Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be shocked that over half a million people under the age of 35 are out of work due to long-term sickness

406 replies

puncheur · 24/12/2023 16:29

I had no idea. These numbers are extraordinary. 560k people between the ages of 16 and 34 economically inactive due to long term illness.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/dec/24/500000-under-35s-out-of-work-long-term-illness-uk?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

More than 500,000 under-35s in UK out of work due to long-term illness

Experts link 44% increase in four years to a growing mental health crisis and underinvestment in health services

https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/dec/24/500000-under-35s-out-of-work-long-term-illness-uk?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Crispedia · 26/12/2023 20:40

DonnaBanana · 26/12/2023 20:14

I think we should feel quite privileged you used one of your paragraphs on us today then

If this is a dig, I am embarrassed for you.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 26/12/2023 20:31

DonnaBanana · 26/12/2023 20:14

I think we should feel quite privileged you used one of your paragraphs on us today then

Nice silencing tactic there. IDS is wishing that he'd thought of that.

"If you're well enough to try to advocate for your rights, you're well enough to work" reads like a perfect Tory soundbite.

DonnaBanana · 26/12/2023 20:14

Crispedia · 26/12/2023 19:12

I don’t know a single person in the last 20 years who has had to leave such a role due to ill health.

I have two good online friends with severe ME, like me, one was a doctor of chemistry and one a lawyer. Educated, well paid people under 35 can be unlucky and get a disabling illness that prevents them working. We are sick too so can’t simply work from home. I can type a few paragraphs daily, no more as texting, typing, face time and phone calls all increase my chronic head pain and all other symptoms to unbearable levels v quickly.

I think we should feel quite privileged you used one of your paragraphs on us today then

Crikeyalmighty · 26/12/2023 19:56

To be frank the country needs a 'reset' - we have disincentivised lots of younger people from much needed but not particularly well paid jobs these days that require vast amounts of study . to me it's ludicrous when a digital marketer or middle ranking estate agent or recruitment consultant with moderate 'sales' or HR manager in a small company is earning as much as a doctor in the NHS with 8 years very high level training behind them or say a headmaster or deputy .

All my sons friends of around 25 to 28 with jobs and families in the south east despair of being able to own a modest flat/home anywhere they would actually want to invest their money in. We are infantilising many by forcing them into houshares well into their 30s in many cases unless they manage to hook up with a real high earner or someone who has inherited and the most they can expect us maybe buying 25% into a 2 bed flat - that's if they can get one without the girl needing to get pregnant

So many of them are getting mental health issues through ending up with 3 flat moves in a year regularly!! Dodgy landlords, weird house mates , landlords selling - the list is endless

The whole situation is unsustainable in the country in all but the very cheapest areas- and those areas are often where the better paid jobs don't exist

RaspberriesUpside · 26/12/2023 19:55

tescocreditcard · 24/12/2023 19:20

I also strongly suspect that mental health issues are linked to both parents being out at work all day.

However, I have noticed a very small but significant reversal in this, with more women staying at home with their children - probably because they have to work till they're 67 anyway so 5ish years out of the workplace won't make much difference to career prospects. Hopefully this will help to improve the mental health of our future generations.

with more women staying at home with their children….Hopefully this will help to improve the mental health of our future generations.

Interesting that it’s mums you are hoping to get out of the workforce rather than dads with their Very Important Jobs. Great way to reverse progress for women 👏

RaspberriesUpside · 26/12/2023 19:46

I look at my kids at university. Who knows what the future holds for them. I would be devastated if they were struck by illness that made them unable to work. I would also be devastated if they didn’t want to work and fabricated illness to get out of it.

Nobody wants this life for young people do they? There is nothing to resent or envy here.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 26/12/2023 19:40

OfcourseitsaNC · 26/12/2023 19:27

I'm glad it doesn't work as an opt out of working for life card for you. 👏

I wish my relative had the same attitude.

It doesn't occur to you that this isn't a matter of attitude but of autism affecting different people differently?

jasflowers · 26/12/2023 19:29

And that is due to demographics, and a great many people not paying sufficient tax while utilising public services

There is no fixing this without significant economic pain for the old and unproductive. Thats the future the UK faces

People in the UK aren't paying enough Tax because the Tories held down wages, quite simply, they can no longer afford to pay tax and still live.

Err why should the old and i assume you mean the "poor" have more pain? why shouldn't the wealthy have to pay more?

& by wealthy, i don't mean higher rate tax payers (who due to Tories holding back tax TH's are no longer wealthy) but the super rich, why can't they pay more?

Or is it they will leave the UK (and go where exactly?)

OfcourseitsaNC · 26/12/2023 19:27

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 26/12/2023 18:02

And yet it doesn't work as an opt-out of working for life card for me.

It's almost like some autistic people can work whilst others can't. And the ones who can't work can't, whether diagnosed or not.

I'm glad it doesn't work as an opt out of working for life card for you. 👏

I wish my relative had the same attitude.

anothernamechangeagainsndagain · 26/12/2023 19:22

Some of those will have profound learning disabilities that mean that they cannot work, I know several (personally and through work) they have the capacity of young children or toddlers, of course they cannot work but they will be included in that statistic

OhcantthInkofaname · 26/12/2023 19:18

Many of them have "leaded arse syndrome".

OfcourseitsaNC · 26/12/2023 19:14

TriOptimim · 26/12/2023 17:46

Where can I get one of these cards?

At the GP, then the ADOS. Followed up by your PIP assessment.

Just do your research on the internet, like my relative did, and you've earned your card.

Crispedia · 26/12/2023 19:12

I don’t know a single person in the last 20 years who has had to leave such a role due to ill health.

I have two good online friends with severe ME, like me, one was a doctor of chemistry and one a lawyer. Educated, well paid people under 35 can be unlucky and get a disabling illness that prevents them working. We are sick too so can’t simply work from home. I can type a few paragraphs daily, no more as texting, typing, face time and phone calls all increase my chronic head pain and all other symptoms to unbearable levels v quickly.

FestiveFruitloop · 26/12/2023 19:04

@BouncingJAS I'd also be fascinated to hear your definition of 'the unproductive'. pins back ears

FestiveFruitloop · 26/12/2023 19:01

BouncingJAS · 26/12/2023 18:02

@FestiveFruitloop

Let me explain the facts of life to you because you seem to not understand the problem.

There is no pot of money waiting for pensioners because "they paid in all of their lives".

That is NOT how the UK tax structure works.

Current working age taxpayers are funding current pensioners. Thats what existed in the 70s 80s 90s as well, and its also completely irrelevant what the reality was in the 70s 80s 90s 00s.

What matters in such a "pay as you go" system is what is happening today.

and today,

The number of working taxpayers "paying in" is not enough to fund the number of current pensioners. That ratio used to be 6:1 in the 50s and it is now 3:1, and is forecast to drop to 2:1 in the 2040s.

And that is due to demographics, and a great many people not paying sufficient tax while utilising public services.

There is no fixing this without significant economic pain for the old and unproductive. Thats the future the UK faces.

There is no free lunch in this world anymore.

😂😂😂

You're funny, I'll give you that. (And, I suspect, have little understanding of the reality of many elderly people's lives. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.)

Please stop putting words in my mouth. I wasn't talking about any 'magic money pot'. I was objecting to the morals of expecting the elderly, who have a fixed income, to be the ones who should expect to be squeezed dry while the super-rich and the crooked remain unaffected, clueless and merrily voting Tory time after time.

meditated · 26/12/2023 18:54

puncheur · 24/12/2023 16:29

I had no idea. These numbers are extraordinary. 560k people between the ages of 16 and 34 economically inactive due to long term illness.
https://www.theguardian.com/society/2023/dec/24/500000-under-35s-out-of-work-long-term-illness-uk?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other

Surely one of the factors is the food. The junk food that everybody eats and normalises. We are all fine, fish fingers and chicken nuggets are fine. Until we are not.

lapsedbookworm · 26/12/2023 18:48

FestiveFruitloop · 26/12/2023 18:03

The people who really need to learn not to expect something for nothing are the aristocracy who expect effort-free payments from renting out the land that their ancestors stole from ours and the employers who underpay their staff. Not the poorest in our society.

Amen.

Quite, people inheriting many multiples of what most people can hope to earn in a lifetime. Then looking down on those people and judging them for their struggles.

jasflowers · 26/12/2023 18:05

Charlie2121 · 26/12/2023 00:43

I work in an environment where most people earn 100k+.

I don’t know a single person in the last 20 years who has had to leave such a role due to ill health.

I also don’t see anyone attending work who is clearly unfit to do so.

This leads me to believe that huge swathes of sickness from work is not genuine.

It’d be interesting to see the stats on average lifetime annual salary vs average time absent from work. If sickness was random then no correlation should exists however I’d wager it is heavily related.

So did i, self medicating with drink and drugs was extremely common, as was burn out, people just dropped out, no one ever figured what happened to them.

People in these sorts of jobs will have access to PHI, able to deal with problems quickly (no waiting lists) they also wont be faced with the worry of bills and housing, its really not a fair comparison

I only personally know of two people who are young and have struggled with work, both experienced very high levels of trauma as youngsters, this seems to have followed them through their teens and 20s, no/limited long term treatments or help, child MH services are near non existent and this has consequence as we now see.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 26/12/2023 18:04

BouncingJAS · 26/12/2023 18:02

@FestiveFruitloop

Let me explain the facts of life to you because you seem to not understand the problem.

There is no pot of money waiting for pensioners because "they paid in all of their lives".

That is NOT how the UK tax structure works.

Current working age taxpayers are funding current pensioners. Thats what existed in the 70s 80s 90s as well, and its also completely irrelevant what the reality was in the 70s 80s 90s 00s.

What matters in such a "pay as you go" system is what is happening today.

and today,

The number of working taxpayers "paying in" is not enough to fund the number of current pensioners. That ratio used to be 6:1 in the 50s and it is now 3:1, and is forecast to drop to 2:1 in the 2040s.

And that is due to demographics, and a great many people not paying sufficient tax while utilising public services.

There is no fixing this without significant economic pain for the old and unproductive. Thats the future the UK faces.

There is no free lunch in this world anymore.

This.

Currently-drawn pensions have always been paid for by currently-working workers. The "paid in all my life" argument has never reflected reality.

FestiveFruitloop · 26/12/2023 18:03

The people who really need to learn not to expect something for nothing are the aristocracy who expect effort-free payments from renting out the land that their ancestors stole from ours and the employers who underpay their staff. Not the poorest in our society.

Amen.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 26/12/2023 18:02

OfcourseitsaNC · 26/12/2023 17:03

You can only speak for yourself here.

My relative used their Autism diagnosis as an opt out of work for life card.

And yet it doesn't work as an opt-out of working for life card for me.

It's almost like some autistic people can work whilst others can't. And the ones who can't work can't, whether diagnosed or not.

BouncingJAS · 26/12/2023 18:02

@FestiveFruitloop

Let me explain the facts of life to you because you seem to not understand the problem.

There is no pot of money waiting for pensioners because "they paid in all of their lives".

That is NOT how the UK tax structure works.

Current working age taxpayers are funding current pensioners. Thats what existed in the 70s 80s 90s as well, and its also completely irrelevant what the reality was in the 70s 80s 90s 00s.

What matters in such a "pay as you go" system is what is happening today.

and today,

The number of working taxpayers "paying in" is not enough to fund the number of current pensioners. That ratio used to be 6:1 in the 50s and it is now 3:1, and is forecast to drop to 2:1 in the 2040s.

And that is due to demographics, and a great many people not paying sufficient tax while utilising public services.

There is no fixing this without significant economic pain for the old and unproductive. Thats the future the UK faces.

There is no free lunch in this world anymore.

FestiveFruitloop · 26/12/2023 18:00

BouncingJAS · 26/12/2023 17:40

@FestiveFruitloop

Its precisely your kind of wishful "pie in the sky" thinking that will lead to brutal spending cuts when the situation deteriorates further.

I don't know where you got the idea I was pie in the sky for asking a simple question which you are opting not to answer. Your prerogative, of course, but I suspect the reason is that you don't actually have an answer.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 26/12/2023 18:00

BouncingJAS · 26/12/2023 17:24

@VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia

No, its "broadening the tax base", which is precisely what is required. Too many people think they are "owed" public services even though they pay little to nothing in. Its this culture of "something for nothing" that needs to be utterly eradicated in the UK.

But even that will not get you anywhere near enough taxes to fund public services properly due to Brexit damage (which causes a loss of £40bn in tax revenue annually).

We are talking about requiring £100bn+ in additional tax every year.

You would need a combination of tax rises (council tax, removal of personal allowance) and spending cuts to achieve that kind of money.

Thats how bad the situation is in the UK. The country is literally on economic life support, but the politicians keep lying to the public about it.

The tax-free personal allowance exists, in part, because we are already topping up the income profit of the employers of the lowest earners by topping up wages subsidising employers instead of making them pay a fair wage with in-work benefits. Taking tax from people who receive a top-up in-work benefit is a pointless additional administrative burden that increases poverty.

The people who really need to learn not to expect something for nothing are the aristocracy who expect effort-free payments from renting out the land that their ancestors stole from ours and the employers who underpay their staff. Not the poorest in our society.

roughlyexactlythesame · 26/12/2023 17:56

God, so sorry - that sounds awful :(