Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Eurovision is no longer about the talent

167 replies

misszebra · 12/05/2024 18:20

Following from a discussion seen in lots of threads. I was so disappointed at the clear political motive behind the jury and popularity votes this year. Switzerland did fantastic, but IMO the image of Switzerland as the 'neutral' country might have been behind a lot of the jury votes at least, although I am glad he won over some others.
Germany were the best by miles I felt, Isaak has such fantastic raw talent and didn't need the circus around him to prove it.

Does anyone else think a lot of the votes were due to politics?

Its a shame to see clear talent pushed under the rug...

OP posts:
Bicyclethief · 12/05/2024 22:17

I agree Sam Ryder was great. He could sing and great entertainer. We did well, was soo proud.

Bicyclethief · 12/05/2024 22:14

I'm old but I love Mahmood. There's so many great artists in Italy. I love Elodie too and of course Emma.

I'm also a huge fan of Pino Daniele. Just genius.
It's just great to hear something different from usual US scene. It's led me to search up other countries music too.
Yes Sanremo is very prestigious. They have a newcomer section as well established acts. I've not watched it though.

EightMonthsScared · 12/05/2024 22:09

The Uk's entry was just sleazy. Who knew people wouldn't love the prison bathroom aesthetic 🤔

Seriously though, he had weak vocals and the song was forgettable and that's why we were nowhere near winning.

When we send decent acts, we get points (see Sam Ryder).

It's not a fix. And interestingly, I think the country's that leaned most heavily into sleaze were punished by the public vote (notably the UK and Spain). I think there are lessons to be learned from that.

AprilDecember · 12/05/2024 22:00

Bicyclethief · 12/05/2024 21:56

Aprildecember

You're right, Italy always sing in Italian. Also, the reason why they do so well is because they send artists from their national competition (Sanremo). This show, and the artist that compete there are shown in other European countries and those artists sell albums not just in their country.

I'm a bit biased but I think Angelina Mango is a great singer and her song should have done way better.

Yes, Sanremo has become a recent fascination of mine! I started paying attention because of Mahmood. There are few Italian entries that I haven't enjoyed to be honest, they usually send something quality, the effort shows! But my second favourite, Emma Marrone, did terribly 😂Her vocals were pretty weak on the night , I'm sad to admit.

Sanremo is also pretty prestigious, right? So quality artists will put themselves forward. The UK did well in Eurovision the one year the act didn't act all apologetic and embarrassed about it. Sam Ryder behaved like it was a privilege to participate.

Bicyclethief · 12/05/2024 21:56

Aprildecember

You're right, Italy always sing in Italian. Also, the reason why they do so well is because they send artists from their national competition (Sanremo). This show, and the artist that compete there are shown in other European countries and those artists sell albums not just in their country.

I'm a bit biased but I think Angelina Mango is a great singer and her song should have done way better.

AprilDecember · 12/05/2024 21:51

No one voting for Eurovision gives a shit about ww2.

Italy almost always sing in Italian and have been top 10 almost every year since they returned. Portugal won in Portuguese, no one speaks that.

HangryOliveMentor · 12/05/2024 21:50

misszebra · 12/05/2024 21:44

I know they have different opinions, that's why I asked! MY point is not just the different opinions - it is the MOTIVE behind the opinions.

Germany placed lower than deserved due to the absurd people who are STILL up in arms over the Second World War, if Russia was allowed to participate they would have the same unfair treatment.

its not a shock when you look at those who thrived on public votes (the 'victim' countries Israel and Ukraine)

Germany placed lower than deserved due to the absurd people who are STILL up in arms over the Second World War, if Russia was allowed to participate they would have the same unfair treatment.
Germany have placed in the Top 3 on 9 occasions and have won it twice (in 1982 and 2010).

Maybe, just maybe, them not placing as high as you felt they should is just a matter of your personal opinion not being shared by the rest of Europe and has nothing to do with WW2.

PossumintheHouse · 12/05/2024 21:50

misszebra · 12/05/2024 21:48

French and Spanish (after English) are the most commonly taught languages in Europe. its not just 'my circle'

Yes, it is. It doesn't matter how 'common' those languages are.

Lokshen · 12/05/2024 21:49

It's been political as long as I can remember. It is sooo vulgar now though I stopped the kids watching. They had been excited after talking about it at school but it was just trashy

misszebra · 12/05/2024 21:48

PossumintheHouse · 12/05/2024 21:46

No, they don't. That's your circle. Everybody does not speak or understand French.

French and Spanish (after English) are the most commonly taught languages in Europe. its not just 'my circle'

OP posts:
PossumintheHouse · 12/05/2024 21:46

misszebra · 12/05/2024 21:45

everyone speaks some French, I think the poster meant some of the more rogue languages

No, they don't. That's your circle. Everybody does not speak or understand French.

misszebra · 12/05/2024 21:45

PossumintheHouse · 12/05/2024 21:42

Ukraine and France spoke in their languages?

everyone speaks some French, I think the poster meant some of the more rogue languages

OP posts:
misszebra · 12/05/2024 21:44

saoirse31 · 12/05/2024 21:37

Amazingly op people have different opinions than you and don't vote the way you do. Shocking, I know.

I know they have different opinions, that's why I asked! MY point is not just the different opinions - it is the MOTIVE behind the opinions.

Germany placed lower than deserved due to the absurd people who are STILL up in arms over the Second World War, if Russia was allowed to participate they would have the same unfair treatment.

its not a shock when you look at those who thrived on public votes (the 'victim' countries Israel and Ukraine)

OP posts:
PossumintheHouse · 12/05/2024 21:42

Bicyclethief · 12/05/2024 21:36

I miss the days when you could actually hear different countries music in their own language. It always interested me to see the different cultures.

Now it's just all the same and mostly in English.

The politics are there as always. I think we are being harsh, I think if anything the singers are more talented than I remember.

Lastly, I think here in the Uk we pretty isolated from mainland Europe; most of our music influences come from US; we aren't very good with other languages but countries in Europe are more open to each others music and stars. So you will find that some of the artists that attend Eurovision are already known across Europe so they more likely to be voted.

Ukraine and France spoke in their languages?

saoirse31 · 12/05/2024 21:37

Amazingly op people have different opinions than you and don't vote the way you do. Shocking, I know.

Bicyclethief · 12/05/2024 21:36

I miss the days when you could actually hear different countries music in their own language. It always interested me to see the different cultures.

Now it's just all the same and mostly in English.

The politics are there as always. I think we are being harsh, I think if anything the singers are more talented than I remember.

Lastly, I think here in the Uk we pretty isolated from mainland Europe; most of our music influences come from US; we aren't very good with other languages but countries in Europe are more open to each others music and stars. So you will find that some of the artists that attend Eurovision are already known across Europe so they more likely to be voted.

Growlybear83 · 12/05/2024 21:18

The voting in Eurovision has always been political - I can remember my parents complaining about it as far back as the early 1960s. Occasionally a reasonable song does win, but as long as we have appalling talentless people like the man who represented the UK last night, we will never win again. We've had some pretty dreadful UK entries over the years but I think last nights was probably the worst I've ever heard.

hot2trotter · 12/05/2024 21:13

Yabu for only just realising - it's been this way for close to 20 years.

Everyoneisunreasonable · 12/05/2024 21:12

This was Germany. Nothing special. I voted France. But liked all the top 5 songs.

To think Eurovision is no longer about the talent
BodyKeepingScore · 12/05/2024 21:06

It was literally never about the talent?

moonshinepoursthroughmywindow · 12/05/2024 21:03

France was the best. A good song, really well sung. No gimmicks.

Amen to that. And I also liked Latvia for the same sort of reasons.

HeadDeskHeadDesk · 12/05/2024 20:59

I've just realised I typed men with 'oiled buttons.' Obviously I meant buttocks.

SwedishKvinnaboske · 12/05/2024 20:49

HeadDeskHeadDesk · 12/05/2024 20:39

I know Eurovision has always been very camp and very LGBTQ friendly but in the last 5-8 years or so it's almost become the competition's whole raison d'etre, to be as outrageously camp and shocking as possible, and it's becoming tedious.

I think Ollie Alexander's dancers' performance last night was just too explicit and that's probably why he didn't get any public votes. And his vocals were a bit dodgy because his routine was too physically taxing for him to sing properly.

Spain didn't do so well and neither did Finland's man with no pants. It seems the audience do actually prefer a great song to the sight of virtually naked men writhing around with oiled buttons like they are at an ancient greek orgy.

Many of the voting countries like Azerbaijan, Albania, Poland etc are still quite socially conservative compared to us, and the populations are somewhat homophobic or prudish by comparison. I imagine people think twice about letting young children watch Eurovision now, it's no longer suitable.

France was the best. A good song, really well sung. No gimmicks.

As for Ireland. WTAF was that? Just utterly terrible.

I agree - how dare we send in a boring song, sung in a very mediocre way, staged in a public bog, and then complain that people are not voting for it because they don't like us as a country.

I understand Israel did complain about Bambie's performance not being 'appropriate' (because of the 'adult' and scary content, not because of the pro-Palestine messages) - I don't know if that got anywhere, if true.

Slightly off-topic, but I'm always amazed that the contest doesn't start until 9pm and then goes on until 1am, in the vast majority of Europe. I wonder who first decided on that?

CurlewKate · 12/05/2024 20:45

@misszebra It never had been.

misszebra · 12/05/2024 20:45

PossumintheHouse · 12/05/2024 20:42

Eurovision begrudgingly likes the UK. If the song is decent, they'll like us. But they'll do no favours otherwise.

yes we don't get the sympathy vote, but get credit where credit due

OP posts:
Swipe left for the next trending thread