Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

No phone for secondary school

637 replies

StillCreatingAName · 08/04/2024 18:46

AIBU? I feel like I might be missing something obvious on this one, but honestly why do children need to take a smartphone to school? It’s baffling me as to why there appears to be parents on auto pilot buying their children smartphones (£££) now in year 6, ready for year 7 as though it’s part of a uniform policy (and then sharing their purchase on the class WhatsApp, give me strength).

Is this all just a fallout from lockdown times, people were sort of forced into screen life, so now there’s more children at secondary school with them, who may not have ordinarily had a phone until older?
I’m expecting dc to walk home with friends talking and socialising without the inclusion of a screen or mindlessly scrolling social media instead of listening to friends. I can see where a basic phone might be needed to contact home, but that doesn’t mean the phone should be out of school bag anytime during school hours should it, but maybe I’m just being naive, time will tell 🤷‍♀️?

AIBU to say children don’t need to get a £££ phone for starting secondary school? (It goes without saying they don’t need it at all for primary school, IMHO)?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
PaperDoIIs · 11/04/2024 19:32

@ICouldBeVioletSky if they can bypass smartphones why couldn't they do the same with a tablet and see/do everything that way?

Isitautumnyet23 · 11/04/2024 19:27

Rosie1990 · 11/04/2024 19:11

He certainly could be and there are always exceptions. It’s meant to be worse for girls which I have. There’s lots of literature out there to support my view and I’m happy to get them a dumb phone for meeting friends and calling me.

The smartphone free childhood I spoke about promotes groups adopting this and not giving them one til later so they’re not left out.

He isn’t though as not a single one of his friends doesn’t have a smartphone and nearly all of his friends are high achievers too in his close group. Im afraid any 12 year old will be the exception without a smartphone and isolated from what is being arranged/communicating with friends.

The most important thing is to have clear boundaries, for example a set time they can’t use the phone in the evening (we do that to coincide with when homework is done and then its off for the night). It’s like any part of parenting, you have to have rules and boundaries and a child who is denied something completely is usually the child that will rebel at some point.

Rosie1990 · 11/04/2024 19:11

Isitautumnyet23 · 11/04/2024 18:22

Really? Guess my top of the class child must be the exception then?

You could have a phone-free childhood with terrible parents who never do anything with you. Or you can have a phone at 12, have parents that do loads with you, lots of activities, always outside, always with friends and allow you to learn abit of responsibility.

If my child didn’t have a phone at 12, im not sure how he would arrange the meet up with his friends this holiday (which he’s done several times). I imagine a 12 year old without access to a smartphone is missing out on alot with their friends. I wouldn’t want to deliberately isolate my child.

He certainly could be and there are always exceptions. It’s meant to be worse for girls which I have. There’s lots of literature out there to support my view and I’m happy to get them a dumb phone for meeting friends and calling me.

The smartphone free childhood I spoke about promotes groups adopting this and not giving them one til later so they’re not left out.

Telephonically · 11/04/2024 18:44

The fact that controls can be evaded by some kids is why keeping phones out of bedrooms and checking them often is generally a good idea. You need to be on top of it all, with layers of protection. Blocking porn at the router level helps.

Incidentally my ds first stumbled across porn when searching for something quite innocent on the family desktop computer which lived in the living room. (These days it's blocked at the router as well as on all devices.) Nothing is perfect short of never using any Internet-connected devices at all and making sure your child has no friends who do either.

Marblessolveeverything · 11/04/2024 18:38

SuziQuinto · 11/04/2024 11:48

Schools do not make using any app a requirement.
All information and homework links you can access through the school website at home, on a laptop. There is never any requirement for a smartphone.

The issue is someone in the family usually has a smart phone. The cost of a laptop is significantly higher, something families may not be able to justify.

ICouldBeVioletSky · 11/04/2024 18:23

tishtashtoo · 09/04/2024 10:11

I agree with you OP. Your child's mental health is paramount. We collectively need to change the culture around smartphones and children.

Yes to being able to contact them if needs be. A non-smartphone will suffice for that. Yes to accessing WhatsApp to liaise with their friends. A shared home phone or home computer can allow that.

No to unlimited exposure to social media apps which do not stop young children accessing them and which are actually designed to feed off a child's insecurities and anxieties- see poor Molly Russell. It's been proven that the tech companies have purposefully designed the algorithm to keep feeding images and posts about suicide and self harm to vulnerable children. The tech companies are not held to account, although new UK legislation may help a small bit.

Look at the data around the sudden dramatic global spike in mental health diagnoses, self harm in girls and suicide among boys - all coinciding with 2010. What happened then? The iPhone was released. Apps and social media on a home computer are fine for occasional use, but a device suddenly in your pocket which can be accessed all day everyday? UK children now spend 10 hours a day on their smartphones. Jonathan Haidt talks about how this has replaced the play-based childhood. We restrict them in real life, but they move through the virtual world with no boundaries.

A child of any age can access pornhub, so long as they can type into a phone. The rise in misogyny in schools and violence towards girls by boys is not a strange coincidence. Our young boys and girls are watching this stuff daily once they get smartphones, and it's their introduction to sex and relationships. Where we once read Judy Blume they watch a woman being choked.

Until this unlimited free access to the entire internet and social media for children is dismantled I'll not be handing over a smartphone to my child.

And no, parental controls don't work when children are savvy and have been born into a world of tech. If they were working the crisis wouldn't be happening.

Excellent post @tishtashtoo , people are delusional if they think the parent settings are watertight/ a magic wand and mean their kids get none of the risks of a smartphone. Kids and teens are much more tech savvy and know how to get round them! Eg:

  • my friend set her daughter’s phone to go off at 7:30 every day. Her lovely, not rebellious 11 year old got round this by changing her phone time zone to Los Angeles so she could keep using it!
  • Another friend found her son switched out the SIM card for a PAYG sim so he could get round the parental controls.
The average age for kids to first see porn is now 11 and as above this is often violent porn and in no way akin to the Playboy mags that may have been passed around the playground a generation ago.

It’s beyond depressing how little people on here seem to know.

Isitautumnyet23 · 11/04/2024 18:22

Rosie1990 · 11/04/2024 17:05

We’re not going to get one til 14 absolutely earliest. It’s terrible for their development and loads of parents don’t really want to but do because they think everyone is. There’s the aforementioned smartphone free childhood groups whose aim is to encourage us to collectively not get them so they don’t feel left out. Def worth checking this out if you haven’t

Really? Guess my top of the class child must be the exception then?

You could have a phone-free childhood with terrible parents who never do anything with you. Or you can have a phone at 12, have parents that do loads with you, lots of activities, always outside, always with friends and allow you to learn abit of responsibility.

If my child didn’t have a phone at 12, im not sure how he would arrange the meet up with his friends this holiday (which he’s done several times). I imagine a 12 year old without access to a smartphone is missing out on alot with their friends. I wouldn’t want to deliberately isolate my child.

NewFriendlyLadybird · 11/04/2024 18:16

The technology exists and no amount of sticking your head in the sand is going to make it otherwise. You might as well work with it.

As others have said, many schools set homework and communicate with students on apps. Bus tickets, pocket money bank accounts, etc. are all based on apps. Teenagers will feel left out if they are not able to communicate with their friends, share music playlists, photos, memes, whatever. Smart phones are tools for modern life and parents need to be able to guide their children in using these tools.

Tiredalwaystired · 11/04/2024 17:15

SuziQuinto · 11/04/2024 16:22

Teachers pass on any such information about extra curricular activities changes when they receive an email or the runner comes round. No need for phones.
The homework app will be checked at home, surely?

They really don’t. Not in a school with 3000 pupils.

Rosie1990 · 11/04/2024 17:05

We’re not going to get one til 14 absolutely earliest. It’s terrible for their development and loads of parents don’t really want to but do because they think everyone is. There’s the aforementioned smartphone free childhood groups whose aim is to encourage us to collectively not get them so they don’t feel left out. Def worth checking this out if you haven’t

Doone22 · 11/04/2024 16:43

Navigation on Google maps, checking bus times which Google maps has live updates for, messaging me if there's a problem with transport or to ask if ge can stay out, stuff like that.
Why should kids be prevented from accessing the useful tools a smartphone can provide.

SuziQuinto · 11/04/2024 16:23

Zanatdy · 11/04/2024 16:22

Mine did because they needed to go on public transport and incase they needed to ring me with any issues. Many kids have a phone long before secondary these days

That's not a problem at all, it just needs to be switched off and kept in their bag for the duration of the school day.

SuziQuinto · 11/04/2024 16:22

Tiredalwaystired · 11/04/2024 15:42

Home work and communication from teachers is all via app at our school. Also info on changes to schedules for music or extra curricular classes which they may not see if they wait til they get home to log on.

Teachers pass on any such information about extra curricular activities changes when they receive an email or the runner comes round. No need for phones.
The homework app will be checked at home, surely?

Zanatdy · 11/04/2024 16:22

Mine did because they needed to go on public transport and incase they needed to ring me with any issues. Many kids have a phone long before secondary these days

Telephonically · 11/04/2024 16:17

One other thing to bear in mind is that the later you provide a phone for them to use, the less natural it might seem to your child for you to be in charge of it, so the more you may feel pushed into handing over not just the phone but a lot more control of it. Starting with a very tightly locked down phone at 11 or 12 lets you ease those restrictions gradually, and lets you gradually teach them how to do various things, including setting up accounts with good privacy and so on. Providing a phone for the first time at 13 or 14 could be much more stressful with much more pushback against any restrictions, because they've become much more independent in that time.

SE13Mummy · 11/04/2024 16:07

I think YABU to be under the impression that any phone provided for a Y7 has to be an expensive one, it doesn't. Likewise, no smartphone provided has to be given to a child with all its functionality accessible.

When DC2 started Y7 their 'new'smartphone (an iPhone purchased for £30) was locked down so they couldn't access the internet, couldn't download anything without me putting in a password, couldn't share location and had a 30 minute daily limit on it. It also locks down at a particular time each evening. They needed it for accessing their school timetable and the homework app, neither of which were available on paper and teachers weren't saying what the homework would be now that they have to upload it to an app.

That was 4 years ago and DC2 still doesn't have an expensive smartphone but does have more freedom on the phone in terms of being able to access pre-approved websites on the phone etc. One of their closest friends doesn't have WhatsApp and that does mean the others need to be mindful when having group chats because this friend is left out of them. I don't track my DCs' location nor do I expect to be updated as to where they are all the time but aspects of secondary school are hard enough as it is and I want my DC to be able to be in touch with friends, access homework etc. using whatever systems are set up to do so. The smartphones haven't stopped my DC walking to school with friends and chatting, nor have they prevented them from taking part in active, outdoor activities but they have facilitated independence and communication in a time where phone boxes and paper homework diaries are no more.

Isitautumnyet23 · 11/04/2024 16:06

dolphinette · 11/04/2024 14:50

My kids wont be having phones or internet. Kids need to get dirty, climb trees, ride bikes, read books and socialise.

Poor kids…how will they arrange to socialise with their friends when they are 12, going to Secondary school and friends could live in a number of towns and villages around the school?

Are they going to call their 12 year old friend on the home phone? (Other than people our grandparents age, who has a home phone anymore???). They will miss out on everything so good luck with that rule.

You also need the internet to do all their homework, everything other than reading (which we do every night) is set on apps.

Come back to us in a few years time and let us know how its going.

Isitautumnyet23 · 11/04/2024 15:52

StillCreatingAName · 08/04/2024 21:49

I’m with the idea of a very basic phone for messages between friends or for genuine safety concerns with getting home or whatever. I will probably end up getting dc a basic phone at some point in Y7 for that very reason- but only for use out of school hours. There seems to be no compelling argument as to why it needs to be a smartphone in any year, let alone year 7 🤷‍♀️ Why should teachers be expected to manage the behaviour of dc wearing ear buds and watching YouTube during lessons- that’s appalling- surely they can only do that because they have a smartphone?

They all use whats app to communicate with each other and keep in touch. I dont think my Son ever sends texts except to family.

Isitautumnyet23 · 11/04/2024 15:49

Burpie · 11/04/2024 09:30

YABU They make life easier which is why we all use them. They can listen to music on their way to school, check bus timetables or other routes home, keep up to date with their friends, contact you in an emergency etc. I got a phone a year before secondary school which was over 20 years ago now so definitely not a lockdown thing or a new thing at all.

Edited

Totally agree - so much of what my Son does on his phone is actually about socialising. Meeting up with friends, taking it out in case of emergencies, chatting with friends etc. My Son would feel very isolated from his friendship group without one.

Isitautumnyet23 · 11/04/2024 15:46

Im quite happy with my mature, responsible, well behaved year 7 child having a smartphone (and definately wasn’t on autopilot when I bought it).

All of my Son’s friends communicate over the various apps (whats app etc). Everything is arranged over them - going into town etc and its the way they communicate today (I used to have to pick up the home phone and cringe at my parents hearing my conversations with friends).

We also have the tracking app on the phone for emergencies - again I trust my 12 year old and his friends to go out together without being monitored, but its always there for emergencies (if he didn’t arrive home at the time agreed).

I feel sorry for any child not trusted enough by year 7 to have a smartphone.

Tiredalwaystired · 11/04/2024 15:42

Home work and communication from teachers is all via app at our school. Also info on changes to schedules for music or extra curricular classes which they may not see if they wait til they get home to log on.

SuziQuinto · 11/04/2024 15:12

thing47 · 11/04/2024 14:53

In my school, phones are not permitted at all. We have calculators in classrooms so they are not needed for that. Phones are handed in a secure bag in morning registration, kept locked in the admin office for the day and collected at home time.

Loads of sympathy for the teachers having to deal with this issue in schools@TitaniasAss.
But there will always be exceptions to 'phones not permitted at all'. You just can't say that. There are around 32,000 children with Type 1 diabetes and increasingly they are going to be managing their condition using a smartphone as a medical device.

They're always given an exception.
Teachers are shown their photo so we know that they're allowed to have their phones out to check blood sugar.

PaperDoIIs · 11/04/2024 15:10

@gldd because it is run by a private company (hence the cost). The school doesn't care. They don't even know the routes and the info on their website is still about the old bus company.There have been times when the school even forgot to tell the bus company that the kids were finishing early so by the time the bus did make it there, then waited for the other school that uses it (not enough time to do return trip) she ended up getting home at the normal time despite finishing at 12. Tbh the main issue was the lack of communication on all sides (school and bus), otherwise she could've taken the public transport route which is lengthy and more expensive , but she still would've gotten home earlier.It's all fun and games at secondary.

gldd · 11/04/2024 15:03

PaperDoIIs · 11/04/2024 14:34

@gldd some of the messages (including the one where they just gave up and said to find alternative arrangements)from the bus company. I'm not making it up, it's incredibly frustrating and stressful.

If this is a school bus, why is it not the responsibility of the school to get your daughter there on time? Why is she made to feel anxious when it is the responsibility of the school, not her?

PaperDoIIs · 11/04/2024 15:02

@dolphinette if you make wide blanket statements you can't expect people not to ask for clarification.