I think more than one thing can be true simultaneously.
Shes not had it easy, and raising Harvey would have been extraordinarily difficult.
But also, she exploits her children, particularly Harvey, for media coverage and social media likes.
She’s not “devoted” to Harvey. Shes rolled him out in the media at an age where he was incapable of providing informed consent, and arguably still isn’t in a position to do so. She repeatedly used him for sympathetic media coverage with no regard for his dignity or privacy.
When you have a child like Harvey, absence and change in routine causes them real distress. I know many, many SEN mums who can’t take a weekend away from their child because of how traumatic the child would find it. KP has fucked off on holiday after holiday after holiday - she’s not led a life that’s “devoted” to Harvey. She has left his care to others and flitted in and out as she wants. Now he’s older and in residential care she allegedly barely sees him - unless there’s a camera to capture it.
Of course she loves him- but surely that’s a bare essential?! That’s the minimum you’d expect from any parent. Just because she loves her child with additional needs, it doesn’t make her a good mum.
It’s almost as if having a child with complex additional needs has given her a free pass. She has exploited/not protected all of her children, but none more so than Harvey.
Having SEN DC myself that fall into the same category, seeing her described as a good mum is insulting.