Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Colour Blind casting

444 replies

ThinWomansBrain · 16/03/2024 22:19

I know any statement that starts "I'm not racist but..." is usually exactly that, but I find colour blind casting in period drama really distracting.
I've seen two films and a play in the last week where it's been really off - why go to all of the effort of period costume and make up, and then have really implausible actors?

Wicked little letters - first Asian police woman was 1970s. not 1920s
National Theatre production - 1930s play - white couple with an inexplicably Asian Child
Catherine Booth (co founder of Salvation Army) was not black

It's particularly jarring when they are supposed to be portraying real characters.

In contrast, I saw some contemporary dance/theatre this evening, I don't even race or gender of most of the dancers.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
marmite2023 · 17/03/2024 09:00

Pastachocolate · 16/03/2024 22:50

I find it hard but that is my issue to resolve Colour blind casting is allowing us too see the best actors for the roles.

I taken longer to follow a family where it would be very rare or impossible for the child in the family to have been from the two parents. (I do remind myself that a child may naturally have very different skin/hair. I know it is my problem.

im from an ethnic minority and if does sometimes feel odd seeing an Asian actor playing a lawyer or doctor at a time when you know their race would never just be ignored by everyone around them and there would have been racist slurs or patients refusing to be treated.

I was about to say I am all for colourblind casting as I enjoy having interesting characters and performances, especially of Shakespeare, but I suppose this could be a problem and I hadn’t thought of it like that. What if casting for historical dramas (less Shakespeare as Shakespeare is always a fantasy, even when it was first written as that’s why so many plays are set in Italy) is colour-washing and gender-washing the reality of history, when women and people of colour were treated horrifically?

That reminds me of the BBC’s Father Brown, where women, people of colour and gay people are cast as allies/good guys and Father Brown on their side, when in reality the Catholic Church was one of the very systems that contributes to systemic inequality and the books were written by Chesterton to promote “good Catholic values” and very much did not support women, gay people or people of colour.

Porridgeislife · 17/03/2024 09:00

ColonelDax · 17/03/2024 08:53

How would you feel if Nelson Mandela was played by Liam Neeson?

I wouldn’t like it, but Liam Neeson also has many, many more opportunities to feature in historically accurate shows than our hypothetical Hispanic actress. Sometimes the ends justify the means.

Unless we’re just going to say too bad to anyone of non-white, non-male background. You’ll just have to take it on the chin that your acting career is limited as you’re just not the right colour?

tonyhawks23 · 17/03/2024 09:00

Literally jesus is portrayed by white people,that's worse than Liam neelson being Martin Luther king surely.colour blind casting has gone on forever.

ColonelDax · 17/03/2024 08:59

Mischance · 17/03/2024 08:56

It would be strange to have a white actor play Nelson Mandela.
If a drama's theme were say racial discrimination it might be a bit confusing if there were colour blind casting.

That's a fair point about Mandela specifically.

But I wouldn't expect people to be happy about a white actor playing Shaka Zulu for example, even though as far as I'm aware he never suffered any racial discrimination.

Ginmonkeyagain · 17/03/2024 08:58

@Startingagainandagain there is an issue that we seem to make historic drams that pull from very limited source material. There are a lot of stories out there that include BAME people - we had a whole empire that spanned the globe for goodness sake.

notanothernana · 17/03/2024 08:58

I saw Wicked Little Letters and found it distracting to begin with. Once I had worked out it was colour blind casting I could enjoy it. I kept thinking, "unmarried Irish woman living with black boyfriend? In the 1920s?? They'd be run out of town. "

Afterwords I thought, colour blind casting is like showing us utopia, where race ceases to be an issue.

Mischance · 17/03/2024 08:56

It would be strange to have a white actor play Nelson Mandela.
If a drama's theme were say racial discrimination it might be a bit confusing if there were colour blind casting.

IbizaToTheNorfolkBroads · 17/03/2024 08:55

You'd hate the current production of Macbeth in Leeds then @ThinWomansBrain . Really diverse cast,all absolutely phenomenal actors. Superb production, facilitated by the best actors for the roles.

Startingagainandagain · 17/03/2024 08:54

I think it is daft for a real life historical figure to be played by an actor that does not look as much as possible as they did and forces people to suspend disbelief.

It is like suggesting that because she is a great actor Meryl Streep would make a good Gandhi or Martin Luther King in a biopic...

Or that Marilyn Monroe could be played by Bradley Cooper to be fully inclusive.

It is just silly.

These days there would be an outcry, an rightly so, if a white actor tried to portray someone of a different race so it does not make sense that asian or black actors would be made to portrait a white historical figure or appear in period drama portraying times when they would not have been part of that society (I doubt there were many black vikings for example).

We should not try to rewrite history instead we should make sure that more contemporary parts are created by actors from all backgrounds and that there is less discrimination and sexism in the industry in general, like any workplace.

Also it is perfectly possible to focus on historical experiences from the point of view of a non white person. Steve McQueen did that with 12 years a slave.

Maybe what we need is to move away from just showing in films and TV what happened in western/predominantly white societies throughout history and have more content which focus on stories of people from other backgrounds.

Boombatty · 17/03/2024 08:54

There was also a big furore about Eddie Redmain playing a transwoman, with people saying that it was taking a part away from a "real" transwoman? Where do we draw the line? Should only gay people play gay parts? Does that mean gay people can't play straight parts?

Didn't Disney also recently drop actors with dwarfism from Snow White to be politically correct? Which then meant less acting jobs for actors with dwarfism!

JaninaDuszejko · 17/03/2024 08:54

See I completely disagree with the above posts about Bridgerton, I think it's clearly an alternative heightened reality (e.g. the clothing colours do not attempt to reflect the reality of textiles technology in Georgian Britain). Shondaland took a modern rumour (that Queen Charlotte was mixed race) and ran with it, it's internally consistent. It's also not colourblind casting, families are either black, white or asian. I think it's a very clever way to introduce more black characters into period dramas.

ColonelDax · 17/03/2024 08:53

Porridgeislife · 17/03/2024 08:52

I’m white and not woke but I really like colour blind casting. Acting has a massive issue with barriers to entry.

Who cares if Queen Victoria is played by a Hispanic actress? It doesn’t take anything away from the play/TV show.

Edited

How would you feel if Nelson Mandela was played by Liam Neeson?

Luddite26 · 17/03/2024 08:53

Boombatty · 17/03/2024 08:50

It wasn't because of her skin colour though!

No it was just pure old misogyny.

Porridgeislife · 17/03/2024 08:52

I’m white and not woke but I really like colour blind casting. Acting has a massive issue with barriers to entry.

Who cares if Queen Victoria is played by a Hispanic actress? It doesn’t take anything away from the play/TV show.

frenchnoodle · 17/03/2024 08:51

Depends on the film, obviously a film claiming to be big budget and historically accurate is going to bug me more than a comedy and low budget stuff.

ColonelDax · 17/03/2024 08:51

Boombatty · 17/03/2024 08:50

It wasn't because of her skin colour though!

🤣I'm sure that was great comfort to her. 🤣

Boombatty · 17/03/2024 08:50

Luddite26 · 17/03/2024 08:50

How much worse could she have been treated ultimately her head being chopped off!

It wasn't because of her skin colour though!

Luddite26 · 17/03/2024 08:50

narniabusiness · 17/03/2024 08:06

I find such casting can be distracting because racism is real and if a character in a film is black I will assume that other characters in the film will be reacting to them as a POC. So if Anne Boleyn was black, she would be treated differently (ie worse) than if she were white, so I would be interpreting the story that way.

How much worse could she have been treated ultimately her head being chopped off!

tonyhawks23 · 17/03/2024 08:49

Re 'non matching' children can I remind you that plenty of people adopt and that doesnt mean there is going to be a subplot it's just normal life.

Boombatty · 17/03/2024 08:47

roadee · 17/03/2024 08:28

We won't truly have colour blind casting until it's truly colour blind. That means any colour in any part. For me there's something almost patronising about the current trend for inserting black actors, and only black actors, into the most unlikely roles. It's like patting them on the head and giving them extra toys to play with to try to make up for them not being treated well in the past. You can't make reparation this way.

At the moment it all feels uncomfortable and strange. Queen Charlotte (ie a real person) being played by a black woman with no comment or alteration to historical facts would be colour blind. Queen Charlotte being played by a black woman, with an awkward plot that has the palace giving away titles and whole estates and trying to integrate two sides of society - black and white - is just ridiculous. Like the ball scene with black on one side of the floor and white on the other - never happened and there are people out there who are gullible enough to think it did. Either produce a historical drama based around known history, or make up a completely new story to support the alternative plot and don't pretend it's a story about real people who led well documented lives.

I agree with your comments about Queen Charlotte. I suspect it was done in order to highlight the issue of racism but the way it was done seemed, to me, to be divisive. It almost seemed to suggest that there was good reasons for there to be such a divide between black and white and they needed some kind of "saviour" character to come in and make them all play nicely together. It seemed very badly done and had undertones of actual racism ie suggesting there was inherently a big difference between the black people and white people that needed "fixing" or "overcoming".

trisky · 17/03/2024 08:45

I do find it jarring when member of the same family are different ethnicities as I find that unrealistic.

There must be some historical figures who can't be colour blind cast though. Nelson Mandela, Martin Luther King spring to mind. Their race is integral to their story.

ColonelDax · 17/03/2024 08:43

roadee · 17/03/2024 08:28

We won't truly have colour blind casting until it's truly colour blind. That means any colour in any part. For me there's something almost patronising about the current trend for inserting black actors, and only black actors, into the most unlikely roles. It's like patting them on the head and giving them extra toys to play with to try to make up for them not being treated well in the past. You can't make reparation this way.

At the moment it all feels uncomfortable and strange. Queen Charlotte (ie a real person) being played by a black woman with no comment or alteration to historical facts would be colour blind. Queen Charlotte being played by a black woman, with an awkward plot that has the palace giving away titles and whole estates and trying to integrate two sides of society - black and white - is just ridiculous. Like the ball scene with black on one side of the floor and white on the other - never happened and there are people out there who are gullible enough to think it did. Either produce a historical drama based around known history, or make up a completely new story to support the alternative plot and don't pretend it's a story about real people who led well documented lives.

This is another great point. The fact it only seems to apply to non-white actors feels slightly condescending. Like it's some kind of a 'reward' for them. 🙄

Ofcourseshecan · 17/03/2024 08:39

burnoutbabe · 16/03/2024 23:12

Parents and kids not matching annoys me as I am wondering if they are supposed to be a step family or adoption and when that plot point will be relevant. (Usually a sub plot in a crime drama where dna doesn't match but someone had an affair or the child was via doner egg/sperm as another twist.)

Yes, especially in murder mysteries when everything is a potential clue to who’s the killer, and you’re racing to work it out before it’s revealed!

ColonelDax · 17/03/2024 08:39

Amisilli · 17/03/2024 08:24

Actually black people have been in the UK since Roman times so black people in a period drama could be historically accurate.

I mean that's technically correct but I think before Windrush the average % of non-white people in the UK was similar to the % of Zoroastrians who are present today.

Have you ever met a Zoroastrian? Maybe you have but probably not, so the idea of peppering period dramas with non-white actors is a bit silly tbh.

I actually think context here is key to the production. Sometimes an actors skin colour gives important information about their role in the production.

For example one of the reasons the world of Game of Thrones felt so realistic (apart for the dragons obvs) was because the casting was done in such a way that it was consistent, so everyone from the North was white, those from the West were blonde and aryan looking, the southerners were olive skinned and those from the summer islands were black. When Dany went east she met a more mixed racial group which was consistent with that areas history.

It made it very easy to see who was from where, what their motivations were and added a realistic grounding to the casting.

Compare that to something like the Rings of Power, or Witcher series where race seems randomly assigned and it leads every single place to feel like everyone there place and detracts somewhat from the overall theme.

roadee · 17/03/2024 08:31

tonyhawks23 · 17/03/2024 08:19

I do have to point out the nativity plays in schools everywhere where the whole cast is white.so much of history is whitewashed it seems a positive move to me to change this.maybe you are distracted by colour but do you get annoyed watching something where Jesus is white for example? A nice away from whitewashing is a positive move id say.
Also what about gender,does that distract too?surely it's not too confusing.

I do a lot of work in schools, and attend a lot of nativity plays. The cast in them tends to reflect the racial profile of the school just fine these days. I've seen plenty of black baby dolls in the manger too😂.

Swipe left for the next trending thread