I have read these documents. They state:
It alleges, in particular, the commission of the following acts with genocidal intent: killing, causing serious bodily and mental harm, inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part, and imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group. According to South Africa, genocidal intent is evident from the way in which Israel’s military attack is being conducted, from the clear pattern of conduct of Israel in Gaza and from the statements made by Israeli officials in relation to the military operation in the Gaza Strip. The Applicant also contends that “[t]he intentional failure of the Government of Israel to condemn, prevent and punish such genocidal incitement constitutes in itself a grave violation of the Genocide Convention”. South Africa stresses that any stated intention by the Respondent to destroy Hamas does not preclude genocidal intent by Israel towards the whole or part of the Palestinian people in Gaza.
But I’m no clearer on what it is that Israel is actually doing that is different from what has happened in any other conflict, or how Israel’s actions in this conflict amount to genocide, and how those actions differ from those involved in other conflicts.
I get the impression that a case for genocide could be made for every and any conflict. Is the conflict in Syria a genocide? I see that there is a case for Ukraine. Is that a genocide too? I believe ISIS’ actions amount to genocide. Hamas’ actions are certainly genocidal.
Is all killing in conflict now considered genocide? If not, can someone please explain to me the difference?