Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

No phone for secondary school

637 replies

StillCreatingAName · 08/04/2024 18:46

AIBU? I feel like I might be missing something obvious on this one, but honestly why do children need to take a smartphone to school? It’s baffling me as to why there appears to be parents on auto pilot buying their children smartphones (£££) now in year 6, ready for year 7 as though it’s part of a uniform policy (and then sharing their purchase on the class WhatsApp, give me strength).

Is this all just a fallout from lockdown times, people were sort of forced into screen life, so now there’s more children at secondary school with them, who may not have ordinarily had a phone until older?
I’m expecting dc to walk home with friends talking and socialising without the inclusion of a screen or mindlessly scrolling social media instead of listening to friends. I can see where a basic phone might be needed to contact home, but that doesn’t mean the phone should be out of school bag anytime during school hours should it, but maybe I’m just being naive, time will tell 🤷‍♀️?

AIBU to say children don’t need to get a £££ phone for starting secondary school? (It goes without saying they don’t need it at all for primary school, IMHO)?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Vettrianofan · 12/04/2024 12:30

One of my eldest children's chemistry teachers can't stand all the technology. He says it just gets in the way of teaching his subject. He's trying his best every day but as @Helar rightly says it's wasting teaching time asking pupils to focus on the lesson instead of their numerous gadgets.

Vettrianofan · 12/04/2024 12:27

10 mins a day extra play outdoors, x5= 50 mins per week. Add that up over a term. We are potentially looking at several hours extra outdoors time at the beginning of the school day. That's priceless.

Vettrianofan · 12/04/2024 12:24

Loving all the different views on this. We really need loads of discussion around this topic.

I had my kids outdoors today away from screens (6 and 8yo). 1hr 20 mins to run an errand in town, walk in and bus it home. Fresh air, chat about what we see. Loved it every second.

Headteacher at their primary school insists that parents don't bring children in until 8.55am (Bell rings 9am sharp ) I ignore this and have for months and months and get there at 8.45am every day so that they're out in the fresh air for as long as possible playing with other children who also show up early. They need that outdoors time before school. Not looking at screens in the morning.

Helar · 12/04/2024 12:20

Obviously if it is needed for medical purpose then they would need to have it, but presumably that’s quite a rare situation and doesn’t apply to the majority of kids who have smart phones. If it is only 1 or 2 kids in the school who have one it’s going to be a lot easier to manage misuse than if every child has one in their pocket.

thing47 · 12/04/2024 11:28

You can have all the community discussions you like, DCs who need a smartphone with them and on at all times for medical reasons are still going to be doing so whether the school community likes it or not, and whether a school bans them or not.

Obviously you would hope that they are not being misused, but that remains a possibility as you rightly say.

Helar · 12/04/2024 11:13

Our school is also strict - they need to be turned off in bags from the start of the school day and not taken out till the end of the school day. My Son wouldn’t dare take it out as I imagine its detention for using it in school time, not to mention the consequences at home too (losing having it). I think this is what most Secondary schools have adopted - ive not heard of any schools in our area where kids are walking round on smartphones at lunch/break.

Unless you’ve been in a lesson or supervising the playground you might be surprised. Many schools had these rules, but children are so addicted to these things that they are sneaking them out all the time unless they are locked up. Even if your son is not doing it, you can bet he is losing instructional time from his teacher having to deal with kids constantly taking them out and playing on them, then kicking off and refusing to hand them in because they are completely addicted and unable to regulate themselves. In my experience, the only thing that really works is locking them away, if they are brought to school at all .

I imagine a child without a smartphone on the bus is most likely sitting next to a friend with one, so still probably looking at one/using it
This is why I’m saying we need a community discussion around this - your child is only as safe as the least protected child with a smart phone at the school.

Helar · 12/04/2024 11:04

PaperDoIIs · 12/04/2024 08:46

Eg a dumb phone for calls. A home desktop computer for word processing or internet research tasks. Print out the bus timetable and put it in your bag. Plan your journey in advance and print out a map if if required. A smart/bluetooth speaker/ Yoto player for music/audio books/ podcasts. An iPad with only specific apps loaded on to it, without access to the internet or any messaging or social media etc.

How much would that cost? That home computer and even ipad carry the same risks unless supervised 100% of the time.

The problem with the phone is that is in their pocket all the time and follows them everywhere and other people can contact them on it or send things unsolicited, and they are using it outside the home without any supervision at all. It’s all singing, all dancing, and gets brought out all the time instead of socialising or engaging with the world around.

A desktop computer is much easier to supervise, obviously doesn’t get taken around with them, and an iPad can be set up so that it doesn’t have an internet browser at all, just whatever educational apps you need. They are also easier to supervise ans the screen is bigger, and they are easier to take away , to leave at home, after a task has been completed. They are less disruptive and addictive than smart phones, but yes they still do need supervision. iPads can be almost as bad as smart phones in school if the parent allows them to be loaded up with games, messaging and social media apps. However, If it’s only got wifi then they can’t be using it all the time out of the house like a smart phone.

I take the point about price, but a basic desktop computer and dumb phone will be cheaper than a smart phone. It depends what the priorities are for functionality versus protection.

Isitautumnyet23 · 12/04/2024 10:20

Helar · 12/04/2024 00:00

Also OP you have to remember that parents who have already given their kids smart phones will have a strong need to justify it to themselves, and to focus on the positives (which of course there always are, with any device or parenting decision in general) and to downplay or deny the negatives.

If they are not teachers, they also only see how their own child behaves at home, and do not see what impact smart phones have on children in general, and on the community.

Whereas I as a teacher can see that the negatives far outweigh the benefits.( as described above)

Itmatters what other parents do and it is your business, because your child is only as protected as the least protected kid at the school. Before the ban, kids were sending horrifically violent and pornographic videos around by text or airdrop, bypassing any controls you as a parent might set. They were also taking photos and videos of other children and posting them on social media. Along with the insidious distraction, limited attention span, addiction and disruptive behaviour associated with them being in bags and pockets.

Hence I have chosen a school with a strictly enforced ban on phones for my kids - they are locked up bell to bell if brought to school.

You can usually find a different device or solution that provides more of the specific benefits you want without some of the dangers of the smart phones.

Eg a dumb phone for calls. A home desktop computer for word processing or internet research tasks. Print out the bus timetable and put it in your bag. Plan your journey in advance and print out a map if if required. A smart/bluetooth speaker/ Yoto player for music/audio books/ podcasts. An iPad with only specific apps loaded on to it, without access to the internet or any messaging or social media etc.

Just to point out, you can be pro-smartphones for 12 year olds (very happy with my child having one for use on the bus/out of school) but totally against use in school time.

Our school is also strict - they need to be turned off in bags from the start of the school day and not taken out till the end of the school day. My Son wouldn’t dare take it out as I imagine its detention for using it in school time, not to mention the consequences at home too (losing having it). I think this is what most Secondary schools have adopted - ive not heard of any schools in our area where kids are walking round on smartphones at lunch/break. I dont have a problem with him playing games on it with his friends on the bus.

I imagine a child without a smartphone on the bus is most likely sitting next to a friend with one, so still probably looking at one/using it.

PaperDoIIs · 12/04/2024 08:46

Eg a dumb phone for calls. A home desktop computer for word processing or internet research tasks. Print out the bus timetable and put it in your bag. Plan your journey in advance and print out a map if if required. A smart/bluetooth speaker/ Yoto player for music/audio books/ podcasts. An iPad with only specific apps loaded on to it, without access to the internet or any messaging or social media etc.

How much would that cost? That home computer and even ipad carry the same risks unless supervised 100% of the time.

Vettrianofan · 12/04/2024 07:08

Smart phones without social media. That's what we need. Only educational apps allowed. No pron. No vacuous crap.

Vettrianofan · 12/04/2024 07:05

Rosie1990 · 11/04/2024 17:05

We’re not going to get one til 14 absolutely earliest. It’s terrible for their development and loads of parents don’t really want to but do because they think everyone is. There’s the aforementioned smartphone free childhood groups whose aim is to encourage us to collectively not get them so they don’t feel left out. Def worth checking this out if you haven’t

DS almost 14 has a smart phone but hardly looks at it. He prefers going out in person to spend time with friends or cycling or chatting with parents or his siblings. I am glad he is neither up nor down about it.

Definitely don't rush to getting them a smart phone.

Vettrianofan · 12/04/2024 07:00

Thanks for posting about the Jon Haidt talk. I have forwarded on to my eldest as he agrees that social media is ruining the minds of young people who are constantly using these phones from a young age. So sad seeing the young boy scrolling an imaginary phone. Is this what it has come to?😔

Telephonically · 12/04/2024 04:19

Helar · 12/04/2024 00:00

Also OP you have to remember that parents who have already given their kids smart phones will have a strong need to justify it to themselves, and to focus on the positives (which of course there always are, with any device or parenting decision in general) and to downplay or deny the negatives.

If they are not teachers, they also only see how their own child behaves at home, and do not see what impact smart phones have on children in general, and on the community.

Whereas I as a teacher can see that the negatives far outweigh the benefits.( as described above)

Itmatters what other parents do and it is your business, because your child is only as protected as the least protected kid at the school. Before the ban, kids were sending horrifically violent and pornographic videos around by text or airdrop, bypassing any controls you as a parent might set. They were also taking photos and videos of other children and posting them on social media. Along with the insidious distraction, limited attention span, addiction and disruptive behaviour associated with them being in bags and pockets.

Hence I have chosen a school with a strictly enforced ban on phones for my kids - they are locked up bell to bell if brought to school.

You can usually find a different device or solution that provides more of the specific benefits you want without some of the dangers of the smart phones.

Eg a dumb phone for calls. A home desktop computer for word processing or internet research tasks. Print out the bus timetable and put it in your bag. Plan your journey in advance and print out a map if if required. A smart/bluetooth speaker/ Yoto player for music/audio books/ podcasts. An iPad with only specific apps loaded on to it, without access to the internet or any messaging or social media etc.

This is not necessarily true. I'd say I'm more anti smart phones precisely because my kids have had then over the last eight years. I would do some things differently if starting again. I'd be trying for solutions that didn't throw the baby out with the bathwater though. We should be able to use phones with the useful stuff and not the bad stuff but without that depending on individual parents having to become experts in creating layers of security.

Years ago on here people tended to be competitively chilled about not restricting or supervising their kids phones but I wonder if that might be changing a bit now. For kids with things like ADHD or even just the ones stuck sitting near noisy classmates homework and class materials being online is a godsend (which doesn't mean unrestricted phone or computer use is appropriate, just that they can be useful). None of this is black and white.

Helar · 12/04/2024 00:00

Also OP you have to remember that parents who have already given their kids smart phones will have a strong need to justify it to themselves, and to focus on the positives (which of course there always are, with any device or parenting decision in general) and to downplay or deny the negatives.

If they are not teachers, they also only see how their own child behaves at home, and do not see what impact smart phones have on children in general, and on the community.

Whereas I as a teacher can see that the negatives far outweigh the benefits.( as described above)

Itmatters what other parents do and it is your business, because your child is only as protected as the least protected kid at the school. Before the ban, kids were sending horrifically violent and pornographic videos around by text or airdrop, bypassing any controls you as a parent might set. They were also taking photos and videos of other children and posting them on social media. Along with the insidious distraction, limited attention span, addiction and disruptive behaviour associated with them being in bags and pockets.

Hence I have chosen a school with a strictly enforced ban on phones for my kids - they are locked up bell to bell if brought to school.

You can usually find a different device or solution that provides more of the specific benefits you want without some of the dangers of the smart phones.

Eg a dumb phone for calls. A home desktop computer for word processing or internet research tasks. Print out the bus timetable and put it in your bag. Plan your journey in advance and print out a map if if required. A smart/bluetooth speaker/ Yoto player for music/audio books/ podcasts. An iPad with only specific apps loaded on to it, without access to the internet or any messaging or social media etc.

thing47 · 11/04/2024 23:04

Smart phones are banned in all schools where I am

Apart, of course, from when there is a medical need for them to be on and with the pupil at all times…

elliejjtiny · 11/04/2024 22:58

My older 2 dc had smartphones from part way through year 7. My 3rd is considerably less trustworthy so he has one (currently year 8) but is only allowed it when he is out and might need to contact us. Dc1 (aged 17) has Instagram and discord, dc2 (aged 15) has discord. Dc4 is in year 6 but won't be allowed any kind of phone for a while, and will have a non smart phone when the time comes.

Helar · 11/04/2024 22:45

Marblessolveeverything · 11/04/2024 18:38

The issue is someone in the family usually has a smart phone. The cost of a laptop is significantly higher, something families may not be able to justify.

I’m a teacher where s mart phones are banned. In low socio economic areas, schools have computer rooms or banks of laptops that the classes use as required, or the school library has laptops that it hires out to kids at a low cost.

Homework is communicated in class and students write it in their diary. Tasks requiring a device would always be optional and there would be a screen free alternative. This is just about schools/teachers changing their practice and can be done. Speak to your school if you’re unhappy about device use.

Helar · 11/04/2024 22:36

I realise that my kids will need some kind of phone to contact me when out and about and to make arrangements and speak to friends, to allow developing independence. When I was a kid. I had a call home card for pay phones and a house phone.

However, a dumb phone will be fine for this.

Schools should not be requiring kids to use phones during the school day. As a teacher, I think that is terrible practice and you should complain. Smart phones are banned in all schools where I am. If tech is genuinely required for a learning task then they go to a computer room or bring out a laptop /tablet for it , depending on the school.

i see how damaging smart phones are. They are very different to eg using a laptop for a specific task. The laptop can be closed and put out of mind. The smart phone stays in the pocket, tempting and distracting them even when they are not looking at it.

children are hopelessly addicted to these things. They just cannot regulate themselves and I spend a lot of time managing those who are sneaking them, even though they are banned. At break time or during free time in class, they don’t want to talk to each other or are unable to maintain a conversation. I could have chatted for hours with my friends as a teen if allowed. Today’s teens just sit mindlessly and isolated staring at their phones. They are losing the art of socialisation and conversation.

More parents are waking up to this, so please stand firm and don’t be pushed into something you don’t want for your child because “everyone else is doing it”. Once you give in, it’s going to be almost impossible to row back . Delay smart phone as long as possible.

whyismysoupcold · 11/04/2024 20:47

ICouldBeVioletSky · 11/04/2024 18:23

Excellent post @tishtashtoo , people are delusional if they think the parent settings are watertight/ a magic wand and mean their kids get none of the risks of a smartphone. Kids and teens are much more tech savvy and know how to get round them! Eg:

  • my friend set her daughter’s phone to go off at 7:30 every day. Her lovely, not rebellious 11 year old got round this by changing her phone time zone to Los Angeles so she could keep using it!
  • Another friend found her son switched out the SIM card for a PAYG sim so he could get round the parental controls.
The average age for kids to first see porn is now 11 and as above this is often violent porn and in no way akin to the Playboy mags that may have been passed around the playground a generation ago.

It’s beyond depressing how little people on here seem to know.

Kids are very smart! I got round all sorts of parental controls when I was younger just by being observant and curious about how things worked.

Alwaytired44 · 11/04/2024 20:25

StillCreatingAName · 08/04/2024 18:46

AIBU? I feel like I might be missing something obvious on this one, but honestly why do children need to take a smartphone to school? It’s baffling me as to why there appears to be parents on auto pilot buying their children smartphones (£££) now in year 6, ready for year 7 as though it’s part of a uniform policy (and then sharing their purchase on the class WhatsApp, give me strength).

Is this all just a fallout from lockdown times, people were sort of forced into screen life, so now there’s more children at secondary school with them, who may not have ordinarily had a phone until older?
I’m expecting dc to walk home with friends talking and socialising without the inclusion of a screen or mindlessly scrolling social media instead of listening to friends. I can see where a basic phone might be needed to contact home, but that doesn’t mean the phone should be out of school bag anytime during school hours should it, but maybe I’m just being naive, time will tell 🤷‍♀️?

AIBU to say children don’t need to get a £££ phone for starting secondary school? (It goes without saying they don’t need it at all for primary school, IMHO)?

My daughter had a phone on Year 6 and that was before Covid!

NinetyPercent · 11/04/2024 20:03

@StillCreatingAName there are a lot of replies and posts on this thread so apologies if it’s been posted already but presumably you’ve seen this? https://delaysmartphones.org.uk/about/

there’s been fair amount of news coverage of it. You could get a group of parents together to delay together?

(my personal opinion is it’s the social media that’s the problem, not the device, plus lack of dialogue between children and parents, or parents not knowing how to use parental controls or insisting on phones being put away at bedtime etc. I also think secondary schools should ban all smartphones - some local to me only allow ‘bricks’. Smartphones are helpful for some kids for checking bus times etc).

Isitautumnyet23 · 11/04/2024 19:56

Rosie1990 · 11/04/2024 19:50

We have different views and that’s ok. All the best

Totally agree - the extremes on here though 🙈 People seem to think a 12 year old is guaranteed to be watching porn if they have a smartphone and others think they will deny their child the internet completely. A healthy middle ground is usually the answer to most things.

Isitautumnyet23 · 11/04/2024 19:54

dolphinette · 11/04/2024 19:40

Can you not comfort your own conscience about your parenting in your journal or something? I don't know who you are and I can't help you.

Edited

I wake up knowing im giving my kids a brilliant childhood and great education. Denying your child the internet is very inward looking and cutting them off from a whole world of information out there.

Good luck in school as they will using the internet/tablets from Primary school age (reception homework had to be done on tablets at our school).

Rosie1990 · 11/04/2024 19:50

Isitautumnyet23 · 11/04/2024 19:27

He isn’t though as not a single one of his friends doesn’t have a smartphone and nearly all of his friends are high achievers too in his close group. Im afraid any 12 year old will be the exception without a smartphone and isolated from what is being arranged/communicating with friends.

The most important thing is to have clear boundaries, for example a set time they can’t use the phone in the evening (we do that to coincide with when homework is done and then its off for the night). It’s like any part of parenting, you have to have rules and boundaries and a child who is denied something completely is usually the child that will rebel at some point.

Edited

We have different views and that’s ok. All the best

dolphinette · 11/04/2024 19:40

Isitautumnyet23 · 11/04/2024 16:06

Poor kids…how will they arrange to socialise with their friends when they are 12, going to Secondary school and friends could live in a number of towns and villages around the school?

Are they going to call their 12 year old friend on the home phone? (Other than people our grandparents age, who has a home phone anymore???). They will miss out on everything so good luck with that rule.

You also need the internet to do all their homework, everything other than reading (which we do every night) is set on apps.

Come back to us in a few years time and let us know how its going.

Can you not comfort your own conscience about your parenting in your journal or something? I don't know who you are and I can't help you.