How the erosion of LGBT rights effects female sex based rights.

I think you need to look up virtue signalling perhaps.

That's because you don't understand what it is. It's essentially the same concept as "slacktivism". That doesn't really apply here.

And it's a shame the RSPCA don't focus more on disability rights, the RNIB hardly tweet about refugees, Rosa Parks barely made a dent in the Norwegian arson rate, and David Attenborough never made a single documentary about the sub prime mortgage market.

Perhaps different people have different priorities?

Need research so that more males can act out their fetishes on un-consenting infants who would be perfectly adequately nourished on formula milk?

I did actually (not sure why you think I didn't) and it's a great example of how she can use her wealth and privilege where she wants to.

I think you need to look up virtue signalling perhaps.
I agree with you. I said it's a shame that attacks on women's rights don't get much platforming by big GC campaigners since they matter just as much.

Virtue signalling would be for eg boasting about how much you do for charity. She is challenging people, not signalling. There's no "guising" involved. Women's rights matter as much as "trans rights".

Not really. She's not signalling to people. It reflects her concerns and feelings. But nice try.

I'd say her obsessive amount of tweets about trans people guised as concern for women is the definition of virtue signalling.

It's funny that you didn't have a clue about it though, it just shows the level of your knowledge @Lampy123678

Who cares how many tweets it got? She's not a virtue signaller.

How many tweets did that get?

Yes, just more from the Ladybird Book of TRA Twaddle.

Again I'm not solely judging her by who quotes her. I'm judging her by what feminist issues she thinks are deserving of her time which by the looks of it is very little bar women's bathrooms.

That's complete nonsense. She was instrumental in getting a group of female lawyers out of Afghanistan. She is the founder of a children's charity and a rape crisis centre.

https://www.sundaypost.com/fp/harry-potter-author-jk-rowling-helped-afghan-lawyers-flee-the-taliban/#:~:text=He%20said%3A%20%E2%80%9CSome%20500%20people,%2C%20undoubtedly%20saved%20many%20lives.%E2%80%9D

Which trans people am I cosying up to can I ask? I provided the information the groups and people I was referencing in my posts so I'd love of you would do the same. You're making a lot of assumptions about me without knowing anything about me in order to not talk about the people there is public information about, no?
Again I'm not solely judging her by who quotes her. I'm judging her by what feminist issues she thinks are deserving of her time which by the looks of it is very little bar women's bathrooms.

It's a matter for their own personal opinions, yes. Which is why I said you're welcome to. If you believe your personal opinion on the ethics of something should be imposed on others then you need to defend how that is carried out without justifying people imposing their ethical opinions on women's rights on women. There's GC feminists who are ethically opposed to abortion and they are entitled to think that but I'd hope you wouldn't agree that their personal ethical opinion should be reflected in law.

I didn't say they couldn't however my first initial post was sprung on because I suggested that a lot of GCs views have more support from ring wingers than not.

Yeah she made that comment a while ago. The mask has long since come off on that. If she did she wouldn't pick up small accounts from regular trans people and quote tweet them to be attacked by her followers which include a lot of right wing misogynistic men ironically.

When did she deny the existence of transpeople? I've seen her saying she knows and loves transpeople and wants them to be safe, I've not seen her denying they exist.

She didn't, but this poster is posting from the Big Book of Hyperbolic TRA Talking Points. Not believing males are literally women equals "denying their existence".

Sorry meant to quote you MissScarlett

Why have you suddenly pivoted to talking about "trans men" when "trans women" are the problem?

I think it's very clear why @MissScarletInTheBallroom useful to highlight it though. Talking about the actual issue is just so boooring apparently.

I am quoting you to argue against the thing in that quote, not something that you may have said several pages ago. Specifically to your quote...

"You're welcome to believe that but again you're choosing to ignore the question of if you also disagree with biological women using chemicals to induce lactation?"

I am saying that you are very wrong if you think the following three situations are all ethically equivalent..

1 women taking medication to allow them to feed their own infants
2 women taking medication to allow them to feed other people's infants
3 men taking medication to allow them to feed infants

Whether the medication is safe or not is indeed a matter for medical research. Whether the practice is ethical or not is a question for everyone.

I think you know that I was suggesting that if you are so very keen to judge JKR and other feminists by who quotes them, likes their tweets etc, maybe you should have a look at some of the transpeople you are - what was your phrase ? - cosying up to.

I don't know how you can pretend to care about women, and think that the people on the pic I posted or those quoted on the terfisaslur website should be seen as women or allowed into women's spaces.

But you do you I suppose.

It's fairly obvious in just a glance at her replies that many people tweeting her support are right wing.

And? People are able to agree on some stuff and not on other stuff. That's normal.

her focus may be a little obsessed with denying the existence of trans people

When did she deny the existence of transpeople? I've seen her saying she knows and loves transpeople and wants them to be safe, I've not seen her denying they exist.

I'm not sure why you think the existence of other sexual predators that aren't JKs friends makes it any better that she mingles with rapists and women beaters but you do you I suppose

So if you don't know if you agree with it or not what are you quoting me to argue?

No I just don't think every accusation that she is using her platform to attract abuse towards people should be defended as being done in defense of her staunch principals of women's rights when she's pretty flakey on defending women. It's also quite literally not every harm mentioned in my post is it ? I'm asking specifically about survivors or sexual assault and abuse and women's rights to abortion
Two major real world issues for women. I proposed she doesn't wade into them because she is aware that a lot of the online support her tweets get is from groups who are misogynistic actually. It's fairly obvious in just a glance at her replies that many people tweeting her support are right wing. You're welcome to offer an alternative reason ? No one has yet except "she can't tweet about everything"..well duh. But she literally tweets about one thing all the time and when people suggest that her focus may be a little obsessed with denying the existence of trans people it's defended as being pro women's rights. Hence the circular argument.