Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Just read the bloody uniform policy!!!

765 replies

flingoringo · 06/09/2023 15:10

I've just read an article about a school in Gateshead where lots of kids were sent home or out in isolation on day one of term because they were wearing the wrong shoes. The offending shoes seem to be mainly a Vivienne Westwood ballet flat (with a big silver VW emblem on the front) and a Nike walking boots. Lots of kids wearing the same, from yr7 to yr11.
Parents are up in arms, obviously. One mentions the CoL crisis so the need to scrimp and save to spend A HUNDRED QUID on the Nike shoes. One mum said her yr7 daughter won't be going back she's finding her a new school.

The school (taken over by an academy in 2019) says the policy is clear, plain black shoes with no logos. That they have done their best to help yr6 parents understand what was to be expected once on yr7.

Now I don't necessarily agree with schools being overly strict with uniform policy. But I do accept that I have to agree to follow the rules at the schools that I chose to send my kids to and if we chose not to then of course they'll be consequences.

AIBU to think it's it's completely ridiculous that this happens every bloody year?!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
13
sockarefootwear · 06/09/2023 17:13

Personally, I think school Uniform is pointless and the time and effort the school puts in to policing it would be better spent on other issues. My DC school frequently fails to communicate important information to parents until the last minute but sends several letters to everyone about uniform every term (including printed copies of letters, e-mails and text messages to parents of every pupil).

However- everyone knows that the schools have a uniform and that there will be consequences if it is not adhered to. Yet every September there are newspaper reports with parents complaining that they are having to buy new shoes/trousers/whatever because what they originally bought was (always very clearly) not in line with uniform. It is always parents who have bought a more expensive branded item (so not a case of having to buy what they can afford).

In my personal experience when there have been sensible reasons for not being able to wear the proper uniform (eg. problems getting items to fit/needing shoes that work with orthotics/shoes breaking and not being able to get a compliant replacement immediately) the school has been very reasonable.

I would entirely support parents campaigning to do away with uniform but sending your DC to school in something that is blatantly wrong with no good reason and then complaining that they are not allowed to wear it just makes them look like arseholes.

Sueveneers · 06/09/2023 17:12

I think isolation for a pair of bloody shoes is absolutely ridiculous. A note sent home with the child should surely suffice.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 06/09/2023 17:08

SocialistSally · 06/09/2023 16:05

But the best sort of adjustments for equality is one that is inclusive. My child also doesn’t want to be singled out as different because of her disability. It’s not hard to have a simple uniform that’s affordable and doesn’t have to include a blazer and clip on tie.

Some students may still need adjustments but the more inclusive you make the general uniform the better. But I’m used to this sort of disability exclusion on MN

This.

The best uniform policy is one where the uniform has multiple options built in, so that the autistic girl who will scratch until she bleeds if you make her wear a certain jumper can wear a different one instead without needing special permission to do so and without standing out because other, neurotypical, children are also wearing a variety of jumpers. And the Black child with an afro (which I fully support because no child should have to chemically-straighten their hair just to go to school) can wear a cardigan instead of trying to pull a jumper over their hair without needing special permission to basically exist comfortably whilst Black. And the girl with surgery scars or a prosthetic leg can wear trousers without being the special exceptional one girl in trousers.

Rosscameasdoody · 06/09/2023 17:08

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 06/09/2023 16:54

  1. It is making already-overloaded parents hoop-jump.
  2. It makes the disabled kids stand out as disabled because they are the only ones not in the strict uniform, increasing bullying.
  3. Not every child who should have a SEND statement of needs / EHCP / whatever it's called now has one. At least with a flexible uniform policy, the undiagnosed child can try to wangle a uniform that doesn't make her want to claw her own skin off.

Worked example of (3) from my own experience:
My school at first had a fairly relaxed uniform policy, offering several styles of skirt and with blazers optional. During the summer uniform shop, I was able to pick a skirt that was soft, lined, and low-waisted with a length that finished a little above the knee. I could pick a jumper that didn't itch through my shirt and I didn't wear the blazer.
Then a new head started. The uniform rules changed overnight to a specific Trutex skirt in a specific length that finished exactly on the knee, a specific jumper, and a forced blazer.

I have sensory processing problems as part of my autism. When I walked, the Trutex skirt hit the back of my knee where the skin is really sensitive and felt like sandpaper. The higher waist cut into me when I sat down and made me feel like I couldn't breathe properly. The jumper itched through my shirt and the blazer felt like I was wearing platemail, it bunched up inside my elbow when I bent my arms and the collar was like sandpaper on my neck.

But I didn't have a SEND diagnosis until I attempted suicide, so my protests were met with "well you'll just have to put up with it". And when I did attempt suicide, I was diagnosed with depression, which wasn't even what was wrong...

My point is that there is no hoop jumping these days beyond advocating for your child. The Equality Act 2010 levelled the playing field by making employers, schools, etc., responsible for providing reasonable adjustment for disabled people so that their disability doesn’t disadvantage them. If, as people are posting here, some schools are not complying then I would have thought it’s important for parents to advocate for their children so that they are not discriminated against.

For example, if your child cannot wear an element of the uniform, don’t just send them to school on the first day of term dressed outside uniform rules or they will be sent home. Contact the school beforehand to explain that your child has a disability that qualifies under the Act and ask for reasonable adjustment in the form of whatever element of the uniform is unsuitable. You don’t need a formal diagnosis to be eligible under the Act, so you don’t need medical evidence, you just need to have a significant difficulty which qualifies.

If a school has a uniform policy then parents have an obligation to follow it - if the child has a disability which makes elements of that uniform unsuitable the school need to know. If you don’t tell them they can’t help. I’m not against making school uniform more inclusive to disabled people, but I don’t think that’s going to happen any time soon, so you have to work with what you have.

RecycleMePlease · 06/09/2023 17:05

My kids have gone to both uniform and non-uniform schools, expensive logoed uniform, and supermarket uniform, and there's been no issue with figuring out who the poorer kids are in any case.

Uniform doesn't equalize - it just causes trouble for the parents, who, if it's a chaotic household don't care anyway so it causes trouble for the kids.

If people are already struggling, having to go out and spend a couple of hundred on clothes just for school isn't going to equalise anything.

mathanxiety · 06/09/2023 17:05

Two days in isolation for something that he couldn't help.

JFC what is wrong with this country?

Agree.

In my DCs' US high school, students contravening the 'offensive logo' rule on clothing were given a school-issued PE T-shirt to wear over the offending item, a transaction that took all of five minutes over the student's lunchtime. Then parents were notified and the incident recorded.

This is because excluding a students from class is a matter taken extremely seriously, and doing so for reasons that are completely frivolous would be a gross contravention of the student's right to education.

jhbjhbiubjuijbiubiujbiub · 06/09/2023 17:04

@Goldbar

100%. Forcing kids to wear jumpers in 30 degree weather seems like a major health and safety issue.

nervousneave · 06/09/2023 17:03

I wore miss sexy trousers and michal kors shoes in year 10 as I was bullied in year 7-9 after a video of me having sec went around. Wearing the branded clothes instantly stopped my bullying.

I agree with rules as I remember screaming and fighting with my parents to buy them and my mum didn’t have the money and also hated it. Stupid how having a tick on your shoes makes your better then wearing the same shoe without and schools should crack down as people just don’t have the money. These parents are crazy but also if it was the same situation as me and it’s stoped the kids bullying I get why the the child and parents were upset.

just wish everyone would follow t

defi · 06/09/2023 17:03

It's hard to take schools seriously on H&S though when many have insisted that students wear jumpers/blazers all though recent heat waves.

^ and they have to ask permission to take them off. A high school near me removed a teens green coat as it wasn't uniform blue and let him cycle home without in winter.

defi · 06/09/2023 17:02

I can't believe teachers are wasting education time on this shit.

It's a power flex, other countries don't make kids dress like little bank managers.

Annaishere · 06/09/2023 17:02

Maybe but I don’t know there’s even a Clark’s in my city anymore

Goldbar · 06/09/2023 17:01

AInightingale · 06/09/2023 17:00

Schools have to think about safety hence the shoe rules, staircases are hazardous places with loads of kids on them. The NIKE mother could have saved herself over £50 by going to Clarks - no sympathy, sorry.

It's hard to take schools seriously on H&S though when many have insisted that students wear jumpers/blazers all though recent heat waves.

jhbjhbiubjuijbiubiujbiub · 06/09/2023 17:01

Crazy waste of time for schools, and putting kids in solidarity for any reason should be illegal.

AInightingale · 06/09/2023 17:00

Schools have to think about safety hence the shoe rules, staircases are hazardous places with loads of kids on them. The NIKE mother could have saved herself over £50 by going to Clarks - no sympathy, sorry.

Perhapsperhapsto · 06/09/2023 16:58

‘Yep. Plain black shoes tend to be priced highly, exactly because retailers know that parents have to buy them for school.’

Thats BS. It’s the opposite, they sell them cheap to get you to buy uniform from their supermarket/ shop.

IsItThough · 06/09/2023 16:58

Rosscameasdoody · 06/09/2023 16:45

I’m not naive I’ve been physically disabled all my life, and I volunteer with various disability charities, so please don’t try to tell me I’m unaware of the issues. I’m not fundamentally against making school uniform, or anything else as inclusive as possible, but I struggle to see how it would work in the case of school uniform because the nature and effect of disability is so diverse.

That’s why the Equality Act exists - to level the playing field for disabled people by enshrining their rights in law. If schools are not adhering to the Act, then parents should be advocating for their children and insisting on whatever adjustment is appropriate for their child - and reasonable adjustment under the Equality Act doesn’t require parents to evidence gather, as a formal diagnosis is not required - there just needs to be a significant and relevant difficulty eligible under the Act.

The fact is that the Equality Act is simply not adhered to by many schools, in many ways, that is where you are being naive. You are quoting the law as if I (disabled, with a disabled child) am also unaware. Schools just need to try harder. It shouldn't be on us to need to advocate in that way.

Schools could make school uniform more inclusive very simply by offering a range of simple options in plain colours (eg any plain shirt, polo shirt, t shirt) and not being so damn fussy about it.

justteanbiscuits · 06/09/2023 16:57

Re the small logo on Kickers - easy to remove with nail scissors!

CecilyP · 06/09/2023 16:57

CuteOrangeElephant · 06/09/2023 16:10

I keep reading things about how horrible mufti days are for poorer or less fashionable kids. Sounds like schools shouldn't do them if they believe in the whole 'uniforms are the great equalizer' thing.

Well quite! Why do they do them?

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 06/09/2023 16:57

Glittertwins · 06/09/2023 16:29

@WiddlinDiddlin - or use a locker to switch shoes around in?

A lot of schools don't have lockers.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 06/09/2023 16:56

fliptopbin · 06/09/2023 16:45

By the time my son was in year 11 he took size 14 shoes, which are quite difficult to find in shops. When one of his shoes broke midweek he had to spend two days in isolation while I ordered him some new ones online, because his other pair of black shoes had a tiny kickers logo on them. And before you say we should have checked, they were not bought to be school shoes.

Two days in isolation for something that he couldn't help.

JFC what is wrong with this country?

CecilyP · 06/09/2023 16:56

Pottedpalm · 06/09/2023 16:10

Maybe the other children were slimmer, so the trousers were not so tight.

So the kids were sent home for being fat? That’s not very nice!

ArabeIIaScott · 06/09/2023 16:54

MariaVT65 · 06/09/2023 15:25

I find the whole thing ridiculous. As long as they are safe, any shoe should be worn IMO. There are enough news articles right now about kids not attending school. Making this worse over something silly is stupid.

My son isn’t at school yet, but he has to wear orthotic insoles which means I have to find him shoes where I can easily take the existing insole out. The rules out all of Clarks. So he will be sent in whatever I can find and what’s comfortable, and the school will suck it up.

Yep. Plain black shoes tend to be priced highly, exactly because retailers know that parents have to buy them for school.

mathanxiety · 06/09/2023 16:54

@midgemadgemodge - the vast majority of students in the US and Canada do not wear school uniform at any point in their education. There is usually a dress code, which can vary from 'no speedos or bikinis in school' to 'students must be covered from ankle to neck'. My own local HS mandates closed toe shoes for lab sciences and forbids offensive slogans on clothing (defined as racist, misogynist, hate speech, or goady, and the opinion that matters on definition of those qualities is that of the dean of discipline). Students in continental Europe also tend to have a dress code and not a uniform.

Last time I looked, the UK was geographically, economically, and culturally firmly a part of what can loosely be called 'the West', which includes the vast majority of those countries whose students do not wear school uniform.

VitoCorleoneOfMNMafia · 06/09/2023 16:54

Rosscameasdoody · 06/09/2023 16:22

Why is it hoop jumping. They are parents, and until the child is old enough to advocate for themselves, isn’t that what they’re there for ? Even more so in the case of disabled children as they generally don’t achieve independence as early as others.

  1. It is making already-overloaded parents hoop-jump.
  2. It makes the disabled kids stand out as disabled because they are the only ones not in the strict uniform, increasing bullying.
  3. Not every child who should have a SEND statement of needs / EHCP / whatever it's called now has one. At least with a flexible uniform policy, the undiagnosed child can try to wangle a uniform that doesn't make her want to claw her own skin off.

Worked example of (3) from my own experience:
My school at first had a fairly relaxed uniform policy, offering several styles of skirt and with blazers optional. During the summer uniform shop, I was able to pick a skirt that was soft, lined, and low-waisted with a length that finished a little above the knee. I could pick a jumper that didn't itch through my shirt and I didn't wear the blazer.
Then a new head started. The uniform rules changed overnight to a specific Trutex skirt in a specific length that finished exactly on the knee, a specific jumper, and a forced blazer.

I have sensory processing problems as part of my autism. When I walked, the Trutex skirt hit the back of my knee where the skin is really sensitive and felt like sandpaper. The higher waist cut into me when I sat down and made me feel like I couldn't breathe properly. The jumper itched through my shirt and the blazer felt like I was wearing platemail, it bunched up inside my elbow when I bent my arms and the collar was like sandpaper on my neck.

But I didn't have a SEND diagnosis until I attempted suicide, so my protests were met with "well you'll just have to put up with it". And when I did attempt suicide, I was diagnosed with depression, which wasn't even what was wrong...

mewkins · 06/09/2023 16:54

enchantedsquirrelwood · 06/09/2023 15:39

I totally agree. Some uniform policies are very clear, others change at a moment's notice.

The government could actually do something useful before it leaves office and ban schools from requiring anything other than standard issue uniform from supermarkets and at a push a logo'd badge. School specific sportswear could be an optional extra.

otherwise there is zero need for any of it.

However sensible shoes should be a given. You don't send the kids home though, you just email all the parents concerned. Shoes comes under health and safety, like not wearing earrings for PE etc.

I agree with this. Uniforms seem to be a way of schools competing with each other. It's so ridiculous. No logos on shoes allowed and yet we have to get 4 bits of PE kit all with the embroidered school logo at significant cost. Brilliant.