Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this “crackdown” on benefit fraud is absolutely pathetic

540 replies

MissLou0 · 09/11/2023 00:34

We lose hundreds of billions from tax avoidance compared to 1 billion on benefit fraud and nothing is done about it, because those are the Tory donors. Michelle Mone just stole £28 million from taxpayers for her PPE scam, she’s not in trouble, and she of course also hides her hundreds of millions offshore.

We lose a small amount from benefit fraud, and as a result everyone who claims any sort of benefit including disability benefits banks are going to be monitored.

The graph below doesn’t even scratch the surface of how much is lost to tax avoidance. For example Rupert Murdoch is worth £17 billion and he hasn’t paid tax in years, personal tax or on his businesses. And he’s ONE person. These people are not targeted yet the most desperate and vulnerable are.

This is completely ignored by the media as the majority of newspaper owners are hiding their money offshore.

I’m in a situation where I don’t need to claim any benefits but I have family who are disabled who have had to fight for even the tiniest amount to live on, and they are now having to deal with this invasion of privacy which will make not even 0.000001% of what cracking down on tax avoidance would.

To think this “crackdown” on benefit fraud is absolutely pathetic
OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
Crispedia · 18/11/2023 21:46

Thank you @therealcookiemonster

therealcookiemonster · 18/11/2023 21:42

@Crispedia indeed. don't get me started on the government's attitude to supporting individuals who are suffering from lifelong, debilitating impairments

Crispedia · 18/11/2023 21:14

therealcookiemonster · 18/11/2023 20:53

@XenoBitch couldn't agree with you more. I feel like the whole system - from health care to benefits is not designed to enable people or support people to work at all.

And please don’t forget those - I am one - who can’t work at all even with support.

Crispedia · 18/11/2023 21:13

“Chancellor Jeremy Hunt doesn’t rule out withdrawing benefits from claimants who have been assessed as unable to work due to ill-health”. V worrying.

https://www.itv.com/news/2023-11-16/chancellor-refuses-to-rule-out-withdrawing-benefits-from-long-term-sick

therealcookiemonster · 18/11/2023 20:53

@XenoBitch couldn't agree with you more. I feel like the whole system - from health care to benefits is not designed to enable people or support people to work at all.

Papyrophile · 18/11/2023 20:49

Rupert Murdoch is Australian by birth, but now a citizen of the US. So no, you can't expect him to pay tax in the UK. When you own a media empire, you (with advice) choose the most favourable place to be resident for tax. But if you work in the UK, for a UK supermarket, use the NHS and expect state education for your children, and a state pension at 67/68, you don't have many choices.

XenoBitch · 18/11/2023 20:42

Seymour5 · 18/11/2023 19:40

Disability benefits (DLA/PIP) are paid to people in work, and lots of people with disabilities and life limiting conditions have jobs and careers. Those payments are not means tested. But surely the first group that need to be working are those without disabilities or chronic conditions.

I’ve been retired for some time, but I had lots of colleagues who could have used their disability to claim they couldn’t work. My last boss had MS, I’ve had colleagues with Autism, partially sighted (one brought his guide dog to work), wheelchair users, amputees, people with epilepsy. I also had clients without disabilities who could have worked, but found all sorts of reasons not to. Its not fraud, but is it acceptable? Is it good for children to grow up in an environment where they don’t learn the value of work, or the opportunities it might bring?

So, the disabled people you mentioned could work. Good for them. An amputee is not going to be having constant time off of work for medical appointments, or end up in hospital regularly.... neither is the partially sighted person.
Many people with disabilities do want to work, but the workplace is not set up for them, or they come across badly in interviews (such as maybe with someone with autism), or they will just need too much time off of work to manage and recover from their conditions.

There is little help out there to get disabled people back into work. DWP will see someone wanting to work and cut their benefits to the bone and expect nearly 40 hours a week jobhunting, then applying for full time roles.
DWP sees a threat of poverty as a way to get people working. The next budget is going to mention jobseekers having their meagre benefits stopped if they don't find employment within 18 months.... all whilst having any spending watched too. If you have been out of work for over a decade, no qualifications or experience to your name... how are you realistically going to find work in that time? Add a disability to the mix and it makes for a very bleak outlook.

Concannon88 · 18/11/2023 20:36

That's obviously not her argument. Shes saying they make a big fuss about benefit fraud and trying to reduce benefit payments, but because they are scum they dont have any plans to crack down on tax evasion.

Concannon88 · 18/11/2023 20:34

Is this in reference to hunts latest proposal to cut benefits to people who dont work? I completely agree with you, the tories make me sick, I try to avoid reading things on this topic as it can really chew you up inside.

Crispedia · 18/11/2023 20:31

I also had clients without disabilities who could have worked, but found all sorts of reasons not to.

V hard now to get benefits long term if physically and mentally well. Hard even when unwell!

Crispedia · 18/11/2023 20:28

Seymour5 · 18/11/2023 19:40

Disability benefits (DLA/PIP) are paid to people in work, and lots of people with disabilities and life limiting conditions have jobs and careers. Those payments are not means tested. But surely the first group that need to be working are those without disabilities or chronic conditions.

I’ve been retired for some time, but I had lots of colleagues who could have used their disability to claim they couldn’t work. My last boss had MS, I’ve had colleagues with Autism, partially sighted (one brought his guide dog to work), wheelchair users, amputees, people with epilepsy. I also had clients without disabilities who could have worked, but found all sorts of reasons not to. Its not fraud, but is it acceptable? Is it good for children to grow up in an environment where they don’t learn the value of work, or the opportunities it might bring?

I have been bedridden now for 10 years with severe ME, even when moderate I was too sick to work.

Seymour5 · 18/11/2023 19:40

Disability benefits (DLA/PIP) are paid to people in work, and lots of people with disabilities and life limiting conditions have jobs and careers. Those payments are not means tested. But surely the first group that need to be working are those without disabilities or chronic conditions.

I’ve been retired for some time, but I had lots of colleagues who could have used their disability to claim they couldn’t work. My last boss had MS, I’ve had colleagues with Autism, partially sighted (one brought his guide dog to work), wheelchair users, amputees, people with epilepsy. I also had clients without disabilities who could have worked, but found all sorts of reasons not to. Its not fraud, but is it acceptable? Is it good for children to grow up in an environment where they don’t learn the value of work, or the opportunities it might bring?

LakieLady · 18/11/2023 15:11

I work in welfare rights. We are a tiny team (equivalent to 3.5 FT staff) and one of our KPIs is how much extra money we get for clients by identifying benefits they are entitled to, but not claimed, or benefits being underpaid.

In 22/23, this was over £680,000 - equivalent to nearly £200k for each FT worker. In the 5+ years that I've been in this role, the number of people getting paid more than they should be is vanishingly tiny, and off the top of my head, I can only think of 4 such cases, and none of them had led to overpayments of more than approx £5k. One client had been underpaid so much, for so long, that her arrears payment was in excess of £25k, and 5-figure sums are not unusual.

We routinely do a full benefit check for every client that's referred to us, which is how we identify over- and underpayments. If our experience is in any way indicative of the overall picture, the level of underpayments nationally must be massive. And it's no surprise that the introduction of the Welfare Reform Act, which made it harder to get benefits, also coincided with the end of Legal Services Commission funding for welfare rights work.

Dawn17 · 18/11/2023 14:39

@AutumnCrow just read your link. That is absolutely terrible and I fear there are going to be more of these tragic cases if these "attacks" on the sick and disabled go ahead.

Dawn17 · 18/11/2023 14:08

@XenoBitch yes, I pray these changes punishing the sick and disabled don't go ahead. That's terrible if they want to check your friend's bank account, just how far will this go? It's as if they think people on benefits are second class citizens who don't deserve the same privacy as people not on benefits.

XenoBitch · 17/11/2023 21:57

Dawn17 · 15/11/2023 13:12

My dh has psychosis amongst a whole load of other mental health issues. Last time he had an attack, just before he got hospitalised, he was running around half dressed telling everyone the government was monitoring him all the time and he was going to be sent to prison (even though he hadn't done anything wrong). This checking of bank accounts, if it happens, is really going to send him over the edge again!

We can only hope that there is some work going on behind the scenes by welfare/mental health charities about this.

I have a friend whose son has been experiencing mental health issues. His benefit money goes into her bank account. Will her account be checked too? Even though she is not on benefits herself.

Crispedia · 16/11/2023 21:58

@CherryMyBrandy, thank you. I receive PIP and ESA, nightmare process. Before that I was on DLA and Incapacity Benefit. Remember Cameron’s 2011 Welfare Reform Act which tightened criteria for new PIP (that replaced DLA) and the new ESA (that replaced Incapacity Benefit) creating 2 groups (admittedly ESA began under Labour) which the Tories in 2017 cruelly then voted to reduce payment for one of the 2 groups. Now sounds like they are looking to tighten the screw further, so depressing. Following trajectory of US of offering threadbare state support for the sick and disabled.

Dawn17 · 15/11/2023 13:12

My dh has psychosis amongst a whole load of other mental health issues. Last time he had an attack, just before he got hospitalised, he was running around half dressed telling everyone the government was monitoring him all the time and he was going to be sent to prison (even though he hadn't done anything wrong). This checking of bank accounts, if it happens, is really going to send him over the edge again!

MistyGreenAndBlue · 15/11/2023 12:49

TigerRag · 15/11/2023 12:43

I've only found this on newspaper sites. I think there's some scaremongering going on. I'll believe it if / when it's announced.

Right. I've found a few newspaper articles all saying exactly (as in word for word) the same thing. So basically just one article disseminated over a few outlets.

Nothing else. Unless I'm just looking in the wrong place. 🤷‍♀️

I guess I'll wait for the Budget

TigerRag · 15/11/2023 12:43

MistyGreenAndBlue · 15/11/2023 12:05

I can't find much about this online.

Do we know when/if this is actually going ahead? All I can see is that it will be mentioned in the Autumn budget.

I've only found this on newspaper sites. I think there's some scaremongering going on. I'll believe it if / when it's announced.

MistyGreenAndBlue · 15/11/2023 12:05

I can't find much about this online.

Do we know when/if this is actually going ahead? All I can see is that it will be mentioned in the Autumn budget.

Rosscameasdoody · 13/11/2023 23:47

XenoBitch · 12/11/2023 20:35

Do you have a link to the Australian PIP thing? Not thinking you are making it up... am just interested (and horrified).

Don’t have specific links, sorry. The info has appeared in various public consultations on welfare reform, and more recently, those for the white paper published this year entitled ‘transforming support’. A number of changes to disability benefits were announced in this, including a new UC ‘health payment’ which can be claimed by PIP claimants.

Akiddleydiveytoo · 13/11/2023 21:52

MistyGreenAndBlue · 13/11/2023 20:03

Absolutely this.

Terry Pratchett — 'The news that they have nothing to fear is guaranteed to strike fear into the hearts of innocents everywhere.'

TP knew the score.

Love a bit of TP 😁

Sam Vines boots theory of socioeconomic unfairness is one of the best economic theories ever written IMHO.

MistyGreenAndBlue · 13/11/2023 20:03

Akiddleydiveytoo · 13/11/2023 19:28

Abso-bloody-lutely OP. All these PPs saying that there should be more checks on benefit claimants to prevent fraud obviously have no idea what the impact of these additional checks have on the genuine, often extremely vulnerable people.

These people already have to jump through hoops and undergo humiliating assessments to claim the pittances they are entitled to without adding even more checks to the equation. The pressure and stress this puts on already very vulnerable people is almost unbearable.

Those saying 'if you're not committing fraud you have nothing to worry about' have obviously never had any dealings with the DWP. They will do anything to avoid paying out, including denying genuine claimants what they are legally entitled to and the more vulnerable you are the more they think they can get away with it.

My brother had serious physical and mental health problems all his life (thanks to a near fatal bout of meningitis when he was 8). He was housebound, had severe mobility issues and extremely poor mental health and was battling stage 3 bowel cancer yet in the last assessment he had approx 5 years ago he was deemed as being 'fit for work' (despite supporting letters from his GP and various hospital consultants saying otherwise). I appealed the decision on his behalf (as he was in no condition to) and went through the assessment criteria point by point providing evidence of his limitations. Surprise, surprise, a few weeks before we were to appear at the tribunal I was contacted to say they had reviewed the situation and were now awarding my brother the HIGHEST POSSIBLE AWARD. Just how do you go from being 'fit for work' to being in the highest possible award in just a matter of months?

As I said, my brother was in no state to contest the initial decision and was on the verge of suicide as there was no way he could hold down a job and that was his only source of income. Without me to advocate for him he would have been left with nothing. As it was, he died a year or so later so at least the Government didn't have to 'waste' too much money on him ay?

People really cannot underestimate the stress and anxiety all of these checks and assessments have on these vulnerable people, especially when they know the Government are just looking for any excuse not to pay out. Living in constant fear of being left destitute, on top of having to deal with your disability or illness is immoral and quite frankly disgusting.

Yes there are an (exceedingly small) number of people who take the piss but to demonise and persecute GENUINE claimants for this minority when you've got billionaires getting away with paying no tax whatsoever is quite frankly obscene.

Absolutely this.

Terry Pratchett — 'The news that they have nothing to fear is guaranteed to strike fear into the hearts of innocents everywhere.'

TP knew the score.