Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this “crackdown” on benefit fraud is absolutely pathetic

540 replies

MissLou0 · 09/11/2023 00:34

We lose hundreds of billions from tax avoidance compared to 1 billion on benefit fraud and nothing is done about it, because those are the Tory donors. Michelle Mone just stole £28 million from taxpayers for her PPE scam, she’s not in trouble, and she of course also hides her hundreds of millions offshore.

We lose a small amount from benefit fraud, and as a result everyone who claims any sort of benefit including disability benefits banks are going to be monitored.

The graph below doesn’t even scratch the surface of how much is lost to tax avoidance. For example Rupert Murdoch is worth £17 billion and he hasn’t paid tax in years, personal tax or on his businesses. And he’s ONE person. These people are not targeted yet the most desperate and vulnerable are.

This is completely ignored by the media as the majority of newspaper owners are hiding their money offshore.

I’m in a situation where I don’t need to claim any benefits but I have family who are disabled who have had to fight for even the tiniest amount to live on, and they are now having to deal with this invasion of privacy which will make not even 0.000001% of what cracking down on tax avoidance would.

To think this “crackdown” on benefit fraud is absolutely pathetic
OP posts:
Thread gallery
14
hellywelly3 · 09/11/2023 06:41

It’s all to stop us looking into and questioning how much of our money the government wastes/ creams off the top for themselves and their buddies.
If we’re all pointing fingers at each other we’re not pointing fingers up at them.

rwalker · 09/11/2023 06:40

littleblackcat27 · 09/11/2023 06:29

WTF???

So you're not paying tax? Did I read that right?

Yes

TintinHadToBeMale · 09/11/2023 06:37

“They hang the man and flog the woman that steals the goose from off the common / but let the greater villain loose that steals the common from the goose”

Seems appropriate for a party that began government by quoting Henry VIII laws and who have always wet themselves over the amazingly wonderful Victorian period.

SD1978 · 09/11/2023 06:36

If it's wrong, it's wrong, whether it's benefits or big business. Whilst I think the penalties should be harsher for big business, I don't agree that it should be ignored because someone is on a lower income.

Tracker1234 · 09/11/2023 06:34

Inheirtance tax can be reduced with planning.

Morph22010 · 09/11/2023 06:29

I work in tax and there’s loads more done now in tackling tax fraud than there ever was (have worked in tax for over 25 years), loads more is done now in closing down legal loopholes than there ever was. I say this as someone who hates the tories and what they’ve done but I don’t think their tackling of tax evasion/avoidance is something they’ve done badly at compared to how others did previously/ could potentially do if they were in power.

littleblackcat27 · 09/11/2023 06:29

rwalker · 09/11/2023 06:21

I think sometimes high taxes in rich are home goals
people avoid it as when you start taking over 1/2 of it in tax on the face of it does seem extortionate

personally IHT I would of encountered the 40% would of quite happily of paid a normal rate of tax 20% but sorted now so will pay nothing

WTF???

So you're not paying tax? Did I read that right?

ruby1957 · 09/11/2023 06:27

electriclight · 09/11/2023 05:53

Tax avoidance isn't illegal. Tax avoidance mechanisms are in place to encourage certain behaviours. Anyone with an ISA practices tax avoidance, for example. So companies practising tax avoidance are operating within the law.

Tax evasion is illegal and any company doing it is hiding it. Nobody thinks it's ok, but they're hiding it. Just like the tradesman who asks you to 'pay in cash' so that they can evade taxes. It's not ok but it's difficult to address.

And none of this makes it ok to claim benefits fraudulently.

Absolutely this ^

The checks would only be on SAVINGS and I would think that most people on benefits (or not) would be hard-pressed to have savings of more than £16k.

littleblackcat27 · 09/11/2023 06:26

Noicant · 09/11/2023 05:54

I think you have to see it in the context of the extent of worklessness and a looming social care bill. Our current spending is unsustainable. Of course people need to cough up what they owe and of course the government have fucked up but it doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be making sure people aren’t claiming what they are not entitled to. Both should be done. I don’t see the problem with that.

The hoops people have to jump through already to get benefits are ludicrous now. Yeah - great!! Let's make it even harder for them to claim. I work with sick/disabled people on a dialysis unit and not everyone sits in a wheelchair, but that doesn't mean that they're able to work. For a myriad of reasons.

Life is complicated for some people.

I can't quite get over the number of Tory apologists on this thread.

Yes - the OP is right - with bells on.

ElleCapitaine · 09/11/2023 06:25

It’s not a matter of either/or. They should be cracking down on both.

LevelledPeach · 09/11/2023 06:23

Janieforever · 09/11/2023 04:15

This, I don’t understand the ops logic, of well it’s not that much and there are worse. If someone is committing benefit fraud of course if should be stopped, as should any other criminal activity.

I don’t understand what you mean though with them dealing with this invasion of privacy, I thought it was monthly bank checks, which doesn’t involve the person? It’s done by the bank?

How can you not understand?

Benefit claimants are being targeted for political reasons, when in fact, it's a tiny proportion of monetary loss to the treasury.

The time spent on policy and the ramifications of implementing any policy is entirely disproportionate to it's impact on monies available to the treasury.

Using a sledgehammer to crack a nut, to show everyone you've got a sledgehammer.

It's typical rhetoric of the right-wing. Give a high profile to any perceived lack of fairness in spending money on the poor, whilst entirely ignoring actual unfairness and inequality that, if solved, would improve the lives of the many.

District and divide. Privatise profits, socialise debts.

It's the Tory way.

Girlsjustwannahavefundamentalrights · 09/11/2023 06:22

The benefits system is broken. I should be entitled to pip because of my disability but i cannot face the application process and being turned down only to have to appeal.

rwalker · 09/11/2023 06:21

I think sometimes high taxes in rich are home goals
people avoid it as when you start taking over 1/2 of it in tax on the face of it does seem extortionate

personally IHT I would of encountered the 40% would of quite happily of paid a normal rate of tax 20% but sorted now so will pay nothing

cuckyplunt · 09/11/2023 06:10

Meh, Tories are chasing votes. Expect an awful lot more of this no-brainer, low hanging fruit, right-wingish shit.
Symptom of desperation!

HauntedGusset · 09/11/2023 06:06

Tbf the levels of benefit fraud shot up during the pandemic when the usual (and perfectly adequate when properly implemented) checks on ID etc were suspended and claims went entirely online. But the answer to that is to implement the existing system of checking details and income properly, not to add an extra layer of intrusion and worry into the lives of every single benefit claimant!

And even if the fraud rate did go up, it was still hugely overshadowed by the level of corruption and financial dodgy dealings and basically fraudulent spaffing of public money that this government engaged in throughout the pandemic and beyond though...

Facebookflight · 09/11/2023 06:05

I think the government should do this for all bank accounts. You’d catch lots of tax evasion. Those who rent out a second home on the quiet etc. Especially in an increasingly cash-free society.

limefrog · 09/11/2023 06:03

Where is your chart from please, OP? I'd like to share it but need a source.

Noicant · 09/11/2023 05:55

And honestly if it were me I wouldn’t care if they were checking because I wouldn’t be committing fraud.

Noicant · 09/11/2023 05:54

I think you have to see it in the context of the extent of worklessness and a looming social care bill. Our current spending is unsustainable. Of course people need to cough up what they owe and of course the government have fucked up but it doesn’t mean you shouldn’t be making sure people aren’t claiming what they are not entitled to. Both should be done. I don’t see the problem with that.

electriclight · 09/11/2023 05:53

Tax avoidance isn't illegal. Tax avoidance mechanisms are in place to encourage certain behaviours. Anyone with an ISA practices tax avoidance, for example. So companies practising tax avoidance are operating within the law.

Tax evasion is illegal and any company doing it is hiding it. Nobody thinks it's ok, but they're hiding it. Just like the tradesman who asks you to 'pay in cash' so that they can evade taxes. It's not ok but it's difficult to address.

And none of this makes it ok to claim benefits fraudulently.

CherryMyBrandy · 09/11/2023 05:43

Absolutely @Loubelle70 They have the cheek to point the figure at "benefit cheats" when the Tory party have had the absolute worst record cheating, swindling, and breaking rules during their time in power. Pot Kettle Black.

Loubelle70 · 09/11/2023 05:30

CherryMyBrandy · 09/11/2023 03:42

But they aren't. Look at the stats. Actually benefit fraud is a tiny proportion of claimants. A SIGNIFICANTLY smaller proportion than under-claimed benefits. But these changes will affect ALL benefit claimants. I can tell you for a fact the system is already very fucking hard on poor and vulnerable people (I know that due to my job not because I claim benefits). This is only going to make that much harder. And it's all political. It's not actually going to change anything. They are doing this, at the expense of taxpayers (because this will cost money to implement) and at the expense of the most vulnerable TO WIN VOTES!

Real benefit fraudsters won't keep their money in the bank in their name. So this will achieve absolutely nothing. They are only doing it to look like they are doing something in the vain hope of getting some votes in the upcoming general election. Please don't be fooled.

@greyhairnomore
The government have worked hard to push onto people the rhetoric that 'you pay for benefit fraud ' ...its divide and conquer. Never mind how many in government are as crooked as they come.
Hate this rhetoric of Rat on a neighbour if you will. Putting people against people. Usually working class against working class.
I earn a good wage, i don't claim benefits...however, some people are struggling, this government and other governments will have you believe everyone is at it... neighbours have become curtain twitching watsons.. guessing who could be 'conning' the system...when really they should be looking at the very people who push the idea that that could be happening.

MidnightOnceMore · 09/11/2023 05:19

Can't imagine why Sunak wants to distract people from the money wasted by this government during COVID

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56319927

Bashing benefits claimants yet again is such a bullshit move.

Hospital staff in PPE

Timeline: Covid contracts and accusations of 'chumocracy'

The government has spent billions of pounds on thousands of deals with private firms.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-56319927

Loubelle70 · 09/11/2023 05:12

CherryMyBrandy · 09/11/2023 02:52

I completely agree with you OP. It's a disgusting attack (along with the changes being proposed to eligibility for ill health/disability benefits)on the most disadvantaged and vulnerable in society I the middle of a cost of living crisis.

Let's get all the poor, sick and disabled working and making more money for the fucking uber rich while they don't pay any fucking taxes.

Let's reinstate the workhouses while we are at it.

Bang on!!!!