Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think it’s very hard to live in the uk without inheritance or family money?

455 replies

Lifesucksthenyoudie · 18/03/2024 08:40

Just that really. Social mobility seems almost impossible at the moment without a head start. I earn a decent salary (Dh doesn’t but that’s another post) but my standard of living is so much worse than my parents and my mother didn’t work until we were in secondary school and even then part time for peanuts. Nursery fees and mortgage alone wipe us out. I haven’t inherited any money (large family, no chance) and feel a bit stuck. Not after sympathy just interested to see if others feel a bit trapped. Why is our society geared up this way?

OP posts:
Saramia · 18/03/2024 10:43

also, there is a lot on this site about inheritance- but surely most people don’t inherit until they are much older?
It also includes people who get handed a lump sum by living parents. They either downsize or remortgage or raid their savings, and give their 20 something kids a huge chunk of cash as a down payment on a house that they otherwise wouldn’t be able to buy.

AntonFeckoff · 18/03/2024 10:43

YANBU. No inheritance or family money here. I also think it's very hard without a partner, although I'd rather have financial independence than risk feeling trapped like I have done previously.

Sususudio · 18/03/2024 10:40

Sorry @TooOldForThisNonsense I was agreeing with you and I meant to tag someone else about the luck bit, but I quoted you by mistake.

I agree that people perhaps need to downgrade their expectations a bit. The next century is going to be Asia's.

Bellyblueboy · 18/03/2024 10:40

I think people’s expectations are built around what they saw their parents have and do thirty odd years ago. Cost of living has completely changed. So has our expectations.

also, there is a lot on this site about inheritance- but surely most people don’t inherit until they are much older? My parents got a small inheritance - but I was lucky enough that my grandmother lived until I had finished university. It would be very sad is people had inheritances to help out with childcare and house deposits. I would rather have my parents!

TooOldForThisNonsense · 18/03/2024 10:37

Sususudio · 18/03/2024 09:24

Our family income is over £200 k. We have always lived in a flat. We don't have a car ( London so easier). Zero help with childcare as both parents abroad. We saved all of it for a rainy day and for the DC,and now the rainy days are here.

It's not all luck, sorry.

Where did I say it was?

OneHonestViewer · 18/03/2024 10:35

This reply has been deleted

This has been deleted by MNHQ for breaking our Talk Guidelines.

helpfulperson · 18/03/2024 10:30

I also think a huge amount depends on area. If you look online at houses in Scotland there are loads of threebedroom houses at around 150,000. And some lovely three bedroom flats at £120,000.

So if you want a house in the south east it will be hard but elsewhere it is doable.

Bigearringsbigsmile · 18/03/2024 10:27

AnonyLonnymouse · 18/03/2024 10:16

The house price issue is enormous. I grew up in a London semi with a SAHM and my father worked as a civil servant on about £30k. This was late seventies and early eighties. Childcare was nonexistent, few mums worked and it was a fairly simple lifestyle. Houses on that road are now selling for £800k plus!

Having said that, as I got into my teens (in the late eighties) I became conscious that there were a lot of women ‘at home’ (my friends’ mums) who probably could have, or would have, wanted to do something outside the home. We had moved to a commuter village by that point so there was a lot less opportunity around than in London! Legions of women were at home, even with grown-up children. A few managed it by getting school-hours roles (I knew a pharmacist and some teachers) but a couple of others went back to work in very low paid roles and with no legal entitlement to make pension contributions, eventually working their way up to a more rewarding role. Some went down the voluntary work route. But even in the late eighties it was still not uncommon for men to ‘not like’ or ‘not allow’ their wives to do much outside the home…😕

But it was a different time and a lot depended on your choice of spouse..divorce was a lot harder back then and child support was deductible from any benefits. I still remember the outrage and gnashing of teeth in the press when the Child Support Agency was first established, impeding a man’s God-given right to take home his pay packet untouched by the needs of any children he might have fathered along the way!

30k was worth a hell of a lot more in those days

Glitterybee · 18/03/2024 10:27

I agree OP

as a single person my decent salary (more than £50k) doesn’t go far!

My parents asked me yesterday why I’ve never bought a house as they can’t understand why as I have a good job…. Their insistence on this subject makes me laugh as they inherited a lot of property and land from my grandparents (before they passed away, they signed it all over to them) which means they don’t know what it’s like to have paid a mortgage or rent either!

They don’t understand that my one single wage doesn’t go far in the current climate. It’s just about enough to survive but definitely not enough to thrive!!!!

oh and there’s no sign of them ever helping me as my grandparents done for them

I’d need to start doing the lottery

Coconutter24 · 18/03/2024 10:20

Why can’t your DH earn more?

AnonyLonnymouse · 18/03/2024 10:16

The house price issue is enormous. I grew up in a London semi with a SAHM and my father worked as a civil servant on about £30k. This was late seventies and early eighties. Childcare was nonexistent, few mums worked and it was a fairly simple lifestyle. Houses on that road are now selling for £800k plus!

Having said that, as I got into my teens (in the late eighties) I became conscious that there were a lot of women ‘at home’ (my friends’ mums) who probably could have, or would have, wanted to do something outside the home. We had moved to a commuter village by that point so there was a lot less opportunity around than in London! Legions of women were at home, even with grown-up children. A few managed it by getting school-hours roles (I knew a pharmacist and some teachers) but a couple of others went back to work in very low paid roles and with no legal entitlement to make pension contributions, eventually working their way up to a more rewarding role. Some went down the voluntary work route. But even in the late eighties it was still not uncommon for men to ‘not like’ or ‘not allow’ their wives to do much outside the home…😕

But it was a different time and a lot depended on your choice of spouse..divorce was a lot harder back then and child support was deductible from any benefits. I still remember the outrage and gnashing of teeth in the press when the Child Support Agency was first established, impeding a man’s God-given right to take home his pay packet untouched by the needs of any children he might have fathered along the way!

Sususudio · 18/03/2024 10:09

IntoTheMild · 18/03/2024 10:07

I don’t think yours is the lifestyle the OP is aspiring to. Your lifestyle sounds similar to my situation but I feel like it’s viewed as a failure not to own/be earning big money.

In most other countries, even rich ones, many people live in flats. Perhaps more people in the UK should get used to this. I will be voting for Labour, but they won't be able to reverse Brexit or this shit show in a hurry.

IntoTheMild · 18/03/2024 10:07

Beezknees · 18/03/2024 08:44

I don't find it hard and I have neither of those things.

I think it depends on your lifestyle surely. I have no childcare costs, not bothered about a big house so I rent a little flat.

Nursery fees are temporary!

I don’t think yours is the lifestyle the OP is aspiring to. Your lifestyle sounds similar to my situation but I feel like it’s viewed as a failure not to own/be earning big money.

ViciousCurrentBun · 18/03/2024 10:05

You haven’t written what age you are. I am of an age, in my fifties where social mobility was not easy but within the grasp of more people. At that point only about 10% of people had a degree so if as a poor kid you made it to a good university or even a not so great one you had a commodity that had more worth.

We have so far inherited zero except a family friend left me 3k which was an absolute shock.

I agree also very much with @SpringOfContentment my house is worth 300k, where DH grew up very near London in a very wealthy commuter belt area it would be a million. His Mum post divorce lives in a 3 bed terrace worth maybe 600k. The house DH grew up in last sold for 2 million.

DH and I met working up North I remember when we bought our house in 1999 at 62k it seemed expensive because we were from near London. You could buy a terrace house a few miles away in an ex pit village for 19k at that point. Our wages would have been the same everywhere geographically as a national scale. We made our money through investing, I mean you need a bit of capital to do so and cheaper housing made that possible. I was also the first in the family to go to University.

DS will be one of the people you are mentioning op as he will be gifted a deposit. We have not told him yet, he is still living at home and saving a lot towards a housing deposit as is his GF. DH and I have been educating him about investing.

izimbra · 18/03/2024 10:04

After 14 years of Conservatism we have growing inequality in so many areas of life:

  • vast differences in spend per head on private schools vs state schools
  • growing health inequality between rich and poor, particularly between rich and poor women
  • growing housing inequality between young and old
  • huge, huge wealth inequality between the generations
  • growing gap in life expectancy between rich and poor.

Because, duh, inequity is intrinsic to Conservatism.

Smartiepants79 · 18/03/2024 10:04

When I was a child my parents had a mortgage rate of 15% - that was the norm.
My father was a deputy head and had ended up with a pay cut due to changes in taxes.
They didn’t have to pay childcare because it didn’t really exist. No one I knew went to nursery at 9 months old. A parent stayed home. We had 1 income til my sister was at school.
I don’t remember my childhood as anything but wonderful but I think it must have been hard for my parents.
The issue of what a good standard of living consists of is the interesting one I think.
Holidays abroad, more than one car. Phones, streaming, eating out….. we did none of this as children. I had 2 pairs of shoes and some wellies. All our birthday parties were at home. We just didn’t spend money the way we do now.

MidnightPatrol · 18/03/2024 10:00

Vod · 18/03/2024 09:53

It's an important point about age cohort. Someone who is 50 and has managed to pull this off was doing so in much more advantageous circumstances than someone who's 30. Even a few years can make a big difference.

Indeed.

On my street the price of homes today is 3x higher than 20 years ago.

Wages are not 3x higher today. They aren't even 50% higher.

NotQuiteNorma · 18/03/2024 10:00

izimbra · 18/03/2024 09:53

Average house price is now over 8 times average salary.

In 1999 was just over 4 times average salary.

Simple maths. Yes it's harder now.

Exactly, which is what older people who 'worked hard all their life to buy their house' for about £6,000 seem to forget.

Hannahoo · 18/03/2024 09:59

We haven't inherited a penny and doing more than fine.

Overthebow · 18/03/2024 09:56

Gettingbysomehow · 18/03/2024 09:25

It's shocking. I'm a boomer so even though I was a single mum I had a good job and was able to buy a home for me and DS.
He's now 40 and has been saving for 30 years for a deposit for a new home and has had to move to Wales to afford it, luckily his job is 100% work from home.
I've decided to forgoe my upcoming inheritance and just pass it straight to him otherwise he'll be very skint for years with the mortgage.
It leaves me having a bit of a belt tightening retirement but I just don't want him to live on beans on toast for years and this way he can buy a bigger house.
I have at least another 20 years to live so he'll inherit my house as well when the time comes.
He and Dil are not having any children because they simply cannot afford to. They like animals more than children anyway and have lots of cousins so I don't think it matters.

I don’t really understand that to be honest. Your DS is older than me. With two full time salaries they should have been able to have bought and afforded a child if they had wanted without you having to have given your inheritance to them. The fact that even with it they can’t afford this is baffling. As I said I’m younger than him and we managed to buy in the south east with no help, and have two DC and pay nursery costs again with no help with costs or childcare. My friends are the same, It’s doable for my generation.

Sususudio · 18/03/2024 09:54

The OP says her DH doesn't earn enough, so perhaps that needs to be explained further, before looking at inheritances.

izimbra · 18/03/2024 09:53

Average house price is now over 8 times average salary.

In 1999 was just over 4 times average salary.

Simple maths. Yes it's harder now.

Vod · 18/03/2024 09:53

MidnightPatrol · 18/03/2024 09:50

Home ownership peaked in the UK in 2002 and has been dropping since then.

Adults aged 35-45 are 3x more likely to rent privately that in 2000.

75% of over 65s own a property outright, while less than a third of under 40 year olds own with a mortgage - the rest all rent or live with family.

Are 'peoples expectations too high' for a couple in work to afford to buy a modest property? This wasn't an unrealistic expectation for older people in the UK today.

Young people today 'may as well dream of going to the moon' vs owning a property like the one their parents owned.

It's an important point about age cohort. Someone who is 50 and has managed to pull this off was doing so in much more advantageous circumstances than someone who's 30. Even a few years can make a big difference.

MidnightPatrol · 18/03/2024 09:50

BMW6 · 18/03/2024 09:26

I disagree OP. I think people's expectations are too high.

As for your ancestors "higher living standards" - you have really got to be joking!

My parents certainly never dreamt of owning property when they were growing up! You may as well have dreamed of going to the moon!

Foreign travel was another totally elite thing, not for the likes of us working class, simply the cost was exorbitant.

Home ownership peaked in the UK in 2002 and has been dropping since then.

Adults aged 35-45 are 3x more likely to rent privately that in 2000.

75% of over 65s own a property outright, while less than a third of under 40 year olds own with a mortgage - the rest all rent or live with family.

Are 'peoples expectations too high' for a couple in work to afford to buy a modest property? This wasn't an unrealistic expectation for older people in the UK today.

Young people today 'may as well dream of going to the moon' vs owning a property like the one their parents owned.

WalkingaroundJardine · 18/03/2024 09:48

I agree. It’s a worldwide thing affecting younger people. Older people were able to work hard off their own bat and buy their own place. Look up Gary’s Economics on You Tube and he explains why houses are now unaffordable for ordinary hard working people not backed by family wealth and why the middle class is shrinking.