Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think the level of state involvement many posters expect is bonkers?

987 replies

FaeryRing · 11/05/2024 11:47

It seems like there is nothing the state shouldn’t be responsible for any more! Feeding your kids, getting them to school, hiring ‘behaviour specialists’ for every classroom because parents don’t want to discipline their own children, giving you money towards virtually anything you ask for because it’s not fair you have to pay for anything yourself.. I find it absolutely wild and don’t think it’s at all realistic or representative of what most adults believe?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
JenniferBooth · 12/05/2024 22:20

The words of my DM who is in her 80s "i dont want wires and cable trailing everywhere and endless engineer visits"

GiacomettisCornetto · 12/05/2024 21:58

Giraffesandbottoms · 12/05/2024 21:27

What percentage is that of the population though? I’d wager not the same % who aren’t potty training and brushing teeth.

Over 65s mostly, so you're probably right.

Giraffesandbottoms · 12/05/2024 21:27

GiacomettisCornetto · 12/05/2024 20:49

Most but not quite everyone. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-56906654

What percentage is that of the population though? I’d wager not the same % who aren’t potty training and brushing teeth.

GiacomettisCornetto · 12/05/2024 20:49

Giraffesandbottoms · 12/05/2024 19:10

Everyone has a phone and everyone has the internet. Everyone is able to google, easily, potty training guidelines or how to brush their child’s teeth. Just as everyone is able to google screen time advice or dietary advice.

it is not hard. People just do not give a fuck to do it.

and some people know and are “too busy”.

Most but not quite everyone. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-56906654

children on ipads, homeschooling

Internet access: 1.5m UK homes still offline, Ofcom finds

People without internet access were most likely to be aged over 65 or live in low income households.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-56906654

ArseholeCatIsABlackAndWhiteCat · 12/05/2024 20:25

shenandoahvalley · 12/05/2024 19:37

There’s a thread running right now by a mum of two boys who have been suspended from school for getting into fights on the bus home from school. She wants TAs or prefects to be onese buses to supervise kids on their way home.

Tbf, she sounds like an exasperated mother who is upset her boys have been suspended (and that the younger one was picked on, proud the elder stepped in to defend him). But WHY is the natural instinct to ask OTHER PEOPLE to do her/the father’s for her/him? I havent posted on that thread as my point has already been made. But a TA?? A prefect - also a child?? Why can’t people take responsibility for their own children?

Do you know many adults that are allowed on a SCHOOL bus?

Noras · 12/05/2024 20:21

My daughter was thinking about a law career and I went with her to court to explain what was happening etc ( not that I have any idea). Anyhow there was a lad out on licence whilst expected to comply with some judges conditions before sentencing . One condition was to claim universal credit as he kept taking money from his grandma who every now and then shouted out ‘I’m 62 you know’. The lad had not done this and just my his responses and demeanour it was clear that something was amiss. To me, it looked like an Ed Psych report would have been useful but instead he was going to jail costing the tax payer tens of thousands a year. What person does not claim free money when out of work?

I felt really sad that evening - it all seems so stupid.

Giraffesandbottoms · 12/05/2024 20:19

taxguru · 12/05/2024 19:42

Classic NHS apologist "it's free, you're lucky etc". It's not sodding free. Taxpayers are paying a small fortune for it. It's the "it's free" attitude of some NHS staff which needs stamping out as it leads to the "can't be arsed to provide a decent service" mentality.

How many people are paying tax to that service they are using though

PetuniaT · 12/05/2024 20:16

I think the gummerment should pay for everything 'cos my granddad fought in the war 😡

BIossomtoes · 12/05/2024 20:13

Overthebow · 12/05/2024 19:53

It’s pretty obvious isn’t it that if you have surgery in your eye you won’t be able to drive for a period of time afterwards?

You’d think. It was pretty obvious to me that I couldn’t drive following cataract surgery.

MistressoftheDarkSide · 12/05/2024 20:08

That looks like an interesting read - thanks 😊

GiacomettisCornetto · 12/05/2024 19:59

The countries with less state involvement in protecting their citizens from the negative effects of neoliberalism are the ones lurching towards fascism. At least, that's the opinion of Nobel winning economist Stiglitz.

https://www.amazon.com/Road-Freedom-Economics-Good-Society/dp/132407437X

https://www.amazon.com/Road-Freedom-Economics-Good-Society/dp/132407437X?tag=mumsnet&ascsubtag=mnforum-am-i-being-unreasonable-5072881-to-think-the-level-of-state-involvement-many-posters-expect-is-bonkers

JenniferBooth · 12/05/2024 19:57

You tell people before the procedure Its called informed consent

JenniferBooth · 12/05/2024 19:54

Not just one eye no.

Overthebow · 12/05/2024 19:53

JenniferBooth · 12/05/2024 18:06

@RosesAndHellebores This happened last week

Someone i know has just had cataract surgery in his right eye and nowhere in the initial NHS letter or texts or phone calls did it say he couldnt drive for a week afterwards, They didnt tell him that till AFTER the procedure. So now he is stuck at home with very low gas and electric because he cant drive to corner shop to top up.
Why cant he walk??? Because he is still waiting for his knee replacement to be done by same NHS and his mobility is fucked due to the (so far) five year wait.
If they had let him know about the not driving BEFORE the procedure he would have topped up extra beforehand. Oh and hes retired so i guess they thought it didnt matter that he couldnt drive for a week despite his limited mobility.

It’s pretty obvious isn’t it that if you have surgery in your eye you won’t be able to drive for a period of time afterwards?

MistressoftheDarkSide · 12/05/2024 19:49

taxguru · 12/05/2024 19:37

Yes re the extras beyond basic state pension (SERPS and S2P), but the basic state pension is only dependant upon "credits" not the amount of NICs paid, as I said.

So what's the difference between "credits" or "contributions" versus NIC then?
In my younger years when working full time and long before NMW, I'd get a letter inviting me to top up by around 250 - 300 to qualify for state pension, which always made me shrug a bit because all money in went out on the necessities and I didn't have that amount accessible - cos life. And also you have to pay in the right amount for is it 30 years to qualify?

Yeah, financially illiterate I am, because when you have little money you tend to feel it's all out of your league....

JenniferBooth · 12/05/2024 19:48

@taxguru your contradictory posts there are really not a good look Ageism creeping in there i suspect.

JenniferBooth · 12/05/2024 19:46

taxguru · 12/05/2024 19:39

He could have asked at the consultations beforehand or could have googled.

Classic example of not taking responsibility and expecting others to do things/tell him things that he could easily have found out for himself.

Classic gaslighting.

MN should have googled.

Also MN dont use Dr Google. Trust in the NHS. HE was told it was a simple procedure and they kept repeating this like Jive Bunny. You dont tell someone its a simple procedure and then drop the "btw you cant drive for a week" bomb after the procedure.

He did drive there LAST AUGUST for a consultation and got slapped with a £75 parking fine when they ran late. And he could walk to the corner shop if they had done his knee in the last five years. oh and i DID google this after he told me no driving and found loads of different answers so even if he had googled it how would he have known which was correct

taxguru · 12/05/2024 19:42

stopwindingeachotherup · 12/05/2024 18:29

I was at the breast clinic the other day - never ideal. I had to wait 40 minutes or so before being seen which was totally acceptable in my view. This one woman kept going up and complaining how others who came in after her were being seen. The receptionist calmly told her that they were seeing different consultants. Still she whinged. It’s free, you’re lucky to get it.

Classic NHS apologist "it's free, you're lucky etc". It's not sodding free. Taxpayers are paying a small fortune for it. It's the "it's free" attitude of some NHS staff which needs stamping out as it leads to the "can't be arsed to provide a decent service" mentality.

taxguru · 12/05/2024 19:39

JenniferBooth · 12/05/2024 18:06

@RosesAndHellebores This happened last week

Someone i know has just had cataract surgery in his right eye and nowhere in the initial NHS letter or texts or phone calls did it say he couldnt drive for a week afterwards, They didnt tell him that till AFTER the procedure. So now he is stuck at home with very low gas and electric because he cant drive to corner shop to top up.
Why cant he walk??? Because he is still waiting for his knee replacement to be done by same NHS and his mobility is fucked due to the (so far) five year wait.
If they had let him know about the not driving BEFORE the procedure he would have topped up extra beforehand. Oh and hes retired so i guess they thought it didnt matter that he couldnt drive for a week despite his limited mobility.

He could have asked at the consultations beforehand or could have googled.

Classic example of not taking responsibility and expecting others to do things/tell him things that he could easily have found out for himself.

shenandoahvalley · 12/05/2024 19:37

There’s a thread running right now by a mum of two boys who have been suspended from school for getting into fights on the bus home from school. She wants TAs or prefects to be onese buses to supervise kids on their way home.

Tbf, she sounds like an exasperated mother who is upset her boys have been suspended (and that the younger one was picked on, proud the elder stepped in to defend him). But WHY is the natural instinct to ask OTHER PEOPLE to do her/the father’s for her/him? I havent posted on that thread as my point has already been made. But a TA?? A prefect - also a child?? Why can’t people take responsibility for their own children?

taxguru · 12/05/2024 19:37

ShyPoet · 12/05/2024 17:45

@taxguru that only applies to young people. For anyone above mid twenties(?) it does still apply to the amount of pension we receive.

Yes re the extras beyond basic state pension (SERPS and S2P), but the basic state pension is only dependant upon "credits" not the amount of NICs paid, as I said.

RosesAndHellebores · 12/05/2024 19:34

Blaidd · 12/05/2024 19:01

I have known children who are unable to function properly in school due to home circumstances such as not having a table or even a pen at home to do homework. Also teenagers who don't know how to use a knife and fork to eat with. There will always be instances where stepping in is crucial.
Some people just shouldn't have children. Ever.

Regrettably my MIL is a former deputy head teacher. She is nearly 88. She can't use a knife and fork and couldn't teach her children to. DH had a lot of catching up to do when he went to uni.

ShyPoet · 12/05/2024 19:24

Againname · 12/05/2024 18:21

@EasternStandard

False economy is why state dependancy is so high now.

Cutting public services funding, and privatising a lot of it so it's now run on a shoestring by private companies (who despite the shoddy service provided and poorly paid staff, get millions for the contract).

That means people don't get effective and timely help. Which means they end up in worse circumstances, more of a crisis, poorer health, and in need of more help than they originally did.

As a result of the false economy, higher numbers of people end up dependant on the state, and with more costly needs, and are dependant for longer periods of time.

Totally agree with this. DH moved out of the NHS to a private company who is contracted into the NHS. He thought the NHS was poorly run. He has been totally shocked by this private company and at the moment is completing a form for an NHS job.
The private company are inefficient, following practices that were outdated 25 years ago, and seeing very few people as the bureaucracy is so badly run. He has been totally shocked. This company will be being paid a lot of money for a standard of service that would not be acceptable in the NHS. But someone is making money.

ThistleTits · 12/05/2024 19:24

pbdr · 11/05/2024 12:25

As someone who has no need for the state to provide any of those things for my child as I do it myself, I am still in favour of the state providing plenty of support for children. Bear in mind that the resources different families have, and the quality of parenting between different families varies enormously. You can preach until the cows come home about how parents should be doing and providing all of these things themselves but the reality is that plenty can't or won't and the only hope those children have is the school or state providing for them to slightly narrow the gap between them and their better parented or more resource rich peers.

Absolutely 👏👏👏

JenniferBooth · 12/05/2024 19:20

Blaidd · 12/05/2024 19:01

I have known children who are unable to function properly in school due to home circumstances such as not having a table or even a pen at home to do homework. Also teenagers who don't know how to use a knife and fork to eat with. There will always be instances where stepping in is crucial.
Some people just shouldn't have children. Ever.

Its a direct result of a policy that makes having children the only way of even getting a chance of being housed.

Swipe left for the next trending thread