Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Black Out nights in theatre ARE important

883 replies

PenguinLord · 06/04/2024 13:07

I know there was a theatre that did it last year and a thread about it- but there is a West End venue this year which will host two or three black out nights (where "all-black-identifying audiences" are invited) of the Slave Play. I had mixed feelings, but after having read a few articles on it, I actually agree with the concept- for the record I am very much white.

Spokesperson for the PM criticised black out nights saying "“The prime minister is a big supporter of the arts and he believes that the arts should be inclusive".

But let's face it, theatre experience is far from inclusive or accessible. Having 2 out of a few dozen nights will not really make a difference, nor excludes people who are not black to attend literally 80 if not more other performances. I was in theatre this week, and had a good look around. 98% of the audience were white. There were a few Asian people and 1 (one) black person- in the audience of around 300.

I suppose Id be far less likely to attend an event where I would stick out like a very sore thumb, is it really such a big deal to have two performances where people who dont usually feel theatre is an inclusive space can feel welcome, surrounded by people that belong to the same community?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
EliflurtleAndTheInfiniteMadness · 09/04/2024 08:45

Lion400 · 09/04/2024 08:27

Agreed

And you're trying to make the issue seem worthless by bringing a heap of complications and what ifs into it. Its not a complex definition of white, its not about what happens in other countries, its specifically about the unconcious bias that occurs in countries with largely Anglo-Saxon heritage against people of colour. Its not personal racism or nastiness between one person and another, it doesn't mean some white people aren't disadvantaged or discriminated against, its systemic racial bias which is still a massive discriminatory part of the system. We need to work on eliminating that and whilst ever that exists there will be situations in which a step up is needed just to level the playing field.

Lion400 · 09/04/2024 08:34

EliflurtleAndTheInfiniteMadness · 09/04/2024 08:09

Equality isn't treating everyone the same. Its about leveling the playing field so people have the same chances, the same education and the same rights. There is privilege in our society just from being white or even more white and male. There is racism and sexism and you can pretend all you want, but those things aren't gone. They should be, but until they are what groups that suffer racism, sexism and so on need is a leg up so they have a chance at reaching equality. And no it doesn't have to work both ways because there's already privilege on the other side of it.

Much research has shown that two parent families, happily together raising the child/ren is the most significant factor in life

Or - as it says here in the link:

  • Children are significantly more likely to avoid poverty and prison, and to graduate from college, if they are raised in an intact two-parent family.
  • From poverty to college graduation to incarceration, black children and young adults from two-parent families are more likely to be flourishing than their white peers from single-parent families
  • On average, black young adults from families headed by their mother and father are more likely to be flourishing educationally than black young adults from non-intact homes

“Children who grow up in a household with only one biological parent are worse off, on average, than children who grow up in a household with both of their biological parents, regardless of the parents’ race or educational background.”
^^

https://ifstudies.org/blog/less-poverty-less-prison-more-college-what-two-parents-mean-for-black-and-white-children

Less Poverty, Less Prison, More College: What Two Parents Mean For Black and White Children

Princeton University sociology professor Sara McClanahan summarized the social scientific consensus about the importance of family structure for children with her colleague Gary Sandefur in this passage from their magisterial 1992 book, Growing Up with...

https://ifstudies.org/blog/less-poverty-less-prison-more-college-what-two-parents-mean-for-black-and-white-children

Lion400 · 09/04/2024 08:27

mids2019 · 09/04/2024 08:08

@Lion400

I see your point but again when it comes to 'white privilege' then if white means white white must include white people from North Africa, pale skinned Hispanics, Jews, Eastern Europeans and the whole ideological edifice of white privilege starts to collapse.

the US government consider s a lot of people of middle eastern heritage white but they themselves don't identify as white. It's not simple. (Or if it's simple then we can't just ideologically align skin tone to privilege)

Agreed

EliflurtleAndTheInfiniteMadness · 09/04/2024 08:26

AzureNewt · 09/04/2024 01:27

I just don’t agree with that analysis at all.

”White privilege” refers to the relative advantages that a white person has, compared to to people from other races, in certain societies.

Just sticking with the interview example; if black candidates are often passed over in favour of white candidates, due to conscious and/or unconscious biases of interviewers, then that’s an example of white privilege. It doesn’t mean that the successful white candidates have done anything wrong, but that they enjoy and may have benefited from the advantage of being less likely to be treated unfairly in the interview process.

That doesn’t make every white person accountable for racism, or import guilt onto them, it just describes one of the ways in which society treats white people (as a class) more favourably than people from some other races.

Given that most interviewers, even with conscious biases, aren’t going to tell the unsuccessful candidate “I didn’t hire you because you are black and I’m racist”, you’re never likely to know the extent to which racism has played a part in any given interview, even if overall trends are clear that there is a problem. I don’t see how you can tackle these insidious things without being able to acknowledge that they exist, which is what the term “white privilege” is designed to do.

I feel as though most people who are affronted by mention of “white privilege” are objecting to the term itself, and the connotations they take from it, rather than what it actually means.

I think you've explained it well. Im white and my life is certainly not privileged but that isn't what the term means. There's unconcious biasis that effect things at a societal level and we need to acknowledge they exist. I don't feel guilty for slavery or for racism or for white privilege, its not about guilt, it's about acknowledging the issue so we can work on fixing it. Other countries might have other different biasis to work on to have true equality, that doesn't change the situation in countries like England and the US and Australia. Two wrongs don't make a right.

valensiwalensi · 09/04/2024 08:24

EliflurtleAndTheInfiniteMadness · 09/04/2024 08:09

Equality isn't treating everyone the same. Its about leveling the playing field so people have the same chances, the same education and the same rights. There is privilege in our society just from being white or even more white and male. There is racism and sexism and you can pretend all you want, but those things aren't gone. They should be, but until they are what groups that suffer racism, sexism and so on need is a leg up so they have a chance at reaching equality. And no it doesn't have to work both ways because there's already privilege on the other side of it.

What’s the quote? “When you have privilege, equality feels like oppression”.

ain’t that the truth!

PenguinLord · 09/04/2024 08:14

JamSandle · 09/04/2024 05:34

It just sounds like segregation to me.

Replace it with 'white out' and see if you feel the same.

Another poster who has not bothered to read three lines about what the event actually entails, but has OPINIONS.

OP posts:
EliflurtleAndTheInfiniteMadness · 09/04/2024 08:09

PressureLikeATickTickTick · 06/04/2024 13:47

And it's not equality if it doesn't work both ways.

You could never ban white /muslim/Jewish people from a performance.

Why has it become socially acceptable to exclude white people? We are the only group that this happens to and if we talk about it we are racist??

Equality isn't treating everyone the same. Its about leveling the playing field so people have the same chances, the same education and the same rights. There is privilege in our society just from being white or even more white and male. There is racism and sexism and you can pretend all you want, but those things aren't gone. They should be, but until they are what groups that suffer racism, sexism and so on need is a leg up so they have a chance at reaching equality. And no it doesn't have to work both ways because there's already privilege on the other side of it.

mids2019 · 09/04/2024 08:08

@Lion400

I see your point but again when it comes to 'white privilege' then if white means white white must include white people from North Africa, pale skinned Hispanics, Jews, Eastern Europeans and the whole ideological edifice of white privilege starts to collapse.

the US government consider s a lot of people of middle eastern heritage white but they themselves don't identify as white. It's not simple. (Or if it's simple then we can't just ideologically align skin tone to privilege)

sashh · 09/04/2024 07:54

There are better ways to be more inclusive.

Often cost is an issue. I'd love to go to the theatre more often but I can't afford it.

Selling tickets at a discount in places you want your target audience from with travel included would be a better way to get more people interested. And include a drink / food at the interval.

That target group could be a geographical area, via a school, or linked to community hubs eg Food banks / community centres / social clubs.

valensiwalensi · 09/04/2024 07:34

mids2019 · 09/04/2024 06:57

@valensiwalensi

I may be getting this wrong but are you suggesting the experience of white people during world war 2 was 'boring'. I was only suggesting that people may have an issue of suggesting inviting white people (of maybe an elderly age) to watch a play about the battle of Britain would be offensive. However the white people may be sharing an experience of be particularly emotionally involved in the topic because of heritage.

Yes you are getting it wrong.

Lion400 · 09/04/2024 07:33

mids2019 · 09/04/2024 07:06

Maybe someone can explain what a white person is? How do you define white?

I reckon if one feels white, one is white. If one feels like a woman, one is a woman. Etcetera.

I’m feeling like a billionaire today. Must tell the bank.

mids2019 · 09/04/2024 07:06

Maybe someone can explain what a white person is? How do you define white?

mids2019 · 09/04/2024 07:06

@Iluvteandbiscuits .

It's not exactly white privilege is it. I think we ignore discrimination and abuse towards white people as it is rarer but it definitely exists. (Or should I say those that perceive them selves as white as mentioned before 'white' is complex term).

Perhaps racial division and the notion of 'white' people being oppressors excuses people from being offensive? I do feel terms like 'white privlige' leads to people seeing white people to become the victims of cultural and historical vengeance.

mids2019 · 09/04/2024 06:57

@valensiwalensi

I may be getting this wrong but are you suggesting the experience of white people during world war 2 was 'boring'. I was only suggesting that people may have an issue of suggesting inviting white people (of maybe an elderly age) to watch a play about the battle of Britain would be offensive. However the white people may be sharing an experience of be particularly emotionally involved in the topic because of heritage.

valensiwalensi · 09/04/2024 06:38

mids2019 · 09/04/2024 05:37

It's like having a WW2 movie set in Europe having a white only evening as the majority of combatants and civilians effected were white. That's not going to go down well.

This example is so boring I can’t even be bothered to try and explain it to you

Iluvteandbiscuits · 09/04/2024 06:36

Threads like this just prove the point that in the current political climate, certain sections of society feel is is legally and socially acceptable to hurl abuse and attempt to pile on hate towards white people with impunity with the confidence their is no reply or retort for fear of reprisals, Its the bloody great elephant in the room every one ignores.

As for claiming to know how easy I have had it as a white woman, unless your a white woman who walked in my shoes you don't speak for me. Especially one who grew up in a predominantly ethnic area in Burnley where people like me were spat on and abused on a daily basis, by other sections of society for being white.

mids2019 · 09/04/2024 05:37

It's like having a WW2 movie set in Europe having a white only evening as the majority of combatants and civilians effected were white. That's not going to go down well.

JamSandle · 09/04/2024 05:34

It just sounds like segregation to me.

Replace it with 'white out' and see if you feel the same.

mids2019 · 09/04/2024 05:21

You have examples of 'white Palestinians and I presume some of these living in the West bank and Gaza may be a little bemused by this rather territory specific notion of white privlege. The concept of white privilege in some regions of the world is so simplistic it is borderline offensive and it denies manifest discrimination on differences resulting from things other than skin colour.

White Palesrinians would come under the non white category under critical race theory as they are an oppressed people showing that 'white privilege' is an extremely simplistic race sensitive term that could hinder more than help discussion about discrimination in societies .

Instead of 'white' if you really wish to try and associate privilege of would be much more instructive to use more explicit descriptions such as 'product of being a descendent of White western Europeans that have multiple generations fronthe same country privilege'. Once you more realistically define privilege you see it is more complex than an extremely limiting vision of 'white privilege'.

Lion400 · 09/04/2024 05:16

At the end of the day it’s about wealth. Wealthy people no matter their skin colour are more privileged than others. And vice versa.

mids2019 · 09/04/2024 04:58

@AzureNewt

A bit of an aside but I don't know if your a pop can but has the singer Due Lips benefited from white privilege in terms of not having barriers to becoming a very successful artist?

https://www.google.com/search?q=dua+lipa&oq=dua+lipa&gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqDAgAEEUYOxixAxiABDIMCAAQRRg7GLEDGIAEMgwIARAAGEMYgAQYigUyDAgCEAAYQxiABBiKBTIPCAMQABhDGLEDGIAEGIoFMgwIBBAAGEMYgAQYigUyDAgFEAAYQxiABBiKBTIPCAYQABhDGLEDGIAEGIoFMgwIBxAAGEMYgAQYigXSAQgyMzQzajBqNKgCALACAA&sourceid=silk&ie=UTF-8#vhid=F9aLfeFWYXcdiM&vssid=l

Although I would say from a purely physical point of her view her skin is white but her Kosovan Alabanian heritage, her name and her parent"a immigration status you may argue could put her into the non white category as far as 'white privelge' theory goes. Racism and bias as well as self perception as being white is a complex subject that can't be wrapped up into an overly simplistic divisive theory such as 'white privilege'.

Coming from Eastern Europe or being a hijab wearing Mulsim with pale i.e. white skin to maybe my uneducated means having a lot less 'white privilege' than a publically schooled white person that is the product multiple generations of UK wealthy white people.

dua lipa - Google Search

https://www.google.com/search?gs_lcrp=EgZjaHJvbWUqDAgAEEUYOxixAxiABDIMCAAQRRg7GLEDGIAEMgwIARAAGEMYgAQYigUyDAgCEAAYQxiABBiKBTIPCAMQABhDGLEDGIAEGIoFMgwIBBAAGEMYgAQYigUyDAgFEAAYQxiABBiKBTIPCAYQABhDGLEDGIAEGIoFMgwIBxAAGEMYgAQYigXSAQgyMzQzajBqNKgCALACAA&ie=UTF-8&oq=dua+lipa&q=dua+lipa&sourceid=silk#vhid=F9aLfeFWYXcdiM&vssid=l

Ramalangadingdong · 09/04/2024 03:36

PressureLikeATickTickTick · 06/04/2024 13:41

No it's divisive and unnecessary.

A white person sat in an audience isn't going to detract from a good play.

We, as white people in 2024, are not guilty of slavery crimes. We are not responsible for the things people who existed before we were even born did.

It's segregation, pure and simple.

I think you’ve got the wrong end of the stick.

I think that “themed” or special interest spaces are important. As a child free woman i wouldn’t dream of trying to impose myself on a gathering of mothers, I don’t want to be a member of the Garrick Club which is all male. I wouldn’t insist on joining a special meeting for Jewish people. I respect the need for those spaces.

We may not be enslavers but we perpetuate its legacy if we persist in a wilful ignorance of why such spaces are still necessary.

valensiwalensi · 09/04/2024 02:28

User8646382 · 09/04/2024 02:25

Sorry, what? Doesn’t ‘import guilt’? Why exclude white people from the theatre then?

Please demonstrate where white people have been excluded from the theatre

User8646382 · 09/04/2024 02:25

AzureNewt · 09/04/2024 01:27

I just don’t agree with that analysis at all.

”White privilege” refers to the relative advantages that a white person has, compared to to people from other races, in certain societies.

Just sticking with the interview example; if black candidates are often passed over in favour of white candidates, due to conscious and/or unconscious biases of interviewers, then that’s an example of white privilege. It doesn’t mean that the successful white candidates have done anything wrong, but that they enjoy and may have benefited from the advantage of being less likely to be treated unfairly in the interview process.

That doesn’t make every white person accountable for racism, or import guilt onto them, it just describes one of the ways in which society treats white people (as a class) more favourably than people from some other races.

Given that most interviewers, even with conscious biases, aren’t going to tell the unsuccessful candidate “I didn’t hire you because you are black and I’m racist”, you’re never likely to know the extent to which racism has played a part in any given interview, even if overall trends are clear that there is a problem. I don’t see how you can tackle these insidious things without being able to acknowledge that they exist, which is what the term “white privilege” is designed to do.

I feel as though most people who are affronted by mention of “white privilege” are objecting to the term itself, and the connotations they take from it, rather than what it actually means.

Sorry, what? Doesn’t ‘import guilt’? Why exclude white people from the theatre then?

Swipe left for the next trending thread