Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Thinking that women would benefit if they were more open minded about height in a potential partner…

861 replies

Moonfishstar · 16/04/2024 13:08

… and not write off the majority of men who are under 6 foot (85%).

Women seem to be fighting for a small proportion of men - with the disappointment that will inevitably bring to the many who inevitably won’t succeed. Of course, it’s even crapper for the good,
but short, men out there.

Of course, we all fancy who we fancy, and I’m not saying we should date shorter (or even average!) men out of pity or a “sense of fairness”, but how much of women’s desire to bag a tall guy is actually societal, and down to how they think other women will view them?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Moonfishstar · 17/04/2024 07:27

Catsmere · 17/04/2024 07:18

Which is the opposite of what you claimed a couple of pages back, whining about virginity (male, presumably) and hypergamy.

I was referring previously to the impact of dating apps on the realities of dating, which is a far broader issue than hypergamy…

OP posts:
Moonfishstar · 17/04/2024 07:23

Catsmere · 17/04/2024 07:16

You still think putting up articles about fiction set in nonsensical versions of the 19th century proves anything? 🙄

Which is why I followed up with two more articles that don’t mentioned Bridgerton!

OP posts:
silentassassin · 17/04/2024 07:21

Describing women not finding something attractive in a man as a hang up suggests that it's something they might need to work through to be more available and open to more men. It feels a little off to me, "women you're not obligated to date men you're not a attracted to, but have you considered working on yourself first

I agree with this. OP- did you unpick your prejudices and have a proper period of self examination before you got together with your 6'3" partner?

Catsmere · 17/04/2024 07:18

Moonfishstar · 17/04/2024 06:09

To summarise the long paper:

”Hence, based on these summary statistics, there is no clear evidence of either increasing or decreasing hypergamy.”

Which is the opposite of what you claimed a couple of pages back, whining about virginity (male, presumably) and hypergamy.

silentassassin · 17/04/2024 07:18

If it would benefit women to look beyond height then why didnt you?

NashvilleQueen · 17/04/2024 07:17

AIBU thinking that men would benefit if they were more open minded about weight/being a similar age in a potential partner ...

It's a standard dating trope isn't it? Women want tall men. Men want thin women who are younger than them. Anyone with strict criteria about physical characteristics undoubtedly misses out on potential partners.

But on your point there was an article in the Guardian a few weeks ago https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2024/mar/22/i-will-never-understand-heterosexual-dating-cultures-obsession-with-height-just-get-a-footstool

xSideshowAuntSallyx · 17/04/2024 07:17

I'd like someone taller than me when i wear my stupidly high heels (which is a rarity these days). As that would make me about 5ft 10, I'm 5ft6 and my highest heels are about 4inches, over 6ft would be perfect.

Catsmere · 17/04/2024 07:16

Moonfishstar · 17/04/2024 05:58

I think hypergamy exists today - and you don’t have to be an incel to think so ffs - see Women’s Health article.

https://www.womenshealthmag.com/relationships/a36958388/hypergamy-definition/

No, not every woman is, but this idea that most women have evolved into a state of pure rationality and reasonableness, and enter relationships with men with total equity without a hint of traditional gender roles is fantasy. I’m not making a moral judgment about whether this is right or wrong, it’s just reality, including for those who consider themselves progressives.

You still think putting up articles about fiction set in nonsensical versions of the 19th century proves anything? 🙄

LolaSmiles · 17/04/2024 07:16

Neither men nor women should feel obliged to date anyone they’re not attracted to, especially not because they pity them!

My original point is that we should pause and examine why we might be rejecting certain people with certain characteristics- such as height- to ensure there’s no hang ups that don’t really have much to do with innate attraction… I used the example of tattoos for me.

Why should they stop and pause and navel gaze to unpick why they don't find a man attractive?

Describing women not finding something attractive in a man as a hang up suggests that it's something they might need to work through to be more available and open to more men. It feels a little off to me, "women you're not obligated to date men you're not a attracted to, but have you considered working on yourself first".

Sweden99 · 17/04/2024 07:13

Astariel · 17/04/2024 06:59

Small men would tend to have the complexes they do if it wasn’t.

No. The small men who do display the traits of ‘short men syndrome’ are not just made that way because everyone is so mean to them about their height. In most cases, the angrily bitter short man would be an angrily bitter tall man - just fixated on something else to justify it.

The whinging from gen Z men that women don’t want to date them is not because women are obsessed with hypergamy. The actual complaints (and sociological data) seems to point to a phenomenon where younger women aren’t interested in a lifetime of doing all the work to look after men while (too many) young men are doubling down on the ‘traditional’ patriarchal expectations and becoming very angry that women want and expect more than the role men want to assign them to.

In that context, ‘hypergamy’ isn’t bridgerton style ‘marrying up’ in a social hierarchy. The ‘up’ in 2024 is trying to find men who are looking to be equal contributors who view women as actual people. It’s having higher standards - and that isn’t going down well with some young men, whether they see themselves as ‘incels’ or not.

There is a sligt danger in this. It suggests that a man who holds down a job, takes decent care of himself, does his share of housework or more and puts his partner first would automatially become a great catch. If he is not particularly charismatic or high rent means he has not that much money left over, they are still not going to be much of a catch "not having their sit together" in MN terms.

PumpkinsAndCoconuts · 17/04/2024 07:11

And how many men care about boob size? Or slim legs? And absolutely won’t date a taller woman??

having some sort of physical preference is normal.
and height is something that matters to some women.
So what? Why is that so bad or in any way unexpected?

being of average to somewhat below average height still doesn’t seem to prevent the vast majority of men (at least those I know) from being in happy relationships. It therefore doesn’t seem like a particularly insurmountable issue to me…

Moonfishstar · 17/04/2024 07:11

Astariel · 17/04/2024 07:00

Are you both male?

Is that why you seem so up set that nasty women ‘needlessly’ exclude shorter men?

Come on, that’s absurd… if I was a gay man in a relationship, how could i simultaneously be bitter about how women were rejecting me for being short? 😂

OP posts:
Sweden99 · 17/04/2024 07:08

Moonfishstar · 17/04/2024 07:03

Fair point. Apologies, I was unnecessarily harsh in my response. I agree with what you’re saying here.

Thank you!
I have been in the position a few times of speaking to young men who are leaning a bit to the red pill. There are a few things that can help in my limited experience, but one horrible crude example is if they were given a restaurant voucher for a free meal anywhere, but 1 in ten restaurants they could go to would poison them.
Suddenly, it is not so tempting if you are not that hungry and the best restaurants are all taken.
Suddenly you have to be either really hungry or it has to be the perfect amazing restaurant.

Noirdesir · 17/04/2024 07:07

Curious now. Before your current partner, if a man who was say, 5'4" had asked you out and was attractive and seemingly compatible with you, would you have dated him?

TheaBrandt · 17/04/2024 07:06

Why do you care?! Men generally are far more exacting, picky and obsessed with looks in women than women are in men. They fucking rate us out of 10 like animals 🙄.

I hope you have gone on a male dominated site to pick them up on this too op?

Moonfishstar · 17/04/2024 07:04

Astariel · 17/04/2024 07:00

Are you both male?

Is that why you seem so up set that nasty women ‘needlessly’ exclude shorter men?

Sigh. I never said “nasty women needlessly exclude shorter men”… try reading my posts!

OP posts:
Moonfishstar · 17/04/2024 07:03

Sweden99 · 17/04/2024 06:59

It is not about what should be allowed. It is about how reality is.
We all have shallow preferences and most have deeper ones too.
To a certain extent, this will reflect what people want in a relationship. Someone who wants a relationship with someone who is as small and weak is relating to the world differently to someone who wants a tall and strong partner. Someone wanting a stupider partner is relating differently that someone who wants a smart partner.

There is no unconditional love in this world and we need the circumstances for it to be there. Often men prioritise looks, youth and kindness more and women often prioritise height, wealth and status.

Fair point. Apologies, I was unnecessarily harsh in my response. I agree with what you’re saying here.

OP posts:
Moonfishstar · 17/04/2024 07:01

@Loubelle70

Fair enough, but given that hypergamy is still so widespread, pretending that it’s not a thing is surely like living in a feminist utopian fantasy?… (a fantasy that sounds pretty good actually - it would be good if there was sufficient equality that hypergamy didn’t exist).

OP posts:
Astariel · 17/04/2024 07:00

Moonfishstar · 17/04/2024 06:48

5’10 and 6’3

Are you both male?

Is that why you seem so up set that nasty women ‘needlessly’ exclude shorter men?

Sweden99 · 17/04/2024 06:59

Moonfishstar · 17/04/2024 06:26

I don’t see how this line of thinking which says “men are attracted in shallow ways - bigs boobs, preferring less intelligent women etc - so why shouldn’t we be allowed to be the same” helps at all…. It reduces everything to its lowest common denominator, and brings out the worst in us. It’s what primary schools kids say when trying to get their way.

It is not about what should be allowed. It is about how reality is.
We all have shallow preferences and most have deeper ones too.
To a certain extent, this will reflect what people want in a relationship. Someone who wants a relationship with someone who is as small and weak is relating to the world differently to someone who wants a tall and strong partner. Someone wanting a stupider partner is relating differently that someone who wants a smart partner.

There is no unconditional love in this world and we need the circumstances for it to be there. Often men prioritise looks, youth and kindness more and women often prioritise height, wealth and status.

Astariel · 17/04/2024 06:59

Small men would tend to have the complexes they do if it wasn’t.

No. The small men who do display the traits of ‘short men syndrome’ are not just made that way because everyone is so mean to them about their height. In most cases, the angrily bitter short man would be an angrily bitter tall man - just fixated on something else to justify it.

The whinging from gen Z men that women don’t want to date them is not because women are obsessed with hypergamy. The actual complaints (and sociological data) seems to point to a phenomenon where younger women aren’t interested in a lifetime of doing all the work to look after men while (too many) young men are doubling down on the ‘traditional’ patriarchal expectations and becoming very angry that women want and expect more than the role men want to assign them to.

In that context, ‘hypergamy’ isn’t bridgerton style ‘marrying up’ in a social hierarchy. The ‘up’ in 2024 is trying to find men who are looking to be equal contributors who view women as actual people. It’s having higher standards - and that isn’t going down well with some young men, whether they see themselves as ‘incels’ or not.

swayingpalmtree · 17/04/2024 06:58

and not write off the majority of men who are under 6 foot (85%).

"Women shouldn't write off men shorter than 6 foot"

dates man who is 6'3"

😂😂😂

AmusedMaker · 17/04/2024 06:56

Your partner is 6’3? ?

😂

Moonfishstar · 17/04/2024 06:55

swayingpalmtree · 17/04/2024 06:52

😂😂😂

Dont you see the hypocrisy here?

LMAO

There’s no hypocrisy because I’m not TELLING people to do anything!

I just wanted to discuss whether women were needlessly hung up on height. I never said we were, I just wanted to discuss whether we might be.

OP posts:
swayingpalmtree · 17/04/2024 06:52

😂😂😂

Dont you see the hypocrisy here?

LMAO