Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to be angry about the benefits system

690 replies

Daffodilsinfebruary · 07/04/2024 16:23

I have recently discovered by using a free, independent benefits calculator called entitledto that had I applied for Universal Credit over 2 years ago, me and my family would be over £16,000 better off.

I had assumed that benefits were for either single-parent families or people unable to work due to disability.

The majority of our savings would have been from claiming 85% back in childcare costs. We also would have had a payout of over £200 each month in addition.

For context, we bring in just shy off £4,000 a month. I thought this was a very reasonable income and we would be entitled to nil.

I feel angry that we did not know about this. A friend of mine who I met through our children attending the same nursery told me she claims 85% back in childcare costs during a conversation in which I complained of my childcare going up £150.

I did further research and 19 billion pounds apparently goes unclaimed every year.

I’ve never claimed benefits in all my life and worked hard to get on the property ladder.

should I be angry that we didn’t claim, or take it in my stride.

I wonder how many other families who could have claimed but haven’t.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
Rosscameasdoody · 15/04/2024 23:14

Lougle · 15/04/2024 22:53

Right, but universal credit take carers allowance pound for pound. Despite it being a taxable benefit. Then the earnings at 55p in the pound.

So £333 per month carers plus £654 earnings makes £987, but only £254 cash income after deductions.

UC deducts CA pound for pound but pays a carers element if you are eligible for CA, regardless of whether you are claiming it or not. I think carers element is around £46 per week. This is not automatic - you have to apply for it.

Rosscameasdoody · 15/04/2024 23:06

KestrelMoon · 15/04/2024 22:57

No. I’m not the one confusing the two different benefits, and frankly, £151 per week can be exceeded by working two weekend shifts on minimum wage at the local Co-op. It is so little money/work, that you can’t really be considered to be a working employee imho because it’s not enough take home pay to pay even minimum subsistence costs.

As a poor woman recently found out because DWP prosecuted her for benefits fraud because some weeks her weekend work at the Co-op exceeded the threshold by 30p. She was caring for her elderly mum the rest of the time.

We’re clearly talking at cross purposes here - carers allowance is a completely separate benefit to local authority care costs. I’ll leave it there so as not to derail the thread.

Rosscameasdoody · 15/04/2024 23:02

Headfirstintothewild · 15/04/2024 22:41

You really don’t understand carer’s allowance, do you? It is meant towards family income.

Again, how many hours of care do you think £81.90 will fund? Hint not many. For DS1 it wouldn’t even fund 2 hours when you consider he is deemed to need 2:1. 6 hrs for DS3’s PA. And that’s only the carer’s wages not other associated costs.

Exactly. You need to be a care giver for a minimum of 35 hours a week for the qualifying disabled person. Put simply if you divide that by the allowance itself - just under £82 per week - it comes out at around £2.34 an hour. For context the financial assessment for care in our local authority area is based on £30 an hour.

KestrelMoon · 15/04/2024 22:57

Rosscameasdoody · 15/04/2024 22:47

Sorry but this is nonsense. As long as you care for the disabled person for 35 hours or more per week you can still work and earn up to £151 per week after deductions, and still claim carers allowance. Direct payments or any other form of care funded by local authorities are totally separate. You’re not just confusing two different threads, you’re confusing two entirely separate benefits paid for entirely different reasons.

Edited

No. I’m not the one confusing the two different benefits, and frankly, £151 per week can be exceeded by working two weekend shifts on minimum wage at the local Co-op. It is so little money/work, that you can’t really be considered to be a working employee imho because it’s not enough take home pay to pay even minimum subsistence costs.

As a poor woman recently found out because DWP prosecuted her for benefits fraud because some weeks her weekend work at the Co-op exceeded the threshold by 30p. She was caring for her elderly mum the rest of the time.

Lougle · 15/04/2024 22:53

Rosscameasdoody · 15/04/2024 22:47

Sorry but this is nonsense. As long as you care for the disabled person for 35 hours or more per week you can still work and earn up to £151 per week after deductions, and still claim carers allowance. Direct payments or any other form of care funded by local authorities are totally separate. You’re not just confusing two different threads, you’re confusing two entirely separate benefits paid for entirely different reasons.

Edited

Right, but universal credit take carers allowance pound for pound. Despite it being a taxable benefit. Then the earnings at 55p in the pound.

So £333 per month carers plus £654 earnings makes £987, but only £254 cash income after deductions.

Rosscameasdoody · 15/04/2024 22:47

KestrelMoon · 15/04/2024 22:40

You can’t use the unpaid carer’s allowance benefit to pay for a paid carer.
If you work, you are not eligible to claim it.

The problem is that the threshold to get the government to give direct benefits to a disabled adult or their family/guardian to then pay for a paid carer is very very high such that there is a high dependence on family members being forced to become unpaid carers. There is such a shortage of funds and carers, that many many families and disabled people are left struggling with no supprt.
edited because I have confused two dusability threads

Edited

Sorry but this is nonsense. As long as you care for the disabled person for 35 hours or more per week you can still work and earn up to £151 per week after deductions, and still claim carers allowance. Direct payments or any other form of care funded by local authorities are totally separate. You’re not just confusing two different threads, you’re confusing two entirely separate benefits paid for entirely different reasons.

Headfirstintothewild · 15/04/2024 22:41

Tomsthumbs · 15/04/2024 22:32

Exactly. So use the allowance to pay someone else to care. Not keep it is a family income. Go out to work yourselves and have another life to compliment your disabled live in persons life. Holistic yes? Rewarding for all? Definitely. Improving society. Without say

You really don’t understand carer’s allowance, do you? It is meant towards family income.

Again, how many hours of care do you think £81.90 will fund? Hint not many. For DS1 it wouldn’t even fund 2 hours when you consider he is deemed to need 2:1. 6 hrs for DS3’s PA. And that’s only the carer’s wages not other associated costs.

KestrelMoon · 15/04/2024 22:40

Tomsthumbs · 15/04/2024 22:32

Exactly. So use the allowance to pay someone else to care. Not keep it is a family income. Go out to work yourselves and have another life to compliment your disabled live in persons life. Holistic yes? Rewarding for all? Definitely. Improving society. Without say

You can’t use the unpaid carer’s allowance benefit to pay for a paid carer.
If you work, you are not eligible to claim it.

The problem is that the threshold to get the government to give direct benefits to a disabled adult or their family/guardian to then pay for a paid carer is very very high such that there is a high dependence on family members being forced to become unpaid carers. There is such a shortage of funds and carers, that many many families and disabled people are left struggling with no supprt.
edited because I have confused two dusability threads

Rosscameasdoody · 15/04/2024 22:39

Tomsthumbs · 15/04/2024 22:32

Exactly. So use the allowance to pay someone else to care. Not keep it is a family income. Go out to work yourselves and have another life to compliment your disabled live in persons life. Holistic yes? Rewarding for all? Definitely. Improving society. Without say

No. Carers allowance can be claimed by anyone looking after the disabled person for more than 35 hours a week, as long as the disabled person is claiming qualifying benefits as detailed upthread. It’s mostly claimed by family members as they are more often than not the main carers. And it’s paid for the benefit of the carer not the disabled person. The carer can personally earn up to £151 a week after deductions from paid employment and still claim carers allowance, so, yes, it’s part of household income.

Lougle · 15/04/2024 22:36

Tomsthumbs · 15/04/2024 22:32

Exactly. So use the allowance to pay someone else to care. Not keep it is a family income. Go out to work yourselves and have another life to compliment your disabled live in persons life. Holistic yes? Rewarding for all? Definitely. Improving society. Without say

You're really not getting it, are you?? It's a taxable benefit for unpaid carers, who are the backbone of society. See what the social care bill is without us!!

Tomsthumbs · 15/04/2024 22:32

Lougle · 15/04/2024 22:20

I think you've misunderstood. It's a recognition that the person who cares is unable to be gainfully employed and it gives a token payment with the more important NI credits.

The rate is £81 per week. That would only enable care of around 4 hours per week.

If someone was going out to work and was gainfully employed, they would stop being entitled to carer's allowance.

You have badly misunderstood.

Exactly. So use the allowance to pay someone else to care. Not keep it is a family income. Go out to work yourselves and have another life to compliment your disabled live in persons life. Holistic yes? Rewarding for all? Definitely. Improving society. Without say

Rosscameasdoody · 15/04/2024 22:32

KestrelMoon · 15/04/2024 22:00

In the context of paid professional carers, the carers’ allowance is usually by seperate benefits payments. You (parent or disabled person) get paid their wages direct and then have to use that money to pay the carers.

This is different type of carers’ allowance from the carer’s allowance that an unpaid carer can claim.

Paid carers are provided by the local authority based on need and means tested on the income, savings and assets of the person being cared for. I think what you’re talking about here is the alternative to that in the form of direct payments from the local authority which can be used to buy in care services. Carers allowance is paid to the carer and is not included in the assessment.

Lougle · 15/04/2024 22:20

Tomsthumbs · 15/04/2024 22:02

Yes of course. The carer can be a paid external non member of the family. The gov supports paid carers so the families can get on and pay a carer to care for the person/child. The family should not assume it is their given rights to claim carers allowance if they can go out to work and allow another carer to help. Thays the gov incentive. Carers allowance is not an income. It is an allowance to help pay for the care of someone. That means someone outside of the home can do the job.
British e onomy will work if families help to put that back in.

I think you've misunderstood. It's a recognition that the person who cares is unable to be gainfully employed and it gives a token payment with the more important NI credits.

The rate is £81 per week. That would only enable care of around 4 hours per week.

If someone was going out to work and was gainfully employed, they would stop being entitled to carer's allowance.

You have badly misunderstood.

Rosscameasdoody · 15/04/2024 22:17

Lougle · 15/04/2024 21:36

I'm not sure I understand this post? Am I misreading it? Carer's allowance is for the carer, not the child.

The whole post is absolute bollocks. Carers allowance is paid to the carer, and is for the benefit of the carer, not the disabled person. To qualify, the person being cared for has to be in receipt of middle or higher rate care component of DLA, Child DLA, Attendance Allowance or PIP. The person claiming carers allowance must be caring for the person for at least 35 hours a week and not be earning any more than £151 a week from paid employment after tax, NI and allowable deductions. And carers are not provided by the government. Local authorities provide home based or residential care based on need and it’s means tested on the income and savings of the person being cared for, including certain benefits they receive - in the case of residential care, any assets such as property, including the home they live in is included.

Headfirstintothewild · 15/04/2024 22:15

It is an allowance to help pay for the care of someone. That means someone outside of the home can do the job.

No it’s not. It wouldn’t go far if that was what carer’s allowance is for. How many hours of care do you think £81.90 pw will fund? In order to be eligible for carer’s allowance the carer has to be providing 35hrs of care a week.

The family should not assume it is their given rights to claim carers allowance if they can go out to work and allow another carer to help.

Except if the cared for person is receiving one of the relevant benefits a carer caring for them for 35hrs is entitled to carer’s allowance. That is a right. Even the government recognise many carers are unable to work. That’s why they don’t have any work requirements on UC and on legacy benefits could claim income support (subject to meeting the other eligibility criteria, obviously).

Tomsthumbs · 15/04/2024 22:02

Lougle · 15/04/2024 21:36

I'm not sure I understand this post? Am I misreading it? Carer's allowance is for the carer, not the child.

Yes of course. The carer can be a paid external non member of the family. The gov supports paid carers so the families can get on and pay a carer to care for the person/child. The family should not assume it is their given rights to claim carers allowance if they can go out to work and allow another carer to help. Thays the gov incentive. Carers allowance is not an income. It is an allowance to help pay for the care of someone. That means someone outside of the home can do the job.
British e onomy will work if families help to put that back in.

KestrelMoon · 15/04/2024 22:00

Lougle · 15/04/2024 21:36

I'm not sure I understand this post? Am I misreading it? Carer's allowance is for the carer, not the child.

In the context of paid professional carers, the carers’ allowance is usually by seperate benefits payments. You (parent or disabled person) get paid their wages direct and then have to use that money to pay the carers.

This is different type of carers’ allowance from the carer’s allowance that an unpaid carer can claim.

XenoBitch · 15/04/2024 21:37

Rosscameasdoody · 14/04/2024 19:41

I was a benefit adviser in a former life and l lost count of the number of times l came across attitudes like this. Some people sit in judgement believing that they know all the circumstances of someone’s life. Unfortunately l’ve been involved in some very sad cases where claimants have been reported and are actually doing nothing wrong - but have had benefit suspended while they are investigated. It causes a lot of hardship.

That is depressing, but I am not surprised.
It plays out on MN all the time... "my neighbour claims XYZ and goes on 10 holidays each year, and has a new car" etc.

Lougle · 15/04/2024 21:36

Tomsthumbs · 15/04/2024 21:31

And of course there are paid carers to help toak the burden. Admittedly, will need to pay but hey, it's your quality of life and gov will provide this to help support. Mustn't take carers allowance as income. It's a given support for the child, not yours.

I'm not sure I understand this post? Am I misreading it? Carer's allowance is for the carer, not the child.

Tomsthumbs · 15/04/2024 21:31

gamerchick · 13/04/2024 09:05

I get it. My youngest will probably never leave home. It's why we work different hours so someone can be home with him.

And of course there are paid carers to help toak the burden. Admittedly, will need to pay but hey, it's your quality of life and gov will provide this to help support. Mustn't take carers allowance as income. It's a given support for the child, not yours.

Tomsthumbs · 15/04/2024 20:39

LanaL · 10/04/2024 16:32

Completely agree with this! If you are entitled - claim it! Even if you think you dont need it , claim it and save some wages for a rainy day - because , believe me those rainy days can come out of the blue !

We claim it now - because we applied during a very rainy time. My husband had just gone self employed ( 2 weeks - so no time to save anything, we had just came back from holiday skint and were waiting for him to go back to work the next day then get paid the following week and subsequent weeks - me too, agency worker , so knew we had a tight week ahead ) well , then it RAINED! He had a life changing accident the same day and was off work for 7 months with no sick pay. In hospital for 3 - that in itself was expensive - i couldnt work barely for a few months due to this and it crippled us . A year later , we still feel the effects and are in massive debt. For a few months before , i was between jobs and didnt even think about applying as i assumed his wage meant we couldnt. But turns out we missed out on about £1000 per month. If we had , we would have had some aside to help us through and wouldnt have had to max credit cards for a month when he first went in to hospital and we were waiting for the first payment.

If you dont claim it, it doesnt go to " people who need it " - no one else gets more because it's unclaimed . It goes straight back into the governments pockets . So everyone saying " please dont claim if you dont need it, leave it for those who do " - thats nonsense and makes no sense at all!

So truly sorry to hear this awful situation happened to you both and you struggled ontop with finances aswell.
Really hope all has improved with both health and finances xx

Headfirstintothewild · 15/04/2024 17:50

Rosscameasdoody · 15/04/2024 17:27

The savings don’t have to be in their name, just used for their benefit. A lot of equipment and other things which make living with a disability easier are not automatically funded, and living with disability is expensive.

I know not everything is funded and living with a disability is expensive. That is exactly what I have posted earlier on this thread. I am also aware savings can be in the parents’ names, I was merely pointing out the risks of DC having savings in case posters aren’t aware because many get caught out.

Rosscameasdoody · 15/04/2024 17:27

Headfirstintothewild · 15/04/2024 16:37

Even if you put it away for them as savings to use to make their lives easier later on.

If DC won’t have capacity as an adult, will need means tested benefits or social care support, saving in their name isn’t a wise idea.

The savings don’t have to be in their name, just used for their benefit. A lot of equipment and other things which make living with a disability easier are not automatically funded, and living with disability is expensive.

Headfirstintothewild · 15/04/2024 16:37

Even if you put it away for them as savings to use to make their lives easier later on.

If DC won’t have capacity as an adult, will need means tested benefits or social care support, saving in their name isn’t a wise idea.

Rosscameasdoody · 15/04/2024 16:28

Mumof3girls9 · 11/04/2024 12:58

This isn’t the case unfortunatly. As I have already stated further up this post we don’t claim UC a as morally we don’t think it’s right as between us our take home pay is just shy of £5000 and we own our own house via a mortgage. Despite our high income we are eligable for approx £350 of Universal credit a month. (I have done the online calculators and also worked it out manually). This is due to the disabled child element and carers element we would be entitled to. We have never claimed benefits in our life and have 3 kids all born before 2017. Two of those children are very poorly and receive the high rate care allowance as well as carers allowance. When you add these elements to the standard allowance and the child element we are entitled to get a total of £2898.55 before wages are deducted. Even when you deduct the 55p per £1 earned of this (and take account of the working allowance) we still would be able to claim £350ish a month which is ludicrous. We don’t need that money and we can’t morally claim it but I bet there are thousands who do because they can. We will be entitled to this for several years yet as the girls are a long way off 18. There will be people like us claiming these elements from a child aged around 2 up until their 18th birthday because they can yet there are people living in poverty and barely getting by.

I don’t understand why you’re not claiming the extra while you can to support your disabled children. Even if you put it away for them as savings to use to make their lives easier later on. The benefit budget is recalculated annually based in part on claims, so all that happens it that it gets reduced - it doesn’t go to people ‘more deserving’.