How the erosion of LGBT rights effects female sex based rights.

I agree with your assessment @ThreeWordHarpy

And how has 'welcoming the support of that person' manifested itself? All I've seen you saying is that JKR/ other feminists are boosting/ validating/ cosying up to people you disapprove of, purely by being quoted by those people.

Unless I missed a load of times that JKR tweeted that she's a big fan of Donald Trump or something?

I believe that TRAs are a danger to women and their rights. Do you?

I see that you have missed the use of quotation marks, or do not understand that it refers to your definitions of these people.

But then you are happy to support people that are not only infringing on the rights of women and children. but physically and mentally abuse them.

Also I didn't use the term "white supremacy" so thanks for making stuff up.

But then this isn't a new step for those that believe in gender identity.

Late to the thread. It appears that we have an OP with some vague, ill defined concerns that sets up @Lampy123678 to effectively spam swamp the thread. They appear to be not based in the UK (as shown by their posting times, their reference to evening during the UK morning) and their lack of understanding of the nuances of UK law and culture. Is it half term elsewhere in the English speaking world?

OP feminists on MN are pushing against the stereotypes that say women must have long hair, wear makeup or revealing clothing, and only do certain occupations. There is nothing about engineering, space, short hair, no makeup or jeans and t-shirt that stops them being for girls. It is the push of the ‘LGBT’ movement that says we must conform to stereotypes - that if you are a girl who prefers short hair and football then you must really be a boy. Or that if you don’t like such stereotypes then that is not because the stereotypes are just that and girls are free to like climbing trees, and boys to dress up as fairies, but because they are ‘non-binary’.

None of that gender crap changes the fact that we are two sexes and we cannot change sex. That men commit 98% of sexual assaults and 88% of victims are women. That only women get pregnant. That women have a disadvantage at sports which means without a separate category we would have no sport. That women get different cancers and need different medication doses. That our heart attack symptoms are different and seat belts designed for men are not safe for women.

Nah just click on any random profile kissing JKs arse

So to be clear you're standing up for people who literally also post about white supremacy as long as they are "protecting children"?
But I thought my perception that a lot of GC people cosy up to right wingers out of my arse 🤔

I find it very interesting that those "right wing" "racist" people that you are spouting on about are also the ones not only protecting the children, but are the ones willing to have an open discussion about this without resorting to violence, name calling, throwing abuse or trying to cancel the other side.

... the majority of the GC twitter bubbles profiles are also spouting racist white replacement shite?

I suspect a trip to Planet Earth is in order.

There are no non-disingenuous TRA talking points.

I've never met a genderist who could give me any reason to change my view as to why I should welcome some males into women's spaces that wasn't essentially "because they really want to be considered women". Doesn't work for me I'm afraid. We're not dealing with a rational belief system here.

You mean except the numerous right wing governments and political parties that support it in relation to left wing or liberal governments? Or that the majority of the GC twitter bubbles profiles are also spouting racist white replacement shite? Or that when you really get into it with half of the GC posters on here they reveal their right wing political opinions on other issues? That's what my opinion is based on. Happy for you to prove me wrong if you are actually suggesting that it's a more popular belief amongst left wing or liberal people?

No no please go back and read my posts I have stated several times you and another person believing X doesn't mean anything. Literally verbatim. When you and person both believe X and that person also is a danger to women and their rights and you welcome the support of that person that's where I take issue.

Well it was you who has stated throughout the thread that a person should be judged by the actions and beliefs of other people who believe one thing that they also believe. You clearly believe that transpeople should be treated as if they have become the sex they identify as. So do all of these people.

https://terfisaslur.com/

Therefore, by your logic, you should be judged by the views and actions of these people. That's fair.

I'm judging her by what feminist issues she thinks are deserving of her time which by the looks of it is very little bar women's bathrooms.

Did you miss the part where she funds a whole rape crisis service for women?

a lot of GCs views have more support from ring wingers than not.

Have you got any receipts for that, or is it just your opinion?

Yeah she made that comment a while ago.

So JKR said transpeople don't exist. A while ago. Presumably it'd be easy to find evidence for that assertion, since you're stating it as fact you must have evidence right?

Who would you consider a Feminist icon out of interest?

Mybe I am being a bit dim but I don't really understand why homosexuality being legal and not believing people can change sex means your daughter can't be an astronaut

Yeah but she also schmoozes with men who have decades of SA and rape allegations. Both can be true. I just don't consider her some sort of feminist icon as you do, sorry.

If you say so.

Yeah but she also schmoozes with men who have decades of SA and rape allegations. Both can be true. I just don't consider her some sort of feminist icon as you do, sorry.

And I think she's disingenuous because her claims to care about women being assaulted doesn't reflect her actions.

Using her own money to set up a rape crisis centre solely for women (the ones with vaginas btw). What an uncaring bitch! She should really care more about women being assaulted and do something about it.

That's fine, we're all allowed an opinion.

And I think she's disingenuous because her claims to care about women being assaulted doesn't reflect her actions. You seem determined to change what I think without providing any defense for her numerous abusive friends.

You were the one who told me to look up "virtue signalling" when it's you who is using it as a buzzword you don't really understand.

She's not expressing anything disingenuously, it's what she believes, and I share that belief. You subscribe to an ideology which sees it differently.

Lol - It means expressing a moral viewpoint disingenuously so yes I believe it's virtue signalling coming from her. Unless you're going to tell me I'm not entitled to think that, is there anything else you want?