully make sense. It reads like click bait.

WalrusOfLove · 15/05/2024 13:41

FaeryRing · 15/05/2024 13:37

Tell me about the last time a female pupil carried out a knife attack at school?

I'm not sure how that's relevant to the topic tbh. Even if boys commit more knife crime the data still shows that girls are significantly more likely to experience violence in single sex schools. And it's not the girls getting stabbed either generally.

You said it best yourself....

But this thread isn’t about what’s best for boys, or where their behaviour comes from, or how to solve it.

It’s about what’s best for girls.

OP posts:
Another76543 · 15/05/2024 13:39

FaeryRing · 15/05/2024 13:37

Tell me about the last time a female pupil carried out a knife attack at school?

I‘m assuming you missed the headline news a couple of weeks ago?

FaeryRing · 15/05/2024 13:37

WalrusOfLove · 15/05/2024 13:35

But surely sending them to an environment where they're significantly more likely to experience violence isn't the solution?

Tell me about the last time a female pupil carried out a knife attack at school?

WalrusOfLove · 15/05/2024 13:35

FaeryRing · 15/05/2024 12:01

I think who is to blame is irrelevant. It’s a fact, and girls shouldn’t be put through a social experiment at the cost of their education to find out why. If boys and their parents want to go away and solve this issue we can talk again. But in the meantime let’s not make our girls pay the price of boys ‘exploring themselves’.

But surely sending them to an environment where they're significantly more likely to experience violence isn't the solution?

OP posts:
WalrusOfLove · 15/05/2024 13:33

FaeryRing · 15/05/2024 11:10

Because I’m aware of a considerable handful of cases of severe violence at school in the last couple of years but all have been perpetrated by boys. I’m also aware of severe violence taking place outside of school between pupils, again all perpetrated by boys against other boys or girls.

I'm sure there is. I thought we were talking about whether girls are better off at SS or co-ed schools, though? That's why violence was brought up because studies show girls are significantly more likely to experience it at SS schools.

OP posts:
Another76543 · 15/05/2024 13:06

FaeryRing · 15/05/2024 11:10

Because I’m aware of a considerable handful of cases of severe violence at school in the last couple of years but all have been perpetrated by boys. I’m also aware of severe violence taking place outside of school between pupils, again all perpetrated by boys against other boys or girls.

A quick google brings up quite a few cases where girls have been the perpetrators in cases involving serious violence.

I think as a country we need to be asking serious questions about why there is an increasing trend in schools for serious violence. I’m not sure it’s helpful to continually say “boys are violent” and just to remove girls from their company and think the problem is solved. Violent boys aren’t going to turn into lovely gentle men overnight. We need to deal with the problems rather than just saying “it’s ok, I’ll just remove my child from the problem”.

As a family, we use private education and are extremely lucky that we can access schools without serious behaviour problems. Protecting my children from awful behaviour in less desirable schools doesn’t mean the problem is solved though. We need to address children’s behaviour so that they become decent adults, for everyone’s sake.

CaveMum · 15/05/2024 13:00

I haven’t read the last thread, so sorry if it’s already been mentioned, but for a while using the “Diamond Model” seemed to be popular in some mixed independent schools. Simply put, it meant that certain subjects like maths, English and science were taught in single sex groups and others (history, languages, etc) were taught in mixed groups.

https://atomlearning.com/blog/diamond-schools

Diamond Schools in the UK

Diamond schools are becoming increasingly popular in the UK. Find out more about the diamond model of education and its benefits for young people.

https://atomlearning.com/blog/diamond-schools

HopeMumsnet · 15/05/2024 12:55

Hi all,
We have received a fair amount of reports regarding this thread and the last one. We'd like to request a bout of collective amnesia and for everyone to get back to discussing what is an important parenting subject.
To be absolutely fair, it does look like the thread is getting back on track, but candidly if it veers off again we're not going to have a huge amount of patience for it continuing.

Allshallbewell2021 · 15/05/2024 12:33

Dd is very happy and thriving in a ss school.

FaeryRing · 15/05/2024 12:21

KeinLiebeslied54321 · 15/05/2024 12:18

You don't see any how looking at what leads boys to be aggressive (toward girls, boys, teachers, anyone) could actually benefit girls in the long term? You think this would only benefit the boys? The first approach to changing behaviour is to study it, to look for patterns, to ascertain what leads to some boys thinking it's ok to treat others like this. Ascertaining what is causing it DOES NOT justify it, but it does help to break patterns, sometimes generational, patterns and speak up against it. It will actually help girls speak up too. I find it shocking you don't see the link tbh, but I am trying not to make personal insults, so I accept we all come from a different point of understanding.

Edited

It does but why do girls schools have to be reduced or closed to achieve that? Why, in the absence of this problem being solved, can’t they stay in single sex schools where these exact issues are not present due to the absence of males?

It sounds like you see the role of women and girls as fixing men, supporting them and solving conundrums around their behaviour. They’re not. As a boy mum if you want to get involved in figuring out what’s behind teen boy violence then go ahead. But why should the girls?

KeinLiebeslied54321 · 15/05/2024 12:18

FaeryRing · 15/05/2024 12:11

But this thread isn’t about what’s best for boys, or where their behaviour comes from, or how to solve it.

It’s about what’s. best. for. girls.

Deary me

You don't see any how looking at what leads boys to be aggressive (toward girls, boys, teachers, anyone) could actually benefit girls in the long term? You think this would only benefit the boys? The first approach to changing behaviour is to study it, to look for patterns, to ascertain what leads to some boys thinking it's ok to treat others like this. Ascertaining what is causing it DOES NOT justify it, but it does help to break patterns, sometimes generational, patterns and speak up against it. It will actually help girls speak up too. I find it shocking you don't see the link tbh, but I am trying not to make personal insults, so I accept we all come from a different point of understanding.

FaeryRing · 15/05/2024 12:11

KeinLiebeslied54321 · 15/05/2024 12:08

If the issues are to be solved, or even minimised, then it's completely relevant to consider what is causing it. You cannot actually think it's ok to write off a whole host of complex issues as 'boys exploring themselves'.

Some girls also bully other girls to the extent that they actually self harm or even commit suicide, and while that's undoubtedly a much smaller number than the male violence, we cannot say it's irrelevant to look for the causes behind that either.

Edited

But this thread isn’t about what’s best for boys, or where their behaviour comes from, or how to solve it.

It’s about what’s. best. for. girls.

Deary me