Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be fed up with all the threads about high earners feeling poor

386 replies

trekking1 · 23/03/2024 17:46

It's always the same condescending "I've worked so hard and only have a 3 bedroom house in a great location and an expensive car", as if 1. that's not a lot 2. people who make 5 times less do not work as hard!

And the suprised pikachu face that having a degree did not magically get them a 500k job. That is not how capitalism works folks

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Ahugga · 24/03/2024 09:55

the80sweregreat · 24/03/2024 09:51

Nothing at all against high earners , but IF everyone was to aspire to these types of jobs and were able to do them successfully, who would do the lower paid jobs that are also really important to society ?
Things would very quickly break down if suddenly everyone had the big office and flash desk but nobody to clean it or empty the rubbish or take them to work on the train or bus

The exact same can be said for the opposite.

KateMiskin · 24/03/2024 09:54

the80sweregreat · 24/03/2024 09:51

Nothing at all against high earners , but IF everyone was to aspire to these types of jobs and were able to do them successfully, who would do the lower paid jobs that are also really important to society ?
Things would very quickly break down if suddenly everyone had the big office and flash desk but nobody to clean it or empty the rubbish or take them to work on the train or bus

Yes. Just as things are breaking down now with not enough tax payers.

MidnightPatrol · 24/03/2024 09:53

the80sweregreat · 24/03/2024 09:51

Nothing at all against high earners , but IF everyone was to aspire to these types of jobs and were able to do them successfully, who would do the lower paid jobs that are also really important to society ?
Things would very quickly break down if suddenly everyone had the big office and flash desk but nobody to clean it or empty the rubbish or take them to work on the train or bus

Sure.

What’s the point you’re trying to make?

Loubelle70 · 24/03/2024 09:51

Im on a decent wage. Yep i work hard..but so do people on a lesser wage..i dont see my skills any better than anyones. We all have strengths.

I would say my wage is reasonably high.. however, i also don't like those posts from high earners moaning about mortgage payments and cost of living. We all have choices...they chose an house etc in expensive area. We choose to be in that position..so ...downsize , dont over extend. I have a modest cottage...if mortgage goes up i can cover it. Those contingencies need to be looked at before commitment.

Theres people who work as hard as me who should be on a better wage.

the80sweregreat · 24/03/2024 09:51

Nothing at all against high earners , but IF everyone was to aspire to these types of jobs and were able to do them successfully, who would do the lower paid jobs that are also really important to society ?
Things would very quickly break down if suddenly everyone had the big office and flash desk but nobody to clean it or empty the rubbish or take them to work on the train or bus

Scottishskifun · 24/03/2024 09:43

In Scotland the tax is much greater and your a higher rate tax payer at 42% from 43k (you pay 21% above 23k). A new band is coming in at 75k of 45% then it's 48% above 125k.

The amount of tax generated from higher rate tax payers is substantial and with the new rates there is concern people will move elsewhere. Although in Scotland the 30 hours aren't related to income or working so everyone gets it whether they work or are a high income household.

I don't understand vilanising higher tax payers they are critical to pay for many services.
To me it's reverse snobbery in a lot of cases.
My "DB" for instance doesn't think it's a real job unless it's manual/on your feet all day. He happily calls me a pen pusher (doesn't understand my job at all) and thinks I do nothing. I don't earn anywhere near 100k but I don't resent anyone that does.

Alcyoneus · 24/03/2024 09:40

trekking1 · 23/03/2024 18:30

I'm not bitter, quite the opposite, I am very grateful for everything I have which is why I am arguing people who have more than me should be too!

Are you in the same camp as anyone more than you should pay more tax?

If people have bigger aspirations than you, what’s wrong with that.

KateMiskin · 24/03/2024 09:30

The one on AMA was about a woman who earns more than 500 K , and IMHO she is an example to us all. More women should know women can make big money. And no, this is not a dig at low earners.

PansyOatZebra · 24/03/2024 09:21

Yanbu only because there’s been so many of them recently. Especially on AMA

maddening · 24/03/2024 09:14

betterangels · 23/03/2024 18:22

It's the 'I work hard' for me. So do very many people on a low income. Stop it.

But "I work hard" is not a statement about whether anyone else does or does not - taking offense yourself and on behalf of anyone that works hard and earns less is your own perception imo.

Annettekurtin · 24/03/2024 09:10

trekking1 · 24/03/2024 00:49

It wouldn't destroy them, it would just slow them down. Not the same thing. You can't exaggerate to prove your point and expect to not get called out on it

No it would damage many professional careers (including mine) irretrievably. I worked in the city earning six figures, it’s not so easy as jacking it in to go on benefits then restarting where you left off. It’s not likely you would ever be able to get an equivalent job with a gap like that. Most women I know who took any significant time off with kids, have not been able to get back into their careers.

Most high earning careers are very competitive especially in the earlier years. You can’t just pick them up and put them down (unfortunately for many women). Gaps in careers are career suicide for those types of careers. Things are changing maybe a little now, but it’s still pretty much the same.

you don’t understand the world of high earning professional careers. That’s ok but don’t make nasty comments.

WithACatLikeTread · 24/03/2024 09:08

GoodnightAdeline · 24/03/2024 08:15

No but they’re entitled to UC which, if you have children, is generous. No point saying ‘I take home 1500 a month’ if UC gives you an extra £800 on top.

I wouldn't say UC is generous.

Eastie77Returns · 24/03/2024 09:06

trekking1 · 24/03/2024 00:01

Pausing your career for a few years does not mean your career will go away, that's ridiculous

Of course it is entirely possible to end up losing a career if you take years out. Millions of women have watched their careers crash and burn for this very reason. Not just ‘slow down’ but literally disappear. Some of your comments demonstrate an alarming detachment from reality…

Similar to another PP, I work in IT/Tech. The field moves incredibly quickly. I have several former colleagues who took time out to have DC. They then found it virtually impossible to return to reasonably paid jobs in Tech after a gap of even a small number of years out because their skills were completely outdated. On the rare occasions they were invited to interviews they found they were out of their depth as employers expect you to be up to date with the latest Tech trends etc and have actual hands on experience (so even taking courses to upskill is not enough). Most now work in lower paid school run or admin jobs.

See above for women who also work in fields such as Finance or Law.

Willyoujustbequiet · 24/03/2024 09:04

GoodnightAdeline · 24/03/2024 08:15

No but they’re entitled to UC which, if you have children, is generous. No point saying ‘I take home 1500 a month’ if UC gives you an extra £800 on top.

Its not generous in the slightest.

A single parent with one child gets £700 but is only allowed to earn £631 before they start deducting. Not all childcare costs are paid either.

Could you manage a mortgage and all your bills on just over £1300?

Annettekurtin · 24/03/2024 08:51

Didimum · 24/03/2024 07:48

Anyone of any stature of income can feel anxiety and worry over finances. Sympathy and empathy are not finite resources that we have to ration out, and empathising with someone concerned over money does not mean there’s any less empathy or understanding for anyone else’s position or worry.

No one is required to gush or even respond to posts they don’t want to – but it’s certainly not necessary to belittle anyone else’s feelings. They are never saying they have it worse, they are simply saying they feel worried or sad.

Giving the old ‘boo hoo’ response or starting a whole thread about it(!) is, quite frankly, gross, and you should have a word with yourself.

This. It’s callous and narcissistic to respond to someone’s worries about their finances with “what about meeee”. If you don’t have anything supportive to say, move on and hide the thread

InterIgnis · 24/03/2024 08:49

Meow8989 · 24/03/2024 08:35

This is what I was trying to say earlier amongst my peers who are high earners all we can talk about is where to move to that’s lower tax and better standard of living

apparently I can’t know because I don’t know all high earners

Indeed. I see it too, and on a personal level am in the process of doing it too.

InterIgnis · 24/03/2024 08:46

The problem with the ‘shut up, pay up, fuck you and fuck off if you don’t like it’ is that higher earners are doing exactly that, and have been for a while. There is a net loss of higher earners from the UK, which is in the top three of countries seeing wealth outflow.

https://www.henleyglobal.com/publications/henley-private-wealth-migration-report-2023/inflows-outflows

So there you go! Higher earners are taking the ‘fuck off’ advice, except of course that’s actually quite the problem.

Inflows and Outflows | Wealth Migration 2023

The data shows countries with net inflows or outflows of 100 or more HNWIs. Nine of the top 10 countries for net inflows in 2023 host investment migration programs

https://www.henleyglobal.com/publications/henley-private-wealth-migration-report-2023/inflows-outflows

Meow8989 · 24/03/2024 08:35

hendoop · 24/03/2024 00:13

We need to look after high earners or the talent leaves, we have so many people emigrate to Dubai and other places because we over tax the high earners

I am not a high earner

However, I do not see the point to crippling the high earners with tax on income.

Work should always pay and there needs to be salaries to aspire to

This is what I was trying to say earlier amongst my peers who are high earners all we can talk about is where to move to that’s lower tax and better standard of living

apparently I can’t know because I don’t know all high earners

Meow8989 · 24/03/2024 08:30

trekking1 · 24/03/2024 00:01

Pausing your career for a few years does not mean your career will go away, that's ridiculous

You are so hilariously out of touch it’s funny.

read about pregnant then screwed - a charity set up specifically because so many women get pregnant and their job screws them.

read just about anything and you’ll see that there is a motherhood penalty particularly in the corporate world

Antisocialbutterflyy · 24/03/2024 08:22

@Newsenmum not poor just not where they thought they would be on that money. Mainly due to housing costs and childcare and heavy taxation. It's tough to be at the top of your game career wise and only be able to cover your bils. That's what people are posting about. They are not saying they are living in poverty. Mumsnet should be a free space to say whatever is on your mind.

Beezknees · 24/03/2024 08:21

GoodnightAdeline · 24/03/2024 08:15

No but they’re entitled to UC which, if you have children, is generous. No point saying ‘I take home 1500 a month’ if UC gives you an extra £800 on top.

Is it generous? I get £400 a month UC as a single parent.

MidnightPatrol · 24/03/2024 08:16

Circe7 · 24/03/2024 00:08

There may be no net loss to the Treasury as a result of removing the cap on who can benefit from free childcare. At the moment there is a cliff edge where you can be worse off earning over £100k than under it because you lose the childcare subsidy and lose your tax free allowance.

People, particularly women, with young children are very likely to go part time or avoid moving to higher paying (often more demanding) job if it would push them over £100k. So the government loses tax revenue from those taxpayers being disincentivised to increase their income. Cliff edges in a tax system are never a good thing.

I’m in a position where working an extra day or getting a promotion would lose me a significant amount of money for this reason. If I did work the extra day I’d pay an extra £10k tax. And whilst I’m not complaining I’m only left with £2k a month after childcare costs as a single parent so not really filthy rich at the moment.

This is the root of most people complaining about CoL despite having technically very high salaries.

£100k after tax, pension, student loan is around £5k a month.

Then two children in childcare is £4k a month.

So suddenly the ‘big salary’ isn’t feeling very big anymore, and having the tax free childcare and free hours removed feels very unfair.

And in my experience in London, people might be spending another £3k+ on their mortgage at today’s rates for a still pretty modest property - so they’re spending £7-8k a month to cover childcare, mortgage, council tax. There is not much left from two decent salaries!

GoodnightAdeline · 24/03/2024 08:15

WithACatLikeTread · 24/03/2024 07:47

The threshold is so low that you basically need to be unemployed or a single parent working part time. Most of the parents on UC are not entitled to those things.

No but they’re entitled to UC which, if you have children, is generous. No point saying ‘I take home 1500 a month’ if UC gives you an extra £800 on top.

GoodnightAdeline · 24/03/2024 08:14

MidnightPatrol · 24/03/2024 08:11

How are you affording childcare?

It costs more than £1600 a month here to put a single child in nursery. Quite a lot more than that in fact.

Well this is the million dollar question isn’t it?

I once saw a poster on here pouring scorn on higher earners, saying how well she coped on £1500 a month. Upon pressing she disclosed she had no mortgage, was retired with no dependents.

People disclose their salary but never their actual expenses which are the relevant part, and whether or not they receive some kind of help with them.

Newsenmum · 24/03/2024 08:11

Antisocialbutterflyy · 23/03/2024 22:05

I think it's more that people have often worked long hours / taken years of professional exams on top of a degree / so have student debt / have had to pay high rent sometimes in a city / then have had to save for a deposit so low equity to loan and then chuck in childcare for two young children and there's not a lot of change left for life. I absolutely get it. Different if you are living in a reasonably priced area and have had help from family for a bigger deposit or an inheritance. Feels like maybe all the sacrifice didn't get you as far as you wanted to. People are allowed to moan about their problems however much they earn, surely?

Yeah but you wouldn’t say oh I’m so poor. You might complain you have a lot less than you wouod have done years ago. I don’t know, I’ve also seen people who would’ve been ok years ago now be in poverty. It sticks with you.