Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Why shouldn’t life be made easier for pregnant women/mothers?

367 replies

Duckwithnobill · 07/04/2024 18:18

Read quite a few threads here lately that have really shown vitriol towards advancements in working conditions, pay and other adaptations that make life easier for pregnant women and women with young children, which is bizarre to say the least on a parenting forum.

A couple of examples being resentment at the increased ability to work from home or more flexibility from employers around attending meetings/commuting in late pregnancy. I’ve seen women that take advantage of these enhancements be labelled as workshy or as the reason women aren’t respected in the workplace. Full disclosure I am pregnant and my employer has been great at accommodating my pregnancy presumably because they want me to return after maternity leave!

Then there’s the whole debate around P&C parking spaces, where some posters seem genuinely angry that there might be small conveniences put in place to make life a little bit easier for parents.

AIBU to find this attitude quite baffling? Surely improvements to the way pregnant women/mothers are treated can only be a good thing? Or should we all just suffer and struggle?

OP posts:
Timeheals · 07/04/2024 22:46

I think there are many policies in place to try and support pregnancy and parents. I think the ones enshrined in law are appropriate (employment protections for pregnant women, paternity improving). Those that aren’t legal such as P&C parking, priority seating etc. are nice and supportive but do require a bit of social support which is largely given. In the work place it is more complicated as some allowances impact others and don’t meet business need - these should be case by case but needs to consider whether support can be offered to others as well (otherwise bias complaints could be introduced)

ooooohnoooooo · 07/04/2024 22:37

MuggedByReality · 07/04/2024 18:29

Because having children is a lifestyle choice, and I as a childfree person object to being penalised, inconvenienced or taxed more to allow entitled parents to receive yet more special treatment.

Wow.

Other peoples children are the ones who will manage and run the place when you are too old to do it. And kids like mine are already contributing their positive part to our world.

Other peoples kids will be providing your medical care, growing your food, delivering and cooking it, designing and making the things that make your life tick. Driving the bus/train that you travel on.

Without others you are nothing. It's called society. We each need each other to function. And a decent society makes sure everyone has a chance to life well, thrive and contribute whatever their stage of life, their sex, or status or whether they are pregnant or not.

Your kind of selfish 'me me me' attitude ignores all of this, and quite frankly, stinks.

surreygirl1987 · 07/04/2024 22:27

ASighMadeOfStone · 07/04/2024 18:32

The only complaints you've read on here about P&C spaces are when people with children equate themselves to people who are disabled.

Pregnancy isn't an illness. Or a race to the bottom. If a pregnant woman needs adjustments in the workplace, fine. Most do not.

Full disclosure: I had a baby. I was pregnant. I wasn't incapable of doing my job.

This. Most women are absolutely fine to do their jobs, as usual, pregnant. If they are not fine doing that, then of course they should ask for adjustments. While some women do struggle in pregnancy, and do need adjustments, I have worked with a significant number of women who unfortunately have used their pregnancies as a ticket for an easy ride for 9 months, wriggling out of as much work as they can (and bragging about that fact to colleagues).

Tiptoptum · 07/04/2024 22:24

This makes me so sad to read some of these comments.

Why are some women so happy to see life made so hard for other women? No pregnancy is not an illness, but it can make you ill, and it’s also bloody hard work, especially towards the end when you are heavily pregnant.

Children are literally the future. Without women having children there are no children, there is no future.

A puppy is a lifestyle choice. That some of us have children is a necessity.

I don’t believe the world should bend over backwards, but really? You are creating and carrying a human being, it can be tough. Why would I want to see other women having it harder because “I didn’t have all that when I was pregnant”

Cookiecoop · 07/04/2024 22:20

In my first (very easy) pregnancy I absolutely believed that no special treatment should be given, as being pregnant was my choice and not an illness. I was almost offended if anyone offered help and found it a bit patronising.

In my second pregnancy, I had severe HG and was bordering on being suicidal. I was massively bullied by my boss (who was fuming at me for getting pregnant) and would genuinely fantasise about dying to get away from it all.

The little acts of kindness I received during that second pregnancy (even just extra lifts, saving staffroom snacks, giving me a chair to sit on) was some reassurance that people cared about me and did help me to carry on. I’m forever grateful that those people made my life a bit easier because now I have a beautiful son, and he has a mum.

GoodnightAdeline · 07/04/2024 22:13

YaMuvva · 07/04/2024 22:08

Yes I’d like to know how @MuggedByReality is being penalised because somebody else goes on maternity leave or is granted flexible working. What happens to them, do they get fined or something?

Theres also something about people who sit around saying “It’s not fair, she Gets to go part time just because she’s had a kid!”. I once said to a colleague “well ask to go part time then they’ll let you if you put a good case in”. He didn’t want to go part time - he just didn’t want anyone else to be able to. These people should not be pandered to or have their spitefulness enabled.

Yep.

If somebody is child free by choice, they should just be happy that other poor suckers are putting in 18+ years of hard work and financial expense so then there are people to take their bins out, cut their hair, serve them in shops and nurse them throughout their life. These people don’t appear out of nowhere at employment age. They’ve been raised to that point by 1 or 2 people who have lost career prospects, a LOT of sleep and money, and spent their every waking hour developing them into functioning adults.

I was adamant for ages I didn’t want children (I have 2 now!) and I remember just looking at parents with slight pity thinking thank God they’re doing that and not me 😂

YaMuvva · 07/04/2024 22:08

GoodnightAdeline · 07/04/2024 22:03

I don’t understand this.

What would happen if people didn’t have children? To you, I mean?

Yes I’d like to know how @MuggedByReality is being penalised because somebody else goes on maternity leave or is granted flexible working. What happens to them, do they get fined or something?

Theres also something about people who sit around saying “It’s not fair, she Gets to go part time just because she’s had a kid!”. I once said to a colleague “well ask to go part time then they’ll let you if you put a good case in”. He didn’t want to go part time - he just didn’t want anyone else to be able to. These people should not be pandered to or have their spitefulness enabled.

Duckwithnobill · 07/04/2024 22:07

Isometimeswonder · 07/04/2024 21:56

@Duckwithnobill potentially your wording is misleading... or purposefully goading.
Should life be "made easier" for pregnant women or mums?
There are lots of people who would like to have life made easier but it isn't always possible.
There is however a shift towards more flexibility, but it should be in general.

It’s not meant to be goading or misleading, I used this wording as I’m using specific examples of changes/enhancements for pregnant women and mothers/parents. Of course everyone should have more flexibility but I’m specifically referring to enhancements that are put in place for these groups, which a lot of posters seem to have a real issue with and I’m not sure why.

OP posts:
saltinecrackers · 07/04/2024 22:06

YaMuvva · 07/04/2024 21:53

Thing is, certainly at the moment, it’s an employee’s market, and people in work now have way more sway than they used to regarding working conditions. There’s been so many times in recent years where unemployment was high and people couldn’t be as choosy or fussy with conditions, but certainly in my sector and related sectors, its the opposite now.

Any employer with good sense will want to hang on tight to good employees that have experience, have shown dedication and who it will be a colossal PITA to replace. It’s good sense to say “She’s now a working mum coming back from maternity leave - we want to keep her, let’s offer flexible working”. Or for that woman to say “I will come back from maternity leave but I’d like to work 2 days from home.

My DC were born and had their infant/nursery years pre-pandemic, but I often think now how much I’d have absolutely loved WFH when I came back off maternity with both kids, and how much it would have made a difference to my quality of life. NOT because I could take the piss and do childcare whilst I work. But because I could have had more sleep! I’d have saved time getting ready and commuting to work, I could roll out of bed at 8.55am ready to start at 9am (like I do now in my FT WFH job), I could ab e worked in my PJs after a long night and the best thing - lunchtime naps! I have had the odd one when WFH if I’ve been extremely tired, but my God I would have LOVED that as a new mum! And not just that - when my kids both went through stages of not sleeping and I’d be going into the office on 2 hours sleep, just having to converse with other humans, drive safely into work, have half my day occupied with chatterboxes etc was unbelievably draining.

So if I had my experiences I had all those years ago now, I’d absolutely be asking for hybrid working if I didn’t already have it. And frankly if other childless people in the workplace didn’t have that, it ain’t my problem. And me having a flexible working arrangement wouldn’t make them any worse off in any way. When making lifestyle and career choices I prioritise my own circumstances not other people’s.

Anyway I’m talking hypothetically about myself because those days are long gone and that didn’t happen, but I really hope a lot more new mums reap the benefits of home working because I imagine it makes an immense difference to their week to have a day at home.

It hasn't been an employee's market for close to year now, although some industries will always have a talent shortage.
Anyway, in 2024 most good employers IMO are flexible towards everyone. As a result the need for 'special concessions' is greatly reduced. Flexible working benefits a lot of groups not just parents but carers, disabled (especially neurodiverse people), etc.

Other workplaces tend to have a culture that isn't great anyway. Or, actually need the FT office presence, in which case one can't pretend that the concessions aren't affecting work output!

As an aside, when companies want to make redundancies, they do try to make people leave by stealth first... requiring office presence is one of those things.

GoodnightAdeline · 07/04/2024 22:03

MuggedByReality · 07/04/2024 18:29

Because having children is a lifestyle choice, and I as a childfree person object to being penalised, inconvenienced or taxed more to allow entitled parents to receive yet more special treatment.

I don’t understand this.

What would happen if people didn’t have children? To you, I mean?

silentpool · 07/04/2024 22:01

Everyone should have access to flexibility.

Isometimeswonder · 07/04/2024 21:56

@Duckwithnobill potentially your wording is misleading... or purposefully goading.
Should life be "made easier" for pregnant women or mums?
There are lots of people who would like to have life made easier but it isn't always possible.
There is however a shift towards more flexibility, but it should be in general.

YaMuvva · 07/04/2024 21:53

Thing is, certainly at the moment, it’s an employee’s market, and people in work now have way more sway than they used to regarding working conditions. There’s been so many times in recent years where unemployment was high and people couldn’t be as choosy or fussy with conditions, but certainly in my sector and related sectors, its the opposite now.

Any employer with good sense will want to hang on tight to good employees that have experience, have shown dedication and who it will be a colossal PITA to replace. It’s good sense to say “She’s now a working mum coming back from maternity leave - we want to keep her, let’s offer flexible working”. Or for that woman to say “I will come back from maternity leave but I’d like to work 2 days from home.

My DC were born and had their infant/nursery years pre-pandemic, but I often think now how much I’d have absolutely loved WFH when I came back off maternity with both kids, and how much it would have made a difference to my quality of life. NOT because I could take the piss and do childcare whilst I work. But because I could have had more sleep! I’d have saved time getting ready and commuting to work, I could roll out of bed at 8.55am ready to start at 9am (like I do now in my FT WFH job), I could ab e worked in my PJs after a long night and the best thing - lunchtime naps! I have had the odd one when WFH if I’ve been extremely tired, but my God I would have LOVED that as a new mum! And not just that - when my kids both went through stages of not sleeping and I’d be going into the office on 2 hours sleep, just having to converse with other humans, drive safely into work, have half my day occupied with chatterboxes etc was unbelievably draining.

So if I had my experiences I had all those years ago now, I’d absolutely be asking for hybrid working if I didn’t already have it. And frankly if other childless people in the workplace didn’t have that, it ain’t my problem. And me having a flexible working arrangement wouldn’t make them any worse off in any way. When making lifestyle and career choices I prioritise my own circumstances not other people’s.

Anyway I’m talking hypothetically about myself because those days are long gone and that didn’t happen, but I really hope a lot more new mums reap the benefits of home working because I imagine it makes an immense difference to their week to have a day at home.

Moglet4 · 07/04/2024 21:52

MikeRafone · 07/04/2024 21:13

So they can walk & how far is the distance they can walk?

It wasn’t long after she’d had her baby and only the second or third time she’d been out. She couldn’t walk far at all. She also missed her appointment as a result. It was a long time ago (about 12 years ago now) but it’s stuck with me because I thought it was absolutely appalling. I can empathise because after my first baby in particular, I could barely walk round the house for 3 weeks after.

saltinecrackers · 07/04/2024 21:39

Duckwithnobill · 07/04/2024 18:43

I agree to an extent although as only the mother can be pregnant and give birth there will always be to some extent greater need for consideration for the woman? My DH will be sharing parental leave but for example couldn’t have dealt with my morning sickness for me or commuted to my job when I had to stop due to PGP!

PP was talking specifically about childcare though. That has nothing to do with pregnancy and birth.
You are conflating several related, but completely separate issues. Accommodations should be given for pregnancy related illnesses/conditions, but not the mere condition of 'pregnancy'.
Women with young children... what 'accommodations' are you talking about and why is this for women, not parents? Unless you're talking about things like safe places to express. But things like pay etc... how is that related?

YaMuvva · 07/04/2024 21:25

ludicrouslycapaciousbags · 07/04/2024 21:19

I thought having children were a choice.

Yes yawn indeed.

When people say this what they mean is “You have to STFU about any complaint ever, including if you were ripped in 2 after a dodgy birth because having a baby is a choice and you deserve no sympathy”. It’s basically another way of showing thinly veiled hate for women.

ludicrouslycapaciousbags · 07/04/2024 21:19

I thought having children were a choice.

Yes yawn indeed.

YaMuvva · 07/04/2024 21:15

ASighMadeOfStone · 07/04/2024 18:32

The only complaints you've read on here about P&C spaces are when people with children equate themselves to people who are disabled.

Pregnancy isn't an illness. Or a race to the bottom. If a pregnant woman needs adjustments in the workplace, fine. Most do not.

Full disclosure: I had a baby. I was pregnant. I wasn't incapable of doing my job.

Pregnancy isn't an illness.

Oh yawn.

Many women are very ill as a result of pregnancy. HTH

MikeRafone · 07/04/2024 21:13

Moglet4 · 07/04/2024 21:02

Not that distance, no.

So they can walk & how far is the distance they can walk?

YaMuvva · 07/04/2024 21:13

mynameiscalypso · 07/04/2024 18:25

I don't think a woman should get special treatment just because she's pregnant or has small children particularly - people have different responsibilities which may well not be child related (eg caring for elderly parents). They shouldn't have less flexibility offered to them because they happen not to have had a child.

I have no view at all on P&C spaces as I don't drive but I think it's right that on buses, for example, wheelchairs should take priority.

Not giving a pregnant woman special treatment is literally sex discrimination. Conditions including pregnancy must be adjusted for in the workplace. Why shouldn’t they?

YaMuvva · 07/04/2024 21:12

YANBU, I find it quite disturbing actually how many people (especially when it’s women) sit rubbing their hands with glee about the thought of making life harder for women. Even if it’s just something small like parent and child parking, so many are determined it should be taken away even when mums with babies say it’s a lifesaver for them.

I think the vast majority of this comes from a horrible place of bitterness of “I didn’t have it that easy so why should you”. When I started in the workplace I endured horrific sexism including being told that I should stop wearing dresses because it ‘makes the older men randy’. It was on me to change how I dress, not on them to change their vile creepy attitudes. I have no doubt sexism still happens but I am SO GLAD this kind of shit would not be said by anyone who doesn’t want to be sacked. I’m so pleased women had much better than I have in many areas of life. Anyone who thinks things shouldn’t get better for women should just sit the fuck down.

PhoenixReincarnated · 07/04/2024 21:09

Moglet4 · 07/04/2024 20:44

Doesn’t necessarily mean they always should though. Often, yes, but not always. I’m thinking, for example, of my friend who had a baby in a pram and was waiting for a bus. They were very busy at that time. There were wheelchair users waiting in the bus queue too. The bus driver told her there was no room and she’d have to wait for the next bus. This happened 3 times until she could actually get on a bus 45 mins later. Why should someone in a wheelchair not wait for the next bus but she should, over and over again? I’m honestly not trying to be antagonistic. I just genuinely think there are grey areas in different circumstances and disability shouldn’t necessarily always be given first priority

Disability campaigners campaigned for years for wheelchair spaces on buses. If parents want a dedicated pram space where they take priority then they need to get off their arses and campaign for one not steal the hard won wheelchair space.

Goldenbear · 07/04/2024 21:09

Lancrelady80 · 07/04/2024 20:20

Not comparable at all your parents are not your dependents.

Well, that just depends on your parents' health and age, doesn't it? Lucky you to not be in a position to find out that they very much can be...

I find this to be an odd argument, it isn’t like some pregnant women don’t have elderly parents that are dependent on them to look after them as well as being pregnant!

Allfur · 07/04/2024 21:07

Any one whose life is more difficult in any way, be it child care, disability sexuality, gender, poverty, etc - should be given allowances in some way - if possible

Noicant · 07/04/2024 21:06

Whatifthehokeycokey · 07/04/2024 20:27

I think the trouble with pregnancy is that it is very common (obviously) and so a lot of women have gone through it, but their experiences vary vastly.

I'm signed off work with hyperemesis gravidarum at the moment (hence being on mumsnet all the time!). It's hugely debilitating and I've been quite close to being hospitalised and put on drip.

It affects 1% of pregnant women. So other women who've been pregnant (my boss) or who've had pregnant wives etc. will be thinking... it's just a bit of morning sickness, why's she being so dramatic?

I'm also very prone to fainting at the moment so don't feel safe driving and don't even really want to be out and about with my toddler because I don't think it's safe.

Again, other women will think... what's all the fuss? I was pregnant with a toddler and I just got on with it. You're not special. etc.

You have my sympathy, I was eating Zofran like they were sweeties, it’s a special kind of hell, the nausea is the worst. I hope you feel better soon x

Swipe left for the next trending thread