Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this country's future looks bleak due to the attitude towards having children

319 replies

KookyExpert · 08/03/2024 12:27

I have observed a very hostile attitude towards people with children especially on MN. Whenever anyone posts anything about struggling financially due to childcare etc, there are lots of people commenting on how having a family and children are lifestyle choice.
As the saying goes it takes a village to raise a child, there are no villages these days and most families have both parents working which makes the role of parenting even harder in the current times.
Not just that, there are many family friendly organisations but in reality if someone has a young child and when parents have to take time off work to look after sick children, there are so many people moaning about it.
UK reported its lowest birth rate in the last 2 decades and it's relying on migrants to fill the jobs. With the hostile attitude and crippling childcare costs, I think this country's future looks bleak and the shortage for many occupations will only get bigger with increased reliance on migrants to fill those jobs if people keep choosing to have no children.
I expect people to have bit more sympathy for parents with children and less hostility to create a better future for everyone.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
acatcalledjohn · 08/03/2024 16:07

40 years ago the carbon footprint of having children was not known. I am an only child. I have chosen to not have children. My parents' choices several decades ago has no bearing on what we know today and the decisions we make today based on said knowledge.

To suggest that it would be better if my parents had decided to not have me says more about you than it does me.

teacrumpetsandcake · 08/03/2024 16:01

I disagree that mumsnet is anti-children. It's largely made up of parents.

Phoebefail · 08/03/2024 15:56

Would you rather they had an abortion than claim benefits then?

Perhaps the realisation that it is an alternative if you can't be arsed to sort contraception before a night of pleasure.

beAsensible1 · 08/03/2024 15:56

ComtesseDeSpair · 08/03/2024 12:36

A lot of this sounds like “I want to have children and so other people need to help me achieve that regardless of whether they want to or not - and btw I’m not going to offer you anything in return.”

Having “a village” isn’t about other people selflessly forming one around you. A lot of parents seem to misinterpret it as such. A village is what you work to build yourself - by finding other parents to do childcare / babysitting swaps with, by looking around you and exchanging favours other people need for the ones you need, by reaching out and offering to help others in a similar position as you because that’s how to forge bonds. When people on MN post about being sad they have no “village”, they never seem to have considered laying the foundations of that village themselves.

Edited

So much this.

the desire to rely on grandparents rather than building a friendship with parents around you makes no sense. Or even just giving the tiniest bit of effort to your existing friends.

Too many selfish people asking why everyone else isn’t selfless.

Ahugga · 08/03/2024 15:56

We have a me me me attitude about everything, not just kids. Very individualistic. It's not healthy. For goodness sake we have a mental health crisis, we've had decades of Age UK adverts about lonely old people, DH brings home something or other from the Samaritans at the train station on a weekly basis - and people think society is fine? Human beings are supposed to function as a collective society and we don't want to anymore. The state has become a surrogate "village", but it's a poor substitute in reality.

underthebun · 08/03/2024 15:54

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

underthebun · 08/03/2024 15:54

@AmethystSparkles pls don’t take it to heart. I truly believe in a safety net & I have a good income. I have friends with good incomes who also believe in a safety net. The ones who don’t or are slagging those of on here are likely getting some form of benefit but feel the need to punch down.

acatcalledjohn · 08/03/2024 15:52

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Did you mean to be so rude?

underthebun · 08/03/2024 15:51

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

AmethystSparkles · 08/03/2024 15:50

You know, unlike a lot of the harsh people on this thread, a lot of us are sensitive/autistic and don’t cope very well in this capitalist society. We often become physically or mentally unwell. We don’t usually have the same earning potential as those who can cope with more stress. That’s why the welfare state exists.

I guess that means that none of us should have children. Maybe it’s a good idea to remove our genes from the gene pool and let all you superior beings get on with earning your 100k plus salaries. Then you can remove the benefits system altogether and if any of you (God forbid) become ill or disabled you can just starve.

underthebun · 08/03/2024 15:50

So far there seems to be no coherent plan for what we're going to do with an aging population, except for increasing the pension age which isn't an actual solution.

You know you can’t bring logic into a debate like this?!

acatcalledjohn · 08/03/2024 15:50

Bananasandtoast · 08/03/2024 15:34

It's a biological/sociological norm to have children. Remaining child free is the "lifestyle choice" IMO.
I hate that "it's a Lifestyle choice" is used as a stick to beat people with when pandemics/wars/inflation happens and suddenly children who were previously comfortably provided for are now heading into poverty.
Or "it's a lifestyle choice so nobody earning less than £50k per year should be allowed a family".
It's just a knobby attitude.

Both are lifestyle choices. Your choice to have children has a massive carbon footprint, which directly affects this planet.

EilonwyWithRedGoldHair · 08/03/2024 15:47

AgainYes · 08/03/2024 13:26

What an immature comment. Do you honestly think you are performing a public service by procreating? I had my kids because I wanted to. Not in order to provide for others. And don’t pretend you did either.

No, people don't have children for that reason. But it is something that the government should take into account, because falling birthrates is a political issue. And the alternative - immigration - is also a huge political issue.

So far there seems to be no coherent plan for what we're going to do with an aging population, except for increasing the pension age which isn't an actual solution.

QueenBitch666 · 08/03/2024 15:45

Child free by choice here. You won't get a shred of sympathy off me Grin

Bananasandtoast · 08/03/2024 15:38

BeachBeerBbq · 08/03/2024 13:32

Frankly, not every child will be a tax payer in future and even more frankly, since you mention "who will pay for x", most or at least half will not be net contributors.
This "they will pay for your old age" will apply to less than half of people and even from that only small percentage will contribute the majority of funds, if it goes as it is now.

Ghis is also for OP arguing the same

Edited

The ones at the lower end of the income scales and not contributing "enough" financially will be the ones cleaning the hospital so that the doctor on £100k patching you up and paying oodles of tax can do their job properly. Etc etc etc.
Everyone has value and worth, don't be such a snob.

budgetbunny · 08/03/2024 15:36

Bananasandtoast · 08/03/2024 15:34

It's a biological/sociological norm to have children. Remaining child free is the "lifestyle choice" IMO.
I hate that "it's a Lifestyle choice" is used as a stick to beat people with when pandemics/wars/inflation happens and suddenly children who were previously comfortably provided for are now heading into poverty.
Or "it's a lifestyle choice so nobody earning less than £50k per year should be allowed a family".
It's just a knobby attitude.

100% this x

Bananasandtoast · 08/03/2024 15:34

It's a biological/sociological norm to have children. Remaining child free is the "lifestyle choice" IMO.
I hate that "it's a Lifestyle choice" is used as a stick to beat people with when pandemics/wars/inflation happens and suddenly children who were previously comfortably provided for are now heading into poverty.
Or "it's a lifestyle choice so nobody earning less than £50k per year should be allowed a family".
It's just a knobby attitude.

WithACatLikeTread · 08/03/2024 15:33

I once had an elderly lady tell me to tell my toddler who wasn't making much noise other than babbling "tell it to shut up". It wasn't even a smart cafe. One of those joined to a bakery. I can't imagine it happening in other places

acatcalledjohn · 08/03/2024 15:29

PSEnny · 08/03/2024 15:24

It’s the entitlement that gets me, too many people think that having children means that they have the right to a huge amount of financial help from tax payers. Nursery fees are short term not a life long cost. Yes, they are expensive. Unless you earn over £100,000 you get 20% in tax free childcare. This is help. There are some people who won’t be happy until they get free world class child care and the right to years of MAT leave. And they’ll still complain that this isn’t enough. Having kids is hard and expensive and always has been. Get on with it or don’t do it.

And those who earn more than 100k make up only a tiny portion of society.

PSEnny · 08/03/2024 15:24

It’s the entitlement that gets me, too many people think that having children means that they have the right to a huge amount of financial help from tax payers. Nursery fees are short term not a life long cost. Yes, they are expensive. Unless you earn over £100,000 you get 20% in tax free childcare. This is help. There are some people who won’t be happy until they get free world class child care and the right to years of MAT leave. And they’ll still complain that this isn’t enough. Having kids is hard and expensive and always has been. Get on with it or don’t do it.

IncompleteSenten · 08/03/2024 15:22

It is a choice though. And arguably a lifestyle. There's nothing wrong with saying so.
It's not mandatory. That makes it a choice. You generally have to live a certain way which makes it a lifestyle. Put together and we have ... A lifestyle choice. 🤷

And so what if people move from other countries to fill vacancies? They need jobs, we have jobs, global population not increased just for the sake of it.

Sounds like a win all round.

Global redistribution of population as part of a worldwide goal of reducing the number of people on the planet to a sustainable level would be wonderful.

It won't ever happen.

But it would be wonderful.

trubones · 08/03/2024 15:16

People are far too selfish and unable to even look after their selves to have kids these days. Some of the comments on mumsnet show this. Bitter and jealous judgemental lot.

ohtowinthelottery · 08/03/2024 15:16

fitzwilliamdarcy · 08/03/2024 13:08

I think we still have a "children should be seen and not heard" mentality. If you go to the continent, children are taken everywhere and are welcome in most places.

That’s also because on the continent, people other than the parents are encouraged to teach and discipline the kids and ensure that their behaviour is good. The other side of the “village” mentality. Do that in this country and you’re likely to be told to fuck off and stop talking to someone else’s kids (at least where I live).

@fitzwilliamdarcy I totally agree with this. I have been in many restaurants on the continent where small children are present late in the evening. They are part of the gathering and sit at the table joining in with family. I have never seen a child running around a restaurant because they won't/can't sit at the table - nor are they playing on ipads. That is why they are welcome.

I was on holiday once in a Spanish resort particularly popular with Mumsnetters. E were a group of 2 families with 5 children aged 2 - 8. When been there an hour or so when a British couple, who had eaten and were just leaving, complimented us on how well behaved our children were. All they were doing was sitting at the table chatting and eating. It made me wonder what other behaviour they'd seen from British kids to feel moved to compliment ours!

Bobskeleton · 08/03/2024 15:15

Maybe the UK is just a hostile place in general.

winterplumage · 08/03/2024 15:08

PostItInABook · 08/03/2024 15:01

Aren’t a record number of young people out of work because ‘mental health’? If that trend continues the argument of we need to have kids to do all the jobs kind of becomes irrelevant.

Mental health is very adversely affected by a hostile and unaccepting environment.