Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To ask if Million pound lottery winner who refuses to share money with partner should have shared?

189 replies

SweetBirdsong · 21/02/2024 13:17

I am surprised this isn't on here actually. It's been on the news for 2 days, and has just been discussed on Loose Women.

From the article...

A couple are waging war over a £1 million lotto scratchcard they ‘purchased together’ weeks before breaking up.

Michael Cartlidge, 39, and former partner Charlotte Cox, 37, purchased the
Lottery card together at a shop in Spalding, Lincs. But when Charlotte walked out on Michael a few weeks later, she was deemed to be the sole winner of the jackpot by lottery chiefs.

Michael admits that Charlotte both paid for and scratched the ticket. But he also claims that he was the one who suggested she buy the ticket and attempted to transfer her cash to cover the purchase while they were in the shop.
He says the mum-of-one initially agreed to split the cash, but later welched on the deal after breaking up with him a few weeks later and claimed she was the sole winner of the jackpot.

He said ‘£1million has never brought such misery.’

So, was the woman (Charlotte) wrong to have kept all the money to herself? They were not married, they didn't own any property together or have joint finances, and they'd only been together 3 months. Lottery chiefs said she is the sole owner of the money and does not have to share it.

YABU - she was WRONG to keep the money and should have split it with him. They were 'a couple.' He didn't pay for the ticket, but they got it at the same time.

YANBU - she was RIGHT to keep it - as she paid for the ticket herself, and didn't need to share it. They'd only been together 3 months, they weren't married, and they didn't have a house together or joint finances.

https://metro.co.uk/2024/02/20/man-claims-ex-dumped-weeks-bought-winning-1-000-000-scratchcard-20311093/

Man claims ex dumped him weeks after they bought winning £1,000,000 scratchcard

'£1 million has never brought such misery.'

https://metro.co.uk/2024/02/20/man-claims-ex-dumped-weeks-bought-winning-1-000-000-scratchcard-20311093

OP posts:
PaintedHair · 22/02/2024 17:42

I have been caught with transferring money before where it’s taken an age even though money in my account. I can see how that has happened. They were together for 13 weeks and apparently she still moved him into her house with her dc. Irrelevant.
Either way no way would I be giving him half - I May bung him £10k until I found out about the assault charge on an ex.
The biggest laugh for me was the shopkeeper going to the papers to say she agreed with the ex boyfriend 😂 Everyone so desperate for their £250 from a red top paper 🙄

Nothankyou22 · 22/02/2024 16:56

I’d cry if it was the other way around though

Sillysausagedog · 22/02/2024 11:10

You don't 'attempt' to transfer someone money. You either do or you don't.

He has no right to any of her winnings!

Julianne65 · 22/02/2024 10:14

He needs to let it go. Three months is not a relationship.

CormorantStrikesBack · 22/02/2024 09:37

MCOut · 21/02/2024 19:40

I don’t know why I’m continuously surprised by the brazen nature of man.

Imagine being so shameless you try to publicly shame your ex into giving you hundreds of thousands of pounds when you are about to go on trial for violence against another ex. That’s before you even consider they were only together for three months, she paid for it and he tried to steal it. How is this man not embarrassed?

Because sadly there’s enough idiots out there to support his viewpoint. I saw this story on fb yesterday and 99% of the comments were saying she should have shared, she’s selfish, etc. men calling her names.

ArrrMeHearties · 22/02/2024 08:11

She bought the ticket, she scratched it and more importantly it's her details on the back of it so its seen as her money. Personally I wouldn't give him a penny of it

MILTOBE · 21/02/2024 22:52

I do think it would have been different if he'd given her the winning numbers but she'd paid for the ticket. She really wouldn't have won otherwise.

All he did was say "Buy a ticket" - that isn't enough to say he owns half of the winnings.

SweetBirdsong · 21/02/2024 21:37

Agecanonix · 21/02/2024 21:08

Unpopular opinion it seems but they WERE both there, £1 Mill is SO much money that neither had to work for. It was a stroke of pure luck, it's at odds not to share that random luck. If it had been a good friend, she'd have shared.

If he'd bought the card she'd have expected something,

£500,000 is a massive amount. It shouldn't matter who handed over the £5.

This is all about base, unattractive but very fashionable, greed.

Humankind is doomed. Or british society is but I think I'll put my bet (and I'll share my winnings!) on humankind being cursed with greed and selfishness and a complete lack of understanding how society needs to work.

They were together for 13 weeks! 😆

I've had food in my fridge longer than the amount of time they dated!

She owes him nothing.

And the lottery bosses said so too.

He says he is going to 'take it further.'

He will get nothing, and end up owing 1000s in legal fees.

Idiotic man!

.

OP posts:
Treehugger22 · 21/02/2024 21:30

I would give him some money like 20k nothing else. He's a recent partner.

Agecanonix · 21/02/2024 21:16

But she'd been with him 3 months! You don't stay that long with someone without some interest.

Anyway, I'm basing my opinion on basic facts. Obvs if he was an abusive Cocklodger etc as mentioned upthread that changes things but the OP was based on the bare facts. So my opinion stands on that.

Shabooboogaloo · 21/02/2024 21:10

Oh bog off! Of course she doesn’t owe anything.
thats hilarious.

Agecanonix · 21/02/2024 21:08

Unpopular opinion it seems but they WERE both there, £1 Mill is SO much money that neither had to work for. It was a stroke of pure luck, it's at odds not to share that random luck. If it had been a good friend, she'd have shared.

If he'd bought the card she'd have expected something,

£500,000 is a massive amount. It shouldn't matter who handed over the £5.

This is all about base, unattractive but very fashionable, greed.

Humankind is doomed. Or british society is but I think I'll put my bet (and I'll share my winnings!) on humankind being cursed with greed and selfishness and a complete lack of understanding how society needs to work.

D1LL1GAF · 21/02/2024 21:06

He should have bought his own card.

Nevermind91 · 21/02/2024 21:01

I know someone who has not had much fun since winning a few years ago. It doesn't necessarily guarantee happiness.

There is also one winner who hasn't told her husband of her lottery win. She doesn't trust him not to become a loafer, so has kept it to herself for several years.

StockpotSoup · 21/02/2024 20:59

ApiarySentinel · 21/02/2024 19:18

if its true and it was his suggestion to buy the ticket then without his suggestion then the winning ticket would not have been purchased, takes two to tango in this case

But where would this all end? If my friend suggests I’d like a certain restaurant, does that mean I have to invite her there at my expense? If I’m thinking of getting a car and my colleague suggests I have a look at the one her neighbour is selling, am I then obliged to give her lifts to work all the time? If I’m looking to move and buy a place after my sister sent me a RightMove link, is she then entitled to a share of the profit when I sell it on?

You say you’ve changed your opinion now you know his history. Why? Being violent to his ex makes him a scuzzball, but it doesn’t make him less entitled to a share of this lottery win, any more than he’d be more entitled if he was a lovely man who ran a soup kitchen and nursed sick puppies. It’s about legal entitlement - and whether he’s nice or vile, this man has no entitlement to the winnings, and rightly so.

MumblesParty · 21/02/2024 20:42

It’s a no brainer. They weren’t a married couple who bought a lottery ticket together. She’s a woman who bought a lottery ticket while she was out with her boyfriend one day. He has no more claim that if he’d been a mate she was out shopping with.

Leaveitou · 21/02/2024 20:35

Good for her 😂

SweetBirdsong · 21/02/2024 20:19

Pretty much a clean sweep almost. 92% of nearly 1200 posters are on the woman's side (who bought the ticket.)

The relationship must have been shit - or non-existent, or she would not have done what she did.

The 8% of people saying YABU are probably mostly men! I can't imagine most women thinking what the woman did is wrong.

OP posts:
ApiarySentinel · 21/02/2024 20:06

MILTOBE · 21/02/2024 19:20

But people suggest lots of things all the time. He didn't suggest the numbers - he just told her to buy the tickets. This is a man with a history of violence towards women who's living in her house very shortly after meeting her and who is also unemployed. It's pretty easy to join dots.

my apologies with that new context then 100% it should be charlottes

Puzzledandpissedoff · 21/02/2024 20:02

This is a man with a history of violence towards women ...

Errr, WHAT??? Shock

HotChocolateNotCocoa · 21/02/2024 19:48

But he also claims that he was the one who suggested she buy the ticket

On that basis, if I suggest a friend gives a bloke she meets on Tinder a chance, I get to sleep with him as well if it turns out he’s got a massive cock.

TwylaSands · 21/02/2024 19:45

Testina · 21/02/2024 13:28

Tbf, every other person on MN AIBU uses “partner” to mean “complete waste of space that I’ve been dating for 3 months”.

Without even knowing that you could tell his character immediately. What man moves in with a single mother within three months of meeting her? He seems to bounce from one vulnerable woman to another. Hopefully she will now throw money at therapy so she doesnt end up with another partner beating entitled loser.

If they paid for them jointly with the intention of it being joint winnings - morally I think it should be shared.
im not sure this man cares about morals.

Patrickiscrazy · 21/02/2024 19:41

No, this lady should not and doesn't have to share.
I believe if married, it doesn't matter who bought or "scratched" the card, it's half and half in case of split. 😊

MCOut · 21/02/2024 19:40

I don’t know why I’m continuously surprised by the brazen nature of man.

Imagine being so shameless you try to publicly shame your ex into giving you hundreds of thousands of pounds when you are about to go on trial for violence against another ex. That’s before you even consider they were only together for three months, she paid for it and he tried to steal it. How is this man not embarrassed?

SleepingStandingUp · 21/02/2024 19:26

pollyglot · 21/02/2024 18:42

Definitely her money.

What I find very distasteful is the Metro's use of casual racism in their reporting. "Welched" as a verb should be banished from the lexicon.

I did not know this. I've learnt something new.