Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be fed up with all the threads about high earners feeling poor

386 replies

trekking1 · 23/03/2024 17:46

It's always the same condescending "I've worked so hard and only have a 3 bedroom house in a great location and an expensive car", as if 1. that's not a lot 2. people who make 5 times less do not work as hard!

And the suprised pikachu face that having a degree did not magically get them a 500k job. That is not how capitalism works folks

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
MidnightPatrol · 24/03/2024 08:11

Samlewis96 · 24/03/2024 07:45

Lol £1600 is my income in total. I manage quite well on it

How are you affording childcare?

It costs more than £1600 a month here to put a single child in nursery. Quite a lot more than that in fact.

BreakingAndBroke · 24/03/2024 07:55

I'm 27 and have worked hard FOR YEARS and still ONLY have one main house and a TINY buy-to-let. We only managed 4 holidays last year whereas everyone I know goes away for at least 6. My kids don't even have their own horses - they have to share! 😭🎻

Ahugga · 24/03/2024 07:49

Samlewis96 · 24/03/2024 07:45

Lol £1600 is my income in total. I manage quite well on it

More than half of that would go on renting a room in lots of places. Earnings are one part of the picture.

Didimum · 24/03/2024 07:48

Anyone of any stature of income can feel anxiety and worry over finances. Sympathy and empathy are not finite resources that we have to ration out, and empathising with someone concerned over money does not mean there’s any less empathy or understanding for anyone else’s position or worry.

No one is required to gush or even respond to posts they don’t want to – but it’s certainly not necessary to belittle anyone else’s feelings. They are never saying they have it worse, they are simply saying they feel worried or sad.

Giving the old ‘boo hoo’ response or starting a whole thread about it(!) is, quite frankly, gross, and you should have a word with yourself.

Krakken · 24/03/2024 07:48

"Because people from all walks of life work hard but the inference is they haven't and that's why that statement offends. Truth be told those on lower incomes often work harder than others."

Generally, that's not true. If I think of those I know on higher incomes, they worked their arses off getting qualified as dentists, drs, lawyers, accountants, IT specialists, successful business owners. Lower income jobs don't often require that kind of initial hard work and investment in learning.
Salaries are usually reflective of the hard work it's taken to get to that position, which is why the statement 'I worked hard' is usually true.
Of course, almost everyone who works, works hard. No one's going to pay you for lazing around and not doing your job.

The real problem we have is that salaries are generally low in this country even for those in professional jobs.
That's why some people who work full time still end up receiving top up benefits and why those who are in professional jobs are feeling like they're struggling.

This is something we should all be angry about.

Desecratedcoconut · 24/03/2024 07:48

GoodnightAdeline · 24/03/2024 07:42

If you’re on a very low income and have children it’s likely that you have a lot subsidised. Universal credit, COL payments, free prescriptions, FSM, funded childcare… very easy to lose touch with how much things actually cost and therefore the outgoings of people who aren’t entitled to anything

To be on fsm your parents need to earn less than £7200 per year. So of course they have a lot subsidised. I expect they aren't sat around talking about the suckers on six figure incomes who miss out on all the free stuff.

WithACatLikeTread · 24/03/2024 07:47

GoodnightAdeline · 24/03/2024 07:42

If you’re on a very low income and have children it’s likely that you have a lot subsidised. Universal credit, COL payments, free prescriptions, FSM, funded childcare… very easy to lose touch with how much things actually cost and therefore the outgoings of people who aren’t entitled to anything

The threshold is so low that you basically need to be unemployed or a single parent working part time. Most of the parents on UC are not entitled to those things.

Samlewis96 · 24/03/2024 07:45

SeeYouInMyDreams · 23/03/2024 21:38

This.

I don’t think many people would be rolling in cash if they only had £1600 per month left after childcare costs. Housing, bills, food, clothing, all essential and would be difficult to cover on that amount for a lot of us I think.

Lol £1600 is my income in total. I manage quite well on it

GoodnightAdeline · 24/03/2024 07:43

K0OLA1D · 23/03/2024 18:36

Oooo what they going to do? Stop paying taxes?

Pay them in another country!

GoodnightAdeline · 24/03/2024 07:42

If you’re on a very low income and have children it’s likely that you have a lot subsidised. Universal credit, COL payments, free prescriptions, FSM, funded childcare… very easy to lose touch with how much things actually cost and therefore the outgoings of people who aren’t entitled to anything

Tumbleweed101 · 24/03/2024 07:40

I think part the problem is the basics now need two incomes to be affordable at whatever level you are earning at. One person may have been able to cover the basics of housing, bills etc and the other earner could cover the more luxury parts of life such as holidays and days out. Everyone is feeling the pinch because the same money isn’t going so far as it was and people are finding they have little reward to what they earn. Cost of living needs to drop to single salary. I don’t know anyone on a typical 40hr min wage job who can cover housing and basics with help from UC or simply just struggling to buy food. Cost of living needs to fall back to a level someone in that situation has affordable options. If that happened everyone who earns would find their own lifestyle improved back to what they expect to have for their earning level.

I’m a single mum on a low income so I also wonder why on Earth people struggle on much higher incomes than me but I do understand the frustration of being told once you earn x you can have a certain lifestyle but when you finally get there cost of living has eroded those expectations.

fixies · 24/03/2024 07:16

Dorisbonson · 23/03/2024 23:44

I think a lot of this is driven by the fact most high earners are in the South East and money doesn't go as far:

  1. The South East housing is really expensive. £500k in Wolverhampton buys an absolutely lovely house in a great road but £500k in London gets a two bed flat in the arse end of nowhere.
  2. Nursery care in London is stupidly expensive. It can be £2000 a child - try doing that with no free childcare hours and pay your mortgage on a shitty overpriced 2 flat (whilst paying a fortune in tax for people who live in bigger houses to have free child care).
  3. Try paying for a train season to commute to London (if you don't want to live in a tiny flat) that costs £600+ a month and then spent 2-3 hours a day commuting so you can pay more tax for people outside the South East to have free childcare and live in bigger houses than you.
  4. Despite paying a fucking fortune in tax and being absolutely fucked financially by mega expensive housing, expensive childcare, expensive train season tickets everyone here seems to think we should pay even more tax and be grateful for it.
  5. On top of all that, many "high earners" have moved away from family to progress their career, worked like dogs with longer hours (at least in the early part of their career if not still) in stressful jobs, had mountains of university debt, whilst often the people complaining about high earners not paying enough tax still live close to their family, get free childcare, bigger houses, benefits/tax credits, shorter working hours and less stress.

Can you see why some of us are monumentally fucked off about people telling us how lucky we are and should be grateful to pay more tax?

^^ this. You can have a very large salary and still end up with nothing at the end obf the month and nothing to show for it. I have a 'higher ish' income but I've no money at all. No savings any more. No holidays, no new clothes. None of the things that are ' resdonable to expect.

Why? Childcare and housing costs and no access to any govt support what so ever. I'm also stuck in this position because I need to work to pay my half of the mortgage. So I can't pause my career. Yes, we could sell up and uproot our kids to live somewhere cheaper but that's not very practical.

I am highly privileged to have a house that I will own in 30 years time. But that's it. I'm overdrawn every month. It will get a bit better when the kids get older but right now it's pretty rubbish. Just seems no point to

Ahugga · 24/03/2024 06:00

trekking1 · 23/03/2024 22:07

Yes, there are plenty of jobs that exists solely to make the rich richer. Surely you know this

Make the rich richer and pay taxes, and employ other people, and do their jobs. Absolutely no job in this world exists entirely in isolation from the rest of society.

Willyoujustbequiet · 24/03/2024 02:12

NeverNameChange · 24/03/2024 00:39

The idea that anyone can have an exec level job if they "work hard" and "make the right choices" is laughable. It's insanely nieve.

Also the real problem isn't how much tax you pay or the fact you don't get nursery funding either. It's how badly the Tory party have literally fucked everything. At least now people on £100k might stop voting for them.

This

Now many of the tory voters are getting a taste of the medicine they expected lower income households to swallow for years and they don't like it one bit. The hypocrisy is very real.

Willyoujustbequiet · 24/03/2024 02:01

HungryBeagle · 23/03/2024 22:17

There are also loads of people who are low paid because they didn’t put the effort in at school and made poor choices. It feels like high earners are allowed to be criticised for their perceived poor choices, but low earners are exempt from any sort of criticism over the choices they have made that may have lead to their circumstances.
As a ‘high earner’ I know better than to express any sort of dissatisfaction at our life/circumstances on here, there’s no point. I have a severely disabled child, but the general view is that if you’ve got spare money you can’t complain about anything.

There are also lots of people who did put a lot of work in at school and may have previously been high earners but are no longer because shit happens.

We can't make assumptions about personal circumstances.

Willyoujustbequiet · 24/03/2024 01:58

whistleblower99 · 23/03/2024 22:12

I am going to laugh my arse off when the welfare system collapses.

Edited

Why would you laugh your arse off if people die of starvation? Is that the kind of thing you find funny?

Willyoujustbequiet · 24/03/2024 01:46

Krakken · 23/03/2024 19:17

I don't understand why people get offended at 'I worked hard' statement. The most successful people I know did work really hard. They worked hard all through school, got qualifications then worked their way up the ladder.
I wish I'd worked that hard and not just coasted through the education system into my mediocre life.

Because people from all walks of life work hard but the inference is they haven't and that's why that statement offends. Truth be told those on lower incomes often work harder than others.

Cavewomansue · 24/03/2024 01:34

YABU. Lots of different people with lots of different circumstances are on the internet. Scroll on if it’s not for you there’s nothing to be be offended about - their experience doesn’t diminish yours.

I would agree with you getting angry by people complaining they pay their taxes for “benefit scroungers” (they’re not) or saying NMW is too high (it’s not); or telling people they are poor because they are stupid. But your complaint is people having more money than you existing on the internet. That’s daft.

SeeYouInMyDreams · 24/03/2024 00:58

trekking1 · 24/03/2024 00:49

It wouldn't destroy them, it would just slow them down. Not the same thing. You can't exaggerate to prove your point and expect to not get called out on it

Getting back in to some industries would be the problem. My partner has known women be unable to get a job after a break to have children. That’s the reality for some industries, like tech. Just because you don’t know that doesn’t make it true.

trekking1 · 24/03/2024 00:49

Annettekurtin · 24/03/2024 00:14

Jacking in your career to go on benefits for years absolutely would destroy many types of careers, including mine. You must have a very sheltered existence

You don’t understand my life or have any empathy for me. Stop with the sneering and just recognize you don’t understand other peoples problems. That’s ok - you can just not comment on any threads where you don’t understand the situation.

It wouldn't destroy them, it would just slow them down. Not the same thing. You can't exaggerate to prove your point and expect to not get called out on it

OP posts:
Onceuponatimeiwasahoe · 24/03/2024 00:40

I knew someone who was getting 3k a month and spent all her money on takeaways and eating out then complained she had no money

NeverNameChange · 24/03/2024 00:39

The idea that anyone can have an exec level job if they "work hard" and "make the right choices" is laughable. It's insanely nieve.

Also the real problem isn't how much tax you pay or the fact you don't get nursery funding either. It's how badly the Tory party have literally fucked everything. At least now people on £100k might stop voting for them.

Maverickess · 24/03/2024 00:36

Femme2804 · 23/03/2024 23:57

I think people in lower income also work hard but they maybe choose wrong choices or simply not lucky.

for example A worked hard in her school, study soo hard and get into top uni. Meanwhile B not working too hard in school, choose not to go to uni and get pregnant. A have a good career and B only have minimum wage job. Both work hard in their own field. But B made a wrong turn in life.

See this is part of the problem, seeing minimum low wage workers as having those jobs because they took a 'wrong turn'.

As many low waged and minimum wage workers are needed and relied upon as higher waged and higher tax paying workers. Without the higher paid the taxes don't get paid - but without the lower paid the work society wants and needs doesn't get done.

If no one took a 'wrong turn' as you put it, then there'd be no support either professionally within the industry or services like cleaners, childcare, elderly care etc. They are valuable roles to society, but clearly not valued.

Both are mutually reliant - but only the financial contribution is ever considered or respected. I mean if no one took a 'wrong turn' and worked in these jobs and everyone earned I don't know £150k a year, there'd be a lot of tax paid - but essentially what for because there's no one in the lower paid jobs doing the actual work like child or social care and the knock on to that is less people again available to make that £150k because they are at home looking after their own children/elderly relatives.

SeeYouInMyDreams · 24/03/2024 00:32

trekking1 · 24/03/2024 00:01

Pausing your career for a few years does not mean your career will go away, that's ridiculous

My partner works in tech and if he’d have taken years off to raise our kids then he’d find it harder to find another job and would be have to take a huge pay cut when returning to work. This is because he’d have a big gap in knowledge about the latest tech and techniques.

He’s a man, but this is why women who have children are always disadvantaged, and why many choose to keep their careers even when paying high childcare costs.

Its not as easy as just saying, pause your career.

Crazycatlady79 · 24/03/2024 00:18

It used to strike me as tone deaf when my sister said to me that she was 'skint' (she and her DH have around 100K plus betwixt them a year, with 2 teenage DC), as I am on disability benefits, live in a run down HA flat with my ND twins...
But, I have got less myopic around it, as it's all relatively. Dsis and her DH have worked their butts off in challenging careers and their lifestyle has adapted accordingly. Her idea of 'skint' is very different to mine, but we are at totally different positions on the socioeconomic scale and I'm fucking proud of her for getting to where she has after our truly awful, abusive and impoverished childhood.
I've never been particularly materialistic nor acquisitive, so I'm okay getting by on the financial support the Govt provides for someone in my position.
I feel for anyone struggling financially. And what that looks like for every household will differ.
Sure, there's posts that make me think "Shut up", but that's more about whatever is going on for me (for example, if things are tough financially my end).

Swipe left for the next trending thread