Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

"Migrants going to Ireland," states Rishi Sunak PM

535 replies

DistinguishedSocialCommentator · 28/04/2024 17:05

AIBU to believe this is fake news, hype at best??

Indeed, some may be going to "Ireland,! and may have been doing so
for the last two years anyway.s or so.

Therefore, what was the number of migrants/boat people that went to Ireland from Jan 1st and Dec 31st in 2022 and the year ending 2023??

As I've said many times, I don't trust any politician or political party for that matter as they are on the whole, in it for themselves.

Message to Rishi Sunak, PM - Please give us the numbers. (I bet you it is no different to what was happening previously)

https://news.sky.com/story/rishi-sunak-says-migrants-going-to-ireland-shows-rwanda-scheme-is-working-as-a-deterrent-13123815#:~:text=Migrants%20travelling%20to%20Ireland%20after,was%20%22exporting%20the%20problem%22.

Rishi Sunak says migrants going to Ireland shows Rwanda scheme is working as a deterrent

Ireland's deputy prime minister has said migrants who arrived in the UK on small boats are crossing from Northern Ireland to the Republic. Speaking to Sky's Trevor Phillips, Rishi Sunak says that it shows the deterrent is working.

https://news.sky.com/story/rishi-sunak-says-migrants-going-to-ireland-shows-rwanda-scheme-is-working-as-a-deterrent-13123815#:~:text=Migrants%20travelling%20to%20Ireland%20after,was%20%22exporting%20the%20problem%22.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Evanna13 · 01/05/2024 16:10

EasternStandard · 01/05/2024 16:02

Yes if you meant the deportation rather than returns it is impacting Ireland, as it impacts behaviour. There was a fair bit of talk about how it wouldn’t, but it does. And yes it must feel very annoying, I’d probably feel the same.

The fair share argument is interesting though because it’s really talking about a fair share of trafficking networks, misery, profiteering, crush in boats and men with sticks etc

The only way to stop that is 100% returns, eg Albania recent policy. You could end the 1951 convention and put in place a central allocation centre for all claims where countries took a quota

It would stop trafficking but I’m not sure people really want that kind of set up

Of course it impacts behaviour and of course it impacts Ireland.

What's happening now all over Europe is a mess and it's only going to get worse. There needs to be some kind of solution with cooperation from all.

lazyarse123 · 01/05/2024 16:06

SeanBeansMealDeal · 28/04/2024 22:30

I don't have strong views either way, but I feel I must really be missing something here.

So when migrants go to France or Italy - safe, wealthy, prosperous countries; but then prefer to continue on and make their way to the UK - also a safe, wealthy, prosperous country, the UK is disgraceful for not wanting them - and the UK is at fault.

But when migrants come to the UK, but then prefer to continue on and make their way to the RoI - also a safe, wealthy, prosperous country, the UK is still disgraceful, because Ireland also don't want them - and the UK is still at fault?

I'm with you. Why is it such an issue for Ireland when we're supposed to just roll over and put up with it?

I am not unsympathetic to the plight of these people but as a pp says it's very rarely women and children always young men. And no I'm not racist but I can't see why migrants are complaining about living in old army camps when it is definitely safer than what they say they are escaping.

Evanna13 · 01/05/2024 16:02

bombastix · 01/05/2024 15:47

Well it's worth remembering that when the UK was a member of the EU the Dublin Regulations didn't work either. You could never really make a return there either even when the UK was in. You could trace claims better.

But this article made the problem clear. The one refusal system in the EU does not work. It is not enforced. The UK cannot return so it's decided to divert to Rwanda. It will be interesting to see the approach of the ECHR court on that one; even after the UK courts have made their domestic rulings. If it works, it will be copied by many others. If it's rejected, I think the UK will be moving out of the ECHR altogether. I know someone will start saying but what about the GFA. However, that's what I mean about the UK changing. It has already.

I can't imagine it will be accepted.

EasternStandard · 01/05/2024 16:02

Evanna13 · 01/05/2024 15:38

I am not talking about returns, I am talking about deportation to Rwanda.
That is why we have this issue in the first place. The UK are not accepting their fair share. They are deporting to Rwanda. That is why Ireland are having this issue.

Edited

Yes if you meant the deportation rather than returns it is impacting Ireland, as it impacts behaviour. There was a fair bit of talk about how it wouldn’t, but it does. And yes it must feel very annoying, I’d probably feel the same.

The fair share argument is interesting though because it’s really talking about a fair share of trafficking networks, misery, profiteering, crush in boats and men with sticks etc

The only way to stop that is 100% returns, eg Albania recent policy. You could end the 1951 convention and put in place a central allocation centre for all claims where countries took a quota

It would stop trafficking but I’m not sure people really want that kind of set up

EasternStandard · 01/05/2024 15:56

mollyfolk · 01/05/2024 15:54

But if the UK hadn’t left the Dublin regulation - wouldn’t France have had to accept people who had been fingerprinted in France. I didn’t understand why they left this agreement as it benefited the UK.

Most of Europe are still part of this Dublin agreement which aims to stop multiple claims.

It’s a really tiny amount and the EU barely use it, we accepted more than we returned overall

It’s for certain situations and not used much at all. All of the EU are seeing issues even with it in place

mollyfolk · 01/05/2024 15:54

EasternStandard · 01/05/2024 15:36

I don’t think anyone would

Which country would say yes to large scale returns?

But if the UK hadn’t left the Dublin regulation - wouldn’t France have had to accept people who had been fingerprinted in France. I didn’t understand why they left this agreement as it benefited the UK.

Most of Europe are still part of this Dublin agreement which aims to stop multiple claims.

bombastix · 01/05/2024 15:47

Well it's worth remembering that when the UK was a member of the EU the Dublin Regulations didn't work either. You could never really make a return there either even when the UK was in. You could trace claims better.

But this article made the problem clear. The one refusal system in the EU does not work. It is not enforced. The UK cannot return so it's decided to divert to Rwanda. It will be interesting to see the approach of the ECHR court on that one; even after the UK courts have made their domestic rulings. If it works, it will be copied by many others. If it's rejected, I think the UK will be moving out of the ECHR altogether. I know someone will start saying but what about the GFA. However, that's what I mean about the UK changing. It has already.

Evanna13 · 01/05/2024 15:38

EasternStandard · 01/05/2024 15:36

I don’t think anyone would

Which country would say yes to large scale returns?

I am not talking about returns, I am talking about deportation to Rwanda.
That is why we have this issue in the first place. The UK are not accepting their fair share. They are deporting to Rwanda. That is why Ireland are having this issue.

EasternStandard · 01/05/2024 15:36

Evanna13 · 01/05/2024 15:33

Exactly!
Shame the UK govt are not playing game. That is the issue here.

Edited

I don’t think anyone would

Which country would say yes to large scale returns?

Evanna13 · 01/05/2024 15:33

mollyfolk · 01/05/2024 15:25

No it won’t and there won’t be a hard border. And ultimately as I said, as long as there is poverty and war there will be refugees everywhere including in Ireland whether they come through NI or not.

All of Europe would be better off working together rather than trying to bat them off on each other.

Exactly!
Shame the UK govt are not playing game. That is the issue here.

bombastix · 01/05/2024 15:27

I mean look at this grimness. This father has spent 14 years in EU countries and he has got a no. He tries for the UK and his daughter dies in the journey. I doubt he even knows that there is no way to claim asylum legally in the UK given the method of entry. Where will he go next?

www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2024/may/01/father-of-girl-died-channel-family-feared-deported-iraq

mollyfolk · 01/05/2024 15:25

No it won’t and there won’t be a hard border. And ultimately as I said, as long as there is poverty and war there will be refugees everywhere including in Ireland whether they come through NI or not.

All of Europe would be better off working together rather than trying to bat them off on each other.

EasternStandard · 01/05/2024 15:22

mollyfolk · 01/05/2024 15:17

The pay off is that Simon Harris said some strong words - which is what the electorate want and really all he could do in this case.

Everyone is playing a game here. He’s neatly brought it to the attention that from now on the situation with refugees can be blamed on the UK (apparently). So when people on either side of the debate in Ireland complain about refugees either being here or being in tents, the government can shake their heads and point the finger elsewhere without demonising the refugees themselves.

Edited

Yes that’s a fair take imo

bombastix · 01/05/2024 15:20

I would agree with there @mollyfolk because the alternative are a bit grim. Ireland is not going to do some daft goady shit like turning up at the border with buses. Which is at least sane

mollyfolk · 01/05/2024 15:17

bombastix · 01/05/2024 15:03

Well I am from the UK! Simon Harris has his own way to make. It's just that being given a big diplomatic slap by Rishi Sunak (who is frankly grateful for the attention) is not great. I note all the more punchy articles on this have disappeared in the Irish press and no wonder. The pay off is rubbish presumably and has brought attention to something that nobody actually wanted except perhaps Rishi Sunak. In raising it so loudly, but getting a very rude return, it's certainly different.

The pay off is that Simon Harris said some strong words - which is what the electorate want and really all he could do in this case.

Everyone is playing a game here. He’s neatly brought it to the attention that from now on the situation with refugees can be blamed on the UK (apparently). So when people on either side of the debate in Ireland complain about refugees either being here or being in tents, the government can shake their heads and point the finger elsewhere without demonising the refugees themselves.

EasternStandard · 01/05/2024 15:10

Evanna13 · 01/05/2024 15:03

I don't think UK will accept returns either. But Irelands strength within the EU vs UK out of the EU is an issue much greater than this.

I don’t think it’s very relevant here as the EU cannot help out in any way wrt what the UK say

Even being within the EU doesn’t mean countries say yes, eg France saying no to Italy

Whether it impacts other stuff maybe but just on this thread I don’t think so

Dulra · 01/05/2024 15:07

DistinguishedSocialCommentator · 01/05/2024 14:45

The difference being they dont have t pay to get visia, checks, jump the queue etc - there is nothing fair in that

We came to England in the early 60's I was a baby - I know of people that played the systems not necessarily via boat but other means - it is unfair on those that do the legal route

If these boat people are fleeing a nasty country - why not stay in the EU as they are safe? Why risk the sea crossing?? Why leave their children, wife etc behind in most cases??

The difference being they don't have to pay to get visa, checks, jump the queue etc - there is nothing fair in that
I think you're missing the point they don't get visas and what queue are they jumping? They've likely paid through the nose to illegal traffickers to get a seat on the boat.

Evanna13 · 01/05/2024 15:03

EasternStandard · 01/05/2024 14:48

Ireland don’t have leverage here though

And despite other stuff I still think people are missing that multiple countries are saying no, and all would say no to these returns

I don't think UK will accept returns either. But Irelands strength within the EU vs UK out of the EU is an issue much greater than this.

bombastix · 01/05/2024 15:03

Well I am from the UK! Simon Harris has his own way to make. It's just that being given a big diplomatic slap by Rishi Sunak (who is frankly grateful for the attention) is not great. I note all the more punchy articles on this have disappeared in the Irish press and no wonder. The pay off is rubbish presumably and has brought attention to something that nobody actually wanted except perhaps Rishi Sunak. In raising it so loudly, but getting a very rude return, it's certainly different.

Evanna13 · 01/05/2024 14:52

bombastix · 01/05/2024 14:45

You get it. My point is, for the first time I think I doubt it a little. Of course Ireland should keep its cool on this. But unless there is a UK EU compromise, I am a bit skeptical whether it would improve. While it's fair to say the relationship between the UK and Ireland has never been smooth, and actually frankly a lot worse and in much worse circumstances with an actual live conflict going on, it was not so reactive. This is very reactive on immigration and I think that is quite a big difference. If you had said to me 10 years ago that the UK would over write the ECHR in its domestic legislation I would have said no. But it did. It left the EU. I really do think things are in a different order of thinking over here. To say it's unneighbourly is really putting it mildly. It is actually a really different country. We are changing in the UK.

I think you are seeing things from a very UK centric perspective.
Simon Harris is new to the job, there is likely to be an election later this year. His first priority is to the Irish electorate. He wants to take a stance on this. How it is viewed in Britian is not his first priority.
This is making headlines in Irish media but I have not seen it among the top stories in the UK.

EasternStandard · 01/05/2024 14:48

Evanna13 · 01/05/2024 14:46

The UK government (especially the Tories) were never a friend to Ireland and have thrown Ireland under the bus on numerous occasions.
The difference now is they can't do this so easily anymore because as part of the EU Ireland have more power and the UK govt REALLY do not like this.

Edited

Ireland don’t have leverage here though

And despite other stuff I still think people are missing that multiple countries are saying no, and all would say no to these returns

Evanna13 · 01/05/2024 14:46

mollyfolk · 01/05/2024 14:39

I absolutely agree with you. There has been a fundamental change in how the UK view Ireland. Hopefully things will improve with a new government.

The UK government (especially the Tories) were never a friend to Ireland and have thrown Ireland under the bus on numerous occasions.
The difference now is they can't do this so easily anymore because as part of the EU Ireland have more power and the UK govt REALLY do not like this.

DistinguishedSocialCommentator · 01/05/2024 14:45

Dulra · 01/05/2024 14:30

Lets hope this will stop the boat people as its unfair on those that have to wait years sometimes to get a visia and cost thousand to get a Brit citizenship
The "boat people" don't get visas or citizenship. They are illegal immigrants that either claim asylum when they get to Britain or disappear under the radar. A concerted international effort needs to happy to tackle the massive people trafficking trade but judging by international progress on the illegal drugs trade I won't hold my breath.

The difference being they dont have t pay to get visia, checks, jump the queue etc - there is nothing fair in that

We came to England in the early 60's I was a baby - I know of people that played the systems not necessarily via boat but other means - it is unfair on those that do the legal route

If these boat people are fleeing a nasty country - why not stay in the EU as they are safe? Why risk the sea crossing?? Why leave their children, wife etc behind in most cases??

OP posts:
bombastix · 01/05/2024 14:45

Dulra · 01/05/2024 14:32

@bombastix
It's just that the actual message from the UK has been extremely dismissive publicly of Simon Harris, and it's worth thinking why that is. Partly it is immediate politics, but the other part is something which shows a change in how the UK regards Ireland. Sunak was incredibly brusque. That is certainly different from the UK.

The tories and Ireland never had a good relationship the tories always saw Ireland as an irritant. If labour gets in I would expect things to change again

You get it. My point is, for the first time I think I doubt it a little. Of course Ireland should keep its cool on this. But unless there is a UK EU compromise, I am a bit skeptical whether it would improve. While it's fair to say the relationship between the UK and Ireland has never been smooth, and actually frankly a lot worse and in much worse circumstances with an actual live conflict going on, it was not so reactive. This is very reactive on immigration and I think that is quite a big difference. If you had said to me 10 years ago that the UK would over write the ECHR in its domestic legislation I would have said no. But it did. It left the EU. I really do think things are in a different order of thinking over here. To say it's unneighbourly is really putting it mildly. It is actually a really different country. We are changing in the UK.

mollyfolk · 01/05/2024 14:39

I absolutely agree with you. There has been a fundamental change in how the UK view Ireland. Hopefully things will improve with a new government.