Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

If VAT is added on Private School Fees, then it will be added onto University fees as well

539 replies

AgathaCrispee · 31/01/2024 08:06

Does it worry you that this new policy of adding VAT on educational fees will also be applied to university fees as well?

AIBU to think this will put university out of the reach of the majority of families who will support their kids through Uni?

Also, for those who do go the level of debt they will come out with will be really big.

If they can apply VAT to private school educational fees then they've setup a case for Independent schools argue that it must be applied to Uni as well.

Is this going to create a situation where only the wealthy can send their kids to Uni?

I'm wondering why no one is asking this question!!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
18
Another76543 · 31/01/2024 10:41

decionsdecisions62 · 31/01/2024 10:35

Universities don't have charitable status. Neither should they and neither should bloody Eton and Marlborough!

Universities don't have charitable status.

Even a quick google shows that this is not correct. They do. From the University of Birmingham :
“Almost all British universities have charitable status because their primary purposes of advancing education and research are deemed to deliver a public benefit.”

LongTimeListener1 · 31/01/2024 10:40

Your worry shouldn’t be about whether they add VAT to university fees (they won’t), your worry should be that universities are chronically underfunded and they’re going to have to find the money from somewhere. Most likely by increasing the fee cap.

AgathaCrispee · 31/01/2024 10:39

decionsdecisions62 · 31/01/2024 10:35

Universities don't have charitable status. Neither should they and neither should bloody Eton and Marlborough!

https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/legal/charity.aspx#:~:text=Almost%20all%20British%20universities%20have,to%20deliver%20a%20public%20benefit.

Our charitable status

https://www.birmingham.ac.uk/legal/charity.aspx#:~:text=Almost%20all%20British%20universities%20have,to%20deliver%20a%20public%20benefit.

OP posts:
MyOrganisationIsCaptured · 31/01/2024 10:38

@decionsdecisions62 yes they do, have a tiny Google it will take seconds

EasternStandard · 31/01/2024 10:36

AgathaCrispee · 31/01/2024 10:29

Hang on, if some universities and private schools have charitable status then they would still be exempt from VAT given that Labour will not be removing that status.

Therefore, the VAT liability will only fall on those without charitable status? Wouldn't that just make the one with it more popular and over subscribed?

This proposal doesn't make any sense the more you dig into it!

No I think they are adding it anyway

decionsdecisions62 · 31/01/2024 10:35

Universities don't have charitable status. Neither should they and neither should bloody Eton and Marlborough!

AgathaCrispee · 31/01/2024 10:29

Hang on, if some universities and private schools have charitable status then they would still be exempt from VAT given that Labour will not be removing that status.

Therefore, the VAT liability will only fall on those without charitable status? Wouldn't that just make the one with it more popular and over subscribed?

This proposal doesn't make any sense the more you dig into it!

OP posts:
noworklifebalance · 31/01/2024 10:23

SmashedPrawnsInAMilkyBasket · 31/01/2024 08:14

This is the answer. The proposal is to remove the spurious charitable status of private schools, a byproduct of which is that they will lose the exemption from VAT. It’s not a proposal to add VAT, but the removal of the exemption, an exemption which doesn’t apply to universities, so there is no correlation between their situations.

No
Private schools will not lose their charitable status under a Labour government.

coffeeaddict77 · 31/01/2024 10:18

MyOrganisationIsCaptured · 31/01/2024 10:09

Again trying to be astonished by the level of ignorance and prejudice on this subject, but I'm so tired of it

Not all charities are about people donating money for ill cats or homeless people, MOSTLY they are businesses providing a service without making money for shareholders, and ploughing any excess back into the service they provide. We live in a capitalist society, where innovation is (usually) applauded.

SO why shouldn't a business open up and charge to provide educational services on a not-for-profit basis? Fine, apparently, if it's a dance school, martial arts school, swim club or similar (which actually are usually profit making businesses) but dare to establish an institution that provides an EDUCATION that is not the bog standard one provided by the state, which is only affordable to people with loads of money because....well if I can't afford it then no one else should be able to either?????? Oh no I'm not envious, I just don't believe in it. Because...I dunno it feels wrong!?

OMG FFS and so on I give up

Universities are charitable status institutions, they are not essential, they are the same but people can't even be bothered to do a tiny bit of research about that before they go spouting on about charitable status of private schools

VAT on private schools is shooting ourselves (the majority with kids in state) in the foot and it won't even punish the people you think it will

Whatever you think about universities being non essential, most people and also the government would disagree, hence why there is a tax payer loan. It would be pointless to add VAT is that just ended up being paid by the tax payer anyway. Private schools are not considered essential by most people and people do not receive tax payer funded loan to go to one.

MyOrganisationIsCaptured · 31/01/2024 10:09

Again trying to be astonished by the level of ignorance and prejudice on this subject, but I'm so tired of it

Not all charities are about people donating money for ill cats or homeless people, MOSTLY they are businesses providing a service without making money for shareholders, and ploughing any excess back into the service they provide. We live in a capitalist society, where innovation is (usually) applauded.

SO why shouldn't a business open up and charge to provide educational services on a not-for-profit basis? Fine, apparently, if it's a dance school, martial arts school, swim club or similar (which actually are usually profit making businesses) but dare to establish an institution that provides an EDUCATION that is not the bog standard one provided by the state, which is only affordable to people with loads of money because....well if I can't afford it then no one else should be able to either?????? Oh no I'm not envious, I just don't believe in it. Because...I dunno it feels wrong!?

OMG FFS and so on I give up

Universities are charitable status institutions, they are not essential, they are the same but people can't even be bothered to do a tiny bit of research about that before they go spouting on about charitable status of private schools

VAT on private schools is shooting ourselves (the majority with kids in state) in the foot and it won't even punish the people you think it will

AgathaCrispee · 31/01/2024 10:05

Spendonsend · 31/01/2024 09:59

The student loan thing is funny in that when its written off the tax payer picks up the bill. So if the loan included vat, the tax payer of the future would pay off the vat. Like current us borrowing from future us.

I was actually thinking this when I read that post. Isn't that just increasing public spending that could be used in other areas?

OP posts:
coffeeaddict77 · 31/01/2024 10:04

twistyizzy · 31/01/2024 09:24

Actually they don't need universities. An ITP could deliver up to Level 7 which is an undergraduate degree. It already happens in other sectors. So you could cut out university completely and still get a degree.

Level 7 is not an undergraduate degree. The people doing it will have already achieved a degree from a university. A degree apprenticeship is level 6 and requires a university.

Spendonsend · 31/01/2024 09:59

The student loan thing is funny in that when its written off the tax payer picks up the bill. So if the loan included vat, the tax payer of the future would pay off the vat. Like current us borrowing from future us.

MyOrganisationIsCaptured · 31/01/2024 09:55

@Lindaofoxford @SmashedPrawnsInAMilkyBasket

A tiny bit of googling will tell you that almost all universities have charitable status

Issueatwork · 31/01/2024 09:52

For all it matters at this point, uni fees could be 9k or 50k. VAT or no VAT. The loan covers it and it is only paid back as a % of income until it’s written off after a few years. I couldn’t get wound up about it, let alone use it as an argument for private schools.

EasternStandard · 31/01/2024 09:51

Kewcumber · 31/01/2024 09:48

Charities have to be registered and charge VAT on "Business activity" so many charities will have the shops registered for VAT under a separate trading entity or will be partially registered for VAT . I assume they will just change the definition of "business activities" so that it catches private education.

All Charities (unless partially registered) have to pay VAT on their inputs (if vatable) and they can't reclaim the VAT.

Geeky government types love drafting tax rules - I'm not aware of any plan to include public universities within the remit though private universities might be caught.

What’s the percentage split on public v private?

I hadn’t given any thought to what is what

Grumpyoldpersonwithcats · 31/01/2024 09:50

Waverleyst · 31/01/2024 09:29

This is interesting. What makes a business BAT exempt? I’m not being facetious. I’m genuinely interested.

Those Labour bastards are going to make organisations BAT exempt? The evil fuckers!
Where the hell is the Daily Mail when you need it?

EasternStandard · 31/01/2024 09:48

I hope not it would be incredibly stupid

Even more so than the current gimmick for non university

Kewcumber · 31/01/2024 09:48

Charities have to be registered and charge VAT on "Business activity" so many charities will have the shops registered for VAT under a separate trading entity or will be partially registered for VAT . I assume they will just change the definition of "business activities" so that it catches private education.

All Charities (unless partially registered) have to pay VAT on their inputs (if vatable) and they can't reclaim the VAT.

Geeky government types love drafting tax rules - I'm not aware of any plan to include public universities within the remit though private universities might be caught.

Another76543 · 31/01/2024 09:46

AgathaCrispee · 31/01/2024 08:06

Does it worry you that this new policy of adding VAT on educational fees will also be applied to university fees as well?

AIBU to think this will put university out of the reach of the majority of families who will support their kids through Uni?

Also, for those who do go the level of debt they will come out with will be really big.

If they can apply VAT to private school educational fees then they've setup a case for Independent schools argue that it must be applied to Uni as well.

Is this going to create a situation where only the wealthy can send their kids to Uni?

I'm wondering why no one is asking this question!!

This question has been raised before and, yes, it does concern me.

Just to clear up the facts first, which so many people with such strong views seem to be unaware of. As things currently stand, only around half of private schools have charitable status. Even those that don’t have charitable status do not have to charge VAT on fees because of an exemption under the VAT legislation.

The Labour Party have said that they are no longer planning to strip schools of charitable status. What they are planning to do is to change the VAT legislation.

For the sake of clarity, this is from the government website.

“If school, higher or further education is being provided for a charge (see paragraph 3.1), the VAT consequences are for an eligible body (see section 4):

  • the education provided is exempt
  • any ‘closely-related’ goods or services provided are exempt”

“With effect from 1 August 2019, an eligible body is:

  • a school, sixth form college, tertiary college or further education college or other centrally funded further education institution (defined as such under the Education Acts)
  • a centrally funded higher education institution in Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland (defined as such under the Education Acts)
  • the governing body of one of these institutions:
  • a local authority
  • a government department or executive agency
  • a non-profit making body that carries out duties of an essentially public nature similar to those carried out by a LA or government department
  • health authority
  • a non-profit making organisation that meets certain conditions
  • a commercial provider of tuition in EFL, in which case special rules will apply (see section 9)
  • a university
  • a higher education provider registered in the approved (fee cap) category of the register maintained by the Office for Students from the date of inclusion in the register”

The VAT exemption for fee paying schools is under the same part of the rules as universities are.

In theory, they might be able to change the legislation to try to ensure that only schools are covered. In reality, trying to change legislation without having unintended consequences can prove challenging.

The Labour Party’s two main policies of raising tax are taxing private schools and non doms. There is no way that even the most optimistic person can think that these changes alone will raise enough to cover any meaningful increase in spending in other areas. The money needs to come somewhere.

Where is the money for all this spending coming from? My concern is that once they tweak the VAT legislation, they’ll look at other tweaks. University fees, care homes, private nurseries, healthcare etc. - all of these are things which many of the population cannot afford and, therefore, could be seen as “luxuries”.

Would the Labour Party admit to looking at any of these things before an election? No, of course they won’t, because it would lose them votes.

Education and vocational training (VAT Notice 701/30)

Find out how VAT applies to education, research, vocational training, examination services and goods and services connected with these activites.

https://www.gov.uk/guidance/vat-on-education-and-vocational-training-notice-70130#section-4

Spendonsend · 31/01/2024 09:42

I dont think that the Labour Government if elected would do this.

I do think it sets in motion the idea that education is a vatable thing and there is a chance that the next government would look to extend the principle.

Yestodessertplease · 31/01/2024 09:41

I emailed my local Labour MP to ask about VAT on school fees - I got a quick response to say I need to wait to see what's in the manifesto. So no point in speculating til it comes out.

AgathaCrispee · 31/01/2024 09:40

I've emailed the NUS, I'll let you know what their take on this is.

Suspect they'll have been considering this too.

OP posts:
Thebestwaytoscareatory · 31/01/2024 09:38

AgathaCrispee · 31/01/2024 09:15

It really doesn't matter whether you believe me or not, it's still something that needs to be talked about.

Yes, given the utter state this country is in, from the CoL crisis and crumbling infrastructure to the recruitment / retention crises in vital public services and the complete erosion of any trust in authority, a discussion on a fictional policy of the opposition is certain what's needed.

titchy · 31/01/2024 09:37

He’s not a first class honours student. However, he has been able to demonstrate he is a first class honours employee.

That's a really great statement!