Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be annoyed by total phone ban

710 replies

TeleGardenGnome · 09/05/2024 07:25

My child's school which is a busy city location has a total phone ban. So you aren't allowed to take any type of phone to school at all even if it stays hidden in a bag and is on silent and never used. They do bag searches and use metal detectors to find students breaking the rules.

If your child's phone is found they get a detention and you can only get it back by visiting the school in person.

So yesterday my child's phone was found in a bag search and removed. There were awful transport issues and it took them several hours to get home. In the meanwhile we had no way to contact each other.

I can't get the phone back due to work and my husband being away for work. It just stresses me out that he won't be able to get in touch if there's a problem. Expressing my feelings here as there is no point complaining to the school. They don't listen to parental feedback.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
Nanny0gg · 09/05/2024 09:27

Ds2 primary is the same thousand students collect and return daily

Can't imagine a primary that big!!
One of my DGC primaries has 72 pupils!

ChristmasGutPunch · 09/05/2024 09:25

Nanny0gg · 09/05/2024 09:14

You don't have one, I take it?

I'm 40 odd. Very very very glad I didn't have one until I left school. Think it's a tragedy for kids.

Nanny0gg · 09/05/2024 09:23

SuziQuinto · 09/05/2024 07:43

I wasn't sure about a total phone ban, but my goodness it's improved behaviour in school. The bullying has been reduced and it's forced the students to otherwise occupy themselves at break and lunchtime.
You will need to teach your son strategies. There will always be a way for you to contact him through school, and vice versa. He can ask someone in the pastoral team for advice and support if he has an issue.

But my DGCs' schools don't allow phones out of bags.

So none of those issues at breaks

Why is the sledgehammer approach needed?

He can ask someone in the pastoral team for advice and support if he has an issue.
Which sadly, is not always provided

Jarstastic · 09/05/2024 09:22

Could engage with the school perhaps via PTA to try and find a solution. Giving examples of how to make it workable. Maybe fund investment? Some good examples on this thread.

One DC’s school has phones handed in policy. Seems to wok. DC doesn’t need a phone to get to school (10 minutes walk away so any issues run home, go back to school, or pop into one of the shops that knows us and has my number) and we don’t let them take their phone as not trusted to not Pokémon along the way and get distracted from road safety!). If they had to take public transport I’d get them a dumb phone or a watch they could phone our numbers.

older DC’s school has policy of away in bags but I can tell they use it by times they view messages to family WhatsApp group. I wish they didn’t take their phone to school.

another local school has no phones at all policy but the teachers go to the railway station and check for delays etc and are available if children need to phone home.

WhiteLily1 · 09/05/2024 09:22

GettingStuffed · 09/05/2024 09:10

We managed without phones for donkeys years.
This just indicates how reliance on technology infantilise children.

Pray tell us oh wise one, how you got to and from secondary school and what you did if there was a problem meaning you were stranded.

lateatwork · 09/05/2024 09:21

user1477391263 · 09/05/2024 08:57

Did you know that it's actually possible to phone on a non-internet connected phone? And that it's possible to access the internet on a computer/laptop/tablet, which the vast, vast majority of households now have?

Edited

A non-internet connected mobile phone. That makes voice calls. Interesting. Say you call a friend in New York, how exactly do you think that call signal reaches that person? Do you really think it's a piece of string with two tin cans?

I think what you mean is a mobile device that limits functionality to voice calls only.

And yup, I'm aware. I'd just prefer my child to have access to Duolingo on their phone. And Satchel. And Sparx. I also want them to call me or text me if they are late out of training.

And I think that choice is mine to make- not the schools. So if my child switches off their phone. Or drops it into a locked box- that's fine.

But you do you.

Nanny0gg · 09/05/2024 09:21

VestibuleVirgin · 09/05/2024 07:44

Some of us lived in a pre-mobile phone world. We survived

I did.

But I much prefer the ease of technology today, thank you very much.

I remember shared party lines and using an operator. Don't want to go back there either.

Commonhousewitch · 09/05/2024 09:21

The argument isn't that it was better in the old days- just that being able to be in contact 24/7 isn't necessary and that children have managed long journeys home with delays without needing to communicate with their parents ; we are all used to instant responses all get stressed now if our partners /friends don't respond to texts - even when there is nothing actually urgent -it probably accounts for more stress than they mitigate...

That said the ban seems unnecessary- is there any PTA way of approaching school

Yondr pouches lasted about an hour at my son's school before the kids worked out how to open them ..total waste of money. School just bans phones being out during the day and actually enforces it.

Tattletwat · 09/05/2024 09:18

*So yesterday my child's phone was found in a bag search and removed. There were awful transport issues and it took them several hours to get home. In the meanwhile we had no way to contact each other.

I can't get the phone back due to work and my husband being away for work. It just stresses me out that he won't be able to get in touch if there's a problem. Expressing my feelings here as there is no point complaining to the school. They don't listen to parental feedback.*

So you have let your child bring a phone in and that rules Don't apply to them.

The not being able to get the phone back is a consequence of not following the rules and is completely you and your child's fault and you will have to wait to get it back.

RawBloomers · 09/05/2024 09:17

VestibuleVirgin · 09/05/2024 07:44

Some of us lived in a pre-mobile phone world. We survived

Fewer of us survived in the pre-mobile world. Child deaths in the 10 - 15 age range have dropped significantly since mobile phones became widespread.

User135644 · 09/05/2024 09:16

Let's face it banning phones through the day for kids is right in terms of concentration in school but it's not going to stop social media addiction. What's the first thing most kids will do when they get home? Pick up their phone and scroll.

Nanny0gg · 09/05/2024 09:15

Tippexy · 09/05/2024 07:39

Has he been taught how to use a pay phone to do a reverse charge call?

😂I don't know if my DGC have ever seen a payphone!

Nanny0gg · 09/05/2024 09:14

ChristmasGutPunch · 09/05/2024 07:41

Phones are so bad for developing young minds and interfere with learning and mental good health. I think the inconvenience is worth it. Ideally I'd ban under 16s from using mobiles (yes phone boxes would need to make a comeback).

You don't have one, I take it?

BodenCardiganNot · 09/05/2024 09:14

This is from an editorial in the Independent.

protecting children from harm cannot ever be the sole responsibility of regulators and the platforms. Parents and teachers are the other primary players in this continuing struggle – and, in reality, the only ones with the presence and power to limit harm. The tech companies can, and do, provide tools to help filter online activity but the decision to give a child a smartphone or tablet and to control their use of it would still lie in the hands of parents, other guardians and schools.
The time will come, if it has not already, when we realise that laws, regulators and codes can only ever do so much. Controlling harmful content at the “supply” end will always be a cat-and-mouse game, with the young user continually devising new ways to evade age verification and explore beyond “approved” content – it is generally what children do. Encryption allows them to do so undetected and encryption cannot be “uninvented”.
Only the physical denial of access through making sure that online activity is restricted to older children – and even then, as supervised as possible – can minimise juvenile exposure to harmful material and unscrupulous people. There is surely a strong case for schools to be smartphone-free zones, driving the bullying and the hate out as far as possible, and for teaching staff to enjoy the necessary spells to confiscate devices.
But even in those circumstances, and even if there was perfect control of online content, the sheer amount of time the young spend on the internet can be as bad for their physical as it is for their mental health. It is up to parents and teachers to be much bolder in constraining the virtual lives of those teenagers and younger children in their care. With the very best will in the world, they cannot expect to be able to subcontract all of that work to ministers, Ofcom and the industry.
Parenthood has never been easy – and it is going to get more difficult.

Esther Ghey: Brianna was addicted to social media – teenagers need to be protected

Exclusive: The mother of Brianna Ghey is calling for tighter controls on smartphones and access to social media for young people in the wake of her daughter’s murder

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/brianna-ghey-school-smartphone-ban-social-media-b2498640.html

User135644 · 09/05/2024 09:14

GettingStuffed · 09/05/2024 09:10

We managed without phones for donkeys years.
This just indicates how reliance on technology infantilise children.

Safeguarding was also sub-standard for donkeys years.

Nanny0gg · 09/05/2024 09:13

Tygertiger · 09/05/2024 07:37

Ask if he can hand it in the morning and collect after school?

I can see why they’re not allowed them in their bags. In practice this just means they sneak them back in their blazer pockets and go to the toilets to use them. But having to give them in at the start of the day seems a good compromise.

Which to be fair, I'm glad about, when one of my DGDs was assaulted in school and school didn't ring her parents.

But mostly, the kids there do follow the phone rules and keep them in their bags

ALovelyCupOfNameChange · 09/05/2024 09:13

coukd you push the school to use those magnetic pouches festivals use? They get locked in the morning and unlocked when they leave. It’s a pain, but I can’t imagine less of a pain then metal detectors.

in the meantime could he have an Apple tag, he can’t contact you but it might help you just keep an eye

User135644 · 09/05/2024 09:11

MegsNaiceJam · 09/05/2024 08:03

The government is pushing a total ban on phones in schools. They can be a behaviour and safeguarding nightmare. For every so many children that keep their phone switched off there will be 1 who doesn’t and that will likely be a problem one.

School budgets are stripped back to ridiculous levels. Large schools don’t have the staffing or time to manage phone collections and handing them back in.

The government needs to step in and fund Yondr pouches if it wants total ban as the reality for many children is that to keep them safe to and from school they need a phone.

Considering how prevalent safeguarding is now, i'm surprised a total ban on phones is allowed.

Bloom15 · 09/05/2024 09:11

sparepantsandtoothbrush · 09/05/2024 07:52

Imagine calling someone bitchy and dismissive after saying this...

Some of us lived in a pre-mobile phone world. We survived

Some of us also lived in a world where car seats weren't used, it was OK to give your child a slap and dog shit didn't require picking up. Things have progressed for the better and all your comment does is show how little understanding you have of that

Exactly!

My Nan lived to be 93 and hated this kind of argument. She loved how much better life was now and how much easier technology made life.

A lot of bus and train tickets are on apps now so this rule is ridiculous.
YANBU OP

GettingStuffed · 09/05/2024 09:10

We managed without phones for donkeys years.
This just indicates how reliance on technology infantilise children.

okaythenright · 09/05/2024 09:10

MissyB1 · 09/05/2024 07:36

Why can’t the school just collect them in at morning registration and the kids get them back at home time? That’s what ds school does.

My sons school has 2300 kids, imagine the logistics lol

User3456 · 09/05/2024 09:09

YANBU
Phones switched off during the day and punishment if they're seen with them out I support. But they need access to phones for journey to and from school in case of problems.
I wish schools would put as much effort into reducing the spread of illnesses at school as they are into these mobile phone bans that just create other logistical problems for our kids anyway.

Riversideandrelax · 09/05/2024 09:08

SuziQuinto · 09/05/2024 07:43

I wasn't sure about a total phone ban, but my goodness it's improved behaviour in school. The bullying has been reduced and it's forced the students to otherwise occupy themselves at break and lunchtime.
You will need to teach your son strategies. There will always be a way for you to contact him through school, and vice versa. He can ask someone in the pastoral team for advice and support if he has an issue.

How will there always be a way to contact him? If the parent can't get hold of them on their phone when on the way to/from school then how can the school?

Also don't understand the issue about finding other ways to occupy themselves at breaks? Did your school not ban phone use in school? That's what they do at DD's school - phones have to be kept in bags and turned off.

I wouldn't be happy about not being able to contact my DD.

WhiteLily1 · 09/05/2024 09:07

BogRollBOGOF · 09/05/2024 09:01

DS needs his phone to zap on and off the bus. The days of 30p for the bus fare are long gone.

Around Christmas there was a storm and the bus service and route was heavily affected by fallen trees, including one stretch of road causing a lengthy diversion through a labyrnithe housing estate. It took him 90 minutes to travel the 3 miles home. While arguably walking would be far quicker in those circumstances, that was not a safe option in those conditions, and the only way he knows to avoid that closed section on foot would be off-road at very high risk of trees falling with no help nearby. He was safer staying at the bus shelter and on the bus.

There is a grand total of zero pay phones on the journey home. The pub halfway is not the kind of place where an autistic 12 year old will be able or allowed to walk up to the bar. Reciting my phone number backwards 3x can not summon me.

Smart phones allowed him to check the bus website for information, contact me to keep us both updated and reassured (because it's natural to be concerned about an otherwise missing 12 year old at twighlight in a storm even without the added complication of autism involved) and use google maps to know where he was in unknown areas.

It wasn't practical for me to go and rescue him because I'd be subject to the same traffic chaos. Plus I was waiting at the bus stop for him as the walk home isn't great at twighlight anyway, so I was able to update him on where I was waiting safely. I didn't have access to my car.

The phone was a vital tool and saved a huge amount of worry on both sides, and gave DS the information he needed to cope with a stressful situation and avoid shutdown or meltdown. It meant I already knew that bus#1 had been too full to pick up at DS's bus stop and he was still waiting rather than being concerned about him not getting off.

In contrast, DS2 doesn't need a phone for a simple 300m walk from primary school, although now on the cusp of leaving, he can use it to update me on spontaneous plans on going to play with friends.

I have no issue with phones being off or shut away in school, but they are necessary for many pupils' journeys.

The days of payphones and bus passes on cards are long over and young people learning to be independent need to learn to function in their current world not a rose-tinted 20th Century version.

Exactly this. Mobiles are part and parcel of every day use so children need to be taught how to use them. Restrictions of course need to be in place and schools must have a very robust policy about phone use in school with heavy sanctions for this being broken.
I have 3 kids in 3 secondary schools and all are allowed phones in bags switched off. The sanctions if you get caught with your phone off are very harsh and mean that bar the odd loo text kids generally don’t bother much as it isn’t worth it.

user1477391263 · 09/05/2024 09:07

lateatwork · 09/05/2024 09:00

The school relies on the very technology they ban.

I'm guessing they sent you a text, and email or had some sort of app to notify you of the ban.

I'm guessing it wasn't a letter, a slip from the teacher or, heaven forbid for a school, an actual phone call (to a non mobile number...) to actually speak to a parent.

Oh and maybe refuse 'online' parent teacher meetings too- insist that the school accommodates your desire for them to meet you face to face- as you don't want mobile phones.

No, they are not trying to ban the internet. They are restricting minors' unsupervised access to the internet, which is not actually the same thing?

Swipe left for the next trending thread