Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be annoyed by total phone ban

710 replies

TeleGardenGnome · 09/05/2024 07:25

My child's school which is a busy city location has a total phone ban. So you aren't allowed to take any type of phone to school at all even if it stays hidden in a bag and is on silent and never used. They do bag searches and use metal detectors to find students breaking the rules.

If your child's phone is found they get a detention and you can only get it back by visiting the school in person.

So yesterday my child's phone was found in a bag search and removed. There were awful transport issues and it took them several hours to get home. In the meanwhile we had no way to contact each other.

I can't get the phone back due to work and my husband being away for work. It just stresses me out that he won't be able to get in touch if there's a problem. Expressing my feelings here as there is no point complaining to the school. They don't listen to parental feedback.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
JasperTheDoll · 12/05/2024 13:17

JassyRadlett · 12/05/2024 13:16

Our school does have form time at the end of the day, and phones are retrieved then.

That isn't the norm in most schools though.

Hateam · 12/05/2024 13:17

wombat15 · 12/05/2024 12:19

Proved your point about what?

About parents having very little idea about what things are like on our schools.

JassyRadlett · 12/05/2024 13:16

JasperTheDoll · 12/05/2024 12:22

But who do they collect them off at the end of the day because schools don't have form time then? The 30 children from one form wouldn't all be together in the same lesson at the end of the day either

Edited

Our school does have form time at the end of the day, and phones are retrieved then.

JasperTheDoll · 12/05/2024 12:22

JassyRadlett · 12/05/2024 11:20

Ours also does it. The form teacher sorts it at registration so they're dealing with 30 kids apiece. The feedback from staff has been very positive, as well as the feedback from parents.

But who do they collect them off at the end of the day because schools don't have form time then? The 30 children from one form wouldn't all be together in the same lesson at the end of the day either

wombat15 · 12/05/2024 12:20

@Hateam are you a parent?

wombat15 · 12/05/2024 12:19

Hateam · 12/05/2024 11:22

You've pretty much proved my point.
Thank you.

Proved your point about what?

KnickerlessParsons · 12/05/2024 11:23

Perhaps "for safety" kids could have a cheap Doro phone to keep in their bag instead of a smart phone. No SM/internet etc. just a phone that makes phone calls.

Hateam · 12/05/2024 11:22

wombat15 · 12/05/2024 11:16

What do you mean by "our schools" I might not have a good idea of what is going on in your particular school but I have a good idea of what is likely to alienate parents in general and make them less helpful in enforcing school rules.

You've pretty much proved my point.
Thank you.

JassyRadlett · 12/05/2024 11:20

KnickerlessParsons · 12/05/2024 10:37

A couple of thousand phones??🤔

Ours also does it. The form teacher sorts it at registration so they're dealing with 30 kids apiece. The feedback from staff has been very positive, as well as the feedback from parents.

wombat15 · 12/05/2024 11:16

Hateam · 12/05/2024 10:03

You have no idea what is going on in our schools.

What do you mean by "our schools" I might not have a good idea of what is going on in your particular school but I have a good idea of what is likely to alienate parents in general and make them less helpful in enforcing school rules.

bluecomputerscreen · 12/05/2024 10:57

schools also can't have it all ways

  • ban phones and sim containing devices
  • use school app that only work on phones and not other decices
  • set homework where they need internet and not provide wifi

my teens often have after school activities where they need to get to themselves and one location requires a smart phone to check in. a total ban would piss me off (but our school handles it sensibly so all is good)

KnickerlessParsons · 12/05/2024 10:37

MissyB1 · 09/05/2024 07:36

Why can’t the school just collect them in at morning registration and the kids get them back at home time? That’s what ds school does.

A couple of thousand phones??🤔

Needanewname42 · 12/05/2024 10:28

@Hateam this is true.
Those who want to get round the rules will.

Maybe the answer is the government up the age from parental controls and company responsibility.
All children's social media stuff is locked between 8.45 and 16.00 regardless of days of the week and holidays.

If China can control social media to that extent so can the UK. Take it out of the schools hands, away from teachers who have a job to do. Put.it onto the companies who are making money out of it

Hateam · 12/05/2024 10:13

Rookangaroo4 · 12/05/2024 09:46

Our kids school have yonder pouches. You put the phone in at the beginning of the day and it locks and unlocks at the end if the day using some sort of machine thing. It’s not 100% effective but it’s definitely cut down phone usage.

There are many YouTube videos that show how to open these without the dedicated magnet.

What if you bring in an old phone and put it in the pouch and keep your actual phone hidden?

Hateam · 12/05/2024 10:03

wombat15 · 12/05/2024 09:42

One or two might be if it is their child that has been banned from having a phone AND they don't believe the school. However, just banning all phones regardless of whether the student breaks rules and regardless of whether it impacts the students safety (and parents stress levels) is going to anger almost all parents and is actually likely to make them less helpful with enforcing school rules in the future. Why go for the latter option rather than the first.

You have no idea what is going on in our schools.

Rookangaroo4 · 12/05/2024 09:46

Our kids school have yonder pouches. You put the phone in at the beginning of the day and it locks and unlocks at the end if the day using some sort of machine thing. It’s not 100% effective but it’s definitely cut down phone usage.

wombat15 · 12/05/2024 09:42

Hateam · 12/05/2024 09:15

That's a perfect ly sensible rule... that many parents will get angry about.

One or two might be if it is their child that has been banned from having a phone AND they don't believe the school. However, just banning all phones regardless of whether the student breaks rules and regardless of whether it impacts the students safety (and parents stress levels) is going to anger almost all parents and is actually likely to make them less helpful with enforcing school rules in the future. Why go for the latter option rather than the first.

Hateam · 12/05/2024 09:15

wombat15 · 12/05/2024 09:01

I don't believe that large numbers of children won't follow the rules on not having phones out in lesson times. If this happens the school obviously has big problems. Regardless can't the rule just be that if the phone is seen it's instant detention. If a student breaks the rule more than once they are not allowed a phone.

It seems at the moment some schools are punishing and making life difficult for all students and parents not to mention less safe because of the actions of a minority.

That's a perfect ly sensible rule... that many parents will get angry about.

lateatwork · 12/05/2024 09:15

TeleGardenGnome · 12/05/2024 08:45

@Hateam, I don't think my child's school have been backed into a corner. There is no sign that they previously had a phones in bags policy and it didn't work.

Rules seem to fall into three categories.

  1. Rules that are sensible and help the community to function
  2. Rules that seem a bit petty (about exact hair length or something) but don't really do any harm.
  3. Rules that when you follow them have negative consequences

I posted about this rule because I think it's in the third category and I wish it could be changed. As I can't change the rule I posted about it instead!!

I also think it's inaccurate to blame shit parents for all the behaviour issues at secondary. There are quite a few other problems frequently mentioned here. Underfunding, under staffing, lack of provision for SEND, lack of alternate provision for children, difficulty of excluding violent students, forcing all students regardless of aptitude into an academic curriculum etc etc.

To prevent chaos many secondary schools now have draconian behaviour policies with lots of type 2 rules because they are trying to impose order and a bit like the military they need to get the children to follow instructions and accept authority without question.

This is entirely understandable. However it's not leading to a pleasant experience educational experience for the children and it's an under rated benefit of independent and selective schools that they can afford not to take these measures.

Edited

This is a really good summation. I find many type 2 rules tiresome - but support the school on these.

Type 3 rules - if they impact my child- then not so much.

I am guessing that those who are using the argument 'we never had mobile phones in my day and we did ok' think that a total phone ban IE not being able to have any phone at school (even if not using it) sits in category 2.

Those who are saying 'but they shouldn't use in class' are missing the point too.
Those who are saying handset only with only calls allowed. Are also missing the point.
If the rules said anything other than 'total phone ban'- then, imo, it sits in category 2.

The school has gone for the nuclear 'ban all phones' option- which does have negative impact and therefore is in category 3.

wombat15 · 12/05/2024 09:01

Hateam · 12/05/2024 06:37

The fundamental problem here is large numbers of children WILL NOT follow the rules and time and time again they are backed-up by their parents.

Schools have been pushed into a corner.

The parents who have created the problem are now moaning about the problem.

I feel sorry for secondary school teachers. No matter what they do they are the enemy when the Real villains are the large number of shit parents.

I don't believe that large numbers of children won't follow the rules on not having phones out in lesson times. If this happens the school obviously has big problems. Regardless can't the rule just be that if the phone is seen it's instant detention. If a student breaks the rule more than once they are not allowed a phone.

It seems at the moment some schools are punishing and making life difficult for all students and parents not to mention less safe because of the actions of a minority.

TeleGardenGnome · 12/05/2024 08:59

Parental backup though is essential in maintaining school discipline. It helps if the rules are proportionate in the first place and communciation from the school is clear. On the other hand parents do need to accept their child can behave badly (most teenagers do at least some of the time) and that they may not have heard an entirely accurate picture of events from them!

OP posts:
TeleGardenGnome · 12/05/2024 08:45

@Hateam, I don't think my child's school have been backed into a corner. There is no sign that they previously had a phones in bags policy and it didn't work.

Rules seem to fall into three categories.

  1. Rules that are sensible and help the community to function
  2. Rules that seem a bit petty (about exact hair length or something) but don't really do any harm.
  3. Rules that when you follow them have negative consequences

I posted about this rule because I think it's in the third category and I wish it could be changed. As I can't change the rule I posted about it instead!!

I also think it's inaccurate to blame shit parents for all the behaviour issues at secondary. There are quite a few other problems frequently mentioned here. Underfunding, under staffing, lack of provision for SEND, lack of alternate provision for children, difficulty of excluding violent students, forcing all students regardless of aptitude into an academic curriculum etc etc.

To prevent chaos many secondary schools now have draconian behaviour policies with lots of type 2 rules because they are trying to impose order and a bit like the military they need to get the children to follow instructions and accept authority without question.

This is entirely understandable. However it's not leading to a pleasant experience educational experience for the children and it's an under rated benefit of independent and selective schools that they can afford not to take these measures.

OP posts:
LuluBlakey1 · 12/05/2024 08:19

Hateam · 12/05/2024 06:37

The fundamental problem here is large numbers of children WILL NOT follow the rules and time and time again they are backed-up by their parents.

Schools have been pushed into a corner.

The parents who have created the problem are now moaning about the problem.

I feel sorry for secondary school teachers. No matter what they do they are the enemy when the Real villains are the large number of shit parents.

^^This.

Phones are not a problem. The problem is children who will not follow rules and parents who support them. They do as they like, think they should not face the consequences and their parents back them up vociferously.

Shit-parenting is the issue.

Hateam · 12/05/2024 06:37

The fundamental problem here is large numbers of children WILL NOT follow the rules and time and time again they are backed-up by their parents.

Schools have been pushed into a corner.

The parents who have created the problem are now moaning about the problem.

I feel sorry for secondary school teachers. No matter what they do they are the enemy when the Real villains are the large number of shit parents.

kkloo · 12/05/2024 04:32

Hateam · 11/05/2024 08:22

I could have worded that better but you know the point I was making

My driving licence is an integral part of my life. If I break the rules it gets taken from me.

So many parents seems to do all they get to stop their own children from learning the key life lesson that rule breaking can have negative consequences.

Following this phone rule can have negative consequences also so it's very different than following the rules regarding driving licenses.

Swipe left for the next trending thread