To think that everything Fiona Harvey said in her Piers Morgan interview was a lie? [Edit by MNHQ]

What I found fascinating (and I'm only up to episode 5) is her intuitive understanding of his trauma. No one else gets this, including those who are supposed to be close to him.

Maybe she's another actress on Netflix's payroll - hired to keep the momentum going and drive more viewers to the show.

I’ve seen the Fb page, I really don’t think it’s fake?

I can see the same fb page up

Actually I wonder if she was reading this and that promoted her to remove her Facebook page!

I do hope it is someone who has reached out to support her. I think the profile has now been removed or made private. Perhaps someone helped her do that or encouraged her to. But it does seem that she is very isolated and that is not good for the human psyche. Loneliness can make us all a little crazy.

It was strange when she kept repeating that she’d seen about the show on ‘BBC breaking news’ Was it even on there as being breaking news??!

More worried that Piers Morgan still has air time.

Why not give it a try now? If she's right, you don't even need to spell or know how to pronounce key words. I'm not saying she's lying; I've worked on the other side of university departments desperately wanting their students to succeed in order to secure funding for the year ahead (call me cynical).

This thread has a weird effect on me, it makes me really wish I had done law at uni🤔

She sounded coherent in the interview because her grandiose, narcissistic personality disorder means she either truly believes she's right or she thinks she's such a clever, master manipulator that everyone will unquestioningly believe her. Maybe you have to know someone like that to understand how dangerous and deluded they are.

I don't see this either, can you link, please?

Is she the same Fiona Harvey on X? That person is incredibly racist and has 54.3K posts but nothing since 2018.

Ordinary degrees aren't graded. If she was aiming to become a solicitor, she'd have done four years at university - a three year ordinary degree and a one year post grad Diploma in Legal Practice. Doing an honours degree, followed by the DLP would have meant five years at university.

When I did my law degree at Aberdeen Uni a couple of years before her, I did an ordinary, as did the majority of my year. It wasn't seen as "lesser" because most of us were doing a fourth year at university anyway, as the DLP was compulsory for anyone wanting to become a solicitor. The four year ordinary plus DLP was seen as the equivalent of a four year honours degree.

I suppose law was a bit different from other degrees in this respect, but there was absolutely nothing unusual about an ordinary law degree.

If she went on to start a legal traineeship after university that implies she did the post grad year after her ordinary degree.

I found the interview fascinating and quite sad. She is articulate, apparently credible and clearly quite bright. She is also, I dare to assert, suffering from quite a significant personality disorder and I genuinely think that she believes what she says, which in turn, leads to her credibility. I think she is quite vulnerable and irrespective of the negative views people hold about her, she did not ask for this publicity. Yes, she went on this show and probably does crave attention to some degree, but I’m not sure being interrogated by Piers Morgan was the right way to go.

I loved Baby Reindeer and found it complex, disturbing and so very interesting but I now question Gadd’s motives and I’d be wary of vilifying a clearly unwell woman.

She got an ordinary degree. I'm not 100% sure as I did an Honours degree, but I don't think they are graded. I think she just didn't understand the question.

Until we see the ‘thousands’ of emails and voice mails we can’t actually know. Or at least hear there’s incontrovertible proof of such. I’m ready to be shot down in flames but I honestly didn’t think she sounded particularly ‘mad’. Relatively composed and together for someone who’s in her position right now. Yes some sus bits like her degree marks but nothing truly loopy. She could have been a sobbing raving mess considering the public outing and the online trolling she’s had. Im just concerned the whole thing was maybe six of one and half a dozen of the other between her and Richard Gadd. The guys definitely got a nerve writing it, acting it and publicising it. He’s a performer at heart so it could well be an extremely embellished piece of performance ‘art’ more loosely based on events than true per se. We’ll probably never know. Can’t help pitying the woman either way.

She's also been giving a journalist a hard time too , 69 phone calls and 48 voice messages in 3 days .

Where are you seeing this? I've had a look and can't find them

There is nothing wrong with him adding stuff for effect, but it's being presented as true, so after watching Martha smashing furniture, sexually assaulting Gadd, attacking his girlfriend and acting completely mad, people are going to project all of that behaviour onto Harvey, whether she did any of it or not. I think it's shocking actually and netflix and Gadd are massively at fault.

Apparently Richard Gadd said he used and incorporated stories from other people so, although a true story, many scenes were embellished and fabricated. He admitted some things didn't happen, they were added for effect.

Janey Godley is no stranger to Twitter stooshies, usually creating them.

that will be interesting to watch, I don’t think Janey has ever backed down from any bandwagon since she started on Twitter.

Thanks. Bit behind the times there!

Because she’s supremely confident in her delusions. She’s like anyone who is an expert in their field and who can talk eloquently and knowledgeably on their chosen subject.

Her chosen subject is herself and she knows she’s right 🤷‍♀️

Agree with this .